⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,261–1,280 · Page 64 of 500
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 9 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 60
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the suit filed by the appellant for the relief of injunction with alternative relief for possession on the ground of limitation as the respondent perfected their rights by adverse possession.
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 899 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1321
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,261–1,280 · Page 64 of 500
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 9 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 60
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the suit filed by the appellant for the relief of injunction with alternative relief for possession on the ground of limitation as the respondent perfected their rights by adverse possession.
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 899 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1321
Whether appellant deserved to be enlarged on bail; whether it is appropriate for High Court to fix a time bound schedule for conclusion of trials.
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 898 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1064
Whether the present acquisition is a part of the integrated development plan of ‘Yamuna Expressway” undertaken by respondent No.3-Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA); Whether the application of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was legal and justified in the instant case, thereby justifying the decision of the State Government to dispense with the enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act; Whether the view taken by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Kamal Sharma validating the questioned acquisition while relying upon Nand Kishore lays
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 897 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 886
The High Court dismissed the petition filed u/s.482 of CrPC for quashing FIR registered u/ss.376, 420, 504 and 506 IPC holding, inter alia, that the offence under Section 376 of IPC is an offence against the society which would require further investigation into the matter and does not warrant interference.
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 895 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 876
High Court held that the appellants-subsequent purchasers could not be said to be bona fide purchasers in accordance with Section 19 (b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and decreed the suit of the plaintiff granting specific performance of oral agreement of sale between the plaintiff and the original defendant (owner of the suit property).
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 894 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1366
Issue arose that whether the Government, like any private individual, have the absolute discretion to frame policy, distribute resources and enter into a contract with whomsoever it pleases, on any terms and conditions it so desires.
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 893 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 947
Writ Petitions seek to challenge the insertion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ in the Preamble to the Constitution of India by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act in 1976.
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 891 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1466
Whether the litigant can be permitted to throw the entire blame on the head of the advocate for the delay in preferring appeal.
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 890 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1335
Whether it is mandatory for the successful auction purchaser to deposit the stamp duty for the sale certificate to be issued to it in view of the provisions of the Stamp Act and the Registration Act.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 89 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1185
Whether the impugned orders passed by National Green Tribunal – order arising out of an ex parte order in suo motu proceedings holding the appellants guilty and directing payment of compensation; and order of dismissal of the review petition filed by appellant No.2 alleging that he had not been given opportunity before adverse order was passed against him, were not sustainable.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 889 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 850
Issue arose as to whether the application for extension can be entertained if it is filed after the expiry of the Arbitral Tribunal’s mandate; and whether the application filed u/s.29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal ought to have been allowed by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 888 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 861
The appellant-Judicial Officer has preferred these appeals for expunging adverse findings/remarks recorded against him in the impugned order dated 02.03.2023 by the Delhi High Court.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 887 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1425
Issue arose as regards conviction and sentence of the appellants u/ss.364, 302, 120-B and 201 IPC for abduction and brutal murder of the victim, if justified.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 886 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 835
Matter pertains to the enhancement of compensation towards pain and suffering for a motor accident victim having suffered 100% disability.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 885 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1013
Issue arose with respect to the devolution of property by way of Marumakkathayam law. Nature and character of the scheduled properties. Whether the property obtained by a female and her children after partition would be considered their separate property or would it belong to her tharwad; whether, in the present facts, ‘PA’ had the legal right to transfer the entire property of her son to her daughter-in-law and grandchildren by way of a mortgage deed or was her right only limited to one-sixth of the property as contended by the original defendants.
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 884 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1099
Trial Court dismissed the suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale by the buyer. High Court allowed the appeal thereagainst and granted decree for specific performance. Whether the impugned judgment of the High Court warrants any interdiction in exercise of the appellate jurisdiction. Whether an omission on the part of the trial court to frame an issue on maintainability of a suit touching jurisdictional fact by itself takes away the powers of the higher court to examine whether the jurisdictional fact did exist for grant of relief as claimed.
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 881 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1448
Issue arose whether the appellant has the locus standi to prefer this SLP against the impugned order; whether the High Court rightly held the proceedings in question to be hit by the bar u/s. 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C.; and whether the High Court could have ordered de novo steps to be taken against the appellant.
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 880 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1525
Whether the mobile service providers who pay excise duties on various items for setting up their business more particularly for erection of mobile towers and peripherals like pre-fabricated buildings etc. can take the benefit of CENVAT Credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for the purpose of payment of service tax on the output services rendered by them.
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 88 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1190
Whether the High Court, while allowing first appeal against judgment of trial court that dismissed the suit filed by respondent for declaration of title and injunction, had wrongly shifted the burden of proof on to the State (defendant) rather than requiring the plaintiff to prove its title.
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 879 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 825
Whether FIR u/ss.376(2)(n) and s.506 IPC lodged against the appellant should be quashed; whether allegations in the FIR are correct; whether relationship between the parties was consensual in nature.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Whether appellant deserved to be enlarged on bail; whether it is appropriate for High Court to fix a time bound schedule for conclusion of trials.
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 898 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1064
Whether the present acquisition is a part of the integrated development plan of ‘Yamuna Expressway” undertaken by respondent No.3-Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA); Whether the application of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was legal and justified in the instant case, thereby justifying the decision of the State Government to dispense with the enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act; Whether the view taken by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Kamal Sharma validating the questioned acquisition while relying upon Nand Kishore lays
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 897 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 886
The High Court dismissed the petition filed u/s.482 of CrPC for quashing FIR registered u/ss.376, 420, 504 and 506 IPC holding, inter alia, that the offence under Section 376 of IPC is an offence against the society which would require further investigation into the matter and does not warrant interference.
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 895 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 876
High Court held that the appellants-subsequent purchasers could not be said to be bona fide purchasers in accordance with Section 19 (b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and decreed the suit of the plaintiff granting specific performance of oral agreement of sale between the plaintiff and the original defendant (owner of the suit property).
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 894 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1366
Issue arose that whether the Government, like any private individual, have the absolute discretion to frame policy, distribute resources and enter into a contract with whomsoever it pleases, on any terms and conditions it so desires.
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 893 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 947
Writ Petitions seek to challenge the insertion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ in the Preamble to the Constitution of India by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act in 1976.
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 891 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1466
Whether the litigant can be permitted to throw the entire blame on the head of the advocate for the delay in preferring appeal.
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 890 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1335
Whether it is mandatory for the successful auction purchaser to deposit the stamp duty for the sale certificate to be issued to it in view of the provisions of the Stamp Act and the Registration Act.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 89 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1185
Whether the impugned orders passed by National Green Tribunal – order arising out of an ex parte order in suo motu proceedings holding the appellants guilty and directing payment of compensation; and order of dismissal of the review petition filed by appellant No.2 alleging that he had not been given opportunity before adverse order was passed against him, were not sustainable.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 889 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 850
Issue arose as to whether the application for extension can be entertained if it is filed after the expiry of the Arbitral Tribunal’s mandate; and whether the application filed u/s.29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal ought to have been allowed by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 888 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 861
The appellant-Judicial Officer has preferred these appeals for expunging adverse findings/remarks recorded against him in the impugned order dated 02.03.2023 by the Delhi High Court.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 887 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1425
Issue arose as regards conviction and sentence of the appellants u/ss.364, 302, 120-B and 201 IPC for abduction and brutal murder of the victim, if justified.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 886 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 835
Matter pertains to the enhancement of compensation towards pain and suffering for a motor accident victim having suffered 100% disability.
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 885 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1013
Issue arose with respect to the devolution of property by way of Marumakkathayam law. Nature and character of the scheduled properties. Whether the property obtained by a female and her children after partition would be considered their separate property or would it belong to her tharwad; whether, in the present facts, ‘PA’ had the legal right to transfer the entire property of her son to her daughter-in-law and grandchildren by way of a mortgage deed or was her right only limited to one-sixth of the property as contended by the original defendants.
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 884 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1099
Trial Court dismissed the suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale by the buyer. High Court allowed the appeal thereagainst and granted decree for specific performance. Whether the impugned judgment of the High Court warrants any interdiction in exercise of the appellate jurisdiction. Whether an omission on the part of the trial court to frame an issue on maintainability of a suit touching jurisdictional fact by itself takes away the powers of the higher court to examine whether the jurisdictional fact did exist for grant of relief as claimed.
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 881 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1448
Issue arose whether the appellant has the locus standi to prefer this SLP against the impugned order; whether the High Court rightly held the proceedings in question to be hit by the bar u/s. 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C.; and whether the High Court could have ordered de novo steps to be taken against the appellant.
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 880 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1525
Whether the mobile service providers who pay excise duties on various items for setting up their business more particularly for erection of mobile towers and peripherals like pre-fabricated buildings etc. can take the benefit of CENVAT Credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for the purpose of payment of service tax on the output services rendered by them.
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 88 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1190
Whether the High Court, while allowing first appeal against judgment of trial court that dismissed the suit filed by respondent for declaration of title and injunction, had wrongly shifted the burden of proof on to the State (defendant) rather than requiring the plaintiff to prove its title.
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 879 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 825
Whether FIR u/ss.376(2)(n) and s.506 IPC lodged against the appellant should be quashed; whether allegations in the FIR are correct; whether relationship between the parties was consensual in nature.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis