⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,201–1,220 · Page 61 of 500
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 968 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 637
Appellant was detained under s.3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black-Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981 to prevent him from indulging in the activities of bootlegging thereby preventing the maintenance of peace. High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant.
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,201–1,220 · Page 61 of 500
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 968 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 637
Appellant was detained under s.3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black-Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981 to prevent him from indulging in the activities of bootlegging thereby preventing the maintenance of peace. High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant.
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 975 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 627
Matter pertains to grant of bail to the appellant-former State Education Minister and MLA, in the ED case for his involvement in various investigations, owing to the racket of illegal appointment of teachers.
Supreme Court of India8 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 856 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1647
The issues were: 1) ingredients, indicia or criteria for an educational institution to be considered a minority educational institution under Article 30 of the Constitution; 2) whether Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) is a minority educational institution; 3) whether the Constitution Bench decision in Azeez Basha was incorrect, and 4) Whether two-Judge Bench of Supreme Court in Anjuman-e-Rahmaniya erred in referring the correctness of the decision rendered in Azeez Basha directly to a Bench of seven Judges.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1050 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 999
Whether the insured vehicle was involved in the accident; whether the insurance policy granted by the insurance company covers the incident; whether the insurance policy was fraudulently obtained.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 941 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 988
Whether the courts below were justified in dismissing the eviction suit filed by the appellant-landlord and holding that the respondent-tenant was entitled to protection under Section 20(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972.
Supreme Court of India19 Dec 2024Full text
2025 INSC 1045 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1406
Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Supreme Court of India18 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 997 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1838
Protection of the sacred groves/Orans of Rajasthan.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 990 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1320
Respondent Nos.5 (original allottee of the plot) and 6 (Respondent No.5’s power of attorney) without any approval from the competent authority, unauthorizedly constructed commercial shops on the subject property which was residential in nature and sold them to the appellants; Impugned order passed by High Court ordering demolition and directing criminal as well as departmental action against the erring officials.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 99 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 162
Matter pertains to conviction of the appellant for offences punishable u/s. 323/34 IPC and imposition of three months imprisonment, as also conviction u/s. 325/34 IPC and imposition of one year imprisonment with Rs 500/- fine which was modified to three months imprisonment with Rs 5000/- fine by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 988 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1581
Whether the Arbitrator had become functus officio after passing of the award dated 16.12.1997 and had no jurisdiction to issue the clarification dated 15.03.2005.
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 986 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1743
Whether the NIA can investigate only the same accused who is present in the NIA investigation qua Scheduled Offences and for non-scheduled offence by virtue of Section 8 of the National Investigation Agency, 2008; In other words, can the NIA investigate any other accused person who, although not being investigated for any Scheduled Offences could be investigated by NIA because there exists a link between the two namely, Scheduled and non-scheduled offences, thereby connecting every co-accused; Whether, the expression “the accused” in Section 8 of the NIA Act has to refer to only the accused in
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 984 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 617
Issue arose as regards entitlement of respondent-employee’s claim to the benefit of Scheduled Caste category, when the respondent appointed on the basis of his ‘Tanti’ Caste Certificate, the ‘Tanti’ caste was deleted from the list of OBCs and merged with Pan/ Swasi caste in the list of Scheduled Castes.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 98 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1223
Appellant was not able to take benefit of female reservation on account of her inability to produce a valid Non-Creamy Layer (NCL) certificate on the last date of submission of the application form. Later, a corrigendum enabled candidates to submit an NCL certificate valid in the current financial year. However, the High Court held that since the petitioner had applied from Open General Category because she did not hold the NCL certificate, her prayer for change of category cannot be accepted.
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 978 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1618
The present petitions sought to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents/alleged contemnors for wilful disobedience of the final judgment and order dated 21.09.2023 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 5542-5543 of 2023 which directed issuance of Sale Certificate of the Secured Asset (belonging to respondent no.1-Borrower) to the petitioner-auction purchaser; Respondent no.4 ‘Greenscape IT Park LLP’ and its director, i.e., respondent no.2 were the subsequent transferee/third party purchaser and respondent no.3, ‘Union Bank of India’ was the secured creditor/ bank. Accordingly
Supreme Court of India12 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 970 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 453
Issue arose as regards the right of a party to get the first appeal restored if compromise decree specifically does not give such liberty.
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 97 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 217
High Court whether justified in altering the selection criteria after the performance of individual candidates was assessed for selection to the posts of District Judge Cadre in the State of Jharkhand.
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 967 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1602
Issue arose whether the appellant while discharging her duty as a public servant on the relevant date, there was any excess in the discharge of the said duty which did not require the first respondent to take a prior sanction for prosecuting the appellant.
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 966 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 492
High Court allowing the petition filed by the respondent under Section 11(6) under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointed an arbitrator. Whether the disputes relating to non- payment of wages and the legality and validity of the termination order were arbitrable.
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 961 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 543
In the instant case, the parties were married and have a son born from their wedlock, however, the realtionship soured and they have been living separately for more than two decades. The main issue between the parties all these years, since separation, is the quantum of maintenance to be paid by the appellant-husband to the respondent-wife.
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 960 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 439
Matter pertains to correctness of the order passed by the High Court refusing to discharge the appellants-accused from offences punishable u/s.306, 498A and 114 of IPC.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2024 INSC 975 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 627
Matter pertains to grant of bail to the appellant-former State Education Minister and MLA, in the ED case for his involvement in various investigations, owing to the racket of illegal appointment of teachers.
Supreme Court of India8 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 856 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1647
The issues were: 1) ingredients, indicia or criteria for an educational institution to be considered a minority educational institution under Article 30 of the Constitution; 2) whether Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) is a minority educational institution; 3) whether the Constitution Bench decision in Azeez Basha was incorrect, and 4) Whether two-Judge Bench of Supreme Court in Anjuman-e-Rahmaniya erred in referring the correctness of the decision rendered in Azeez Basha directly to a Bench of seven Judges.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1050 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 999
Whether the insured vehicle was involved in the accident; whether the insurance policy granted by the insurance company covers the incident; whether the insurance policy was fraudulently obtained.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 941 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 988
Whether the courts below were justified in dismissing the eviction suit filed by the appellant-landlord and holding that the respondent-tenant was entitled to protection under Section 20(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972.
Supreme Court of India19 Dec 2024Full text
2025 INSC 1045 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1406
Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Supreme Court of India18 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 997 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1838
Protection of the sacred groves/Orans of Rajasthan.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 990 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1320
Respondent Nos.5 (original allottee of the plot) and 6 (Respondent No.5’s power of attorney) without any approval from the competent authority, unauthorizedly constructed commercial shops on the subject property which was residential in nature and sold them to the appellants; Impugned order passed by High Court ordering demolition and directing criminal as well as departmental action against the erring officials.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 99 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 162
Matter pertains to conviction of the appellant for offences punishable u/s. 323/34 IPC and imposition of three months imprisonment, as also conviction u/s. 325/34 IPC and imposition of one year imprisonment with Rs 500/- fine which was modified to three months imprisonment with Rs 5000/- fine by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 988 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1581
Whether the Arbitrator had become functus officio after passing of the award dated 16.12.1997 and had no jurisdiction to issue the clarification dated 15.03.2005.
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 986 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1743
Whether the NIA can investigate only the same accused who is present in the NIA investigation qua Scheduled Offences and for non-scheduled offence by virtue of Section 8 of the National Investigation Agency, 2008; In other words, can the NIA investigate any other accused person who, although not being investigated for any Scheduled Offences could be investigated by NIA because there exists a link between the two namely, Scheduled and non-scheduled offences, thereby connecting every co-accused; Whether, the expression “the accused” in Section 8 of the NIA Act has to refer to only the accused in
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 984 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 617
Issue arose as regards entitlement of respondent-employee’s claim to the benefit of Scheduled Caste category, when the respondent appointed on the basis of his ‘Tanti’ Caste Certificate, the ‘Tanti’ caste was deleted from the list of OBCs and merged with Pan/ Swasi caste in the list of Scheduled Castes.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 98 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1223
Appellant was not able to take benefit of female reservation on account of her inability to produce a valid Non-Creamy Layer (NCL) certificate on the last date of submission of the application form. Later, a corrigendum enabled candidates to submit an NCL certificate valid in the current financial year. However, the High Court held that since the petitioner had applied from Open General Category because she did not hold the NCL certificate, her prayer for change of category cannot be accepted.
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 978 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1618
The present petitions sought to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents/alleged contemnors for wilful disobedience of the final judgment and order dated 21.09.2023 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 5542-5543 of 2023 which directed issuance of Sale Certificate of the Secured Asset (belonging to respondent no.1-Borrower) to the petitioner-auction purchaser; Respondent no.4 ‘Greenscape IT Park LLP’ and its director, i.e., respondent no.2 were the subsequent transferee/third party purchaser and respondent no.3, ‘Union Bank of India’ was the secured creditor/ bank. Accordingly
Supreme Court of India12 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 970 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 453
Issue arose as regards the right of a party to get the first appeal restored if compromise decree specifically does not give such liberty.
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 97 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 217
High Court whether justified in altering the selection criteria after the performance of individual candidates was assessed for selection to the posts of District Judge Cadre in the State of Jharkhand.
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 967 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1602
Issue arose whether the appellant while discharging her duty as a public servant on the relevant date, there was any excess in the discharge of the said duty which did not require the first respondent to take a prior sanction for prosecuting the appellant.
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 966 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 492
High Court allowing the petition filed by the respondent under Section 11(6) under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointed an arbitrator. Whether the disputes relating to non- payment of wages and the legality and validity of the termination order were arbitrable.
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 961 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 543
In the instant case, the parties were married and have a son born from their wedlock, however, the realtionship soured and they have been living separately for more than two decades. The main issue between the parties all these years, since separation, is the quantum of maintenance to be paid by the appellant-husband to the respondent-wife.
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 960 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 439
Matter pertains to correctness of the order passed by the High Court refusing to discharge the appellants-accused from offences punishable u/s.306, 498A and 114 of IPC.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis