⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
101–120 · Page 6 of 500
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 359 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 160
Whether in terms of the provisions of Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991, the amalgamated company as successor of the amalgamating company shall be entitled to set-off of the losses suffered.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 358 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 154
Whether a notice seeking commencement of arbitration, issued on 02.06.2022, could set in motion the process of resolution of a dispute regarding a work completed as early as on 30.07.2000.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
101–120 · Page 6 of 500
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 359 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 160
Whether in terms of the provisions of Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991, the amalgamated company as successor of the amalgamating company shall be entitled to set-off of the losses suffered.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 358 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 154
Whether a notice seeking commencement of arbitration, issued on 02.06.2022, could set in motion the process of resolution of a dispute regarding a work completed as early as on 30.07.2000.
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 357 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 593
Matter arose as regards the order passed by the High Court rejecting the appellant’s application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail during pendency of the appeal, when many of the allegations in the instant case and the earlier case appear to be overlapping.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 356 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 146
Once the prescribed limitation period u/s.61(2) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 expired, whether it was open to the suspended director to take steps to convert the incompetent appeal and maintain an appeal in his own name.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 355 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 565
Whether the Appellants are entitled to the benefit of ss.3 and 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, and if so, to what extent; whether the benefit of s.4 of the 1958 Act is available to an offender who has been sentenced only with payment of fine, and not to any term of imprisonment.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 353 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 135
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court in its impugned order misdirected itself in its approach and reasoning to reverse the judgment of Single Judge for all the stated facts, reasons and circumstances, the non-acceptance of the case of the appellant for promotion to the post of Society Manager.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 352 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 119
If Dearness Allowance (DA) and Dearness Relief (DR) are to be added on salary and pension payable to serving employees and retired employees, respectively, whether there could be a higher rate for enhancement of DA than what it is for DR.
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 35 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 395
Whether the issue of limitation was erroneously decided by the trial Court as well as the High Court, leading to an unjustified rejection of the suit for specific performance of agreement to sell filed by the appellant; whether the issue of readiness and willingness was also wrongly decided against the appellant and in favour of the defendant-respondent; whether the High Court committed grave error in the facts as well as in law in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant and affirming the judgment of the trial Court.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 348 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 508
Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the findings of fact recorded by the trial Court while exercising its revisional jurisdiction u/s.46 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999; whether the burden of proving unlawful sub-letting lies upon the landlord, and if so, whether such burden was duly discharged in the present case; whether the alleged retirement of the original tenant-partner and continuation of business by Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 constituted a mere reconstitution of partnership or amounts to unlawful sub-letting / assignment u/ss.27(2)(b)(ii) and 27(2)(p) of the Karnataka
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 346 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 503
Challenge by the appellant-wife to the decree of divorce granted to the respondent-husband on the ground of cruelty and desertion.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 342 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 86
Whether, on a prima facie view, there exists an arbitration agreement between the parties and as such, whether the reference to arbitration u/s.11 by the High Court warrants interference by this Court.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 341 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 550
The appellant herein sought removal of encroachments on public paths, roads and public property made by fruit vendors, rehri vendors, hawkers, squatters and other vendors which are creating nuisance, traffic hazards, hinderances in free use of paths.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 340 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 494
Issue pertains to the execution of a compromise decree passed in a civil suit; and whether the executing court can go beyond the decree and has to execute the decree as it stands without making any modifications therein.
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 34 · [2026] 2 S.C.R. 86
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court in exercise of powers u/s.37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was justified to interfere with the judgment and order of the Single Judge of the High Court passed u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upholding the award of the Arbitral Tribunal.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 339 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 479
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court in the Second Appeal filed by the defendants, whereby the judgment passed by the first appellate court was upheld and the decree of the specific performance as passed in first appeal maintained.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 336 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 459
What would be the relevant date for computation of the period of limitation, whether it is the date when the criminal complaint is filed or the date when the Court/Magistrate takes cognizance.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 335 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 444
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the Appellant had no lis before it and was not entitled to be heard in the proceedings in CWP No. 38742 of 2025, and, if not, what consequential directions ought to follow in relation to the Appellant’s participation in CWP No. 38742 of 2025 and the further course to be adopted in respect of LPA No. 760 of 2026 and CR No. 2579 of 2026.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 333 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 433
Whether the appellant is entitled for pensionary benefits keeping in view the State Bank of India Employees’ Pension Fund Rules, 1955.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 332 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 67
(i) What is contended by the appellant is that punishment imposed u/s.20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 on the appellant would take care of the punishment for the conviction u/s.25 and s.29 of the Act, which according to the appellant, are only part of substantive offence. Given the legislative mandate, whether the said contention has to be negatived; (ii) Whether the fine imposed separately as part of the punishment of two offences would be liable to be treated concurrent along with the sentences of imprisonment.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 330 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 600
Matter pertains to the manner of filling of a vacancy reserved for Person with Disability with Low Vision (PWD-LV) in the Unreserved category UR (PWD-LV), where the recruitment notification stipulated that in case of non-availability of qualified unreserved candidate in the PWD-LV category, the vacancy will be filled up by PWD candidates of other categories as per merit.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 357 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 593
Matter arose as regards the order passed by the High Court rejecting the appellant’s application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail during pendency of the appeal, when many of the allegations in the instant case and the earlier case appear to be overlapping.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 356 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 146
Once the prescribed limitation period u/s.61(2) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 expired, whether it was open to the suspended director to take steps to convert the incompetent appeal and maintain an appeal in his own name.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 355 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 565
Whether the Appellants are entitled to the benefit of ss.3 and 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, and if so, to what extent; whether the benefit of s.4 of the 1958 Act is available to an offender who has been sentenced only with payment of fine, and not to any term of imprisonment.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 353 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 135
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court in its impugned order misdirected itself in its approach and reasoning to reverse the judgment of Single Judge for all the stated facts, reasons and circumstances, the non-acceptance of the case of the appellant for promotion to the post of Society Manager.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 352 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 119
If Dearness Allowance (DA) and Dearness Relief (DR) are to be added on salary and pension payable to serving employees and retired employees, respectively, whether there could be a higher rate for enhancement of DA than what it is for DR.
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 35 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 395
Whether the issue of limitation was erroneously decided by the trial Court as well as the High Court, leading to an unjustified rejection of the suit for specific performance of agreement to sell filed by the appellant; whether the issue of readiness and willingness was also wrongly decided against the appellant and in favour of the defendant-respondent; whether the High Court committed grave error in the facts as well as in law in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant and affirming the judgment of the trial Court.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 348 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 508
Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the findings of fact recorded by the trial Court while exercising its revisional jurisdiction u/s.46 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999; whether the burden of proving unlawful sub-letting lies upon the landlord, and if so, whether such burden was duly discharged in the present case; whether the alleged retirement of the original tenant-partner and continuation of business by Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 constituted a mere reconstitution of partnership or amounts to unlawful sub-letting / assignment u/ss.27(2)(b)(ii) and 27(2)(p) of the Karnataka
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 346 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 503
Challenge by the appellant-wife to the decree of divorce granted to the respondent-husband on the ground of cruelty and desertion.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 342 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 86
Whether, on a prima facie view, there exists an arbitration agreement between the parties and as such, whether the reference to arbitration u/s.11 by the High Court warrants interference by this Court.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 341 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 550
The appellant herein sought removal of encroachments on public paths, roads and public property made by fruit vendors, rehri vendors, hawkers, squatters and other vendors which are creating nuisance, traffic hazards, hinderances in free use of paths.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 340 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 494
Issue pertains to the execution of a compromise decree passed in a civil suit; and whether the executing court can go beyond the decree and has to execute the decree as it stands without making any modifications therein.
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 34 · [2026] 2 S.C.R. 86
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court in exercise of powers u/s.37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was justified to interfere with the judgment and order of the Single Judge of the High Court passed u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upholding the award of the Arbitral Tribunal.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 339 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 479
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court in the Second Appeal filed by the defendants, whereby the judgment passed by the first appellate court was upheld and the decree of the specific performance as passed in first appeal maintained.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 336 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 459
What would be the relevant date for computation of the period of limitation, whether it is the date when the criminal complaint is filed or the date when the Court/Magistrate takes cognizance.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 335 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 444
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the Appellant had no lis before it and was not entitled to be heard in the proceedings in CWP No. 38742 of 2025, and, if not, what consequential directions ought to follow in relation to the Appellant’s participation in CWP No. 38742 of 2025 and the further course to be adopted in respect of LPA No. 760 of 2026 and CR No. 2579 of 2026.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 333 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 433
Whether the appellant is entitled for pensionary benefits keeping in view the State Bank of India Employees’ Pension Fund Rules, 1955.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 332 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 67
(i) What is contended by the appellant is that punishment imposed u/s.20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 on the appellant would take care of the punishment for the conviction u/s.25 and s.29 of the Act, which according to the appellant, are only part of substantive offence. Given the legislative mandate, whether the said contention has to be negatived; (ii) Whether the fine imposed separately as part of the punishment of two offences would be liable to be treated concurrent along with the sentences of imprisonment.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2026Full text
2026 INSC 330 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 600
Matter pertains to the manner of filling of a vacancy reserved for Person with Disability with Low Vision (PWD-LV) in the Unreserved category UR (PWD-LV), where the recruitment notification stipulated that in case of non-availability of qualified unreserved candidate in the PWD-LV category, the vacancy will be filled up by PWD candidates of other categories as per merit.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis