⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,161–1,180 · Page 59 of 500
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 338 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 502
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.227 – Discharge – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.34, 304 Part II, 304A – Culpable homicide not amounting to murder – Appellant no.1 was doing interior decoration of the shop on contract basis and the appellant no.2 was the Store Manager of the company which had taken the said shop on lease –…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,161–1,180 · Page 59 of 500
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 338 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 502
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.227 – Discharge – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.34, 304 Part II, 304A – Culpable homicide not amounting to murder – Appellant no.1 was doing interior decoration of the shop on contract basis and the appellant no.2 was the Store Manager of the company which had taken the said shop on lease –…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 330 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 638
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss.319, 397, 401 – Whether the High Court was right in exercising its revisional jurisdiction for the purpose of setting aside the order of the Trial Court rejecting the second application preferred by the respondent no.2 u/s.319 of the CrPC: Held: The High Court in exercise of its re…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 199 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1861
[2025] 2 S.C.R. 1863 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Prism Cement Limited & Anr. Held: The State Government was not competent to issue the impugned notices for revising the assessment of the assessee-respondent and to demand the exempted tax only for the reason that the assessee-respondent has not submitted Form ‘C’…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 236 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 208
M/s Techno Prints v. Chhattisgarh Textbook Corporation & Anr. be reasonable ground to exercise such power – Final order in any case cannot travel beyond the show cause notice – Whether show cause notice makes out a case for blacklisting, should be the test to determine whether it is a genuine case to blacklist a contra…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 104 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 934
Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 – Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtra State, Pune (CCRA) – Absence of statutory review power – Appellants’ application for refund of stamp duty was initially allowed by the CCRA – However, it later recalled the said order and rejected the refund request as time-barred – Whether …
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 91 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 880
Headnotes† Constitution of India – Art.226 – Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 – s.18 – Existence of the statutory remedy and Writ jurisdiction of the High Court: Held: In the opinion of this Court, there is a direct confrontation between the judgment of the two Judges Bench of this Court in Jha…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 95 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 263
Held: First and second reliefs not in relation to any measures taken by the secured creditor u/s.13(4) – They are reliefs in relation to the actions taken prior to the secured creditor stepping into the picture and well prior to the secured creditor invoking 264 [2025] 2 S.C.R. Digital Supreme Court Reports the provisi…
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 34 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 446
Held: It is the cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence that there is no vicarious liability unless the statute specifically provides so – Thus, an individual who has perpetrated the commission of an offence on behalf of a company can be made an accused, if the statute provides for such liability and if there is s…
Supreme Court of India18 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1041 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1253
Pursuant to an advertisement published by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (“BPCL”), the appellant made an online application for being appointed/ allotted a regular and rural retail outlet. The appellant was selected on draw on lots and he offered a suitable piece of land for purchase/lease belonging to third parties - Shri Lila Dhar and Shri Dinesh Kumar, whose consent letters were made available along with the application. At the time of application, there was some dispute between Mr. Lila Dhar and Mr. Dinesh Kumar as regards the land which was offered by the appellant. But the same
Supreme Court of India19 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1037 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1148
Issue arose as regards the refusal of Kerala Public Service Commission to expand vacancies despite the directions of the tribunal.
Supreme Court of India19 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1016 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1143
Whether the High Court was justified in denying the interest for the period between 22.06.2016 to 13.07.2023, which was the period of delay in supplying the copy of paper book to the standing counsel for the insurance company.
Supreme Court of India19 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1008 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1122
The victim was subjected to grave accusations and was also disrobed and assaulted in public. The Court take this as an opportunity to refer and reaffirm the commitment to the ideals of equality and justice for all.
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 992 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1117
Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) rejected the application of the appellant for the listing of certain equity shares to the BSE holding that the appellant had not taken in principle approval from the Stock Exchange and it also did not take the approval of the shareholders for the allotment of the shares to the Asset Reconstruction Private Limited (RARE). Order upheld and confirmed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 993 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1108
The appellant here is the consumer who sought that the respondent- insurer release the entire insurance amount in his favour. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission had allowed the complaint partly, whereas the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission modified it and allowed the complaint in full. However, the National Commission reduced the insurance amount. Whether the National Commission has transgressed its jurisdiction by interefering with the State Commission’s order.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 995 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1093
Appellant alleged to be an active member of the Popular Front of India (PFI) involved in planning to cause disturbance during the proposed visit of Prime Minister of India to Patna in 2022. Chargesheet filed against the appellant under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 153A & 153B of the IPC and Sections 13, 17, 18, 18A, 18B & 20, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Charges not framed yet. Appellant has undergone long incarceration, no likelihood of trial being completed in near future. High Court whether justified in denying bail.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 987 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1072
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order of conviction and death sentence to the appellant for offences punishable u/ss.302, 364 and 377 IPC and ss. 4 and 6 of the POCSO, for committing murder and brutal sexual assault of the 4 year old boy.
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 976 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1044
Whether the Special Judge could have conducted the proceedings against the present appellant for the offence punishable u/s.58 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; whether the Special Judge was justified in recording the findings against the appellant as well as the other police officers without even issuing notice to them.
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 983 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1038
An allotment of land to the Respondent was canceled by the Appellant for not paying the full amount as per the scheme. In a writ petition filed by the Respondent, High Court directed the respondent to pay the balance outstanding amount within 30 days and directed the appellant to handover the possession of the plot to the respondent. Respondent did not deposit the full amount and instead preferred a complaint against the Appellant in the District Forum, which dismissed Respondent’s complaint. In the appeal filed by the Respondent before the State Commission, respondent filed an application und
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 980 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 993
The present appeals arise from a common judgment passed by the High Court dated 29.10.2009, whereby the High Court allowed the writ appeals and thereby quashed the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the appellant Trust.
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 973 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 987
Whether the arbitration clause between the parties is non-existent or requires agreement of all the parties to the dispute to refer the dispute to arbitration? Interpretation and construction of arbitration clause discussed.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 330 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 638
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss.319, 397, 401 – Whether the High Court was right in exercising its revisional jurisdiction for the purpose of setting aside the order of the Trial Court rejecting the second application preferred by the respondent no.2 u/s.319 of the CrPC: Held: The High Court in exercise of its re…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 199 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1861
[2025] 2 S.C.R. 1863 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Prism Cement Limited & Anr. Held: The State Government was not competent to issue the impugned notices for revising the assessment of the assessee-respondent and to demand the exempted tax only for the reason that the assessee-respondent has not submitted Form ‘C’…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 236 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 208
M/s Techno Prints v. Chhattisgarh Textbook Corporation & Anr. be reasonable ground to exercise such power – Final order in any case cannot travel beyond the show cause notice – Whether show cause notice makes out a case for blacklisting, should be the test to determine whether it is a genuine case to blacklist a contra…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 104 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 934
Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 – Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtra State, Pune (CCRA) – Absence of statutory review power – Appellants’ application for refund of stamp duty was initially allowed by the CCRA – However, it later recalled the said order and rejected the refund request as time-barred – Whether …
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 91 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 880
Headnotes† Constitution of India – Art.226 – Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 – s.18 – Existence of the statutory remedy and Writ jurisdiction of the High Court: Held: In the opinion of this Court, there is a direct confrontation between the judgment of the two Judges Bench of this Court in Jha…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 95 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 263
Held: First and second reliefs not in relation to any measures taken by the secured creditor u/s.13(4) – They are reliefs in relation to the actions taken prior to the secured creditor stepping into the picture and well prior to the secured creditor invoking 264 [2025] 2 S.C.R. Digital Supreme Court Reports the provisi…
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 34 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 446
Held: It is the cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence that there is no vicarious liability unless the statute specifically provides so – Thus, an individual who has perpetrated the commission of an offence on behalf of a company can be made an accused, if the statute provides for such liability and if there is s…
Supreme Court of India18 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1041 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1253
Pursuant to an advertisement published by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (“BPCL”), the appellant made an online application for being appointed/ allotted a regular and rural retail outlet. The appellant was selected on draw on lots and he offered a suitable piece of land for purchase/lease belonging to third parties - Shri Lila Dhar and Shri Dinesh Kumar, whose consent letters were made available along with the application. At the time of application, there was some dispute between Mr. Lila Dhar and Mr. Dinesh Kumar as regards the land which was offered by the appellant. But the same
Supreme Court of India19 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1037 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1148
Issue arose as regards the refusal of Kerala Public Service Commission to expand vacancies despite the directions of the tribunal.
Supreme Court of India19 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1016 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1143
Whether the High Court was justified in denying the interest for the period between 22.06.2016 to 13.07.2023, which was the period of delay in supplying the copy of paper book to the standing counsel for the insurance company.
Supreme Court of India19 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1008 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1122
The victim was subjected to grave accusations and was also disrobed and assaulted in public. The Court take this as an opportunity to refer and reaffirm the commitment to the ideals of equality and justice for all.
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 992 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1117
Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) rejected the application of the appellant for the listing of certain equity shares to the BSE holding that the appellant had not taken in principle approval from the Stock Exchange and it also did not take the approval of the shareholders for the allotment of the shares to the Asset Reconstruction Private Limited (RARE). Order upheld and confirmed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 993 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1108
The appellant here is the consumer who sought that the respondent- insurer release the entire insurance amount in his favour. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission had allowed the complaint partly, whereas the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission modified it and allowed the complaint in full. However, the National Commission reduced the insurance amount. Whether the National Commission has transgressed its jurisdiction by interefering with the State Commission’s order.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 995 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1093
Appellant alleged to be an active member of the Popular Front of India (PFI) involved in planning to cause disturbance during the proposed visit of Prime Minister of India to Patna in 2022. Chargesheet filed against the appellant under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 153A & 153B of the IPC and Sections 13, 17, 18, 18A, 18B & 20, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Charges not framed yet. Appellant has undergone long incarceration, no likelihood of trial being completed in near future. High Court whether justified in denying bail.
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 987 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1072
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order of conviction and death sentence to the appellant for offences punishable u/ss.302, 364 and 377 IPC and ss. 4 and 6 of the POCSO, for committing murder and brutal sexual assault of the 4 year old boy.
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 976 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1044
Whether the Special Judge could have conducted the proceedings against the present appellant for the offence punishable u/s.58 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; whether the Special Judge was justified in recording the findings against the appellant as well as the other police officers without even issuing notice to them.
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 983 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1038
An allotment of land to the Respondent was canceled by the Appellant for not paying the full amount as per the scheme. In a writ petition filed by the Respondent, High Court directed the respondent to pay the balance outstanding amount within 30 days and directed the appellant to handover the possession of the plot to the respondent. Respondent did not deposit the full amount and instead preferred a complaint against the Appellant in the District Forum, which dismissed Respondent’s complaint. In the appeal filed by the Respondent before the State Commission, respondent filed an application und
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 980 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 993
The present appeals arise from a common judgment passed by the High Court dated 29.10.2009, whereby the High Court allowed the writ appeals and thereby quashed the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the appellant Trust.
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2024Full text
2024 INSC 973 · [2024] 12 S.C.R. 987
Whether the arbitration clause between the parties is non-existent or requires agreement of all the parties to the dispute to refer the dispute to arbitration? Interpretation and construction of arbitration clause discussed.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis