⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,081–1,100 · Page 55 of 500
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1041 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2100
Whether conviction of appellant for the offences punishable u/s.8 of the Goa Children’s Act, 2003 is sustainable; whether the appellant deserves to be given benefit under provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1040 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2086
The appellant has preferred Civil Appeal No.8544 of 2024 aggrieved by the two directions given by the High Court in the impugned order relating to additional payment of Rs.25 lakhs per acre to the respondent as additional sale price and secondly, the direction to the District Court to conduct the survey of the auction property measuring 5 acres 20 guntas in Sy.No.67 and to fix its boundaries.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,081–1,100 · Page 55 of 500
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1041 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2100
Whether conviction of appellant for the offences punishable u/s.8 of the Goa Children’s Act, 2003 is sustainable; whether the appellant deserves to be given benefit under provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1040 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2086
The appellant has preferred Civil Appeal No.8544 of 2024 aggrieved by the two directions given by the High Court in the impugned order relating to additional payment of Rs.25 lakhs per acre to the respondent as additional sale price and secondly, the direction to the District Court to conduct the survey of the auction property measuring 5 acres 20 guntas in Sy.No.67 and to fix its boundaries.
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 104 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 934
Whether the amended six-month limitation, introduced by the 24.04.2015 amendment to Section 48(1) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 governs the Appellants’ claim for stamp duty refund, particularly when the Cancellation Deed was executed prior to the amendment but registered thereafter.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1039 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1525
Matter pertains to issuance of directions to High Courts on the Reserved Judgments.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1038 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1532
Issue arose whether the respondents succeeded in establishing a valid marital relationship between their mother and the deceased primarily on the basis of the oral testimony of P.W.2; and whether the relationship between the deceased and the respondents’ mother can be presumed to be a valid marital union, in the absence of formal documentary proof.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1037 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 740
Issue arose as regards to whether D.W.5-son could have entered the witness box and deposed on behalf of his mother-defendant No.1.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1035 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1516
Issue arose as regards order of the tribunal imposing compensation of Rs.50 Crores and other directions on the exporter perpetrating environmental degradation and pollution.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1034 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1493
The following questions arise for determination: (i) the effect of respondent no.2/KPTCL’s delay in commissioning the 220 kV evacuation system upon the timelines stipulated for fulfilment of the CPs and achievement of COD under the PPA; (ii) the entitlement of appellant to invoke and encash the performance bank guarantee in the facts of the present case; (iii) the sustainability of the finding of Force Majeure recorded by the State Commission in the absence of the contractual notice contemplated under Article 14.5 of the PPA; (iv) the character of the PPA as a contingent contract; and (v) the
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1033 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2148
Issue arose as regards to whether Indian Banks Association Clarification and HRMD Circular can override the 2014 guidelines for the purpose of pay fixation of ex-servicemen during re-employment; whether re-fixation as done by the respondent-Bank pursuant to the IBA Clarification is in consonance with the guidelines dated 17.02.2014 and whether the High Court was justified in confirming such re-fixation; and if not, in what manner can the fixation of pay of ex-servicemen may be made on their re-employment and what reliefs can be granted to the appellants-ex-servicemen.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1032 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2394
Issue arose whether an inadvertent error in the shipping bills, which was permitted to be corrected u/s.149 of the Customs Act, 1962 can defeat appellant-exporter’s claim under the MEIS-Merchandise Exports from India Scheme.
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1030 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1487
A suit for specific performance was decreed by the trial court, which was dismissed by the High Court in appeal, reversing the judgment and decree. Whether the High Court erred in reversing the findings and the judgment and decree passed by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1029 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1413
Issue arose as regards the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court setting aside notification cancelling the earlier notifications issued by erstwhile Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. in 2011-12 as unsustainable, quashing the subsequent notification issued by 1st appellant proposing to initiate a fresh selection process for the post of Sub-Engineer (Electrical) and directing the appointment of the respondent-writ petitioners who were selected pursuant to the earlier notifications issued by the erstwhile AP-Transco.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1028 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1184
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the High Court was correct in reducing the amount of compensation awarded by the MACT to the Appellant-claimant.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1027 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1174
Issue arose whether it is necessary for the appellate court to consider the pleadings of the parties before adjudicating the prayer made for leading additional evidence u/Ord. XLI r.27(1) CPC.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1026 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1161
Issue arose as regards claim for parity in pay by the respondents appointed on contractual basis as Assistant Professors with Assistant Professors who are performing identical duties and functions.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1025 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2056
Accepting the recommendations of the EAC, the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) granted Environmental Clearance (EC) to the project proponent on 19.04.2022. Aggrieved by the issuance of EC dated 19.04.2022, person interested in environment, respondent no.1 filed an appeal before the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which was allowed. Whether the decision of NGT requires any interference.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1024 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2108
During pendency of these appeals, son of original appellant (since deceased) filed an application seeking setting aside of the abatement and for substitution. Whether the applicant is entitled to be substituted in place of the original appellant so as to continue to prosecute these appeals.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1021 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1427
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant on the ground that the appellant had not filed the arbitration petition u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within the period of limitation prescribed therein.
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1020 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1444
Whether a review or recall of an order passed in a criminal proceeding initiated under section 340 of CrPC is permissible or not.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1019 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1150
Having regard to the provisions of the Indian Forest Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1966, more particularly the expression “State Forest Service” as defined in r.2(g), whether any service in a State connected with forestry having members of gazetted status is required to be approved by the Central Government in consultation with the State Government or is the approval of the Central Government relatable to and required in respect of a post in the State Forest Service; if it is answered that approval is relatable to the service and not post, what relief is the appellant entitled to on facts and i
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 104 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 934
Whether the amended six-month limitation, introduced by the 24.04.2015 amendment to Section 48(1) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 governs the Appellants’ claim for stamp duty refund, particularly when the Cancellation Deed was executed prior to the amendment but registered thereafter.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1039 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1525
Matter pertains to issuance of directions to High Courts on the Reserved Judgments.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1038 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1532
Issue arose whether the respondents succeeded in establishing a valid marital relationship between their mother and the deceased primarily on the basis of the oral testimony of P.W.2; and whether the relationship between the deceased and the respondents’ mother can be presumed to be a valid marital union, in the absence of formal documentary proof.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1037 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 740
Issue arose as regards to whether D.W.5-son could have entered the witness box and deposed on behalf of his mother-defendant No.1.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1035 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1516
Issue arose as regards order of the tribunal imposing compensation of Rs.50 Crores and other directions on the exporter perpetrating environmental degradation and pollution.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1034 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1493
The following questions arise for determination: (i) the effect of respondent no.2/KPTCL’s delay in commissioning the 220 kV evacuation system upon the timelines stipulated for fulfilment of the CPs and achievement of COD under the PPA; (ii) the entitlement of appellant to invoke and encash the performance bank guarantee in the facts of the present case; (iii) the sustainability of the finding of Force Majeure recorded by the State Commission in the absence of the contractual notice contemplated under Article 14.5 of the PPA; (iv) the character of the PPA as a contingent contract; and (v) the
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1033 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2148
Issue arose as regards to whether Indian Banks Association Clarification and HRMD Circular can override the 2014 guidelines for the purpose of pay fixation of ex-servicemen during re-employment; whether re-fixation as done by the respondent-Bank pursuant to the IBA Clarification is in consonance with the guidelines dated 17.02.2014 and whether the High Court was justified in confirming such re-fixation; and if not, in what manner can the fixation of pay of ex-servicemen may be made on their re-employment and what reliefs can be granted to the appellants-ex-servicemen.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1032 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2394
Issue arose whether an inadvertent error in the shipping bills, which was permitted to be corrected u/s.149 of the Customs Act, 1962 can defeat appellant-exporter’s claim under the MEIS-Merchandise Exports from India Scheme.
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1030 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1487
A suit for specific performance was decreed by the trial court, which was dismissed by the High Court in appeal, reversing the judgment and decree. Whether the High Court erred in reversing the findings and the judgment and decree passed by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1029 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1413
Issue arose as regards the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court setting aside notification cancelling the earlier notifications issued by erstwhile Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. in 2011-12 as unsustainable, quashing the subsequent notification issued by 1st appellant proposing to initiate a fresh selection process for the post of Sub-Engineer (Electrical) and directing the appointment of the respondent-writ petitioners who were selected pursuant to the earlier notifications issued by the erstwhile AP-Transco.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1028 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1184
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the High Court was correct in reducing the amount of compensation awarded by the MACT to the Appellant-claimant.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1027 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1174
Issue arose whether it is necessary for the appellate court to consider the pleadings of the parties before adjudicating the prayer made for leading additional evidence u/Ord. XLI r.27(1) CPC.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1026 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1161
Issue arose as regards claim for parity in pay by the respondents appointed on contractual basis as Assistant Professors with Assistant Professors who are performing identical duties and functions.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1025 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2056
Accepting the recommendations of the EAC, the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) granted Environmental Clearance (EC) to the project proponent on 19.04.2022. Aggrieved by the issuance of EC dated 19.04.2022, person interested in environment, respondent no.1 filed an appeal before the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which was allowed. Whether the decision of NGT requires any interference.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1024 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2108
During pendency of these appeals, son of original appellant (since deceased) filed an application seeking setting aside of the abatement and for substitution. Whether the applicant is entitled to be substituted in place of the original appellant so as to continue to prosecute these appeals.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1021 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1427
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant on the ground that the appellant had not filed the arbitration petition u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within the period of limitation prescribed therein.
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1020 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1444
Whether a review or recall of an order passed in a criminal proceeding initiated under section 340 of CrPC is permissible or not.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1019 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1150
Having regard to the provisions of the Indian Forest Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1966, more particularly the expression “State Forest Service” as defined in r.2(g), whether any service in a State connected with forestry having members of gazetted status is required to be approved by the Central Government in consultation with the State Government or is the approval of the Central Government relatable to and required in respect of a post in the State Forest Service; if it is answered that approval is relatable to the service and not post, what relief is the appellant entitled to on facts and i
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis