⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,061–1,080 · Page 54 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1062 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2400
Issue arose whether the delivery of the true/xerox copy of the Arbitral Award duly signed by the Arbitrator to an authorised representative of the State would constitute delivery upon the respondent in accordance with s.31(5) of the 1996 Act.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1061 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 258
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,061–1,080 · Page 54 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1062 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2400
Issue arose whether the delivery of the true/xerox copy of the Arbitral Award duly signed by the Arbitrator to an authorised representative of the State would constitute delivery upon the respondent in accordance with s.31(5) of the 1996 Act.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1061 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 258
Allegation against the respondent nos.1 and 2 that they raped a minor girl. It is admitted that they never committed the acts together and always acted separately. In light of the controversy involved in the instant case, the two question arise for consideration: i) whether the High Court fell in a grave error in acquitting the respondent nos.1 and 2 by holding that the prosecution failed to discharge its evidentiary burden as the evidence led by the prosecution was full of inconsistencies and contradictions; ii) whether the High Court erred in its finding that the trial was carried out in vio
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1060 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 300
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the National Green Tribunal imposing a compensation of ₹18 crores on the appellant for alleged environmental violations; and whether the tribunal adhered to fair procedure while conducting its proceedings.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 106 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 231
Matter pertains to the modification of sentence imposed for offence u/s.498A IPC and s.4 of the DP Act and payment of compensation to the wife-de facto complainant.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1059 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 339
I) Whether the impugned documents, i.e., Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, Receipt of Consideration and the registered Will, allegedly entered into by K, father of the appellant/ defendant no.1 and respondent no.1/plaintiff in favour of the plaintiff would confer a valid title over the suit property; II) Whether the plaintiff can claim any benefit u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1058 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 362
Whether the wisdom of the legislature in defining a ‘local candidate’ entitled to apply under the ‘Competent Authority Seats/Quota’, by a subordinate legislation, in consonance with a Presidential Order issued u/Art.371D of the Constitution of India, can be interfered with and expanded by the High Court u/Art.226.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1057 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2350
Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission) rejected the appellant’s petition for payment of arrears at an enhanced tariff for the electricity supplied by it to the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited (HPSEB). APTEL allowed the appellant’s appeal in part and inter alia held that the tariff for its 3 MW hydel power plant under the PPA dated 30.03.2000 required no redetermination but, the tariff for its additional 1.90 MW hydel power plant required to be redetermined as per the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Power Procurement from Renewable S
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1056 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2326
Issue arose for consideration whether the disciplinary authority took into consideration the past conduct of the respondent while passing the dismissal order.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1054 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2389
Issue arose with regards to application filed by State of Maharashtra seeking modifications in the directions issued by this Court in the judgment and order dated 22nd May 2025 as regards Zudpi Jungle Lands.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1052 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2297
Whether the premises of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant where appellant’s vehicles are exclusively used for handling and storage operations, constitute a ‘public place’ under the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1963; whether such vehicles are liable to pay tax u/s.3 thereof or entitled to exemption therefrom.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1051 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2289
Issue arose whether the order of conviction u/s.498-A IPC and consequential sentence imposed on the appellant-mother-in-law can be sustained on the basis of the material evidence.
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1050 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2368
Whether the CESTAT erred in passing the impugned order setting aside the penalty imposed upon the respondents-assessees.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 105 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 187
Issue arose as to whether, based on the materials on record, prima facie, ingredients of the offences u/ss.323, 504, 506, 509, and 511 IPC are made out; whether the chargesheet and the related criminal proceedings against the appellants, liable to be quashed; and whether the mere assertion of “filthy language” allegedly used by the appellants in scolding the complainant, sufficient to establish commission of offences u/s.504 and 509 IPC.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1048 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2199
Whether continuation of the prosecution initiated by the revenue u/s.276C(1), Income Tax Act, 1961 against the appellant after passing an order by the Settlement Commission, would amount to abuse of process of Court; whether in the facts of the present case, the High Court was justified to dismiss the quashing petition filed by the appellant, and if not, what relief can be granted.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1047 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2227
Leakage of question paper of Assistant Engineer (Civil) Mains Examination conducted by the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC), on 26th and 27th August, 2022, led to the present reference by the Hon’ble President of India under Article 317(1) of the Constitution of India, for inquiry and report as to whether Respondent (Ms. Mepung Tadar Bage) ought to be removed as member of APPSC on grounds of misbehaviour.
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1046 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2191
Whether Order XXX Rule 10 CPC in any manner debar a suit filed against the proprietor.
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1045 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2183
Present appeal assails the correctness of the judgment of the High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant-EARC and further directing that the amount deposited, vide order dated 02.02.2023, be transmitted to the account of the respondent no.1 herein; priority of first charge amongst the EPFO and the secured creditors in view of s.11(2) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1044 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2810
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that since the appellant was a transferee pendent lite of judgment debtor, therefore, in view of provisions of Rule 102 of Or.XXI of CPC, the application filed by the appellant under Rules 97 and 101 of Or.XXI CPC was not maintainable.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1043 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2136
Writ petition filed u/Art.32 challenging the continuing validity of the sentence of death against the petitioner, having been affirmed on appeal, declined in review, and followed by the rejection of mercy petitions and seeks its reconsideration in the light of guidelines laid down in the case of Manoj and others v. State of Madhya Pradesh; and whether Art.32 authorises this Court to reopen a capital sentencing exercise that has otherwise attained finality, solely to cure the procedural lapse the petitioner identifies.
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1042 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2108
The accused-appellants were convicted for the offences punishable u/ss.376(2)(g), 201 and 302 of Penal Code, 1860. The High Court dismissed the appeals against conviction preferred by the accused-appellants.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Allegation against the respondent nos.1 and 2 that they raped a minor girl. It is admitted that they never committed the acts together and always acted separately. In light of the controversy involved in the instant case, the two question arise for consideration: i) whether the High Court fell in a grave error in acquitting the respondent nos.1 and 2 by holding that the prosecution failed to discharge its evidentiary burden as the evidence led by the prosecution was full of inconsistencies and contradictions; ii) whether the High Court erred in its finding that the trial was carried out in vio
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1060 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 300
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the National Green Tribunal imposing a compensation of ₹18 crores on the appellant for alleged environmental violations; and whether the tribunal adhered to fair procedure while conducting its proceedings.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 106 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 231
Matter pertains to the modification of sentence imposed for offence u/s.498A IPC and s.4 of the DP Act and payment of compensation to the wife-de facto complainant.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1059 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 339
I) Whether the impugned documents, i.e., Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, Receipt of Consideration and the registered Will, allegedly entered into by K, father of the appellant/ defendant no.1 and respondent no.1/plaintiff in favour of the plaintiff would confer a valid title over the suit property; II) Whether the plaintiff can claim any benefit u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1058 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 362
Whether the wisdom of the legislature in defining a ‘local candidate’ entitled to apply under the ‘Competent Authority Seats/Quota’, by a subordinate legislation, in consonance with a Presidential Order issued u/Art.371D of the Constitution of India, can be interfered with and expanded by the High Court u/Art.226.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1057 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2350
Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission) rejected the appellant’s petition for payment of arrears at an enhanced tariff for the electricity supplied by it to the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited (HPSEB). APTEL allowed the appellant’s appeal in part and inter alia held that the tariff for its 3 MW hydel power plant under the PPA dated 30.03.2000 required no redetermination but, the tariff for its additional 1.90 MW hydel power plant required to be redetermined as per the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Power Procurement from Renewable S
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1056 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2326
Issue arose for consideration whether the disciplinary authority took into consideration the past conduct of the respondent while passing the dismissal order.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1054 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2389
Issue arose with regards to application filed by State of Maharashtra seeking modifications in the directions issued by this Court in the judgment and order dated 22nd May 2025 as regards Zudpi Jungle Lands.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1052 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2297
Whether the premises of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant where appellant’s vehicles are exclusively used for handling and storage operations, constitute a ‘public place’ under the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1963; whether such vehicles are liable to pay tax u/s.3 thereof or entitled to exemption therefrom.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1051 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2289
Issue arose whether the order of conviction u/s.498-A IPC and consequential sentence imposed on the appellant-mother-in-law can be sustained on the basis of the material evidence.
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1050 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2368
Whether the CESTAT erred in passing the impugned order setting aside the penalty imposed upon the respondents-assessees.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 105 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 187
Issue arose as to whether, based on the materials on record, prima facie, ingredients of the offences u/ss.323, 504, 506, 509, and 511 IPC are made out; whether the chargesheet and the related criminal proceedings against the appellants, liable to be quashed; and whether the mere assertion of “filthy language” allegedly used by the appellants in scolding the complainant, sufficient to establish commission of offences u/s.504 and 509 IPC.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1048 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2199
Whether continuation of the prosecution initiated by the revenue u/s.276C(1), Income Tax Act, 1961 against the appellant after passing an order by the Settlement Commission, would amount to abuse of process of Court; whether in the facts of the present case, the High Court was justified to dismiss the quashing petition filed by the appellant, and if not, what relief can be granted.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1047 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2227
Leakage of question paper of Assistant Engineer (Civil) Mains Examination conducted by the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC), on 26th and 27th August, 2022, led to the present reference by the Hon’ble President of India under Article 317(1) of the Constitution of India, for inquiry and report as to whether Respondent (Ms. Mepung Tadar Bage) ought to be removed as member of APPSC on grounds of misbehaviour.
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1046 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2191
Whether Order XXX Rule 10 CPC in any manner debar a suit filed against the proprietor.
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1045 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2183
Present appeal assails the correctness of the judgment of the High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant-EARC and further directing that the amount deposited, vide order dated 02.02.2023, be transmitted to the account of the respondent no.1 herein; priority of first charge amongst the EPFO and the secured creditors in view of s.11(2) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1044 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2810
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that since the appellant was a transferee pendent lite of judgment debtor, therefore, in view of provisions of Rule 102 of Or.XXI of CPC, the application filed by the appellant under Rules 97 and 101 of Or.XXI CPC was not maintainable.
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1043 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2136
Writ petition filed u/Art.32 challenging the continuing validity of the sentence of death against the petitioner, having been affirmed on appeal, declined in review, and followed by the rejection of mercy petitions and seeks its reconsideration in the light of guidelines laid down in the case of Manoj and others v. State of Madhya Pradesh; and whether Art.32 authorises this Court to reopen a capital sentencing exercise that has otherwise attained finality, solely to cure the procedural lapse the petitioner identifies.
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1042 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2108
The accused-appellants were convicted for the offences punishable u/ss.376(2)(g), 201 and 302 of Penal Code, 1860. The High Court dismissed the appeals against conviction preferred by the accused-appellants.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis