⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,041–1,060 · Page 53 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 109 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 961
A plea of a Christian man to accord his father a decent burial in his own native village.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1089 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 44
Whether the conviction of the appellant u/s.306, IPC is sustainable; was the evidence against the appellant of such nature that the overt acts attributed to her left the deceased-victim with no option except to commit suicide.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,041–1,060 · Page 53 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 109 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 961
A plea of a Christian man to accord his father a decent burial in his own native village.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1089 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 44
Whether the conviction of the appellant u/s.306, IPC is sustainable; was the evidence against the appellant of such nature that the overt acts attributed to her left the deceased-victim with no option except to commit suicide.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1088 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 703
Issue arose whether the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in affirming the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal by setting aside the punishment of compulsory retirement imposed upon the respondent-workman and directing his reinstatement into the original post with continuity of service without back wages.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1086 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 627
Whether the appellants, being allottees of an apartment in a project developed by the erstwhile Corporate Debtor and having admittedly paid a sum of Rs.57,56,684/- out of the total consideration of Rs.60,06,368/-, are to be treated as belated claimants entitled only to refund of 50% of their principal deposit under Clause 18.4(xi), or whether, their claim having been duly verified and incorporated in the list of creditors, they are entitled to possession in terms of Clause 18.4(vi)(a) of the Resolution Plan.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1085 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 528
Issue arose whether the decision of the High Court to uphold the appellant-bidder’s disqualification under Clause 5(D) for not furnishing Joint Venture agreement justified; and whether the appellant would have stood disqualified since its washeries had been exclusively committed to the State Mining Corporation.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1084 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 542
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order by the High Court permitting the respondents who had applied as reserved candidates in OBC category after having availed age relaxation for the post of Constable, to be considered for recruitment under unreserved category.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1083 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 558
Issue arose whether the respondents having applied in reserved category, and availed relaxation in age and/or physical measurements to participate in the recruitment process and secured more than the unreserved candidates in the written test and trade test can be considered against the unreserved vacancies.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1081 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 744
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the courts below convicting and sentencing the appellant for offence punishable u/ss.302/34 IPC and ss.25, 27 of the Arms Act; and delay at the instance of the High Court in uploading the judgment after a period of about 2 years 5 months.
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1080 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 574
Whether the order impugned conforms to the scope of review of an order u/s.114 and Or.47 of CPC.
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 108 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 948
Whether the conviction of the appellants-accused under Sections 201 and 302 read with Section 34, Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable.
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1079 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 663
The APTEL dismissed the appeals (Appeal no.135 of 2018 along with Appeal no.54 of 2019) and upheld the order dated 20.03.2018 passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) in Petition No.105/MP/20173.
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1078 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 522
Whether the order of the High Court directing pay and recovery is sustainable.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1074 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 1
Whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned order, by which it disposed of the application filed by the appellant- complainant seeking cancellation of bail of the accused persons on the ground of threats being administered to the witnesses in violation of the condition imposed at the time of release on bail, holding that the appellant as an aggrieved person had a remedy under Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 and declining to cancel the bail of the accused persons.
Supreme Court of India3 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1071 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 645
Whether the High Court, while invoking the Proviso to s.100(5), CPC, was correct in referring to and applying s.67, Indian Succession Act, 1925; whether s.67, Indian Succession Act, 1925 is attracted to determine the succession to the suit schedule property or not.
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1070 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2428
Issue arose whether the courts below failed to award compensation under the head loss of earnings to the minor appellant; and whether the High Court erred in granting an adequate amount of compensation under pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1069 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2416
Whether the High Court erred in rejecting the quashing petition filed by the appellants-Officers of the Bank challenging the order passed by the Magistrate issuing process against them for the offences punishable u/ss.500 and 501, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1067 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 283
Whether the High Court was correct in allowing the pre-arrest bail to respondent-accused u/s.438 Cr.PC in respect of alleged commission of offenses punishable u/ss.118(1), 115(1), 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 333, 324(4), 76, 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and u/ss.3(1)(o), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w)(i) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1066 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 507
Whether Clause 18.1 of the agreement proscribed payment of pendente lite interest on the sum awarded.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1065 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 383
Whether the company petition decided in favour of the Appellant by the NCLT was maintainable u/ss.397 and 398, Companies Act, 1956 Act; assuming that the company petition was maintainable, whether the NCLT had jurisdiction to decide whether the gift deed is valid or not; if the answer to the aforesaid question is in the affirmative, were the facts on record and the law such so as to support the finding of the NCLT that the gift deed is invalid; whether the Appellant was able to prove that she has been a victim of mismanagement and oppression by the Directors of the Company.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1063 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 410
1) Whether the State can insist that a teacher seeking appointment in a minority educational institution must qualify the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET); If so, whether providing such a qualification would affect any of the rights of the minority institutions guaranteed under the Constitution of India; and 2) Whether teachers appointed much prior to issuance of Notification dated 29th July, 2011 by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) u/s.23(1) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act) read with the newly inserted proviso (second proviso) in s.2
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1088 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 703
Issue arose whether the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in affirming the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal by setting aside the punishment of compulsory retirement imposed upon the respondent-workman and directing his reinstatement into the original post with continuity of service without back wages.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1086 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 627
Whether the appellants, being allottees of an apartment in a project developed by the erstwhile Corporate Debtor and having admittedly paid a sum of Rs.57,56,684/- out of the total consideration of Rs.60,06,368/-, are to be treated as belated claimants entitled only to refund of 50% of their principal deposit under Clause 18.4(xi), or whether, their claim having been duly verified and incorporated in the list of creditors, they are entitled to possession in terms of Clause 18.4(vi)(a) of the Resolution Plan.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1085 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 528
Issue arose whether the decision of the High Court to uphold the appellant-bidder’s disqualification under Clause 5(D) for not furnishing Joint Venture agreement justified; and whether the appellant would have stood disqualified since its washeries had been exclusively committed to the State Mining Corporation.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1084 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 542
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order by the High Court permitting the respondents who had applied as reserved candidates in OBC category after having availed age relaxation for the post of Constable, to be considered for recruitment under unreserved category.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1083 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 558
Issue arose whether the respondents having applied in reserved category, and availed relaxation in age and/or physical measurements to participate in the recruitment process and secured more than the unreserved candidates in the written test and trade test can be considered against the unreserved vacancies.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1081 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 744
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the courts below convicting and sentencing the appellant for offence punishable u/ss.302/34 IPC and ss.25, 27 of the Arms Act; and delay at the instance of the High Court in uploading the judgment after a period of about 2 years 5 months.
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1080 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 574
Whether the order impugned conforms to the scope of review of an order u/s.114 and Or.47 of CPC.
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 108 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 948
Whether the conviction of the appellants-accused under Sections 201 and 302 read with Section 34, Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable.
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1079 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 663
The APTEL dismissed the appeals (Appeal no.135 of 2018 along with Appeal no.54 of 2019) and upheld the order dated 20.03.2018 passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) in Petition No.105/MP/20173.
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1078 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 522
Whether the order of the High Court directing pay and recovery is sustainable.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1074 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 1
Whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned order, by which it disposed of the application filed by the appellant- complainant seeking cancellation of bail of the accused persons on the ground of threats being administered to the witnesses in violation of the condition imposed at the time of release on bail, holding that the appellant as an aggrieved person had a remedy under Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 and declining to cancel the bail of the accused persons.
Supreme Court of India3 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1071 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 645
Whether the High Court, while invoking the Proviso to s.100(5), CPC, was correct in referring to and applying s.67, Indian Succession Act, 1925; whether s.67, Indian Succession Act, 1925 is attracted to determine the succession to the suit schedule property or not.
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1070 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2428
Issue arose whether the courts below failed to award compensation under the head loss of earnings to the minor appellant; and whether the High Court erred in granting an adequate amount of compensation under pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1069 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2416
Whether the High Court erred in rejecting the quashing petition filed by the appellants-Officers of the Bank challenging the order passed by the Magistrate issuing process against them for the offences punishable u/ss.500 and 501, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1067 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 283
Whether the High Court was correct in allowing the pre-arrest bail to respondent-accused u/s.438 Cr.PC in respect of alleged commission of offenses punishable u/ss.118(1), 115(1), 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 333, 324(4), 76, 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and u/ss.3(1)(o), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w)(i) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1066 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 507
Whether Clause 18.1 of the agreement proscribed payment of pendente lite interest on the sum awarded.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1065 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 383
Whether the company petition decided in favour of the Appellant by the NCLT was maintainable u/ss.397 and 398, Companies Act, 1956 Act; assuming that the company petition was maintainable, whether the NCLT had jurisdiction to decide whether the gift deed is valid or not; if the answer to the aforesaid question is in the affirmative, were the facts on record and the law such so as to support the finding of the NCLT that the gift deed is invalid; whether the Appellant was able to prove that she has been a victim of mismanagement and oppression by the Directors of the Company.
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1063 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 410
1) Whether the State can insist that a teacher seeking appointment in a minority educational institution must qualify the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET); If so, whether providing such a qualification would affect any of the rights of the minority institutions guaranteed under the Constitution of India; and 2) Whether teachers appointed much prior to issuance of Notification dated 29th July, 2011 by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) u/s.23(1) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act) read with the newly inserted proviso (second proviso) in s.2
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis