⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,021–1,040 · Page 52 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1114 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 982
Whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the anticipatory bail applications of the appellants; issue of inordinate delay by Courts in deciding the bail and anticipatory bail applications.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1113 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 131
Issue arose whether the orders of the trial court, as affirmed by the High Court, directing segregation of the appellant’s trial from that of the co-accused and requiring the filing of a separate charge sheet solely on the ground that the appellant is a sitting MLA, legally sustainable.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,021–1,040 · Page 52 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1114 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 982
Whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the anticipatory bail applications of the appellants; issue of inordinate delay by Courts in deciding the bail and anticipatory bail applications.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1113 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 131
Issue arose whether the orders of the trial court, as affirmed by the High Court, directing segregation of the appellant’s trial from that of the co-accused and requiring the filing of a separate charge sheet solely on the ground that the appellant is a sitting MLA, legally sustainable.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1112 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 94
Whether the General Conditions (GC) under the EIA 2006 Notification, are applicable to Item 8(a) (Building and Construction Projects) and Item 8(b) (Township and Area Development Projects) of the Schedule thereto, and, if so, whether such projects when situated within 10 km (subsequently reduced to 5 km) of environmentally sensitive areas are required to be appraised as Category A projects by the Central Expert Appraisal Committee (Central EAC), rather than being considered by the State Expert Appraisal Committees (SEACs) and the State/UT Environment Impact Assessment Authorities (SEIAAs).
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1111 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 764
Whether the inspection and seizure conducted by Respondent No.2 u/s.15, Legal Metrology Act, 2009 without obtaining a prior warrant, was unlawful and violative of the principles of natural justice, thereby justifying invocation of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1110 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 169
Whether the appellants, fall within the category of “speculative investors” so as to disentitle them from initiating proceedings u/s.7 of the IBC; whether the Ordinance/Amendment Act introducing threshold requirements for filing of s.7 IBC applications by allottees was applicable to the facts of the present case.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1109 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 152
Whether the High Court was correct in reversing the order passed by the Civil Court dismissing the interlocutory application filed by respondent no.1 for amending the written statement and for filing a counter claim in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the appellant; and legality of institution of a counter claim against a co-defendant.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1108 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 794
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court fell in error in directing respondent nos. 2 to 4 to allow rectification of the financial bid of respondent no.1 by treating the amount offered by it as the per day figure and on that basis to compute the total amount for the entire contractual period of 1095 days.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1107 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 212
Whether the High Court committed any error in bringing the case within the ambit of “attempt to commit murder” punishable u/s.307 IPC on the ground that the deceased-R died after a period of nine months from the date of the incident.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1106 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 253
Issue arose whether the Division Bench of the High Court is justified in non-suiting the appellant on the ground that her complaint was barred by limitation; and whether the subsequent event of removal of the appellant from the post of the Director, CFRGS or initiation of inquiry by the Executive Council are in any way linked to sexual harassment or amounts to sexual harassment as described u/s.3(2) of the POSH Act.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1105 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 825
Whether the plaintiff’s suit was time-barred or not. Whether it is Article 65 or Article 59 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, which would apply to the present facts in hand.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1102 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 640
The High Court has affirmed the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court vide order dated 20.09.2019. Whether respondent- husband should contribute towards the marriage expenses of his daughter.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1101 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 855
The present case concerns the implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 along with the prolonged institutionalisation. The lack of access to education, health, and community life for persons residing in State-run care institution/ homes, must be viewed through the expansive constitutional lens. Whether the institutional structures respect the autonomy, equality, and dignity of persons with disabilities as guaranteed under the Indian Constitution.
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1100 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 78
The complaint of the appellant before the High Court was that the police officers concerned had failed in their duty by not registering a First Information Report apropos the attack and assault on him by four individuals on 13.05.2023. The Division Bench of the High Court dismissed his writ petition, suspecting his bonafides.
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 110 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 998
Whether respondents should have granted the benefit of promotion from MMG/Scale-II to MMG/Scale-III with effect from 28.07.2001 with all monetary benefits to the appellant.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 11 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 130
Merely because a Central Government employee works within the territory of a particular State, whether the CBI requires consent from the concerned State Government to register an FIR against such Central Government employee in connection with commission of an offence under a Central Act; whether the High Court was justified in quashing the FIRs and the subsequent proceedings against the respondents holding that the same were vitiated in view of the lack of consent and the lack of notification for a Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1097 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 585
Whether the conviction of the appellants, as recorded by the trial Court and affirmed by the High Court, deserves to be upheld or whether they are entitled to acquittal.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1096 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 58
Whether the High Court erred in refusing to quash the proceedings u/s.420, IPC against the appellant.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1095 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 66
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court holding that prima facie cognizable offences are made out for investigation against the appellant-officers of the CBI, and directing the Delhi Police to register a case.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1094 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 26
Validity of the finding that appellant no.2-doctor, the Obstetrician/ Gynaecologist who conducted the delivery of newborn child, which resulted in death of both woman and newborn child, is guilty of medical negligence and deficiency in service.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1090 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2437
Challenge to the judgment of the High Court whereby the appeals filed by the appellants herein were dismissed against the judgment of the trial court convicting them for offences u/ss.25A and 29, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1112 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 94
Whether the General Conditions (GC) under the EIA 2006 Notification, are applicable to Item 8(a) (Building and Construction Projects) and Item 8(b) (Township and Area Development Projects) of the Schedule thereto, and, if so, whether such projects when situated within 10 km (subsequently reduced to 5 km) of environmentally sensitive areas are required to be appraised as Category A projects by the Central Expert Appraisal Committee (Central EAC), rather than being considered by the State Expert Appraisal Committees (SEACs) and the State/UT Environment Impact Assessment Authorities (SEIAAs).
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1111 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 764
Whether the inspection and seizure conducted by Respondent No.2 u/s.15, Legal Metrology Act, 2009 without obtaining a prior warrant, was unlawful and violative of the principles of natural justice, thereby justifying invocation of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1110 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 169
Whether the appellants, fall within the category of “speculative investors” so as to disentitle them from initiating proceedings u/s.7 of the IBC; whether the Ordinance/Amendment Act introducing threshold requirements for filing of s.7 IBC applications by allottees was applicable to the facts of the present case.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1109 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 152
Whether the High Court was correct in reversing the order passed by the Civil Court dismissing the interlocutory application filed by respondent no.1 for amending the written statement and for filing a counter claim in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the appellant; and legality of institution of a counter claim against a co-defendant.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1108 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 794
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court fell in error in directing respondent nos. 2 to 4 to allow rectification of the financial bid of respondent no.1 by treating the amount offered by it as the per day figure and on that basis to compute the total amount for the entire contractual period of 1095 days.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1107 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 212
Whether the High Court committed any error in bringing the case within the ambit of “attempt to commit murder” punishable u/s.307 IPC on the ground that the deceased-R died after a period of nine months from the date of the incident.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1106 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 253
Issue arose whether the Division Bench of the High Court is justified in non-suiting the appellant on the ground that her complaint was barred by limitation; and whether the subsequent event of removal of the appellant from the post of the Director, CFRGS or initiation of inquiry by the Executive Council are in any way linked to sexual harassment or amounts to sexual harassment as described u/s.3(2) of the POSH Act.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1105 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 825
Whether the plaintiff’s suit was time-barred or not. Whether it is Article 65 or Article 59 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, which would apply to the present facts in hand.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1102 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 640
The High Court has affirmed the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court vide order dated 20.09.2019. Whether respondent- husband should contribute towards the marriage expenses of his daughter.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1101 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 855
The present case concerns the implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 along with the prolonged institutionalisation. The lack of access to education, health, and community life for persons residing in State-run care institution/ homes, must be viewed through the expansive constitutional lens. Whether the institutional structures respect the autonomy, equality, and dignity of persons with disabilities as guaranteed under the Indian Constitution.
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1100 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 78
The complaint of the appellant before the High Court was that the police officers concerned had failed in their duty by not registering a First Information Report apropos the attack and assault on him by four individuals on 13.05.2023. The Division Bench of the High Court dismissed his writ petition, suspecting his bonafides.
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 110 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 998
Whether respondents should have granted the benefit of promotion from MMG/Scale-II to MMG/Scale-III with effect from 28.07.2001 with all monetary benefits to the appellant.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 11 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 130
Merely because a Central Government employee works within the territory of a particular State, whether the CBI requires consent from the concerned State Government to register an FIR against such Central Government employee in connection with commission of an offence under a Central Act; whether the High Court was justified in quashing the FIRs and the subsequent proceedings against the respondents holding that the same were vitiated in view of the lack of consent and the lack of notification for a Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1097 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 585
Whether the conviction of the appellants, as recorded by the trial Court and affirmed by the High Court, deserves to be upheld or whether they are entitled to acquittal.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1096 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 58
Whether the High Court erred in refusing to quash the proceedings u/s.420, IPC against the appellant.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1095 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 66
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court holding that prima facie cognizable offences are made out for investigation against the appellant-officers of the CBI, and directing the Delhi Police to register a case.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1094 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 26
Validity of the finding that appellant no.2-doctor, the Obstetrician/ Gynaecologist who conducted the delivery of newborn child, which resulted in death of both woman and newborn child, is guilty of medical negligence and deficiency in service.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1090 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2437
Challenge to the judgment of the High Court whereby the appeals filed by the appellants herein were dismissed against the judgment of the trial court convicting them for offences u/ss.25A and 29, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis