⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
981–1,000 · Page 50 of 500
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1190 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 463
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment and order by which the application filed by the respondent herein (judgment debtor-original defendant) under Order XLI Rule 5(1) and Rule 5(3), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, respectively came to be allowed and thereby the Court granted stay of the execution of the money decree suffered by the respondent without insisting for the deposit of the decretal amount.
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
981–1,000 · Page 50 of 500
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1190 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 463
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment and order by which the application filed by the respondent herein (judgment debtor-original defendant) under Order XLI Rule 5(1) and Rule 5(3), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, respectively came to be allowed and thereby the Court granted stay of the execution of the money decree suffered by the respondent without insisting for the deposit of the decretal amount.
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1189 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 311
Matter pertains to issuance of directions relating to road safety, safety of pedestrians while walking on footpaths, wearing of helmets, wrong lane driving and unsafe overtaking, use of dazzling LED white lights to help in reduction of road accidents and fatalities.
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1188 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 405
Issue arose whether tax can be levied u/s.3F of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948, on the ink and processing material used by the appellant in undertaking the printing work of lottery tickets.
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1187 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 1
Whether the impugned judgments suffer from perversity and misreading of evidence, warranting re-appreciation of evidence under Article 136 of the Constitution of India; whether the High Court is correct in reversing the finding of the Trial Court on the Oral Gift without an appeal/cross-appeal by the Plaintiff; whether the Plaintiff established her claim as the daughter of K and A; whether the claim of the Plaintiff under oral gift/Hiba is validly proved, and the title is derived to an extent of 10 acres; whether the suit for declaratory relief is barred by limitation.
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1184 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 263
Whether the prosecution has succeeded in establishing, beyond a reasonable doubt, a complete chain of circumstances leading only to the conclusion of guilt of the Appellants, or whether the circumstances leave room for reasonable doubt warranting acquittal.
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1183 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 286
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned directions issued by the High Court were beyond the scope of the writ petition and ought to be set aside.
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1182 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 301
Issue arose whether the impugned tender condition meets the test of reasonableness and fairness and or whether the same constitutes an arbitrary criteria which excludes the other eligible bidders from participation thereby violating, the mandate contained in Arts.14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 118 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1725
(1) Whether the High Court acted well within the contours of its powers under Section 482 of the CrPC in rejecting Ajay Malik’s quashing petition; (2) Whether the High Court fell in error in rejecting the Compounding Application moved by Ajay Malik and supported by the Complainant; (3) Whether the High Court was legally correct in accepting Ashok Kumar’s Criminal Revision, thereby discharging him from the captioned criminal proceedings; (4) Whether the existing legal framework in India sufficiently protects the rights of domestic workers.
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 117 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1147
Whether the respondent-Muthoot Finance Ltd. is a “State” within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution and therefore amenable to writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1162 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1599
Whether the High Court ought to have applied the doctrine of “pay and recover” requiring the Insurance Company to satisfy the amount of compensation to the claimant and subsequently allow the Insurance Company to recover the amount in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1161 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1559
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the auction was per se illegal being conducted in violation of the terms and conditions of the lease deed and the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Income Tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962; whether the High Court erred in dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the appellant-DDA without adverting to the validity of the auction; whether the e-auction conducted by the Recovery Officer, DRT, the confirmation of sale and sale certificate issued in favour of the Auction Purchaser ought to be quashed and set aside and the amount depo
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1160 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1575
Whether the appellant-GUVNL is entitled to reimbursement of the fixed charges, in relation to the diverted electricity from out of its allocated share by Essar Power Limited (EPL) to its sister company-Essar Steel Limited (ESL), in addition to the compensation payable for such wrongful diversion.
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 116 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1041
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for rape and murder of the deceased and imposition of death sentence.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1159 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1539
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court erred in holding that all the acts done by the official receiver between the declaration of the appellant’s insolvency and the annulment of the adjudication of insolvency were saved u/s.37(1), Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 and that notwithstanding the annulment of insolvency against the appellant and his mother, the sale deed executed on 11.03.1983 was valid.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1158 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1515
The present appeal has been filed challenging the ex-parte judgment and order dated 16.04.2009 passed by the High Court acquitting the respondent no.1-accused u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and reversing the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and the Sessions Court.
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1155 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1490
When victim herself has stepped into witness box, whether her examination can be done in piecemeal.
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1154 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1419
Issue arose as regards the validity of the Notification No. S.O.377, dated 09.03.2007, issued by the Government of Rajasthan in exercise of its powers conferred by s.8(3) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 granting exemption from payment of Value Added Tax on sale of asbestos cement sheets and bricks, manufactured in the State of Rajasthan, having contents of fly ash 25% or more by weight subject to specific conditions, is violative of Art. 304(a) of the Constitution of India being discriminatory vis-à-vis goods imported from outside the State of Rajasthan; and whether the High Court w
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1153 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1401
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the application seeking quashing of the charge sheet as well as the consequential proceedings arising out of the FIR registered for offences punishable u/ss.420, 467, and 468 IPC.
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 115 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1009
Whether the presumption of legitimacy, if not displaced, determines paternity in law; whether the Civil Court had the jurisdiction to entertain the Original Suit and whether the Family Court was entitled to reopen the Maintenance Petition; whether the second round of litigation, initiated by the Respondent, was barred by the principle of res judicata.
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1148 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1378
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the decree holder (respondent) would be entitled to interest upon interest in terms of s.31(7)(b), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or the interest awarded by the arbitral tribunal in the award in terms of the memorandum of understanding (MoU) entered into between the parties i.e. between the appellant and the respondent fulfil the requirement of s.31(7)(a) and (b) of the said Act.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 1189 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 311
Matter pertains to issuance of directions relating to road safety, safety of pedestrians while walking on footpaths, wearing of helmets, wrong lane driving and unsafe overtaking, use of dazzling LED white lights to help in reduction of road accidents and fatalities.
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1188 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 405
Issue arose whether tax can be levied u/s.3F of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948, on the ink and processing material used by the appellant in undertaking the printing work of lottery tickets.
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1187 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 1
Whether the impugned judgments suffer from perversity and misreading of evidence, warranting re-appreciation of evidence under Article 136 of the Constitution of India; whether the High Court is correct in reversing the finding of the Trial Court on the Oral Gift without an appeal/cross-appeal by the Plaintiff; whether the Plaintiff established her claim as the daughter of K and A; whether the claim of the Plaintiff under oral gift/Hiba is validly proved, and the title is derived to an extent of 10 acres; whether the suit for declaratory relief is barred by limitation.
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1184 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 263
Whether the prosecution has succeeded in establishing, beyond a reasonable doubt, a complete chain of circumstances leading only to the conclusion of guilt of the Appellants, or whether the circumstances leave room for reasonable doubt warranting acquittal.
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1183 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 286
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned directions issued by the High Court were beyond the scope of the writ petition and ought to be set aside.
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1182 · [2025] 10 S.C.R. 301
Issue arose whether the impugned tender condition meets the test of reasonableness and fairness and or whether the same constitutes an arbitrary criteria which excludes the other eligible bidders from participation thereby violating, the mandate contained in Arts.14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 118 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1725
(1) Whether the High Court acted well within the contours of its powers under Section 482 of the CrPC in rejecting Ajay Malik’s quashing petition; (2) Whether the High Court fell in error in rejecting the Compounding Application moved by Ajay Malik and supported by the Complainant; (3) Whether the High Court was legally correct in accepting Ashok Kumar’s Criminal Revision, thereby discharging him from the captioned criminal proceedings; (4) Whether the existing legal framework in India sufficiently protects the rights of domestic workers.
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 117 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1147
Whether the respondent-Muthoot Finance Ltd. is a “State” within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution and therefore amenable to writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1162 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1599
Whether the High Court ought to have applied the doctrine of “pay and recover” requiring the Insurance Company to satisfy the amount of compensation to the claimant and subsequently allow the Insurance Company to recover the amount in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1161 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1559
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the auction was per se illegal being conducted in violation of the terms and conditions of the lease deed and the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Income Tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962; whether the High Court erred in dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the appellant-DDA without adverting to the validity of the auction; whether the e-auction conducted by the Recovery Officer, DRT, the confirmation of sale and sale certificate issued in favour of the Auction Purchaser ought to be quashed and set aside and the amount depo
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1160 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1575
Whether the appellant-GUVNL is entitled to reimbursement of the fixed charges, in relation to the diverted electricity from out of its allocated share by Essar Power Limited (EPL) to its sister company-Essar Steel Limited (ESL), in addition to the compensation payable for such wrongful diversion.
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 116 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1041
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for rape and murder of the deceased and imposition of death sentence.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1159 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1539
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court erred in holding that all the acts done by the official receiver between the declaration of the appellant’s insolvency and the annulment of the adjudication of insolvency were saved u/s.37(1), Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 and that notwithstanding the annulment of insolvency against the appellant and his mother, the sale deed executed on 11.03.1983 was valid.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1158 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1515
The present appeal has been filed challenging the ex-parte judgment and order dated 16.04.2009 passed by the High Court acquitting the respondent no.1-accused u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and reversing the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and the Sessions Court.
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1155 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1490
When victim herself has stepped into witness box, whether her examination can be done in piecemeal.
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1154 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1419
Issue arose as regards the validity of the Notification No. S.O.377, dated 09.03.2007, issued by the Government of Rajasthan in exercise of its powers conferred by s.8(3) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 granting exemption from payment of Value Added Tax on sale of asbestos cement sheets and bricks, manufactured in the State of Rajasthan, having contents of fly ash 25% or more by weight subject to specific conditions, is violative of Art. 304(a) of the Constitution of India being discriminatory vis-à-vis goods imported from outside the State of Rajasthan; and whether the High Court w
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1153 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1401
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the application seeking quashing of the charge sheet as well as the consequential proceedings arising out of the FIR registered for offences punishable u/ss.420, 467, and 468 IPC.
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 115 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1009
Whether the presumption of legitimacy, if not displaced, determines paternity in law; whether the Civil Court had the jurisdiction to entertain the Original Suit and whether the Family Court was entitled to reopen the Maintenance Petition; whether the second round of litigation, initiated by the Respondent, was barred by the principle of res judicata.
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1148 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1378
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the decree holder (respondent) would be entitled to interest upon interest in terms of s.31(7)(b), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or the interest awarded by the arbitral tribunal in the award in terms of the memorandum of understanding (MoU) entered into between the parties i.e. between the appellant and the respondent fulfil the requirement of s.31(7)(a) and (b) of the said Act.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis