⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
9,741–9,760 · Page 488 of 500
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 108 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1112
V. Giri (A.C.), Huzefa Ahmadi, Anunaya Mehta, Mohd.G Sadique T.A., Ejaz Maqbool, Tanima Kishore, Mrigank Prabhakar, Rohan Sharma, Hemantika Wahi. Parul Kumari for the Appearing Parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H RAMESHCHANDRA AMBALAL JOSHI v. STATE OF 1115 GUJARAT CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J. 1. Accor…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 107 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1078
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
9,741–9,760 · Page 488 of 500
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 108 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1112
V. Giri (A.C.), Huzefa Ahmadi, Anunaya Mehta, Mohd.G Sadique T.A., Ejaz Maqbool, Tanima Kishore, Mrigank Prabhakar, Rohan Sharma, Hemantika Wahi. Parul Kumari for the Appearing Parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H RAMESHCHANDRA AMBALAL JOSHI v. STATE OF 1115 GUJARAT CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J. 1. Accor…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 107 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1078
[2014] 1 S.C.R. 1078 A VIJAY KUMAR V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal No. 441 of 2009) FEBRUARY 18, 2014 B [T.S. THAKUR AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] PENAL CODE, 1860: c ss. 302 rlw 120-B, 460 and 382 - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction by courts below - Held: Witness has made material improvements while deposing in cou…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 106 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1069
P.P. Malhotra, ASG, Syed Tanweer Ahmad, Sonia Malhotra, Shreekant N. Terdal, Yasir Rauf for the Appellant. Pranab Kumar Mullick, Soma Mullick for the Respondent. F The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. This appeal has been filed by the Union of India G challenging the judgment and order of the Calcutt…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 105 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 990
BHASKAR LAL SHARMA & ANR. v. MONICA & ORS. 991 finally concluded by the trial court - Trial court directed to A ' complete trial expeditiously. s. 125 - Maintenance granted u/s. 125 by trial court - Writ petition u/Article 32 for service of notice on the husband (respondent)-and for payment of the arrears of maintenanc…
Supreme Court of India18 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1046 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 543
(2012) 9 SCC 446: 2012 (7) SCR 584; Shahzad Hasan Khan V. lshtiaq Hasan Khan and Anr. (1987) 2 sec 684: 1987 (3) SCR 34; State of Maharashtra V. Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao (1989) Supp (2) sec 605: 1989 (1) Suppl. SCR 315; G M. Jagan Mohan Rao v. P. V. Mohan Rao (2010) 15 SCC 491; Harjit Singh V. State of Punjab (2002…
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1045 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 868
SHASHIKALA DEVI v. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA 871 2.1. Pension is neither a bounty nor a matter of A grace but is a payment for past services rendered by the employee. If pension is not a bounty, but a right which the employee a…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1043 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 293
Ajay Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2010) 15 SCC 83; Jitendra Singh alias Babboo Singh and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2013) 11 SCC 193 - relied on. Hariram v. State State of Rajasthan (2009) 13 SCC 193; F Abuzar Hussain @ Guizar Hossain v. State of West Bengal 2012 (9) SCR 244:(2012) 10 SCC 489,; Yakub Abdul…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1042 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 488
Section 7(4)(b) provides that an arbitration agreement can be culled out from an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunication which provide a G record of the agreement. Reading the provisions it can safely be concluded that an arbitration agreement even though in writing need not be signed …
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1041 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1489
c ORDER, 1. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner claiming the benefit of the provision under the Juvenile Justice (Care. and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter called, 'the D Act'). The petitioner claimed that he was born on 14th April, 1980 and that the incident occurred on 18th June, 1997. He, t…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1040 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1362
1364 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 13 S.C.R. A matter of investigation. The issue is sensitive not only because of loss of an invaluable human life but also because of the reasons which are sought to be attributed for the sordid affair. The circumstances which the petitioner has referred to in the writ petition and the …
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 104 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 955
956 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1 A given wide powers not only to enforce the rights but even to create new rights, with the underlying objective to achieve social justice - The said sweeping power conferred upon the Tribunal is not unbridled - It is, thus, this fine balancing which is required to be achieved…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1039 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 265
and Order dated 27-05.2008 of the F Securities Appellate Tribunal,…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1038 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 278
WITH C.A. No. 10909 of 2014. D G.S. Chaturvedi (for Surya Kant), Jagat Arora (for Rajiv Nanda) for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E J.S. KHEHAR, J. Civil Appeal No.10908 of 2014 1. The appellants were promoted from the Junior Management Grade Scale-I (hereinafter referred to as the F …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1037 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 305
Sudhir Kilshreshtha for the Appellant. D A. Mariarputham, Yusuf Khan (for Aruna Mathur) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E J.S.KHEHAR, J. 1. The appellant was inducted into the employment of the parent Human Resource Development Department, of the Government of Sikkim, as a Graduate Teache…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1036 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 255
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: The Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court erred in law in allowing the wage revision F benefits to the employees, who were not covered either under communication dated 8.8.2006 issued by the Government of India or the consequential Office Order dated 25.8.2006 whereby …
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1034 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 308
Chetan Chawla, T.A. Khan, B.V. Balramdas, Arvind Kumar Sharma for the Respondent. . F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by · ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 10 of the Special Court (Tri'al of Offences relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (for short "the Special C…
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1033 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 961
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 961 VASANT SAMPAT DUPARE A v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal Nos. 2486-2487 of 2014) NOVEMBER26, 2014 B [DIPAK MISRA, ROHINTON FALi NARIMAN AND UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss.302, 376(2)(f) - Rape and murder of 4 years old minor girl - Conviction based on c circumstantial evidence -…
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1032 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 853
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The function and powers of the Human Rights Commission are enumerated under Section 12 G of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. There is · nothing in Section 12 which authorises the Human Rights Commission to adjudicate upon the disputes of title and possession of prop…
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1030 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 175
F Vijay Hansaria, Rajeev B. Masodkar, Anil K. Jha for the Appellants. Shekhar Naphade, Anshuman Sinha, Naresh Kumar, G Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Shubhangi Tuli, Vatsalya Vigya for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J.1. This appeal is preferred againstH ~TA BABURAO MANE v. RAMACHANDRA…
Supreme Court of India14 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 103 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1063
P.P. Malhotra, ASG, P.K. Dey, Shadman Ali, B.V. Bairam Das for the Respondent. c The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Appellant is the accused in C.C. No. 205 of 1994 on the file of the Special Judge, Delhi. He was tried for offences D under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code (45…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2014] 1 S.C.R. 1078 A VIJAY KUMAR V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal No. 441 of 2009) FEBRUARY 18, 2014 B [T.S. THAKUR AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] PENAL CODE, 1860: c ss. 302 rlw 120-B, 460 and 382 - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction by courts below - Held: Witness has made material improvements while deposing in cou…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 106 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1069
P.P. Malhotra, ASG, Syed Tanweer Ahmad, Sonia Malhotra, Shreekant N. Terdal, Yasir Rauf for the Appellant. Pranab Kumar Mullick, Soma Mullick for the Respondent. F The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. This appeal has been filed by the Union of India G challenging the judgment and order of the Calcutt…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 105 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 990
BHASKAR LAL SHARMA & ANR. v. MONICA & ORS. 991 finally concluded by the trial court - Trial court directed to A ' complete trial expeditiously. s. 125 - Maintenance granted u/s. 125 by trial court - Writ petition u/Article 32 for service of notice on the husband (respondent)-and for payment of the arrears of maintenanc…
Supreme Court of India18 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1046 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 543
(2012) 9 SCC 446: 2012 (7) SCR 584; Shahzad Hasan Khan V. lshtiaq Hasan Khan and Anr. (1987) 2 sec 684: 1987 (3) SCR 34; State of Maharashtra V. Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao (1989) Supp (2) sec 605: 1989 (1) Suppl. SCR 315; G M. Jagan Mohan Rao v. P. V. Mohan Rao (2010) 15 SCC 491; Harjit Singh V. State of Punjab (2002…
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1045 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 868
SHASHIKALA DEVI v. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA 871 2.1. Pension is neither a bounty nor a matter of A grace but is a payment for past services rendered by the employee. If pension is not a bounty, but a right which the employee a…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1043 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 293
Ajay Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2010) 15 SCC 83; Jitendra Singh alias Babboo Singh and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2013) 11 SCC 193 - relied on. Hariram v. State State of Rajasthan (2009) 13 SCC 193; F Abuzar Hussain @ Guizar Hossain v. State of West Bengal 2012 (9) SCR 244:(2012) 10 SCC 489,; Yakub Abdul…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1042 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 488
Section 7(4)(b) provides that an arbitration agreement can be culled out from an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunication which provide a G record of the agreement. Reading the provisions it can safely be concluded that an arbitration agreement even though in writing need not be signed …
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1041 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1489
c ORDER, 1. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner claiming the benefit of the provision under the Juvenile Justice (Care. and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter called, 'the D Act'). The petitioner claimed that he was born on 14th April, 1980 and that the incident occurred on 18th June, 1997. He, t…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1040 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1362
1364 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 13 S.C.R. A matter of investigation. The issue is sensitive not only because of loss of an invaluable human life but also because of the reasons which are sought to be attributed for the sordid affair. The circumstances which the petitioner has referred to in the writ petition and the …
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 104 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 955
956 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1 A given wide powers not only to enforce the rights but even to create new rights, with the underlying objective to achieve social justice - The said sweeping power conferred upon the Tribunal is not unbridled - It is, thus, this fine balancing which is required to be achieved…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1039 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 265
and Order dated 27-05.2008 of the F Securities Appellate Tribunal,…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1038 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 278
WITH C.A. No. 10909 of 2014. D G.S. Chaturvedi (for Surya Kant), Jagat Arora (for Rajiv Nanda) for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E J.S. KHEHAR, J. Civil Appeal No.10908 of 2014 1. The appellants were promoted from the Junior Management Grade Scale-I (hereinafter referred to as the F …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1037 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 305
Sudhir Kilshreshtha for the Appellant. D A. Mariarputham, Yusuf Khan (for Aruna Mathur) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E J.S.KHEHAR, J. 1. The appellant was inducted into the employment of the parent Human Resource Development Department, of the Government of Sikkim, as a Graduate Teache…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1036 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 255
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: The Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court erred in law in allowing the wage revision F benefits to the employees, who were not covered either under communication dated 8.8.2006 issued by the Government of India or the consequential Office Order dated 25.8.2006 whereby …
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1034 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 308
Chetan Chawla, T.A. Khan, B.V. Balramdas, Arvind Kumar Sharma for the Respondent. . F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by · ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 10 of the Special Court (Tri'al of Offences relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (for short "the Special C…
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1033 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 961
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 961 VASANT SAMPAT DUPARE A v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal Nos. 2486-2487 of 2014) NOVEMBER26, 2014 B [DIPAK MISRA, ROHINTON FALi NARIMAN AND UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss.302, 376(2)(f) - Rape and murder of 4 years old minor girl - Conviction based on c circumstantial evidence -…
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1032 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 853
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The function and powers of the Human Rights Commission are enumerated under Section 12 G of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. There is · nothing in Section 12 which authorises the Human Rights Commission to adjudicate upon the disputes of title and possession of prop…
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1030 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 175
F Vijay Hansaria, Rajeev B. Masodkar, Anil K. Jha for the Appellants. Shekhar Naphade, Anshuman Sinha, Naresh Kumar, G Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Shubhangi Tuli, Vatsalya Vigya for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J.1. This appeal is preferred againstH ~TA BABURAO MANE v. RAMACHANDRA…
Supreme Court of India14 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 103 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1063
P.P. Malhotra, ASG, P.K. Dey, Shadman Ali, B.V. Bairam Das for the Respondent. c The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Appellant is the accused in C.C. No. 205 of 1994 on the file of the Special Judge, Delhi. He was tried for offences D under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code (45…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis