⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
921–940 · Page 47 of 500
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 137 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1392
The accused-appellant’s petition u/s.482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing of the FIR u/ss.366, 376 and 506 of Penal Code, 1860 was dismissed by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 136 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 252
Whether the appellants were entitled to regular pay scale in light of the circular dated 10.05.1984 issued by the State.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
921–940 · Page 47 of 500
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 137 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1392
The accused-appellant’s petition u/s.482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing of the FIR u/ss.366, 376 and 506 of Penal Code, 1860 was dismissed by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 136 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 252
Whether the appellants were entitled to regular pay scale in light of the circular dated 10.05.1984 issued by the State.
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 135 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1398
Issue arose as regards permanent alimony to be given by respondent-husband to appellant-wife, post-divorce.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 134 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1953
Issue arose whether on commencement of recruitment process on the date of advertisement, the private respondents or the appellants possessed the minimum qualification prescribed in the 2022 Recruitment Rules; whether the interim order and the impugned judgment passed by the High Court based on the concession of the Advocate General of the State, would amount to change of rules of the game after commencement of recruitment process; whether in terms of s.23(2) of RTE Act and para 10 of NCTE Guidelines dated 11.02.2011, how far the State Government can change the eligibility criteria and the impu
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 133 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1370
The Trial Court convicted the appellant for the offences punishable u/ss.304-B and 498-A of IPC; By the impugned judgment, the High Court has confirmed the conviction and sentence.
Supreme Court of India6 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1324 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 248
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant-South Delhi Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, thereby affirming the order passed by the District Judge granting deemed sanction to the plans put forward by the respondents for construction of a residential house.
Supreme Court of India17 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1322 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 221
Appellant-accused was convicted for the offence punishable u/s.302 IPC. The High Court further affirmed the order on sentence dated 20.02.2021, whereby the accused-appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 132 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1381
Whether the incident in question occurred at a place which can be termed to be a place within public view; whether the allegations in the FIR constitute an offence either under Section 3(1)(r) or under Section 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India14 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1318 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 206
Whether the judgment of Trial Court, as affirmed by the High Court, convicting the appellant for the charges u/s.302, IPC and s.25, Arms Act and the sentence as directed, is based on cogent material and evidence sufficient to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1314 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 189
Whether in respect of the goods purchased/services availed, the appellant would qualify as a “consumer” as defined in s.2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 131 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1265
Matter pertains to pollution caused by tanneries by discharging untreated or partially treated effluents into the River Palar and surrounding areas; and as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the writ petition against the order of the Loss of Ecology (Prevention and Payment of Compensation) Authority determining a total sum of Rs. 2,91,01,278 as payable to affected individuals/families by the polluters.
Supreme Court of India11 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1309 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 167
Issue arose whether the High Court was right in declining to reverse the appellate order of eviction obtained by the respondent-owner against the appellants-lessee on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent.
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1308 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 417
Bharat Drilling & Foundation Treatment Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand and Ors. (2009) 16 SCC 705, if requires to be referred to a larger bench for reconsideration and authoritative decision in order to obviate uncertainty and for clear declaration of law as regards applicability of prohibited claims in a contract.
Supreme Court of India11 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1308 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 152
Whether the present case meets the exacting threshold for the exercise of the curative jurisdiction of this Court and; whether two sets of outcomes of this Court can stand together when they rest on an identical evidentiary foundation; whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the curative petition ought to be allowed and the petitioner be acquitted of the charges u/ss.302, 364, 376 and 201, IPC.
Supreme Court of India11 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1307 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 540
Matter pertains to the execution of the compromise decree passed in a dispute as regards performance of religious rituals and the custody of idols and paraphernalia associated with the common deity Lord Sangalappa Swamy, worshipped by the two sects, the appellants and the respondents; and whether the respondents had in fact violated its terms as alleged by the appellants.
Supreme Court of India10 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1304 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 123
The High Court directed the appellant to appear before a Hospital for collection of blood samples for DNA profiling. Whether the High Court was justified in directing the appellant to undergo DNA testing.
Supreme Court of India10 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1300 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 531
Whether an order rejecting the plaint u/Or.VII r.11 of the CPC is appealable u/s.13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Supreme Court of India10 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1298 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 43
Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment whereby it allowed the appeals filed by the vendees and set aside the decree passed by the Trial Court, while granting the relief of specific performance of Agreement to Sell executed by the Original Vendors in favour of the Original Vendees and holding the Appellants-Subsequent Purchasers not to be the bona fide purchasers of the subject land for value without notice.
Supreme Court of India10 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1297 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 578
Issue arose whether the value of the duty paid bought out items delivered directly at the buyer’s site is liable to be included in the value of the boiler cleared by the assessee from its factory in completely knocked down (CKD) condition, for the assessment of the excise duty; and whether the show cause notice is legal and valid under the extended limitation period as provided under the proviso to s.11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1296 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 500
Matter pertains to sustainability of the order passed by the High Court in batch of writ petitions wherein the landholders questioned the legality of revenue annotations and mutation entries that described their lands as affected by forest proceedings and as having vested in the State.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 135 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1398
Issue arose as regards permanent alimony to be given by respondent-husband to appellant-wife, post-divorce.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 134 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1953
Issue arose whether on commencement of recruitment process on the date of advertisement, the private respondents or the appellants possessed the minimum qualification prescribed in the 2022 Recruitment Rules; whether the interim order and the impugned judgment passed by the High Court based on the concession of the Advocate General of the State, would amount to change of rules of the game after commencement of recruitment process; whether in terms of s.23(2) of RTE Act and para 10 of NCTE Guidelines dated 11.02.2011, how far the State Government can change the eligibility criteria and the impu
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 133 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1370
The Trial Court convicted the appellant for the offences punishable u/ss.304-B and 498-A of IPC; By the impugned judgment, the High Court has confirmed the conviction and sentence.
Supreme Court of India6 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1324 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 248
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant-South Delhi Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, thereby affirming the order passed by the District Judge granting deemed sanction to the plans put forward by the respondents for construction of a residential house.
Supreme Court of India17 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1322 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 221
Appellant-accused was convicted for the offence punishable u/s.302 IPC. The High Court further affirmed the order on sentence dated 20.02.2021, whereby the accused-appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 132 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1381
Whether the incident in question occurred at a place which can be termed to be a place within public view; whether the allegations in the FIR constitute an offence either under Section 3(1)(r) or under Section 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India14 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1318 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 206
Whether the judgment of Trial Court, as affirmed by the High Court, convicting the appellant for the charges u/s.302, IPC and s.25, Arms Act and the sentence as directed, is based on cogent material and evidence sufficient to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1314 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 189
Whether in respect of the goods purchased/services availed, the appellant would qualify as a “consumer” as defined in s.2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 131 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1265
Matter pertains to pollution caused by tanneries by discharging untreated or partially treated effluents into the River Palar and surrounding areas; and as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the writ petition against the order of the Loss of Ecology (Prevention and Payment of Compensation) Authority determining a total sum of Rs. 2,91,01,278 as payable to affected individuals/families by the polluters.
Supreme Court of India11 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1309 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 167
Issue arose whether the High Court was right in declining to reverse the appellate order of eviction obtained by the respondent-owner against the appellants-lessee on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent.
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1308 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 417
Bharat Drilling & Foundation Treatment Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand and Ors. (2009) 16 SCC 705, if requires to be referred to a larger bench for reconsideration and authoritative decision in order to obviate uncertainty and for clear declaration of law as regards applicability of prohibited claims in a contract.
Supreme Court of India11 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1308 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 152
Whether the present case meets the exacting threshold for the exercise of the curative jurisdiction of this Court and; whether two sets of outcomes of this Court can stand together when they rest on an identical evidentiary foundation; whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the curative petition ought to be allowed and the petitioner be acquitted of the charges u/ss.302, 364, 376 and 201, IPC.
Supreme Court of India11 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1307 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 540
Matter pertains to the execution of the compromise decree passed in a dispute as regards performance of religious rituals and the custody of idols and paraphernalia associated with the common deity Lord Sangalappa Swamy, worshipped by the two sects, the appellants and the respondents; and whether the respondents had in fact violated its terms as alleged by the appellants.
Supreme Court of India10 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1304 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 123
The High Court directed the appellant to appear before a Hospital for collection of blood samples for DNA profiling. Whether the High Court was justified in directing the appellant to undergo DNA testing.
Supreme Court of India10 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1300 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 531
Whether an order rejecting the plaint u/Or.VII r.11 of the CPC is appealable u/s.13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Supreme Court of India10 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1298 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 43
Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment whereby it allowed the appeals filed by the vendees and set aside the decree passed by the Trial Court, while granting the relief of specific performance of Agreement to Sell executed by the Original Vendors in favour of the Original Vendees and holding the Appellants-Subsequent Purchasers not to be the bona fide purchasers of the subject land for value without notice.
Supreme Court of India10 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1297 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 578
Issue arose whether the value of the duty paid bought out items delivered directly at the buyer’s site is liable to be included in the value of the boiler cleared by the assessee from its factory in completely knocked down (CKD) condition, for the assessment of the excise duty; and whether the show cause notice is legal and valid under the extended limitation period as provided under the proviso to s.11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1296 · [2025] 11 S.C.R. 500
Matter pertains to sustainability of the order passed by the High Court in batch of writ petitions wherein the landholders questioned the legality of revenue annotations and mutation entries that described their lands as affected by forest proceedings and as having vested in the State.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis