⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
9,181–9,200 · Page 460 of 500
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 762 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 463
Policy decision - Interference by courts, scope of. Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1. The High Court in the earlier judgment had issued the direction relating to carrying of census in a particular manner by adding certain facets though the lis 463 H 464 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014) 11 S.C.R. ,. A was absolutely…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 760 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1312
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
9,181–9,200 · Page 460 of 500
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 762 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 463
Policy decision - Interference by courts, scope of. Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1. The High Court in the earlier judgment had issued the direction relating to carrying of census in a particular manner by adding certain facets though the lis 463 H 464 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014) 11 S.C.R. ,. A was absolutely…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2014Full text
2014 INSC 760 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1312
Ranjit Kumar, SG, Ms. Sadhna Sandhu, Adv., (for B.V. F Balaram Das, Adv.) for the Appellants. Sumeer Kumar Shrivastava, Kumari Nanda Sinha, S.K. Verma, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G KURIAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2 Respondent, while working as Deputy Office Superintendent, Central…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 76 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 291
s. 94 - Secrecy of a ballot - Held: Is to be preserved in view of the statutory provision contained in s. 94 of the Act -Secrecy of ballot has always been treated as sacrosanct and indispensable adjunct of free and fair election - Such -principle G of secrecy is based on public policy aimed to ensure that voter may vot…
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 757 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 436
1994 (4) Suppl. SCR 295 relied on para 22 2003(1) SCR 21 relied on para 23 2010 (2) SCR 380 relied on para 24 G CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 1167 of 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 14.05.2010 of the High H 438 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014) 11 S.C.R. • A Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandig…
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 756 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 1146
NANO KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH 1149 High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal A No. 785 of 2001. WITH Crl.A. Nos. 900-902, 908, 909-910, 911, 912, 913 & 914 of 2012. B Dharam Bir Raj, Vohra, Yash Pal Dhingra, Binay Kr. Das for the Appellant. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Apoorv Kurup, V.C. Shukla, C C.D. …
Supreme Court of India30 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 754 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 85
G Prerna Singh, Gopal Singh, Rajiv Kumar, Kusum Chaudhary for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted.H BINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF BIHAR 87 [R. BANUMATHI, J.]• 2. Whether the charges under Section 406 IPC and the A criminal complaint for criminal breach of trust for al…
Supreme Court of India30 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 753 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 447
448 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 11 S.C.R. • A 1.2. In the instant case, the incident that took place around noon cannot be said to be a grave provocation that continued to provoke the appellant right through the day till 9.30 in the evening when the appellant shot the deceased, because the appellant had performed his …
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 752 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 456
456 ZARINASIDDIQUlv.A. RAMALINGAMALIAS 457 R. AMARNATHAN period the matter remained pending in different courts, order A passed by the trial court upheld and that of the High Court set aside, with the condition that the plaintiff would pay additional amount to the first defendant. Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD:…
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 751 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 120
122 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 13 S.C.R. A the agreement as contained in Section 16 of the Act. [Paras 30, 31][135-F-H; 136-A-B] 1.3 The basic requirement in relation to same cause of action is not made out as also the ingredients for claiming the reliefs is different, the defendants 8 (appellants) are not entitled t…
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 750 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 587
Dr. Sushi I Balwada for the Appellant. H MUNM@SYEDAKBAR v. STATE OF INSP. OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE 589 STATION, GOBICHETTIPALAYAM M. Yogesh Kanna, Vanita Chandrakant Giri, Santha A• Kumaran for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by FAK!<IR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, J. 1. This appeal at the inst…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 75 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 263
that they would be put to face the trial for the offence punishable under Section 292 IPC altern…
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 749 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 597
Gaurav Agrawal for the Appellant. D. Mahesh Babu, S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Krishan Kumar G Singh for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. 1. Nemo moriturus praesumitur mentire literally means no one at the point of death is presumed .to lie. H Nobody normally may lie and die for fear of me…
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 748 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 1202
Gurbux Singh vs. Bhooralal 1964 SCR 831 =AIR 1964 SC 1810 - followed.0 Kewal Singh vs. Lajwanti, 1980 (1) SCR 854 = (1980) 1 SCC 290; Deva Ram vs. lshwar Chand, 1995 (4) Suppl. SCR 369 = (1995) 6 SCC 733; Sidramappa vs. Rajashetty & Ors. 1970 (3) SCR 319 =AIR (1970) SC 1059; State of M.P. v. E State of Maharashtra & Or…
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 745 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 1119
[2014) 11 S.C.R. 1119• DARIUS RUTION KAVASMANECK A v. GHARDA CHEMICALS LIMITED & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014) OCTOBER 28, 2014 B [J. CHELAMESWAR AND A.K. SIKRI, JJ.] Companies Act, 1956 - ss. 3(1)(iii), 43A and 43A (1C), 43A (11) - Articles of Association - Article 57 - Pre-emption clause - Amendment made by …
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 743 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 428
Rakesh K. Sharma, Sanjay Kunur, R.N. Keshwani, S.N. Bhat for the Appellant. C Mahesh Srivastava, Vaibhav M. Srivastava, P.N. Puri, Murari Kumar, Yakesh Anand, Vijay Pratap Singh, Sanjeev Anand for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Whether or not New Manga…
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 742 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1082
The instant appeal arose out of the order. dated 4.8.1986 passed by ESI Corporation holding the F appellant-club as covered under the Employees' State . Insurance Act, 1948 and directing it to pay the required contribution in respect of its employees for the period 1.2.1980 to 31.8.1985. Dismissing the appeal, the Cour…
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 741 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1
A. Saran, Sr. Adv., Amit Kumar, Ms. Rekha Bakshi, Shaurya Sahay for the Petitioner. Tushar Mehta, ASG, A. K Srivastava, C. R. Singh, Shyam E Divan, Shirish H. Sanjanwala, Sr.Advs .. Braj Kishore Mishra, Ms. Aparna Jha, Abhishek Yadav, Ejaz Maqbool, Mrigank Prabhakar, GauraveAgrawal,A. L. Shah, R. Shaa, P. Soma Sundaram…
Supreme Court of India27 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 738 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1097
. C However, there is no need to give su.ch a restricted meaning, since the true purpose of an application for recovery is to proceed to the logical end of execution and recovery itself, that is by way of execution and distraint. Thus, s.22 clearly covers and interdicts such D an application for recovery made under the…
Supreme Court of India17 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 737 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 1100
KULDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND 1101 accused persons except the appellant and the said A judgment was affirmed by the High Court. There is no strong reason to agree with the judgment of conviction passed by the trial court and affirmed by the High Court as against the appellant. The judgment of conviction of the a…
Supreme Court of India17 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 736 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 1117
- s.482. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: F s. 482 - Exercise of power by High Court to quash criminal proceedings u/s 138 rlw s.141 of Negotiable Instrument Act against Directors of accused company -Principles culled out. G Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1. So far as Directors who are not signatories to …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Ranjit Kumar, SG, Ms. Sadhna Sandhu, Adv., (for B.V. F Balaram Das, Adv.) for the Appellants. Sumeer Kumar Shrivastava, Kumari Nanda Sinha, S.K. Verma, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G KURIAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2 Respondent, while working as Deputy Office Superintendent, Central…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 76 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 291
s. 94 - Secrecy of a ballot - Held: Is to be preserved in view of the statutory provision contained in s. 94 of the Act -Secrecy of ballot has always been treated as sacrosanct and indispensable adjunct of free and fair election - Such -principle G of secrecy is based on public policy aimed to ensure that voter may vot…
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 757 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 436
1994 (4) Suppl. SCR 295 relied on para 22 2003(1) SCR 21 relied on para 23 2010 (2) SCR 380 relied on para 24 G CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 1167 of 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 14.05.2010 of the High H 438 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014) 11 S.C.R. • A Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandig…
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 756 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 1146
NANO KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH 1149 High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal A No. 785 of 2001. WITH Crl.A. Nos. 900-902, 908, 909-910, 911, 912, 913 & 914 of 2012. B Dharam Bir Raj, Vohra, Yash Pal Dhingra, Binay Kr. Das for the Appellant. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Apoorv Kurup, V.C. Shukla, C C.D. …
Supreme Court of India30 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 754 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 85
G Prerna Singh, Gopal Singh, Rajiv Kumar, Kusum Chaudhary for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted.H BINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF BIHAR 87 [R. BANUMATHI, J.]• 2. Whether the charges under Section 406 IPC and the A criminal complaint for criminal breach of trust for al…
Supreme Court of India30 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 753 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 447
448 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 11 S.C.R. • A 1.2. In the instant case, the incident that took place around noon cannot be said to be a grave provocation that continued to provoke the appellant right through the day till 9.30 in the evening when the appellant shot the deceased, because the appellant had performed his …
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 752 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 456
456 ZARINASIDDIQUlv.A. RAMALINGAMALIAS 457 R. AMARNATHAN period the matter remained pending in different courts, order A passed by the trial court upheld and that of the High Court set aside, with the condition that the plaintiff would pay additional amount to the first defendant. Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD:…
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 751 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 120
122 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 13 S.C.R. A the agreement as contained in Section 16 of the Act. [Paras 30, 31][135-F-H; 136-A-B] 1.3 The basic requirement in relation to same cause of action is not made out as also the ingredients for claiming the reliefs is different, the defendants 8 (appellants) are not entitled t…
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 750 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 587
Dr. Sushi I Balwada for the Appellant. H MUNM@SYEDAKBAR v. STATE OF INSP. OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE 589 STATION, GOBICHETTIPALAYAM M. Yogesh Kanna, Vanita Chandrakant Giri, Santha A• Kumaran for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by FAK!<IR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, J. 1. This appeal at the inst…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 75 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 263
that they would be put to face the trial for the offence punishable under Section 292 IPC altern…
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 749 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 597
Gaurav Agrawal for the Appellant. D. Mahesh Babu, S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Krishan Kumar G Singh for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. 1. Nemo moriturus praesumitur mentire literally means no one at the point of death is presumed .to lie. H Nobody normally may lie and die for fear of me…
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 748 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 1202
Gurbux Singh vs. Bhooralal 1964 SCR 831 =AIR 1964 SC 1810 - followed.0 Kewal Singh vs. Lajwanti, 1980 (1) SCR 854 = (1980) 1 SCC 290; Deva Ram vs. lshwar Chand, 1995 (4) Suppl. SCR 369 = (1995) 6 SCC 733; Sidramappa vs. Rajashetty & Ors. 1970 (3) SCR 319 =AIR (1970) SC 1059; State of M.P. v. E State of Maharashtra & Or…
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 745 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 1119
[2014) 11 S.C.R. 1119• DARIUS RUTION KAVASMANECK A v. GHARDA CHEMICALS LIMITED & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014) OCTOBER 28, 2014 B [J. CHELAMESWAR AND A.K. SIKRI, JJ.] Companies Act, 1956 - ss. 3(1)(iii), 43A and 43A (1C), 43A (11) - Articles of Association - Article 57 - Pre-emption clause - Amendment made by …
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 743 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 428
Rakesh K. Sharma, Sanjay Kunur, R.N. Keshwani, S.N. Bhat for the Appellant. C Mahesh Srivastava, Vaibhav M. Srivastava, P.N. Puri, Murari Kumar, Yakesh Anand, Vijay Pratap Singh, Sanjeev Anand for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Whether or not New Manga…
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 742 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1082
The instant appeal arose out of the order. dated 4.8.1986 passed by ESI Corporation holding the F appellant-club as covered under the Employees' State . Insurance Act, 1948 and directing it to pay the required contribution in respect of its employees for the period 1.2.1980 to 31.8.1985. Dismissing the appeal, the Cour…
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 741 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1
A. Saran, Sr. Adv., Amit Kumar, Ms. Rekha Bakshi, Shaurya Sahay for the Petitioner. Tushar Mehta, ASG, A. K Srivastava, C. R. Singh, Shyam E Divan, Shirish H. Sanjanwala, Sr.Advs .. Braj Kishore Mishra, Ms. Aparna Jha, Abhishek Yadav, Ejaz Maqbool, Mrigank Prabhakar, GauraveAgrawal,A. L. Shah, R. Shaa, P. Soma Sundaram…
Supreme Court of India27 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 738 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1097
. C However, there is no need to give su.ch a restricted meaning, since the true purpose of an application for recovery is to proceed to the logical end of execution and recovery itself, that is by way of execution and distraint. Thus, s.22 clearly covers and interdicts such D an application for recovery made under the…
Supreme Court of India17 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 737 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 1100
KULDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND 1101 accused persons except the appellant and the said A judgment was affirmed by the High Court. There is no strong reason to agree with the judgment of conviction passed by the trial court and affirmed by the High Court as against the appellant. The judgment of conviction of the a…
Supreme Court of India17 Oct 2014Full text
2014 INSC 736 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 1117
- s.482. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: F s. 482 - Exercise of power by High Court to quash criminal proceedings u/s 138 rlw s.141 of Negotiable Instrument Act against Directors of accused company -Principles culled out. G Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1. So far as Directors who are not signatories to …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis