⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
881–900 · Page 45 of 500
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 160 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1
Whether the criminal proceedings against the appellant(s) under Sections 498A, 506, Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 155 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 476
Whether an offence u/s.276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 could be said to have been committed on the actual date of filing of return of income or on the day immediately after the due date for filing of returns as per s.139(1) of the Act; what is the meaning of the expression “first offence” appearing in Clause 8 of the Guidelines for Compounding of Offences under Direct Tax Laws, 2014; what amounts to voluntary disclosure for the purpose of Clause 8 of the 2014 Guidelines; whether the 2014 Guidelines are mandatory or directory in nature.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
881–900 · Page 45 of 500
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 160 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1
Whether the criminal proceedings against the appellant(s) under Sections 498A, 506, Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 155 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 476
Whether an offence u/s.276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 could be said to have been committed on the actual date of filing of return of income or on the day immediately after the due date for filing of returns as per s.139(1) of the Act; what is the meaning of the expression “first offence” appearing in Clause 8 of the Guidelines for Compounding of Offences under Direct Tax Laws, 2014; what amounts to voluntary disclosure for the purpose of Clause 8 of the 2014 Guidelines; whether the 2014 Guidelines are mandatory or directory in nature.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 154 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 521
Issue arose as regards the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission disallowing the insurance claim of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 153 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 619
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting bail to the accused in a case registered for offence punishable u/s.18 of the NDPS Act, and when subsequently he was involved in another case of the same nature.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 152 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 262
Issue arose as regards the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2003 repealing the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 particularly given that the 1976 Act had earlier been upheld by this Court; and whether u/s.68(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act read with r. 56 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, the state and regional transport authorities can lawfully delegate the power to grant contract carriage permits to the Secretary or whether such power must remain with the multi-member authorities due to its quasi
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 151 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1497
The appellant herein has sought to quash proceedings for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323, 504 and 506, Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(1)(r),3(1)(s), 3(2)(5a) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 150 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1691
In a case where the trial court relied upon the DNA report, whether the non-examination of the scientific experts involved in the process of conducting DNA profiling examination and issuing the report, led to the failure of justice vitiating the trial wherein the appellants were awarded capital punishment.
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 149 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 404
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was correct in setting aside the order of dismissal of the respondent.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 148 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1454
Whether the High Court committed any error in holding the appellant guilty of the offence of murder.
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 147 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 388
Whether on the strength of the evidence of the four witnesses, the appellant-accused can be linked with the offence; whether it can be said that the charge against the accused of committing murder of the deceased stood conclusively proved beyond all reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 146 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 376
Whether the judgment in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh & Ors. is applicable prospectively or extends retrospectively.
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 145 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 363
The appellants herein have preferred appeal against their conviction. Appellant-W was convicted by the Trial Court for offence punishable u/s.392 r/w. s.397 IPC and appellant-A was convicted u/s.392 r/w. s.397 IPC and s.25(1) of the Arms Act. Their appeals were dismissed by the impugned order of the High Court.
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 144 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1427
Whether the services of the appellant-workmen (gardeners) were terminated without complying with Sections 6E and 6N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Appellants, if entitled to reinstatement with back wages as also regularization of their services.
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 143 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 343
Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was justified in disposing of the consumer complaint filed by the respondents no. 1 and 2 thereby directing the appellant to deduct only 10% of the Basic Sale Price (BSP) towards cancellation of the complainants’ apartment and refund the balance amount along with simple interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of each payment till the date of refund.
Supreme Court of India12 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1425 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 498
Issue arose whether the High Court erred in law in holding that the appellants failed to prove the involvement of the alleged offending vehicle.
Supreme Court of India12 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1423 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 593
Issue arose whether the compassionate appointment of a family member on account of death of an employee in service, is as a matter of right; whether the dependent family member of a deceased employee, after being appointed on a post on compassionate basis, can later on seek appointment on a post higher; and whether a dependent family member of a deceased employee can seek compassionate appointment on a post higher than the post which the deceased was holding, on the ground of eligibility.
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 142 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 313
Matter pertains to extending the benefits for Persons with Benchmark Disabilities-PwBD candidates to all persons with disabilities-PwD candidates in writing their examinations.
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1417 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 488
This is an appeal challenging the judgment dated 27.06.2024 passed by the High Court, whereby the conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellant u/ss.8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) and 8(c) r/w 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) were affirmed.
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1415 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 505
Issue arose whether the Internal Complaints Committee-ICC constituted in one department of the Central Government has the jurisdiction to entertain a complaint of sexual harassment under the POSH Act against an employee of a different department of the Central Government; whether the use of the words ‘where the respondent is an employee’ as contained in s.11 of the POSH Act would mandate that ICC proceedings must be instituted and carried out at the workplace of the ‘respondent’ instead of the workplace of the aggrieved woman where incident occurred and complaint was made; and if not, under th
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1412 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 439
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant could be convicted for an offence lesser than one punishable u/s.302, Penal Code, 1860.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 154 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 521
Issue arose as regards the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission disallowing the insurance claim of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 153 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 619
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting bail to the accused in a case registered for offence punishable u/s.18 of the NDPS Act, and when subsequently he was involved in another case of the same nature.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 152 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 262
Issue arose as regards the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2003 repealing the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 particularly given that the 1976 Act had earlier been upheld by this Court; and whether u/s.68(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act read with r. 56 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, the state and regional transport authorities can lawfully delegate the power to grant contract carriage permits to the Secretary or whether such power must remain with the multi-member authorities due to its quasi
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 151 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1497
The appellant herein has sought to quash proceedings for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323, 504 and 506, Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(1)(r),3(1)(s), 3(2)(5a) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 150 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1691
In a case where the trial court relied upon the DNA report, whether the non-examination of the scientific experts involved in the process of conducting DNA profiling examination and issuing the report, led to the failure of justice vitiating the trial wherein the appellants were awarded capital punishment.
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 149 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 404
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was correct in setting aside the order of dismissal of the respondent.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 148 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1454
Whether the High Court committed any error in holding the appellant guilty of the offence of murder.
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 147 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 388
Whether on the strength of the evidence of the four witnesses, the appellant-accused can be linked with the offence; whether it can be said that the charge against the accused of committing murder of the deceased stood conclusively proved beyond all reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 146 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 376
Whether the judgment in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh & Ors. is applicable prospectively or extends retrospectively.
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 145 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 363
The appellants herein have preferred appeal against their conviction. Appellant-W was convicted by the Trial Court for offence punishable u/s.392 r/w. s.397 IPC and appellant-A was convicted u/s.392 r/w. s.397 IPC and s.25(1) of the Arms Act. Their appeals were dismissed by the impugned order of the High Court.
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 144 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1427
Whether the services of the appellant-workmen (gardeners) were terminated without complying with Sections 6E and 6N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Appellants, if entitled to reinstatement with back wages as also regularization of their services.
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 143 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 343
Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was justified in disposing of the consumer complaint filed by the respondents no. 1 and 2 thereby directing the appellant to deduct only 10% of the Basic Sale Price (BSP) towards cancellation of the complainants’ apartment and refund the balance amount along with simple interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of each payment till the date of refund.
Supreme Court of India12 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1425 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 498
Issue arose whether the High Court erred in law in holding that the appellants failed to prove the involvement of the alleged offending vehicle.
Supreme Court of India12 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1423 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 593
Issue arose whether the compassionate appointment of a family member on account of death of an employee in service, is as a matter of right; whether the dependent family member of a deceased employee, after being appointed on a post on compassionate basis, can later on seek appointment on a post higher; and whether a dependent family member of a deceased employee can seek compassionate appointment on a post higher than the post which the deceased was holding, on the ground of eligibility.
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 142 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 313
Matter pertains to extending the benefits for Persons with Benchmark Disabilities-PwBD candidates to all persons with disabilities-PwD candidates in writing their examinations.
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1417 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 488
This is an appeal challenging the judgment dated 27.06.2024 passed by the High Court, whereby the conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellant u/ss.8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) and 8(c) r/w 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) were affirmed.
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1415 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 505
Issue arose whether the Internal Complaints Committee-ICC constituted in one department of the Central Government has the jurisdiction to entertain a complaint of sexual harassment under the POSH Act against an employee of a different department of the Central Government; whether the use of the words ‘where the respondent is an employee’ as contained in s.11 of the POSH Act would mandate that ICC proceedings must be instituted and carried out at the workplace of the ‘respondent’ instead of the workplace of the aggrieved woman where incident occurred and complaint was made; and if not, under th
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2025Full text
2025 INSC 1412 · [2025] 12 S.C.R. 439
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant could be convicted for an offence lesser than one punishable u/s.302, Penal Code, 1860.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis