⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,881–8,900 · Page 445 of 500
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 191 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 361
M.O.Shamsudhin v. State of Kera/a 1995 (2) SCR 900:(1995) 3 SCC 351; State of Bihar v. Basawan Singh AIR 1958 SC 500:1959 SCR 195 - referred to. F Case Law Reference 1995 (2) SCR 900 referred to. Para 6 1959 SCR 195 referred to. Para 7 G CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 787 of 2011 From the Judgment…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 190 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 416
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,881–8,900 · Page 445 of 500
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 191 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 361
M.O.Shamsudhin v. State of Kera/a 1995 (2) SCR 900:(1995) 3 SCC 351; State of Bihar v. Basawan Singh AIR 1958 SC 500:1959 SCR 195 - referred to. F Case Law Reference 1995 (2) SCR 900 referred to. Para 6 1959 SCR 195 referred to. Para 7 G CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 787 of 2011 From the Judgment…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 190 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 416
[2015) 3 S.C.R. 416 A MD.ALl@GUDDU v. STATE OF U.P. B " (Criminal Appeal No. 2238 OF 2010) MARCH 10, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND N.V. RAMANA, JJ.] c Penal code, 1860-ss. 363, 366 and 376- Conviction under, by courts below- On appeal, held: The accused were convicted without proper appreciation of evidence - In view of the un…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 19 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 273
274 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A Act, proceedings before Company Court cannot be barred holding that the respondent-company waived the hypothecation by accepting the arbitral award - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Or. II r. 2 - Contract Act, 1872 -ss. 176 and 177. B Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 189 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 976
Anwar Ali v. State of U.P (2011) 15 SCC 360; Karlik Malhar v. State of Bihar 1995 (5) Suppl. SCR 239 : (1996) 1 SCC 614; Ashok Rai v. State of U.P. (2014) 5 SCC 713 G - referred to. 1.2 The circumstances of the case pointed out to the commission of the crime under Section 302 IPC. There is no doubt about the occurrence…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 188 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 990
- Amount of Rs. 10 lacs lying in Court be invested in the name of minor son represented by the respondent in any one of the Nationalized Bank as per the choice of the respondent till he attains majority - The respondent is G permitted to withdraw the periodical interest accrued thereon once in a year directly from the …
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 187 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 740
741 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 2 S.C.R. A Allowing tile appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The plaintiff's case was based on Patta No.1, which was not exhibited. According to the respondent-plaintiff, Exhibit A-21 which is a Land B Resettlement Register establishes the grant of the said Patta No.1 in favour of the plaintif…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 186 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 450
NAGARAJ v. STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 451 SALEM TOWN, T. N. - Both the prosecution and the High Court took the deposition A of the room boy to be trustworthy, ignoring the fact that the room boy as well as the Manager had access to the hotel room for three days before the body of the deceased was found - They h…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 185 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 794
Radiance Fincap (P) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. G 2015(1) SCALE 677; Arvind Bansalv. State of Haryana 2015 (3) SCALE 2.0(.\· Kamai/ Kaur v. State of Punjab (2015) 1JT377 - relied on. 794 H 795 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A Pune Municipal Corporation vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki 2014 (1) SCR 783:(2014) 3…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 184 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 365
- However, in the present case, the judgment of the High E Court shows that the questions arising in the reference had. specifically been answered- Therefore, the error was of form and not of su_bstance - The High Court was not at fault by reframing the initially referred twelve questions because the reframing did not …
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 182 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 351
352 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2015] 3 S.C.R. A Law- Promissory Estoppe/. Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. It is a settled principle of law that the service conditions of a State employee are governed by8 the Statutory Rules framed by the State from time to time. An employee is, therefore, entitled to enforce h…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 18 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 377
378 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 1 S.C.R. A a so-called legal principle, which turned out to be incorrect in law - He did not record his satisfaction by mentioning the role played by the appellants which would bring them within criminal net - Trial court issued summons on an erroneous presumption in law - Thus, order o…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 179 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 692
WITH E Civil Appeal Nos: 2586, 2587, 2588, 2589, 2590, 2591 and 2593 of 2015 Amrendra Sharan, Rachana Srivastava, Utkarsh Sharma, F Viresh B. Saharya, V. B. Saharya (For Saharya & Co.) for the Appellants. Ravinder Sethi, Rajeev Ghawana, Gautam Narayan, E. C. Agrawala for the Respondents. G The Judgment of the Court was…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 178 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 903
904 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A decision regarding the custody of the children. Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The principle of the comity of courts is essentially a principle of self-restraint, applicable when 8 a foreign court is seized of the issue of the custody of a child prior to the dome…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 177 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 829
Halsbury Laws of England, 3rd Edn. Vol. 32; Law of Receiver, 4th Edn. by James L. High - referred to. c CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 2475-2476 of 2015. From the Judgment and Order dated 14.01.2013 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Court Receiver's D Report No. 25 of 2007 and Additional Rep…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 176 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 955
. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar for the Appellant. ' ~ P. C. Sharma, Anchit Sharma, Sumit Kumar for the 8 Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Leave granted. c 2. This appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 27'h February, 2013 passed by the High Cour…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 175 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 961
Criminal law: Dying declaration - Concept Proof of its authenticity - Procedure to be followed when a person is brought to the hospital in serious injured C condition - Discussed. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The prosecution has 'shown' that Section 3048 stood attracted since the death of the D wife occur…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 171 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 882
[2015] 2 S.C.R. 882 A UNION OF INDIA & ORS. v. DILEEP KUMAR SINGH B (Civil Appeal Nos.2466-2467 of 2015) FEBRUARY 26, 2015 rr.s. THAKUR AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] c Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 -Proviso to s. 47 - Employee of Central Reserve Police …
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 170 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 860
Sushil Kumar Jain, Khushbu Jain (for Pratibha Jain) for the Appellant. G Ayesha Chawdhry, Musharraf Chawdhry, C. D. Singh for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H RAVINDRA v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 863 [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J.] PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J. 1. This appeal by A special leave arises …
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 17 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 16
SITIKANATHA MISHRA v. UNION OF INDIA 17 of the said regularization.- The appellant had to be taken A as having been regularized on the post of Professor with effect from 27th January, 1997. [para 12-13] [23-B-D] State of M.P. 'Vs. Sandhya Tomar 2012 (11) SCR 839 = 2013 (11) SCC 357, State of Rajasthan vs. S.N. Tiwari 2…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 169 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 722
H. L. GULATI v. UNION OF INDIA 723 appellant guilty of grave misconduct - However delinquency A established was of .negligence and not misconduct -Therefore finding that appellant was guilty of grave misconduct cannot be accepted - In the absence of conclusion of grave negligence, punishment order set aside - Jurisdict…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2015) 3 S.C.R. 416 A MD.ALl@GUDDU v. STATE OF U.P. B " (Criminal Appeal No. 2238 OF 2010) MARCH 10, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND N.V. RAMANA, JJ.] c Penal code, 1860-ss. 363, 366 and 376- Conviction under, by courts below- On appeal, held: The accused were convicted without proper appreciation of evidence - In view of the un…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 19 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 273
274 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A Act, proceedings before Company Court cannot be barred holding that the respondent-company waived the hypothecation by accepting the arbitral award - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Or. II r. 2 - Contract Act, 1872 -ss. 176 and 177. B Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 189 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 976
Anwar Ali v. State of U.P (2011) 15 SCC 360; Karlik Malhar v. State of Bihar 1995 (5) Suppl. SCR 239 : (1996) 1 SCC 614; Ashok Rai v. State of U.P. (2014) 5 SCC 713 G - referred to. 1.2 The circumstances of the case pointed out to the commission of the crime under Section 302 IPC. There is no doubt about the occurrence…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 188 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 990
- Amount of Rs. 10 lacs lying in Court be invested in the name of minor son represented by the respondent in any one of the Nationalized Bank as per the choice of the respondent till he attains majority - The respondent is G permitted to withdraw the periodical interest accrued thereon once in a year directly from the …
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 187 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 740
741 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 2 S.C.R. A Allowing tile appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The plaintiff's case was based on Patta No.1, which was not exhibited. According to the respondent-plaintiff, Exhibit A-21 which is a Land B Resettlement Register establishes the grant of the said Patta No.1 in favour of the plaintif…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 186 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 450
NAGARAJ v. STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 451 SALEM TOWN, T. N. - Both the prosecution and the High Court took the deposition A of the room boy to be trustworthy, ignoring the fact that the room boy as well as the Manager had access to the hotel room for three days before the body of the deceased was found - They h…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 185 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 794
Radiance Fincap (P) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. G 2015(1) SCALE 677; Arvind Bansalv. State of Haryana 2015 (3) SCALE 2.0(.\· Kamai/ Kaur v. State of Punjab (2015) 1JT377 - relied on. 794 H 795 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A Pune Municipal Corporation vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki 2014 (1) SCR 783:(2014) 3…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 184 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 365
- However, in the present case, the judgment of the High E Court shows that the questions arising in the reference had. specifically been answered- Therefore, the error was of form and not of su_bstance - The High Court was not at fault by reframing the initially referred twelve questions because the reframing did not …
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 182 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 351
352 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2015] 3 S.C.R. A Law- Promissory Estoppe/. Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. It is a settled principle of law that the service conditions of a State employee are governed by8 the Statutory Rules framed by the State from time to time. An employee is, therefore, entitled to enforce h…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 18 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 377
378 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 1 S.C.R. A a so-called legal principle, which turned out to be incorrect in law - He did not record his satisfaction by mentioning the role played by the appellants which would bring them within criminal net - Trial court issued summons on an erroneous presumption in law - Thus, order o…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 179 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 692
WITH E Civil Appeal Nos: 2586, 2587, 2588, 2589, 2590, 2591 and 2593 of 2015 Amrendra Sharan, Rachana Srivastava, Utkarsh Sharma, F Viresh B. Saharya, V. B. Saharya (For Saharya & Co.) for the Appellants. Ravinder Sethi, Rajeev Ghawana, Gautam Narayan, E. C. Agrawala for the Respondents. G The Judgment of the Court was…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 178 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 903
904 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A decision regarding the custody of the children. Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The principle of the comity of courts is essentially a principle of self-restraint, applicable when 8 a foreign court is seized of the issue of the custody of a child prior to the dome…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 177 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 829
Halsbury Laws of England, 3rd Edn. Vol. 32; Law of Receiver, 4th Edn. by James L. High - referred to. c CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 2475-2476 of 2015. From the Judgment and Order dated 14.01.2013 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Court Receiver's D Report No. 25 of 2007 and Additional Rep…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 176 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 955
. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar for the Appellant. ' ~ P. C. Sharma, Anchit Sharma, Sumit Kumar for the 8 Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Leave granted. c 2. This appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 27'h February, 2013 passed by the High Cour…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 175 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 961
Criminal law: Dying declaration - Concept Proof of its authenticity - Procedure to be followed when a person is brought to the hospital in serious injured C condition - Discussed. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The prosecution has 'shown' that Section 3048 stood attracted since the death of the D wife occur…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 171 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 882
[2015] 2 S.C.R. 882 A UNION OF INDIA & ORS. v. DILEEP KUMAR SINGH B (Civil Appeal Nos.2466-2467 of 2015) FEBRUARY 26, 2015 rr.s. THAKUR AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] c Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 -Proviso to s. 47 - Employee of Central Reserve Police …
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 170 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 860
Sushil Kumar Jain, Khushbu Jain (for Pratibha Jain) for the Appellant. G Ayesha Chawdhry, Musharraf Chawdhry, C. D. Singh for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H RAVINDRA v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 863 [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J.] PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J. 1. This appeal by A special leave arises …
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 17 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 16
SITIKANATHA MISHRA v. UNION OF INDIA 17 of the said regularization.- The appellant had to be taken A as having been regularized on the post of Professor with effect from 27th January, 1997. [para 12-13] [23-B-D] State of M.P. 'Vs. Sandhya Tomar 2012 (11) SCR 839 = 2013 (11) SCC 357, State of Rajasthan vs. S.N. Tiwari 2…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 169 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 722
H. L. GULATI v. UNION OF INDIA 723 appellant guilty of grave misconduct - However delinquency A established was of .negligence and not misconduct -Therefore finding that appellant was guilty of grave misconduct cannot be accepted - In the absence of conclusion of grave negligence, punishment order set aside - Jurisdict…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis