⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
841–860 · Page 43 of 500
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 215 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 128
Whether BRO-Border Road Organisation was justified in accepting the bid of Rs.1,569/-, and on the failure of the appellant-L1 bidder to execute the agreement asking for forfeiture vide encashment of bank guarantee of Rs.15,04,64,000/-.
Supreme Court of India14 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 214 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1876
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
841–860 · Page 43 of 500
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 215 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 128
Whether BRO-Border Road Organisation was justified in accepting the bid of Rs.1,569/-, and on the failure of the appellant-L1 bidder to execute the agreement asking for forfeiture vide encashment of bank guarantee of Rs.15,04,64,000/-.
Supreme Court of India14 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 214 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1876
Whether earlier decrees obtained by the appellant for permanent injunction foreclosed re-litigation of the dispute under the doctrine of res judicata and whether declaratory relief could be granted in favour of the State through a suit instituted by third parties, when the State had failed in earlier litigation.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 213 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 670
Whether the appellant is liable to pay stamp duty and penalty on the agreement to sell dated 03.09.2003 allegedly executed between the appellant and the mother of respondent no.1 in respect of the suit property.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 212 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1060
Issue arose whether the period of officiating service of the temporarily appointed Assistant Executive Engineers-AEEs between 1990-1992 including the appellants should be taken into account for considering their seniority over and above the 1997 batch of regularly appointed candidates through APPSC-private respondents.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 211 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1020
Whether the appointment of the Chancellor of the CMJ University was made with due adherence to the procedure, as mandated by law; whether the dissolution order dated 31st March, 2014 was passed with due adherence to the procedure provided under Section 48 of the CMJ University Act, 2009 and in compliance of the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 13th September, 2013 in SLP(C) No. 19617 of 2013 titled as “CMJ Foundation & Ors. v. State of Meghalaya and Ors.”; whether the Division Bench of the High Court of Meghalaya was justified in remanding the matter to the learned Single Judge
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 210 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 544
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting bail to the respondent without considering the rigours of s.45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 21 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 117
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the High Court refusing to quash the complaint, summoning order and order declaring the appellant a proclaimed offender passed by the Magistrate; whether the proclaimed offender status, under the provisions of the Cr.P.C., of an accused can subsist if such accused stands acquitted during trial in connection to the very same offence; and whether the subsistence of the proclamation u/s.82 Cr.P.C. necessary for the authorities to proceed against accused against whom such proclamation issued, u/s.174A IPC.
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 208 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 557
Matter pertains to imposition of penalty u/s.271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on undisclosed income in the specified previous year.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 207 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 998
Whether HUDCO was in breach of its reciprocal contractual obligations under the allotment letter dated 31.10.1994, and whether the appellant was entitled to refund of the forfeited amount in terms of cl.5(vi) of the allotment letter; further, whether Appellant entitled to discretionary relief of interest on refund of forfeited amount u/s.34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 203 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 534
Whether the High Court erred in finding that there were specific allegations in the FIR and Chargesheet even after dropping the charge of Section 376, IPC in order to maintain the criminal proceedings against the Appellants and thus, dismissing the quashing petition filed by them.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 202 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 622
Whether the initiation of criminal proceedings at the instance of respondent no.2 in the present case was totally activated by mala fide, instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance and with a view to spite the appellants.
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 201 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 574
Matter pertains to the challenge to the appointment of the third respondent as the Chairperson of the National Commission for Homeopathy on the ground of not fulfilling the requisite experience of working for ten years as a ‘leader’ in the area of health care.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 200 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1717
The role of advocates in taking up the responsibility of rendering assistance to both the court as well as the litigant, particularly those with limited means.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 20 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 105
Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the order of the Tribunal granting benefit of Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, to the Appellant-mother.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 2 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 239
Whether the application under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 could have been made by the Appellant-MCD, a “local authority” within the meaning of Section 2(41) of the Act.
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 199 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1861
Whether the amendment to s.8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act), introduced by the Finance Act, 2002, applies retrospectively to take away tax exemption benefits granted under the Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993 (PSI 1993). Whether the State Government was justified in taking away a right accured to the assessee-respondent on mere prospective amendment of s.8(5) without revoking the Entitlement Certificate dated 24.03.1998 without notice or opportunity of hearing.
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 198 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 65
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants for quashing the FIR under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. FIR against the appellants, if ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 197 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1569
Whether a spouse of a marriage declared as void under s.11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is entitled to claim permanent alimony and maintenance under u/s.25 of the Act; whether in a petition filed seeking a declaration under s.11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a spouse is entitled to seek maintenance pendente lite under u/s.24 of the Act.
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 194 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 48
Whether senior’s admonition can be attributed to mean an ‘intentional insult with the intent to provoke’ within the means of s.504, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 190 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1581
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting relief of suspension of sentence and bail to the respondent/accused pending an appeal against his conviction, under the 1985 Act.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Whether earlier decrees obtained by the appellant for permanent injunction foreclosed re-litigation of the dispute under the doctrine of res judicata and whether declaratory relief could be granted in favour of the State through a suit instituted by third parties, when the State had failed in earlier litigation.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 213 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 670
Whether the appellant is liable to pay stamp duty and penalty on the agreement to sell dated 03.09.2003 allegedly executed between the appellant and the mother of respondent no.1 in respect of the suit property.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 212 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1060
Issue arose whether the period of officiating service of the temporarily appointed Assistant Executive Engineers-AEEs between 1990-1992 including the appellants should be taken into account for considering their seniority over and above the 1997 batch of regularly appointed candidates through APPSC-private respondents.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 211 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1020
Whether the appointment of the Chancellor of the CMJ University was made with due adherence to the procedure, as mandated by law; whether the dissolution order dated 31st March, 2014 was passed with due adherence to the procedure provided under Section 48 of the CMJ University Act, 2009 and in compliance of the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 13th September, 2013 in SLP(C) No. 19617 of 2013 titled as “CMJ Foundation & Ors. v. State of Meghalaya and Ors.”; whether the Division Bench of the High Court of Meghalaya was justified in remanding the matter to the learned Single Judge
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 210 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 544
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting bail to the respondent without considering the rigours of s.45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 21 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 117
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the High Court refusing to quash the complaint, summoning order and order declaring the appellant a proclaimed offender passed by the Magistrate; whether the proclaimed offender status, under the provisions of the Cr.P.C., of an accused can subsist if such accused stands acquitted during trial in connection to the very same offence; and whether the subsistence of the proclamation u/s.82 Cr.P.C. necessary for the authorities to proceed against accused against whom such proclamation issued, u/s.174A IPC.
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 208 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 557
Matter pertains to imposition of penalty u/s.271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on undisclosed income in the specified previous year.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 207 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 998
Whether HUDCO was in breach of its reciprocal contractual obligations under the allotment letter dated 31.10.1994, and whether the appellant was entitled to refund of the forfeited amount in terms of cl.5(vi) of the allotment letter; further, whether Appellant entitled to discretionary relief of interest on refund of forfeited amount u/s.34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 203 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 534
Whether the High Court erred in finding that there were specific allegations in the FIR and Chargesheet even after dropping the charge of Section 376, IPC in order to maintain the criminal proceedings against the Appellants and thus, dismissing the quashing petition filed by them.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 202 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 622
Whether the initiation of criminal proceedings at the instance of respondent no.2 in the present case was totally activated by mala fide, instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance and with a view to spite the appellants.
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 201 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 574
Matter pertains to the challenge to the appointment of the third respondent as the Chairperson of the National Commission for Homeopathy on the ground of not fulfilling the requisite experience of working for ten years as a ‘leader’ in the area of health care.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 200 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1717
The role of advocates in taking up the responsibility of rendering assistance to both the court as well as the litigant, particularly those with limited means.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 20 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 105
Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the order of the Tribunal granting benefit of Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, to the Appellant-mother.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 2 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 239
Whether the application under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 could have been made by the Appellant-MCD, a “local authority” within the meaning of Section 2(41) of the Act.
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 199 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1861
Whether the amendment to s.8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act), introduced by the Finance Act, 2002, applies retrospectively to take away tax exemption benefits granted under the Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993 (PSI 1993). Whether the State Government was justified in taking away a right accured to the assessee-respondent on mere prospective amendment of s.8(5) without revoking the Entitlement Certificate dated 24.03.1998 without notice or opportunity of hearing.
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 198 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 65
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants for quashing the FIR under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. FIR against the appellants, if ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 197 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1569
Whether a spouse of a marriage declared as void under s.11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is entitled to claim permanent alimony and maintenance under u/s.25 of the Act; whether in a petition filed seeking a declaration under s.11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a spouse is entitled to seek maintenance pendente lite under u/s.24 of the Act.
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 194 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 48
Whether senior’s admonition can be attributed to mean an ‘intentional insult with the intent to provoke’ within the means of s.504, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 190 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1581
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting relief of suspension of sentence and bail to the respondent/accused pending an appeal against his conviction, under the 1985 Act.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis