⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,441–8,460 · Page 423 of 500
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 76 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 808
Allowing the appeal, the Court Held: 1. After insertion of clause 29-A in Article 366 H 808 STATE OF KARNATAKA v. PRO LAB & ORS. ETC. 809 of the Constitution of India, the Works Contract which A was indivisible one by legal fiction, altered into a contract, is permitted to be bifurcated into two: one for "sale of goods…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 759 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 961
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,441–8,460 · Page 423 of 500
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 76 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 808
Allowing the appeal, the Court Held: 1. After insertion of clause 29-A in Article 366 H 808 STATE OF KARNATAKA v. PRO LAB & ORS. ETC. 809 of the Constitution of India, the Works Contract which A was indivisible one by legal fiction, altered into a contract, is permitted to be bifurcated into two: one for "sale of goods…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 759 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 961
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: Indisputably, the appellant has been continuously serving as a teacher since 1989 and pursuant to the order passed in the earlier writ petition the appellant was paid entire salary from the date when H 961 962 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A the salary was not paid. The H…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 758 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 574
2. The plaintiff herself alongwith PW-2 were the witnesses who have testified in support of the claim of H 576 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A adoption of her husband. Specifically, PW-2 though had stated that the adoption of husband of plaintiff took place 40 years back she could not recollect her own age; sh…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 757 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1087
1087 1088 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A mentionE1d against the mutation entries - If the entry with regard to the land being held on behalf of the villagers as made in the mutation records are to be ignored, on account of the finclings recorded in the order of the revenue authority, which were approved in th…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 756 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 487
1.2 the multiple reasons for arriving at the said G . conclusion are as follows: (i) Historical perspective of the statutory scheme:The historical narration of the relevant provisions from time to time depict one common theme, H 487 488 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A namely, to provide rebate of duty paid on …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 755 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 849
V. V. S. Rao, Guntur Prabhakar, Ambati Srinivas, Vijayshree, G. Pramod Kumar for the Appellants. G. V. R. Choudary, K. Shivraj Choudhuri, A. Chandra Sekhar, P. S. Kumar for the Respondents. H 852 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 11 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by N. V. RAMANA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Th…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 754 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 285
- After about 5 years - Without challenging the same in F departmental. appeal - State took preliminary objection regarding de/ayl/aches in filing the petition - Single Judge of High Court without adverting to the preliminary objection, allowed the petition on the ground of non-compliance of s. 34 of Jammu and Kashmir …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 753 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 556
556 AVENUE SUPERMARTS PVT. LTD. v. NISCHINT BHALLA 557 R. Rathinave/ Chettiar and Another vs. V Sivaraman A and Others 1999 (2) SCR 313: (1999) 4 SCC 89; Sneh Gupta vs. Devi Sarup and Others 2009 (2) SCR 553:(2009) 6 SCC 194; Janatha Textiles and Others vs. Tax Recovery Officer and Another 2008 (8) SCR 1148: (2008) 12 …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 752 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 564
11. 7.1990 - Evidence recorded by Commissioner - No objection taken by Corporation regarding evidence recorded by Commissioner of those persons also who were not named in order dated 11. 7. 1990 ~ Tribunal awarded compensation E of Rs. 1.25 crores including a sum on account of Special damages in respect of medical expe…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 751 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 861
Shekhar Naphade, Parimal Shroff, Ankur Saigal, Mahesh Agarwal, E. C. Agrawala, R. N. Keshwani, Ram Lal Roy for the Respondents. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.K. AGRAWAL, J. 1. Leave granted 2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and E order dated 22.06.2010 passed by the Division Bench o…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 750 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 390
RAM BAHAL v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION 391 AZAMGARH in the Khasra/Khatauni - Further, appreciation or re- A appreciation of evidence must come to a halt at some stage of the judicial proceedings and cannot percolate to the constitutional court exercising, jurisdiction under Article 136 """. Constitution of India…
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 748 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 570
570 M/S. STAR:~ 'fiJSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER OF 571 CUSTOM::> tiMPORTS), RAIGAD ores into concentrates would amount to 'manufacture'. A Therefore, it cannot now he argued that roasting of ores and converting the same into concentrates would not be manufacture. With the addition of Note 4, a legal friction is created trea…
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 745 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 697
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The view of the High Court that the Deed of Conveyance is founded on the Act and, therefore, G contractual rights would not be the only determinative elements in the dispute is concurred with. The High ·Court's opinion that the principles of natural justice are an "inalienable p…
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 742 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 259
Escorts JCB Ltd. v. CCE (2003) 1 SCC 281; Prabhat Zarda Factory Ltd. v. Commissioner of G Central Excise 2002 (146) ELT 497 (S.C.); Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd. (1984) 1 SCC 467; and VIP Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs & Centre/ Excise (2003) 5 sec 507 - relied on. H COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS AN…
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 741 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 851
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: No doubt, the paper in-question was meant for wrapping and this end use remained the same even G after printing. However, whereas blank paper could be used as wrapper for any kind of product, after the printing of logo and name of the specific product of Parle thereupon, the end use…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 738 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 218
PURNIMA MANTHENA v. DR. RENUKADATLA 219 on merits, after a complete adjudication - No final A determination on merits was warranted as it has the effect of pre judging disputed questions pending before the CLB. s. 1OF - Role of appellate forum under - Held: While the language applied ins. 1OF evinces that all orders, w…
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 737 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 439
(3) to s. 378 can be granted or not - High Court failed to exercise its appellate jurisdiction properly in the appeal filed by the appellant against the a<Jquittal order - Thus, order F passed by the High Court set aside. Allowing the appeal, the Court · HELD: 1.1 The appellant, being the father of the G deceased, has …
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 735 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 604
E Jay Kish or Singh for the Appellants. Manan Kumar Mishra, Anjul Dwivedi, Anjani Kumar Mishra forthe Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by F PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 22.01.2014, passed by the High Court of Punjab and. Haryana in Regular Second A…
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 731 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 435
435 436 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A scale upon the amalgamation of the erstwhile Bank with the respondent Bank. [Para 23] [444-C] 2. There is no allegation by the appellant that he was either reduced in rank or that his placement was B incorrect or any similar grievance. That being the position, the appell…
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 73 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1044
WITH 8 C.A. Nos. 1310 of 2006 and C. A. Nos. 1318 and 1319 of2015 • Rakesh Uttamchandra Upadhyay, Amar Deep Sharma for the Appellants. c S. K. Dubey, Pramod Kr. Sharma, K. V. Mohan, M. Datta, Angad Mehta, Arun Cathpalia, D. Bharat Kumar, Pr_a~eep Kumar Bakshi, Sayooj Mohandas M., Mohd. lrshadHanif, M:. Z. Chaudhary,Aft…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: Indisputably, the appellant has been continuously serving as a teacher since 1989 and pursuant to the order passed in the earlier writ petition the appellant was paid entire salary from the date when H 961 962 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A the salary was not paid. The H…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 758 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 574
2. The plaintiff herself alongwith PW-2 were the witnesses who have testified in support of the claim of H 576 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A adoption of her husband. Specifically, PW-2 though had stated that the adoption of husband of plaintiff took place 40 years back she could not recollect her own age; sh…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 757 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1087
1087 1088 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A mentionE1d against the mutation entries - If the entry with regard to the land being held on behalf of the villagers as made in the mutation records are to be ignored, on account of the finclings recorded in the order of the revenue authority, which were approved in th…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 756 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 487
1.2 the multiple reasons for arriving at the said G . conclusion are as follows: (i) Historical perspective of the statutory scheme:The historical narration of the relevant provisions from time to time depict one common theme, H 487 488 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A namely, to provide rebate of duty paid on …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 755 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 849
V. V. S. Rao, Guntur Prabhakar, Ambati Srinivas, Vijayshree, G. Pramod Kumar for the Appellants. G. V. R. Choudary, K. Shivraj Choudhuri, A. Chandra Sekhar, P. S. Kumar for the Respondents. H 852 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 11 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by N. V. RAMANA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Th…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 754 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 285
- After about 5 years - Without challenging the same in F departmental. appeal - State took preliminary objection regarding de/ayl/aches in filing the petition - Single Judge of High Court without adverting to the preliminary objection, allowed the petition on the ground of non-compliance of s. 34 of Jammu and Kashmir …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 753 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 556
556 AVENUE SUPERMARTS PVT. LTD. v. NISCHINT BHALLA 557 R. Rathinave/ Chettiar and Another vs. V Sivaraman A and Others 1999 (2) SCR 313: (1999) 4 SCC 89; Sneh Gupta vs. Devi Sarup and Others 2009 (2) SCR 553:(2009) 6 SCC 194; Janatha Textiles and Others vs. Tax Recovery Officer and Another 2008 (8) SCR 1148: (2008) 12 …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 752 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 564
11. 7.1990 - Evidence recorded by Commissioner - No objection taken by Corporation regarding evidence recorded by Commissioner of those persons also who were not named in order dated 11. 7. 1990 ~ Tribunal awarded compensation E of Rs. 1.25 crores including a sum on account of Special damages in respect of medical expe…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 751 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 861
Shekhar Naphade, Parimal Shroff, Ankur Saigal, Mahesh Agarwal, E. C. Agrawala, R. N. Keshwani, Ram Lal Roy for the Respondents. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.K. AGRAWAL, J. 1. Leave granted 2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and E order dated 22.06.2010 passed by the Division Bench o…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 750 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 390
RAM BAHAL v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION 391 AZAMGARH in the Khasra/Khatauni - Further, appreciation or re- A appreciation of evidence must come to a halt at some stage of the judicial proceedings and cannot percolate to the constitutional court exercising, jurisdiction under Article 136 """. Constitution of India…
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 748 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 570
570 M/S. STAR:~ 'fiJSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER OF 571 CUSTOM::> tiMPORTS), RAIGAD ores into concentrates would amount to 'manufacture'. A Therefore, it cannot now he argued that roasting of ores and converting the same into concentrates would not be manufacture. With the addition of Note 4, a legal friction is created trea…
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 745 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 697
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The view of the High Court that the Deed of Conveyance is founded on the Act and, therefore, G contractual rights would not be the only determinative elements in the dispute is concurred with. The High ·Court's opinion that the principles of natural justice are an "inalienable p…
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 742 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 259
Escorts JCB Ltd. v. CCE (2003) 1 SCC 281; Prabhat Zarda Factory Ltd. v. Commissioner of G Central Excise 2002 (146) ELT 497 (S.C.); Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd. (1984) 1 SCC 467; and VIP Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs & Centre/ Excise (2003) 5 sec 507 - relied on. H COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS AN…
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 741 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 851
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: No doubt, the paper in-question was meant for wrapping and this end use remained the same even G after printing. However, whereas blank paper could be used as wrapper for any kind of product, after the printing of logo and name of the specific product of Parle thereupon, the end use…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 738 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 218
PURNIMA MANTHENA v. DR. RENUKADATLA 219 on merits, after a complete adjudication - No final A determination on merits was warranted as it has the effect of pre judging disputed questions pending before the CLB. s. 1OF - Role of appellate forum under - Held: While the language applied ins. 1OF evinces that all orders, w…
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 737 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 439
(3) to s. 378 can be granted or not - High Court failed to exercise its appellate jurisdiction properly in the appeal filed by the appellant against the a<Jquittal order - Thus, order F passed by the High Court set aside. Allowing the appeal, the Court · HELD: 1.1 The appellant, being the father of the G deceased, has …
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 735 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 604
E Jay Kish or Singh for the Appellants. Manan Kumar Mishra, Anjul Dwivedi, Anjani Kumar Mishra forthe Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by F PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 22.01.2014, passed by the High Court of Punjab and. Haryana in Regular Second A…
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 731 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 435
435 436 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A scale upon the amalgamation of the erstwhile Bank with the respondent Bank. [Para 23] [444-C] 2. There is no allegation by the appellant that he was either reduced in rank or that his placement was B incorrect or any similar grievance. That being the position, the appell…
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 73 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1044
WITH 8 C.A. Nos. 1310 of 2006 and C. A. Nos. 1318 and 1319 of2015 • Rakesh Uttamchandra Upadhyay, Amar Deep Sharma for the Appellants. c S. K. Dubey, Pramod Kr. Sharma, K. V. Mohan, M. Datta, Angad Mehta, Arun Cathpalia, D. Bharat Kumar, Pr_a~eep Kumar Bakshi, Sayooj Mohandas M., Mohd. lrshadHanif, M:. Z. Chaudhary,Aft…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis