⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,181–8,200 · Page 410 of 500
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1092 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 741
convict a personH GURCHARAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB 743 under Section 306 IPC, there has to be a clear mens rea to commit ·A an offence and that there ought to be an active or direct act leading the deceased to commit suicide, being left with no option. The assessment of the evidence on record does not demonstrate any…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1090 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 139
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,181–8,200 · Page 410 of 500
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1092 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 741
convict a personH GURCHARAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB 743 under Section 306 IPC, there has to be a clear mens rea to commit ·A an offence and that there ought to be an active or direct act leading the deceased to commit suicide, being left with no option. The assessment of the evidence on record does not demonstrate any…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1090 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 139
GURPAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB 141 Yatinder Singh, Sr. Adv.( AC), Arijeet Singh, Ms. Apraj ita A Anvita, Ad vs. for the Appellant. SaurabhAjay Gupta, AAG., Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Saurabh Singhal, Nishant Bishnoi, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B AMITAVA ROY, J. 1. The subject matter o…
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 109 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 447
[2016] I S.C.R. 44 7 SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER & ORS. A v. S.C.R. CArERERS, DRY FRUITS, FRUIT JUICE STALLS WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR. (Civil Appeal Nos. 618-620of2016) B JANUARY 29, 2016 (V. GO PALA GOWDA AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.) Licence - Renewal of- Under Catering Policy, 2010 of Indian Railways - To the pre-…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1089 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 101
HELD: 1.1 In the instant case, while respondent company was the acquirer, UBL was the person acting in concert. This is evident from the letter of offer (public announcement) dated 15'h February, 2005. The embargo under Regulation 22(7) of the G Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares …
Supreme Court of India1 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1087 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 99
DW-5/4; Courts below held that Mark A clearly shows that the same related to property bearing Khasra No. 267 and in that way the same can not be connected to the suit land. Based on oral H 99 100 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 11 S.C.R. A and documentary evidence, the courts below have recorded concurrent findings of fac…
Supreme Court of India1 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1086 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 759
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The prosecution heavily relied upon the Gconfessional statement of PW3 (the accomplice) which was given soon after his arrest. It had also come on record that PW3 became approver. Though the manne.r in which he became approver was challenged before the Trial Court as well as t…
Supreme Court of India1 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1085 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 742
744 ·SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 9 S.C.R. A of Madhya Pradesh;-Bench at Gwalior, in Second Appeal No .. 374.of 1998. ., . ,., •. , . . . . .. l Pune~t Jain; Manu M'atieshwari, Ms. Chhay~ Kirti, Abhinav Gupta I and Ms. Pratibha, Advs. for the appellants. Raj esh, A.dv. for the· respo1ident: · ·.. B ''-··-···,•,.--.: -~…
Supreme Court of India30 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1084 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 557
558 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 8 S.C.R. A examination leaves a margin of about two years on either side even if ossification test of multiple joints is conducted. [Para 10) [563-A-B) 1.2 From a reading of Section 49 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, it is clear that it B provides th…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1083 · [2016] 12 S.C.R. 131
Constitution of India - Constitutional Scheme - Principle of separation of powers - Discussed. Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1.1 In the present case, the High Court could not have issued such directions some of which were in the field of exclusive domain of the Legislature. [Para 10] [139-F] 1.2 The High Court…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1079 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 897
WITH D C. A. Nos. 10832, 10833, 10834, 10835, 10836, 10838, 10839, · 10840, 10843, 10844, 10845, 10846, 10847, 10848, 10849, 10850of2016. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Dev Prakash Bhardwaj, Advs. for the Appellants. R. Balasubramaniam, Ananya Mishra, Santosh Kumar, Ms. Aarti E Sharma, Shadman Ali, G. Ramakrishna Prasad, M. K. M…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1078 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 729
WITH F Civil Appeal No. 11827of2016. P. S. Narasimha,ASG, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Mahabir Singh, Ravinder Sethi, Amrender Saran, Anoop Baghi, Jitendra Mohan Sharma, P.P. Malhotra, A. K. Sanghi, Sr. Advs., Praneet Pranav, Ms. Binu Tamta, G Shadman Ali, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Vibhu Shanker Mishra, R. S. Nagar, Raj Bahadur Yadav,…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1076 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 227
SAHA AND ANOTHER proceedings into the report given by the Committee cannot be A treated as 'judicial proceedings'. It cannot be said that the departmental proceedings, which were initiated against the delinquent doctors and in which five of the appellants constituted Inquiry Committee, evidence could be or would have b…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1075 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 373
[2016] 9 S.C.R. 373 RAVINDRA RAMCHANDRA WAGHMARE A v. INDORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 11307 of2016) NOVEMBER 29, 2016 B [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND ARUN MISHRA, JJ.] Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956: s.305 - Rapid Transport System - BRTS corridor scheme for improvement of public transp…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1074 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 813
- High Court overlooked the facts that the Firm was held to be the tenant whereas defendant no.J was Firm's employee; and that defendant no.l was held to be in possession of the suit house as F 'trespasser' and not as 'tenant' - Thus, order of the High Court set aside and that of the first appellate court restored. All…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1073 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 719
Allowing the appeals, the Court F HELD: 1.1 Though by virtue of Section 116 of the Evidence Act, 1872, the tenant is estopped from challenging the title of his landlord during continuance of the tenancy, yet the tenant/lessee is entitled to challenge the derivative title of an Assignee/Vendee of the original landlord (…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1072 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 459
State of Tamil Nadu v. RamalinKa SamiK(ll Madam, 1985 (1) Suppl. SCR63 : (1985) 4 SCC J - relied on. 4. It is also not correct to say that the claim raised by the appellant was barred by limitation. It was never in dispute between G the parties, that the appellant was in possession of the land. Only that, respondent No…
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1070 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 790
4. In the fact situation that developed in quick succession, there was as such no pre-meditation or prior concert on the part of the accused persons to commit murder. The incident happened on the spur of the moment and in an uncontrollable, embittered and agitated state of enragement, thus depriving the accused H 792 S…
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 107 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 419
.[2016] 11S.C.R.419 MIS MADRAS PETROCHEM LTD. & ANR A v. • BIFR& ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 614-615 of2016) B JANUARY 29, 2016 (KURIAN JOSEPH AND R.F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) - ss. 13, 35, 37 and 41 - Sick Industrial …
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1067 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 781
[2016] 7 S.C.R. 781 DILBAGH SINGH A v. STATE OF PUNJAB (Criminal Appeal No. 1096 of 2016) B NOVEMBER 28, 2016 [DIPAK MISRA AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, I985: ss.50, 57 - Applicability of - Recovery of six bags of poppy husk from car - Conviction by courts below - Plea of non-com…
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1066 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 953
[2016) 9 S.C.R. 953 MOHD. HASHIM A v. STATE OF UP & ORS. (Criminal Apneal No. 1218of2016) NOVEMBER 28, 2016 [DIPAK MISRA AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.] Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - s.4 - Powers of Court to release certain offenders on probation of good conduct - Extension of such benefit, only when offences under which co…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
GURPAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB 141 Yatinder Singh, Sr. Adv.( AC), Arijeet Singh, Ms. Apraj ita A Anvita, Ad vs. for the Appellant. SaurabhAjay Gupta, AAG., Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Saurabh Singhal, Nishant Bishnoi, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B AMITAVA ROY, J. 1. The subject matter o…
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 109 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 447
[2016] I S.C.R. 44 7 SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER & ORS. A v. S.C.R. CArERERS, DRY FRUITS, FRUIT JUICE STALLS WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR. (Civil Appeal Nos. 618-620of2016) B JANUARY 29, 2016 (V. GO PALA GOWDA AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.) Licence - Renewal of- Under Catering Policy, 2010 of Indian Railways - To the pre-…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1089 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 101
HELD: 1.1 In the instant case, while respondent company was the acquirer, UBL was the person acting in concert. This is evident from the letter of offer (public announcement) dated 15'h February, 2005. The embargo under Regulation 22(7) of the G Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares …
Supreme Court of India1 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1087 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 99
DW-5/4; Courts below held that Mark A clearly shows that the same related to property bearing Khasra No. 267 and in that way the same can not be connected to the suit land. Based on oral H 99 100 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 11 S.C.R. A and documentary evidence, the courts below have recorded concurrent findings of fac…
Supreme Court of India1 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1086 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 759
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The prosecution heavily relied upon the Gconfessional statement of PW3 (the accomplice) which was given soon after his arrest. It had also come on record that PW3 became approver. Though the manne.r in which he became approver was challenged before the Trial Court as well as t…
Supreme Court of India1 Dec 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1085 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 742
744 ·SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 9 S.C.R. A of Madhya Pradesh;-Bench at Gwalior, in Second Appeal No .. 374.of 1998. ., . ,., •. , . . . . .. l Pune~t Jain; Manu M'atieshwari, Ms. Chhay~ Kirti, Abhinav Gupta I and Ms. Pratibha, Advs. for the appellants. Raj esh, A.dv. for the· respo1ident: · ·.. B ''-··-···,•,.--.: -~…
Supreme Court of India30 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1084 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 557
558 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 8 S.C.R. A examination leaves a margin of about two years on either side even if ossification test of multiple joints is conducted. [Para 10) [563-A-B) 1.2 From a reading of Section 49 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, it is clear that it B provides th…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1083 · [2016] 12 S.C.R. 131
Constitution of India - Constitutional Scheme - Principle of separation of powers - Discussed. Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1.1 In the present case, the High Court could not have issued such directions some of which were in the field of exclusive domain of the Legislature. [Para 10] [139-F] 1.2 The High Court…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1079 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 897
WITH D C. A. Nos. 10832, 10833, 10834, 10835, 10836, 10838, 10839, · 10840, 10843, 10844, 10845, 10846, 10847, 10848, 10849, 10850of2016. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Dev Prakash Bhardwaj, Advs. for the Appellants. R. Balasubramaniam, Ananya Mishra, Santosh Kumar, Ms. Aarti E Sharma, Shadman Ali, G. Ramakrishna Prasad, M. K. M…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1078 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 729
WITH F Civil Appeal No. 11827of2016. P. S. Narasimha,ASG, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Mahabir Singh, Ravinder Sethi, Amrender Saran, Anoop Baghi, Jitendra Mohan Sharma, P.P. Malhotra, A. K. Sanghi, Sr. Advs., Praneet Pranav, Ms. Binu Tamta, G Shadman Ali, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Vibhu Shanker Mishra, R. S. Nagar, Raj Bahadur Yadav,…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1076 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 227
SAHA AND ANOTHER proceedings into the report given by the Committee cannot be A treated as 'judicial proceedings'. It cannot be said that the departmental proceedings, which were initiated against the delinquent doctors and in which five of the appellants constituted Inquiry Committee, evidence could be or would have b…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1075 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 373
[2016] 9 S.C.R. 373 RAVINDRA RAMCHANDRA WAGHMARE A v. INDORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 11307 of2016) NOVEMBER 29, 2016 B [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND ARUN MISHRA, JJ.] Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956: s.305 - Rapid Transport System - BRTS corridor scheme for improvement of public transp…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1074 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 813
- High Court overlooked the facts that the Firm was held to be the tenant whereas defendant no.J was Firm's employee; and that defendant no.l was held to be in possession of the suit house as F 'trespasser' and not as 'tenant' - Thus, order of the High Court set aside and that of the first appellate court restored. All…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1073 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 719
Allowing the appeals, the Court F HELD: 1.1 Though by virtue of Section 116 of the Evidence Act, 1872, the tenant is estopped from challenging the title of his landlord during continuance of the tenancy, yet the tenant/lessee is entitled to challenge the derivative title of an Assignee/Vendee of the original landlord (…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1072 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 459
State of Tamil Nadu v. RamalinKa SamiK(ll Madam, 1985 (1) Suppl. SCR63 : (1985) 4 SCC J - relied on. 4. It is also not correct to say that the claim raised by the appellant was barred by limitation. It was never in dispute between G the parties, that the appellant was in possession of the land. Only that, respondent No…
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1070 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 790
4. In the fact situation that developed in quick succession, there was as such no pre-meditation or prior concert on the part of the accused persons to commit murder. The incident happened on the spur of the moment and in an uncontrollable, embittered and agitated state of enragement, thus depriving the accused H 792 S…
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 107 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 419
.[2016] 11S.C.R.419 MIS MADRAS PETROCHEM LTD. & ANR A v. • BIFR& ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 614-615 of2016) B JANUARY 29, 2016 (KURIAN JOSEPH AND R.F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) - ss. 13, 35, 37 and 41 - Sick Industrial …
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1067 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 781
[2016] 7 S.C.R. 781 DILBAGH SINGH A v. STATE OF PUNJAB (Criminal Appeal No. 1096 of 2016) B NOVEMBER 28, 2016 [DIPAK MISRA AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, I985: ss.50, 57 - Applicability of - Recovery of six bags of poppy husk from car - Conviction by courts below - Plea of non-com…
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1066 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 953
[2016) 9 S.C.R. 953 MOHD. HASHIM A v. STATE OF UP & ORS. (Criminal Apneal No. 1218of2016) NOVEMBER 28, 2016 [DIPAK MISRA AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.] Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - s.4 - Powers of Court to release certain offenders on probation of good conduct - Extension of such benefit, only when offences under which co…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis