⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
801–820 · Page 41 of 500
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 267 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 918
Whether, in light of the facts and circumstances of this case and the position of law apropos to the sanction for prosecution, the High Court ought to have exercised its powers u/s.482 of the CrPC to quash the charge-sheet and the summoning with respect to the appellant herein.
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 266 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 708
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
801–820 · Page 41 of 500
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 267 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 918
Whether, in light of the facts and circumstances of this case and the position of law apropos to the sanction for prosecution, the High Court ought to have exercised its powers u/s.482 of the CrPC to quash the charge-sheet and the summoning with respect to the appellant herein.
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 266 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 708
Issue arose as regards the sustainability of the conviction of the accused u/s.120B and 411 IPC, when the seized gold bars are not the same gold bars linked to the fraudulent transactions.
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 265 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1206
Whether the reservation of the plot of land lapsed under Sections 49, 126 and 127 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1967 due to the failure of the authorities to acquire it within the statutory timeframe, thereby entitling the appellants to use the land as permissible under law.
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 264 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2130
(1) Whether the instant writ petition is maintainable in view of Article 212 (1) of the Constitution of India and whether the proceedings of the ethics committee are amenable to judicial review? (2) Whether this court can review the proportionality of the punishment imposed by the house in exercise of its writ jurisdiction? (3) If so, whether the petitioner’s expulsion is disproportionate to the misconduct attributed to him and whether it merits any interference? (4) If so, whether this court is empowered to determine the quantum of punishment that may be imposed on the petitioner?
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 263 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1174
Trial court convicted the appellants under Sections 302 and 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. High Court altered the conviction to Section 304 Part II, IPC. Whether the identity of the appellants as accused was established. Appellants, if entitled to acquittal.
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 262 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1178
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellants would be entitled to claim interest on delayed stamp duty refund, in the absence of a provision in the statute to that effect.
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 261 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 836
Does the Evidence Act, 1872 prescribe any particular age as a determinative factor to treat a witness to be a competent witness; Does the Evidence Act treat evidence of a child on the same footing as any other witness; Before the evidence of the child witness is recorded, is it necessary for the Trial Court to record its opinion and satisfaction that the child witness understands the duty of speaking the truth; Whether the Court should apply s.106 of the Evidence Act in criminal cases with care and caution; Does s.106 of the Evidence Act absolve the prosecution from the duty of proving that a
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 260 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2006
In a case where the appellant alongwith a co-accused was alleged to have kidnapped and murdered the minor daughter of PW1, the issues for consideration were: (i) Whether the chain of circumstantial evidence based on which the High Court convicted the Appellant was complete; (ii) Whether the circumstance of last seen together can be made the basis of conviction; (iii) Whether the circumstance of recovery of the dead body following the Appellant’s statement was proof beyond reasonable doubt against the Appellant; (iv) Whether motive is an important link in a case based on circumstantial evidence
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 26 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 151
Whether the High Court has correctly exercised its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 in granting the respondent/claimant one more opportunity to cross-examine appellant/respondent’s witness, despite the Arbitral Tribunal rejecting such a prayer.
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 259 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1295
Issue arose as regards the computation of pensionary benefits of Job contract employees, only such period of their service as ‘Job Contractors’ to be counted for pensionary benefits as was sufficient to entitle them for pension or the entire period of Job Contract Employment; and the order of the Division Bench of the High Court dismissing the writ appeals filed by the State due to inordinate delay.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 258 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 696
Whether the concurrent conviction of the appellant under Sections 420, 468 and 471, Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 and Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5 (2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was justified.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 257 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 701
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court by which it allowed respondent no.1 to withdraw the amount deposited in the court by the appellant and disposed of the writ petition as being infructuous.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 256 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1785
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the criminal appeal preferred by accused-respondent and dismissing acquittal appeal preferred by the State, thereby acquitting both the accused persons.
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 256 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1142
Appellant appeared in the NEET-UG 2024 Examination and secured a rank of 2462 in the Persons with Disability (PwD) category. The designated Disability Certification Centre found him ineligible to pursue medical course on the basis of his quantified disability. When appellant challenged the decision before the High Court in a writ petition, it was dismissed on the ground that the Court cannot substitute the opinion of the experts in the field of disability. Appellant approached the Supreme Court by filing SLP and this Court while issuing notice directed Director, All India Institute of Medical
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 255 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1273
Whether under Notification dated 25.02.2021 issued under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, a land owner with more than 25 cents is liable to pay conversion fee for the entire land holding or would the conversion fee be calculable for the portion of land that is in excess of 25 cents.
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 253 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 687
Whether the High Court could have justifiably invoked judicial review u/Art.226 of the Constitution to interdict personal insolvency proceedings initiated against respondent no.1 u/s.95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by holding that his liability as a debtor has been waived.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 252 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1608
Whether the High Court erred in modifying the terms of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between a private party and a governmental authority in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 251 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 657
Whether the appellants' qualifications for the post in question meet the standard prescribed in the recruitment notification.
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 25 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 177
Whether the High Court was justified in interdicting CIRP proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 249 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1969
I. Whether the Supreme Court decisions in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (I) and (II), which lay down the guidelines for the designation of senior advocates, require reconsideration. II. Whether an advocate on record is guilty of misconduct by merely lending his name to petition without further participation in the proceedings of the case.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Issue arose as regards the sustainability of the conviction of the accused u/s.120B and 411 IPC, when the seized gold bars are not the same gold bars linked to the fraudulent transactions.
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 265 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1206
Whether the reservation of the plot of land lapsed under Sections 49, 126 and 127 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1967 due to the failure of the authorities to acquire it within the statutory timeframe, thereby entitling the appellants to use the land as permissible under law.
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 264 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2130
(1) Whether the instant writ petition is maintainable in view of Article 212 (1) of the Constitution of India and whether the proceedings of the ethics committee are amenable to judicial review? (2) Whether this court can review the proportionality of the punishment imposed by the house in exercise of its writ jurisdiction? (3) If so, whether the petitioner’s expulsion is disproportionate to the misconduct attributed to him and whether it merits any interference? (4) If so, whether this court is empowered to determine the quantum of punishment that may be imposed on the petitioner?
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 263 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1174
Trial court convicted the appellants under Sections 302 and 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. High Court altered the conviction to Section 304 Part II, IPC. Whether the identity of the appellants as accused was established. Appellants, if entitled to acquittal.
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 262 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1178
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellants would be entitled to claim interest on delayed stamp duty refund, in the absence of a provision in the statute to that effect.
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 261 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 836
Does the Evidence Act, 1872 prescribe any particular age as a determinative factor to treat a witness to be a competent witness; Does the Evidence Act treat evidence of a child on the same footing as any other witness; Before the evidence of the child witness is recorded, is it necessary for the Trial Court to record its opinion and satisfaction that the child witness understands the duty of speaking the truth; Whether the Court should apply s.106 of the Evidence Act in criminal cases with care and caution; Does s.106 of the Evidence Act absolve the prosecution from the duty of proving that a
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 260 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2006
In a case where the appellant alongwith a co-accused was alleged to have kidnapped and murdered the minor daughter of PW1, the issues for consideration were: (i) Whether the chain of circumstantial evidence based on which the High Court convicted the Appellant was complete; (ii) Whether the circumstance of last seen together can be made the basis of conviction; (iii) Whether the circumstance of recovery of the dead body following the Appellant’s statement was proof beyond reasonable doubt against the Appellant; (iv) Whether motive is an important link in a case based on circumstantial evidence
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 26 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 151
Whether the High Court has correctly exercised its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 in granting the respondent/claimant one more opportunity to cross-examine appellant/respondent’s witness, despite the Arbitral Tribunal rejecting such a prayer.
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 259 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1295
Issue arose as regards the computation of pensionary benefits of Job contract employees, only such period of their service as ‘Job Contractors’ to be counted for pensionary benefits as was sufficient to entitle them for pension or the entire period of Job Contract Employment; and the order of the Division Bench of the High Court dismissing the writ appeals filed by the State due to inordinate delay.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 258 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 696
Whether the concurrent conviction of the appellant under Sections 420, 468 and 471, Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 and Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5 (2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was justified.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 257 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 701
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court by which it allowed respondent no.1 to withdraw the amount deposited in the court by the appellant and disposed of the writ petition as being infructuous.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 256 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1785
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the criminal appeal preferred by accused-respondent and dismissing acquittal appeal preferred by the State, thereby acquitting both the accused persons.
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 256 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1142
Appellant appeared in the NEET-UG 2024 Examination and secured a rank of 2462 in the Persons with Disability (PwD) category. The designated Disability Certification Centre found him ineligible to pursue medical course on the basis of his quantified disability. When appellant challenged the decision before the High Court in a writ petition, it was dismissed on the ground that the Court cannot substitute the opinion of the experts in the field of disability. Appellant approached the Supreme Court by filing SLP and this Court while issuing notice directed Director, All India Institute of Medical
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 255 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1273
Whether under Notification dated 25.02.2021 issued under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, a land owner with more than 25 cents is liable to pay conversion fee for the entire land holding or would the conversion fee be calculable for the portion of land that is in excess of 25 cents.
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 253 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 687
Whether the High Court could have justifiably invoked judicial review u/Art.226 of the Constitution to interdict personal insolvency proceedings initiated against respondent no.1 u/s.95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by holding that his liability as a debtor has been waived.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 252 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1608
Whether the High Court erred in modifying the terms of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between a private party and a governmental authority in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 251 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 657
Whether the appellants' qualifications for the post in question meet the standard prescribed in the recruitment notification.
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 25 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 177
Whether the High Court was justified in interdicting CIRP proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 249 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1969
I. Whether the Supreme Court decisions in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (I) and (II), which lay down the guidelines for the designation of senior advocates, require reconsideration. II. Whether an advocate on record is guilty of misconduct by merely lending his name to petition without further participation in the proceedings of the case.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis