⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,041–8,060 · Page 403 of 500
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 219 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 852
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra (2006) 10 SCC 681: 2006 (7) Suppl. SCR 156; State of B Rajasthan v. Parthu (2007) 12 SCC 754: 2007 (9) SCR 932 - referred to. Case Law Reference 2006 (7) Suppl. SCR 156 referred to Para 13 c 2007 (9) SCR 932…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 218 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 500
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,041–8,060 · Page 403 of 500
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 219 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 852
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra (2006) 10 SCC 681: 2006 (7) Suppl. SCR 156; State of B Rajasthan v. Parthu (2007) 12 SCC 754: 2007 (9) SCR 932 - referred to. Case Law Reference 2006 (7) Suppl. SCR 156 referred to Para 13 c 2007 (9) SCR 932…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 218 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 500
Mis Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa (1969) 2 SCC 627 : 1970 (1) SCR 753; Co111111issio11er of Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh v. Sanjiv Fabrics (2010) 9 SCC 630 G : 2010 (11) SCR 627 - referred to. Case Law Reference 2001 (1) SCR 195 distinguished Paras 1970 (1) SCR753 referred to Para 7 2010 (11) SCR 627 referred to …
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 217 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 913
Appeal - Against acquittal - Power of appellate court - Scope of - Held: Court has the power to review and relook the entire Fevidence - Appellate Court can interfere with the acquittal order if it is based on erroneous views and against settled position of law. Judgment - Reason is the heartbeat of every conclusion in…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 216 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 83
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: It emerges from the record that the reason for auctioning the ghat in q-uestion was that the Circle Officer had accepted the recommendation of the District Level Committee G and acted as per the Government instruction vide letter No.2526 dated 12.09.1978 to go through open auction…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 215 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 1
2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016) 2 S.C.R. A the recent past. Otherwise, the respondents do not stand to loose anything inasmuch as the moment evidence is produced to the effect that royalty was paid on the minerals by the leaseholder which was used in the construction, the construction contractor like the respondents wou…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 214 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 174
1.3 Coming to the finding of the High Court that the respondents have Jost their right to challenge the order passed by the High Court in the Writ Petition, it is true that SLP was Edismissed by this Court on the ground that cost was not deposited by the appellant. But that was not of much significance. In the applicat…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 213 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 19
Words and Phrases - 'Res judicata' - Meaning of - Discussed Disposing of the appeals, the Court F HELD : 1.1 'Res jll(/iC{lf(I' literally means a "thing adjudicated" or "an issue that has been definitively settled by judicial decision;'. The principle operates as a bar to try the same issue once over. It aims to preven…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 212 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 1018
(2016] 3 S.C.R. 1018 l A PANKAJAKSHI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & OTHERS v. CHANDRIKA & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 20 I of2005) B FEBRUARY 25, 2016 [ANIL R. DAVE, KURIAN JOSEPH, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND R.F. NARIMAN, JJ.) Travancore-Cochin High Court Act, 1125 - s. 23 - Kera/a c High Court Act, 1958 -- s. 9 - Co…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 206 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 9
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The basic purpose of Ruic 17 of Order 18 C.P.C. Eis to enable the court to clarify any position or doubt, and the court may, either .rno 1110/11 or on the request of any party, recall any witness at any stage in that regard. This power can he exercised at any stage of the suit. N…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 205 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1115
Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar for the Appellants. S.M. Jadhav, Anshuman, (for Mis. S.M. Jadhav & Company), Priya Puri, Ranjay Kumar Dubey, Vikas Bansal, Chandra Bhushan H 1115 1116 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 1 S.C.R. A Prasad, Meenesh Kumar Dubey, Kaushal Yadav, B. Krishna Prasad for the Respondents. The Judgment…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 204 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 29
WITH E C.A.No.1673of2016 & C.A. No. 1674-1675 of2016 A.K. Srivastava, Vivek K. Tankha, Sr. Advs., Sushi I Kumar Jain, F Puneet Jain, Ms. Christi Jain, Abhinav Gupta, Manu Maheshwari, Apurv Taran, Ms. Pratibha Jain, B.K. Satija, Talha Rahman, Nish it Agrawal, M. ShoebAlam, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Varun Thakur, Ms. Shrad…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 201 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1118
1118 0>totll v. KISHORE R. AJMERA 1119 and third category, conclusion has to be gathered from various A circumstances like the volume of the trade effected; the period of persistence in trading in the particular scrip; the particulars of the buy and sell orders, namely, the volume thereof; the proximity of time between…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 197 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 476
HELD:l. Both the appellants and the respondents/ . defendants have to share the blame of leaving the compromise decree unexecuted for over a decade whereafter fresh rounds of c confrontations surfaced leading to the present situation. Be that ·as it may, though there has been no determinance of the appellants' right, t…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 190 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1084
235811993, 2359/1993, 2360/1993, 2361II993, 2362/1993, 236311993, 2364/1994, and 2365/1993 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. Shailendra Jain, Manoj Swarup, Siddharth S., Neha Kedia, Prerna Mann, Karanvir Singh Khehar, Ajay Kumar, Madhu F Moolchandan i for the Appellants. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Ha…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 19 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 34
34 PREM SAGAR MANOCHA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 35 initiation of proceedings u/s.340 - Proceedings u/s.340 liable to be A quashed - Penal Code, 1860 - ss.193, 195. s.340 - amended provision vis-a-vis provision prior to amendment - Scope of - Held: s.340 prior to amendment in 1973 was s.479-A in the I 898 Code and it was …
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 187 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 989
Ms. Shobha, Inder Singh .. \kanksha Kaushik, Shrey Dambhare, Advs. for the Appellants. H 989 990. SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 2 S.C.R. A Vishnu B. Saharya, Viresh B. Saharya (For Mis Saharya & Co.) Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. 1. In land acquisition proceedings perta…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 18 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 137
Dismissing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1. The motive for the alleged assault is the grudge of the accused-A who contested in the college student election in which P. W.8 also contested, who stated to have ultimately won the elections. According to the case of the prosecution, all the appellants gathered under a mang…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 179 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 981
Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The final order passed by the Consolidation Officer was without opportunity or notice of hearing to. the F appellant and proforma respondents subsequent to adjournment of the matter without further dates. The order itself mentions only the presence of TR and not the appel…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 178 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 992
JAIDEV INDER SINGH v. AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT 993 TRUST the challenge on the acquisition and there was no issue on the A claim for allotment under the Rules as a local displaced person. [Para 8, 9) [995-H; 996-A-B] 1.3 The challenge on the acquisition was finally concluded before the High Court by judgment dated 27.09.200…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 177 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 672
B Manoj Swarup, Ajay Kumar, Ms. Prerna Mann for the Appellant. T. K. Prabhakaran, Deepak Prabhakaran, Gopal Jain for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. I . Leave granted. c 2. The appellant was employed by the respondent initially as Boiler Attendant in the year 1983 in the Company in…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Mis Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa (1969) 2 SCC 627 : 1970 (1) SCR 753; Co111111issio11er of Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh v. Sanjiv Fabrics (2010) 9 SCC 630 G : 2010 (11) SCR 627 - referred to. Case Law Reference 2001 (1) SCR 195 distinguished Paras 1970 (1) SCR753 referred to Para 7 2010 (11) SCR 627 referred to …
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 217 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 913
Appeal - Against acquittal - Power of appellate court - Scope of - Held: Court has the power to review and relook the entire Fevidence - Appellate Court can interfere with the acquittal order if it is based on erroneous views and against settled position of law. Judgment - Reason is the heartbeat of every conclusion in…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 216 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 83
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: It emerges from the record that the reason for auctioning the ghat in q-uestion was that the Circle Officer had accepted the recommendation of the District Level Committee G and acted as per the Government instruction vide letter No.2526 dated 12.09.1978 to go through open auction…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 215 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 1
2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016) 2 S.C.R. A the recent past. Otherwise, the respondents do not stand to loose anything inasmuch as the moment evidence is produced to the effect that royalty was paid on the minerals by the leaseholder which was used in the construction, the construction contractor like the respondents wou…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 214 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 174
1.3 Coming to the finding of the High Court that the respondents have Jost their right to challenge the order passed by the High Court in the Writ Petition, it is true that SLP was Edismissed by this Court on the ground that cost was not deposited by the appellant. But that was not of much significance. In the applicat…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 213 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 19
Words and Phrases - 'Res judicata' - Meaning of - Discussed Disposing of the appeals, the Court F HELD : 1.1 'Res jll(/iC{lf(I' literally means a "thing adjudicated" or "an issue that has been definitively settled by judicial decision;'. The principle operates as a bar to try the same issue once over. It aims to preven…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 212 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 1018
(2016] 3 S.C.R. 1018 l A PANKAJAKSHI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & OTHERS v. CHANDRIKA & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 20 I of2005) B FEBRUARY 25, 2016 [ANIL R. DAVE, KURIAN JOSEPH, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND R.F. NARIMAN, JJ.) Travancore-Cochin High Court Act, 1125 - s. 23 - Kera/a c High Court Act, 1958 -- s. 9 - Co…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 206 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 9
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The basic purpose of Ruic 17 of Order 18 C.P.C. Eis to enable the court to clarify any position or doubt, and the court may, either .rno 1110/11 or on the request of any party, recall any witness at any stage in that regard. This power can he exercised at any stage of the suit. N…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 205 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1115
Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar for the Appellants. S.M. Jadhav, Anshuman, (for Mis. S.M. Jadhav & Company), Priya Puri, Ranjay Kumar Dubey, Vikas Bansal, Chandra Bhushan H 1115 1116 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 1 S.C.R. A Prasad, Meenesh Kumar Dubey, Kaushal Yadav, B. Krishna Prasad for the Respondents. The Judgment…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 204 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 29
WITH E C.A.No.1673of2016 & C.A. No. 1674-1675 of2016 A.K. Srivastava, Vivek K. Tankha, Sr. Advs., Sushi I Kumar Jain, F Puneet Jain, Ms. Christi Jain, Abhinav Gupta, Manu Maheshwari, Apurv Taran, Ms. Pratibha Jain, B.K. Satija, Talha Rahman, Nish it Agrawal, M. ShoebAlam, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Varun Thakur, Ms. Shrad…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 201 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1118
1118 0>totll v. KISHORE R. AJMERA 1119 and third category, conclusion has to be gathered from various A circumstances like the volume of the trade effected; the period of persistence in trading in the particular scrip; the particulars of the buy and sell orders, namely, the volume thereof; the proximity of time between…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 197 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 476
HELD:l. Both the appellants and the respondents/ . defendants have to share the blame of leaving the compromise decree unexecuted for over a decade whereafter fresh rounds of c confrontations surfaced leading to the present situation. Be that ·as it may, though there has been no determinance of the appellants' right, t…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 190 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1084
235811993, 2359/1993, 2360/1993, 2361II993, 2362/1993, 236311993, 2364/1994, and 2365/1993 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. Shailendra Jain, Manoj Swarup, Siddharth S., Neha Kedia, Prerna Mann, Karanvir Singh Khehar, Ajay Kumar, Madhu F Moolchandan i for the Appellants. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Ha…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 19 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 34
34 PREM SAGAR MANOCHA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 35 initiation of proceedings u/s.340 - Proceedings u/s.340 liable to be A quashed - Penal Code, 1860 - ss.193, 195. s.340 - amended provision vis-a-vis provision prior to amendment - Scope of - Held: s.340 prior to amendment in 1973 was s.479-A in the I 898 Code and it was …
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 187 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 989
Ms. Shobha, Inder Singh .. \kanksha Kaushik, Shrey Dambhare, Advs. for the Appellants. H 989 990. SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 2 S.C.R. A Vishnu B. Saharya, Viresh B. Saharya (For Mis Saharya & Co.) Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. 1. In land acquisition proceedings perta…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 18 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 137
Dismissing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1. The motive for the alleged assault is the grudge of the accused-A who contested in the college student election in which P. W.8 also contested, who stated to have ultimately won the elections. According to the case of the prosecution, all the appellants gathered under a mang…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 179 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 981
Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The final order passed by the Consolidation Officer was without opportunity or notice of hearing to. the F appellant and proforma respondents subsequent to adjournment of the matter without further dates. The order itself mentions only the presence of TR and not the appel…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 178 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 992
JAIDEV INDER SINGH v. AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT 993 TRUST the challenge on the acquisition and there was no issue on the A claim for allotment under the Rules as a local displaced person. [Para 8, 9) [995-H; 996-A-B] 1.3 The challenge on the acquisition was finally concluded before the High Court by judgment dated 27.09.200…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 177 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 672
B Manoj Swarup, Ajay Kumar, Ms. Prerna Mann for the Appellant. T. K. Prabhakaran, Deepak Prabhakaran, Gopal Jain for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. I . Leave granted. c 2. The appellant was employed by the respondent initially as Boiler Attendant in the year 1983 in the Company in…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis