⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,981–8,000 · Page 400 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 308 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 787
- Suit decreed infavour of original lessee - First appeal by DDA dismissed - During pendency of second appeal by DDA, said D property purchased by the respondent vide sale deed in view of compromise decree passed by the High Court - Substitution of respondent in place of the original lessee - Payment of charges for con…
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 306 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 1027
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,981–8,000 · Page 400 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 308 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 787
- Suit decreed infavour of original lessee - First appeal by DDA dismissed - During pendency of second appeal by DDA, said D property purchased by the respondent vide sale deed in view of compromise decree passed by the High Court - Substitution of respondent in place of the original lessee - Payment of charges for con…
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 306 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 1027
- With a view to threaten, he went to the house of appellant no. I with pistol and dagger - FIR was lodged against him under Arms DAct - Supplementary charge sheet filed against husband and other accused persons - CJM took cognizance of offence against them -Petition filed uls.482 for quashing cognizance order - High C…
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 305 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 525
525 526 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2016] 2 S.C.R. A proving the defence shifts upon the accused and a presumption would arise uls.20 of the Act. Appeal against acquittal: Scope of interference by High Court - Held: If the evaluation of the evidence and the findings recorded by the trial court does not suffer from any illeg…
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 304 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 1
[2016] 3 S.C.R. l KEDAR MISHRA A v. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 3 778-80of2016) B APRIL 12, 2016 [T.S. THAKUR, CJI, R. BANUMATHI AND UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.] '""<!, Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition cof Surplus Land) Rules, 1963: r.19 - Right of pre-emption - Pre-emption applica…
Supreme Court of India11 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 302 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 872
F Christian Medical College Ve/lore & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. 2013 (7) SCR 908 : (2014) 2 SCC 305: Kamlesh Verma vs. Mayawati and Others 2013 (11) SCR 25 : (2013) 8 SCC 320; Union of India vs. Na111it Sharma 2013 (13) SCR 96 : (2013) 10 SCC 359; G Sheonandan Paswan vs. State of Bihar and others 1987 (1) SCR 702 …
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 301 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 515
515 516 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] S S.C.R. A Concession Rules,1960. Dismissing the appeals, the Court Majority opinion(Per T.S. Thakur, CJI, for himself and for V. Gopala Gowda,J.) HELD: 1. Once the Parliament decl~res it to be expedientB in public interest to bring the regulation and development of mines and minera…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 300 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 699
provide a level playing field between Bthe two classes…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 30 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 56
Nahar Singh Yadav and another v. Union of India and others 2010 (13) SCR 851:(2011) 1 SCC 307 - relied on. 1.2 In the instant case, the apprehension that has been H stated is absolutely mercurial and cannot remotely be stated to 56 USMANGANI ADAMBHAI VAHORA v. STATE OF GUJARAT 57 be reasonable. The High Court could not…
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 3 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 91
(9) SCR 311:(2012) 10 SCC 1; Manohar Lal Sharma G vs. Principal Secretary 2014 (8) SCR 446 (2014) 9 SCC 516; Goa Foundation vs. Union of India 2014 (5) SCR 302:(2014) 6 SCC 590; Nar Narain Mishra vs. The State of U.P. 2013 (2) ADJ 166; State of Tamil Nadu vs. Mis. Hind Stone 1981 (2) SCC 205: 1981 (2) SCR 742 ;Deepak K…
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 3 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 571
Dismissing the appeal, the Court E HELD: 1. The High Court has rightly held that the renewal was in pursuance of the Government Order dated 26th February, 2013 which itself was in conflict with the order of the High Court in *Nar Narain Mishra's case as reiterated in **Suk/um Sing/i's case. Orders of the High Court in …
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 298 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 288
and Order dated 13.10.2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay…
Supreme Court of India5 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 297 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 600
Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv., Ms. Niranjana Singh, Vibhushankar Mishra, Sudhir Agarwal, D. S. Mahra, Advs. for the Appellant. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., R. Jawaharlal, Sidharth Bawa, Shyamal, B Ashwani Kumar, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. I. Instant appeals have been…
Supreme Court of India5 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 296 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 948
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The instant transaction on the face of it is in contravention of the 1956 Act and is not done for legal necessity, such transaction is voidable and unless such a transaction is soughtH 948 NARAYAN v. BABASAHEB & ORS. 949 to be impeached or set aside, the question of recovery o…
Supreme Court of India1 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 294 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 292
LILAWATI AGARWAL ETC. v. THE STATE OF Jl-IARKHAND 293 ETC. *R"gh"bir Singh case and what has been clarified in three Judge A Bench judgment in **K.S. Paripoortum (II) C(lse, it cannot be said that the three-Judge Bench decision runs counter to the authority in the Constitution Bench. It also does not give a different i…
Supreme Court of India31 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 293 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 837
G Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 Rule 55 of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 does not confer power on the Chairman of the Corporation to issue any instructions that can travel beyond the rules. In terms of Rule 55, he has been H 837 838 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2016] …
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 291 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 11
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 In the instant ease, the High Court has not yet admitted the matter. It is not in dispute that no substantial question of law has been formulated as it could not have been when the appeal has not been admitted. As appeal under Section 100 CPC F is required to be admitted only …
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 290 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 881
- The fact that Police chose not to send up a suspect to face trial does not affect power of the trial court uls. 319 to sw111i10n such a person on account of evidence recorded during trial -,- This is the factual scenario in the case at hand also - It would not be proper to deal with detailed merits of the prosecution…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 289 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 45
G 1.4 It is directed that the court should not normally insist on appearance of Good Samaritans as that causes delay, expenses and inconvenience. Tlte concerned court should exercise the power to appoint the Commission for examination of Good Samaritans in accordance with the provisions contained in section 284 of the …
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 287 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 685
Disposing of the appeal and the petition, the Court B HELD: 1.1 For a fair and objective system of appointment, there ought to be a fair and realistic assessment of the requirement, for otherwise the appointments may be made not because they are required but because they come handy for political aggrandisement, appease…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 284 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 876
Rajinder \Vali, B. K. Satija, Ad vs .• for the Appellant. Nidesh Gupta, Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advs., Tarun Gupta, Punect, H 878 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 2 S.C.R. A Atul S. Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh, Mis. Khaitan & Co., Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by. KURIAN, J. !. Leave granted. B…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
- With a view to threaten, he went to the house of appellant no. I with pistol and dagger - FIR was lodged against him under Arms DAct - Supplementary charge sheet filed against husband and other accused persons - CJM took cognizance of offence against them -Petition filed uls.482 for quashing cognizance order - High C…
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 305 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 525
525 526 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2016] 2 S.C.R. A proving the defence shifts upon the accused and a presumption would arise uls.20 of the Act. Appeal against acquittal: Scope of interference by High Court - Held: If the evaluation of the evidence and the findings recorded by the trial court does not suffer from any illeg…
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 304 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 1
[2016] 3 S.C.R. l KEDAR MISHRA A v. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 3 778-80of2016) B APRIL 12, 2016 [T.S. THAKUR, CJI, R. BANUMATHI AND UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.] '""<!, Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition cof Surplus Land) Rules, 1963: r.19 - Right of pre-emption - Pre-emption applica…
Supreme Court of India11 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 302 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 872
F Christian Medical College Ve/lore & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. 2013 (7) SCR 908 : (2014) 2 SCC 305: Kamlesh Verma vs. Mayawati and Others 2013 (11) SCR 25 : (2013) 8 SCC 320; Union of India vs. Na111it Sharma 2013 (13) SCR 96 : (2013) 10 SCC 359; G Sheonandan Paswan vs. State of Bihar and others 1987 (1) SCR 702 …
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 301 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 515
515 516 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] S S.C.R. A Concession Rules,1960. Dismissing the appeals, the Court Majority opinion(Per T.S. Thakur, CJI, for himself and for V. Gopala Gowda,J.) HELD: 1. Once the Parliament decl~res it to be expedientB in public interest to bring the regulation and development of mines and minera…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 300 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 699
provide a level playing field between Bthe two classes…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 30 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 56
Nahar Singh Yadav and another v. Union of India and others 2010 (13) SCR 851:(2011) 1 SCC 307 - relied on. 1.2 In the instant case, the apprehension that has been H stated is absolutely mercurial and cannot remotely be stated to 56 USMANGANI ADAMBHAI VAHORA v. STATE OF GUJARAT 57 be reasonable. The High Court could not…
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 3 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 91
(9) SCR 311:(2012) 10 SCC 1; Manohar Lal Sharma G vs. Principal Secretary 2014 (8) SCR 446 (2014) 9 SCC 516; Goa Foundation vs. Union of India 2014 (5) SCR 302:(2014) 6 SCC 590; Nar Narain Mishra vs. The State of U.P. 2013 (2) ADJ 166; State of Tamil Nadu vs. Mis. Hind Stone 1981 (2) SCC 205: 1981 (2) SCR 742 ;Deepak K…
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 3 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 571
Dismissing the appeal, the Court E HELD: 1. The High Court has rightly held that the renewal was in pursuance of the Government Order dated 26th February, 2013 which itself was in conflict with the order of the High Court in *Nar Narain Mishra's case as reiterated in **Suk/um Sing/i's case. Orders of the High Court in …
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 298 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 288
and Order dated 13.10.2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay…
Supreme Court of India5 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 297 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 600
Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv., Ms. Niranjana Singh, Vibhushankar Mishra, Sudhir Agarwal, D. S. Mahra, Advs. for the Appellant. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., R. Jawaharlal, Sidharth Bawa, Shyamal, B Ashwani Kumar, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. I. Instant appeals have been…
Supreme Court of India5 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 296 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 948
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The instant transaction on the face of it is in contravention of the 1956 Act and is not done for legal necessity, such transaction is voidable and unless such a transaction is soughtH 948 NARAYAN v. BABASAHEB & ORS. 949 to be impeached or set aside, the question of recovery o…
Supreme Court of India1 Apr 2016Full text
2016 INSC 294 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 292
LILAWATI AGARWAL ETC. v. THE STATE OF Jl-IARKHAND 293 ETC. *R"gh"bir Singh case and what has been clarified in three Judge A Bench judgment in **K.S. Paripoortum (II) C(lse, it cannot be said that the three-Judge Bench decision runs counter to the authority in the Constitution Bench. It also does not give a different i…
Supreme Court of India31 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 293 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 837
G Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 Rule 55 of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 does not confer power on the Chairman of the Corporation to issue any instructions that can travel beyond the rules. In terms of Rule 55, he has been H 837 838 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2016] …
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 291 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 11
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 In the instant ease, the High Court has not yet admitted the matter. It is not in dispute that no substantial question of law has been formulated as it could not have been when the appeal has not been admitted. As appeal under Section 100 CPC F is required to be admitted only …
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 290 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 881
- The fact that Police chose not to send up a suspect to face trial does not affect power of the trial court uls. 319 to sw111i10n such a person on account of evidence recorded during trial -,- This is the factual scenario in the case at hand also - It would not be proper to deal with detailed merits of the prosecution…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 289 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 45
G 1.4 It is directed that the court should not normally insist on appearance of Good Samaritans as that causes delay, expenses and inconvenience. Tlte concerned court should exercise the power to appoint the Commission for examination of Good Samaritans in accordance with the provisions contained in section 284 of the …
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 287 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 685
Disposing of the appeal and the petition, the Court B HELD: 1.1 For a fair and objective system of appointment, there ought to be a fair and realistic assessment of the requirement, for otherwise the appointments may be made not because they are required but because they come handy for political aggrandisement, appease…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 284 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 876
Rajinder \Vali, B. K. Satija, Ad vs .• for the Appellant. Nidesh Gupta, Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advs., Tarun Gupta, Punect, H 878 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 2 S.C.R. A Atul S. Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh, Mis. Khaitan & Co., Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by. KURIAN, J. !. Leave granted. B…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis