⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
781–800 · Page 40 of 500
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 296 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1713
Issue arose whether the legal heirs of a deceased partner in a partnership firm, being non-signatories to the partnership deed and in the absence of their explicit consent, can still be bound by the arbitration agreement; and whether the right to sue for the rendition of accounts survive to the legal heirs of the deceased partner, entitling them to invoke the arbitration clause in the partnership deed.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
781–800 · Page 40 of 500
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 296 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1713
Issue arose whether the legal heirs of a deceased partner in a partnership firm, being non-signatories to the partnership deed and in the absence of their explicit consent, can still be bound by the arbitration agreement; and whether the right to sue for the rendition of accounts survive to the legal heirs of the deceased partner, entitling them to invoke the arbitration clause in the partnership deed.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 295 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2101
Whether it is for the prosecution to connect the accused to the alleged crime by producing credible and legally admissible evidence to punish.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 292 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1534
Issue arose whether the contours of s.439 CrPC permit the grant of compensation by the High Court to the appellant for alleged wrongful confinement for four months in a matter of possession of narcotic substances.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 291 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2091
The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application of appellant praying for quashing of the FIR registered u/ss.409, 219 and 114 of IPC and also rejected the appellant’s prayer for anticipatory bail.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 290 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2080
Whether the impugned judgment and order passed by the Courts below warrant any interference in so far as the award of compensation is concerned. Whether appellant no.2, who was minor at the time of incident, was actually involved in the accident.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 289 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1456
Matter pertains to the correctness of order passed by the High Court terminating two women Judicial Officers from service during probation period; and whether the cessation of services of two Judicial Officers is punitive, arbitrary and thus, contrary to law.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 288 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1445
Issue arose as to whether the borrower of a project loan, falls within the definition of ‘Consumer’ under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 282 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1433
What are the parameters that a High Court should keep in mind while granting or refusing a leave to appeal filed under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 281 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1416
Issue arose as regards the correctness of orders passed by the High Court staying the discharge of the accused and directing him to surrender before the trial court.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 278 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1405
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the direction issued in Priyanka Srivastava v. State of Uttar Pradesh [2015] 4 SCR 108 that a complaint will be accompanied by an affidavit is prospective in nature not having any retrospective application and thus, will not be applicable to the complaint lodged against the appellants in the year 2010-2011.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 277 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1411
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the courts below allowing the application filed by the daughter of the deceased to implead herself as defendant in the suit for recovery of possession filed by her mother.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 276 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1703
Whether the said plot is a MHADA layout; Whether the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) is legally competent to redevelop a ‘censused slum’ situated on MHADA land under Regulation 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations (DCR); Whether ineligible transit camp occupants can delay a sanctioned redevelopment project by invoking Regulation 33(5) applicable to MHADA layouts; Whether the said plot is a slum area; Whether a separate notification is necessary to declare a ‘censused slum’ as a slum under the Maharashtra Slum Area (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment Act 1971 (‘Slum Act’).
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 275 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1396
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the Hotel constructed by the late father of the appellant on the property which he had bought in 1965, was his contribution to the firm and thus, the same was brought on to the stock of the firm and would become the ‘property of the firm’ as per Section 14, Partnership Act.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 274 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1625
Whether in the instant case, single Judge of the High Court was right in holding that the appellant herein is entitled to get the benefit of s.3 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999. Whether the Division Bench of the High Court committed any error in upsetting the findings recorded by the Single Judge.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 273 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2035
Whether an agent by virtue of being a holder of the General Power of Attorney (‘GPA’) along with Agreement to Sell had any right, title or interest in the subject-matter of the agency, to execute a registered sale deed after the death of the principal; Whether it was obligatory for the Respondent to challenge the execution and validity of the GPA and the Agreement to Sell and seek a declaration that the registered sale deed invalid, non-est or illegal.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 272 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1331
Challenge to the constitutional validity and the right of the authorized officers to arrest under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act).
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 270 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1325
Matter pertains to the entitlement of the appellant to pensionary benefits, when her unauthorised absence for twenty years was treated as extraordinary leave and her service was regularised.
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 27 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 266
Issue arose as regards summoning a person as accused for facing the trial, when the said person was named in the FIR but not chargesheeted.
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 269 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 727
Issue arose whether the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, coupled with the Public Procurement Policy for Micro and Small Enterprises Order 2012 mandate procurement of 25 percent of goods and services by the government, and its instrumentalities from the Micro and Small Industrial Enterprises; and whether the prescription of mandatory minimum turnover clause in Notice Inviting Tenders is violative of Arts.14 and 19 of the Constitution, provisions of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 and the Procurement Preference Policy, 2012.
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 268 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1311
Whether there was any material suppression of fact on the part of the appellant’s father while obtaining an insurance policy or not.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 295 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2101
Whether it is for the prosecution to connect the accused to the alleged crime by producing credible and legally admissible evidence to punish.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 292 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1534
Issue arose whether the contours of s.439 CrPC permit the grant of compensation by the High Court to the appellant for alleged wrongful confinement for four months in a matter of possession of narcotic substances.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 291 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2091
The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application of appellant praying for quashing of the FIR registered u/ss.409, 219 and 114 of IPC and also rejected the appellant’s prayer for anticipatory bail.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 290 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2080
Whether the impugned judgment and order passed by the Courts below warrant any interference in so far as the award of compensation is concerned. Whether appellant no.2, who was minor at the time of incident, was actually involved in the accident.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 289 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1456
Matter pertains to the correctness of order passed by the High Court terminating two women Judicial Officers from service during probation period; and whether the cessation of services of two Judicial Officers is punitive, arbitrary and thus, contrary to law.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 288 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1445
Issue arose as to whether the borrower of a project loan, falls within the definition of ‘Consumer’ under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 282 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1433
What are the parameters that a High Court should keep in mind while granting or refusing a leave to appeal filed under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C.
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 281 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1416
Issue arose as regards the correctness of orders passed by the High Court staying the discharge of the accused and directing him to surrender before the trial court.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 278 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1405
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the direction issued in Priyanka Srivastava v. State of Uttar Pradesh [2015] 4 SCR 108 that a complaint will be accompanied by an affidavit is prospective in nature not having any retrospective application and thus, will not be applicable to the complaint lodged against the appellants in the year 2010-2011.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 277 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1411
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the courts below allowing the application filed by the daughter of the deceased to implead herself as defendant in the suit for recovery of possession filed by her mother.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 276 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1703
Whether the said plot is a MHADA layout; Whether the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) is legally competent to redevelop a ‘censused slum’ situated on MHADA land under Regulation 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations (DCR); Whether ineligible transit camp occupants can delay a sanctioned redevelopment project by invoking Regulation 33(5) applicable to MHADA layouts; Whether the said plot is a slum area; Whether a separate notification is necessary to declare a ‘censused slum’ as a slum under the Maharashtra Slum Area (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment Act 1971 (‘Slum Act’).
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 275 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1396
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the Hotel constructed by the late father of the appellant on the property which he had bought in 1965, was his contribution to the firm and thus, the same was brought on to the stock of the firm and would become the ‘property of the firm’ as per Section 14, Partnership Act.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 274 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1625
Whether in the instant case, single Judge of the High Court was right in holding that the appellant herein is entitled to get the benefit of s.3 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999. Whether the Division Bench of the High Court committed any error in upsetting the findings recorded by the Single Judge.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 273 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2035
Whether an agent by virtue of being a holder of the General Power of Attorney (‘GPA’) along with Agreement to Sell had any right, title or interest in the subject-matter of the agency, to execute a registered sale deed after the death of the principal; Whether it was obligatory for the Respondent to challenge the execution and validity of the GPA and the Agreement to Sell and seek a declaration that the registered sale deed invalid, non-est or illegal.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 272 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1331
Challenge to the constitutional validity and the right of the authorized officers to arrest under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act).
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 270 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1325
Matter pertains to the entitlement of the appellant to pensionary benefits, when her unauthorised absence for twenty years was treated as extraordinary leave and her service was regularised.
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 27 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 266
Issue arose as regards summoning a person as accused for facing the trial, when the said person was named in the FIR but not chargesheeted.
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 269 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 727
Issue arose whether the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, coupled with the Public Procurement Policy for Micro and Small Enterprises Order 2012 mandate procurement of 25 percent of goods and services by the government, and its instrumentalities from the Micro and Small Industrial Enterprises; and whether the prescription of mandatory minimum turnover clause in Notice Inviting Tenders is violative of Arts.14 and 19 of the Constitution, provisions of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 and the Procurement Preference Policy, 2012.
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 268 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1311
Whether there was any material suppression of fact on the part of the appellant’s father while obtaining an insurance policy or not.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis