⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
61–80 · Page 4 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 51 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 580
Issue arose as to whether persons who were arrayed as respondents in the consumer complaints but ultimately against whom no notice was issued and the complaints did not proceed, could be brought within the net of execution, on the premise that they were directors/promoters of the judgment-debtor company.
Supreme Court of India19 May 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
61–80 · Page 4 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 51 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 580
Issue arose as to whether persons who were arrayed as respondents in the consumer complaints but ultimately against whom no notice was issued and the complaints did not proceed, could be brought within the net of execution, on the premise that they were directors/promoters of the judgment-debtor company.
Supreme Court of India19 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 508 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 424
Issue arose whether s.13(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980 can be interpreted to permit fresh recommendation or change in place of posting of a waitlisted candidate, who has already been recommended for appointment elsewhere; and whether, after enforcement of the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission Act, 2023, repealing the Old Act, the recommendation dated 13.12.2023 and consequential communications and placement order dated 12.01.2024 and 15.01.2025, issued in favour of the appellant can be sustained within the statutory scheme of the New
Supreme Court of India18 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 502 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 410
Whether the Decree in question is a simple Preliminary Decree, or whether the Trial Court, made it both a Preliminary and a Final Decree; whether the same could be put to Execution; whether the High Court erred in interdicting the Execution Proceedings holding that before putting the Decree to Execution, a Final Decree was necessary.
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 5 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 1
Whether the High Court has rightly allowed the application filed by the respondent u/s.11, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 490 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 263
Matter pertains to the premature release of the petitioner sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of the deceased, and has been in jail for approximately twenty-two years.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 488 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 241
Issue arose whether the students transferred to private medical colleges liable to pay fees at Government rates or at the rates applicable to private medical colleges; how the differential liability, if any, is to be apportioned between the students and the Educational Trust; whether the State of Odisha and/or the MCI/NMC should be directed to make good the deficiency; and whether the entire liability should be fixed on the Education Trust.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 486 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 294
The present appeal by the appellant-convict is directed against judgment and order dated 04.02.2025 of the High Court. Thereby, the High Court confirmed the conviction and sentence against the appellant and held the appellant guilty of commission of offences u/ss.302 and 323 of the IPC and u/ss.3(2)(v) and 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 481 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 584
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court setting aside the summoning order passed by the Magistrate and remanding the matter, regarding complicity of first appellant-corporate entity running the co-accused hospital, and the third appellant-Chairman, both of whom are in a separate territorial jurisdiction than the Magistrate; and whether the allegations contained in the complaint prima facie disclose commission of a criminal offence.
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 48 · [2026] 2 S.C.R. 144
Whether F.A. No. 213 of 2000 abated on non-substitution of LRs of ‘M’ i.e., appellant 1(2), who was one of the LRs of deceased- judgment debtor ‘K’; whether the order of the High Court dtd.03.05.2013, holding that appellants No. 2 and 3 along with other heirs of ‘K’ sufficiently represented the interest of ‘K’ in the appeal, would, by the principle of res judicata, bar a declaration that the appeal had abated; whether by allowing impleadment of the heirs and legal representatives of ‘M’ as proforma respondents in F. A. No. 213 of 2000, vide order dtd.03.05.2013, the High Court, in effect set a
Supreme Court of India12 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 479 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 577
Whether the filing/refiling of the appeal by respondent No.1 was incurably tainted and ought to have been rejected at the threshold by NCLAT.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 476 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 597
Matter arose as regards inclusion of Rajasthani language as medium of instructions for education and public employment.
Supreme Court of India7 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 474 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 567
Issue arose whether the appellant-assessee is entitled to a deduction of Rs.21,74,234/- being the interest paid by it in respect of the loan availed from the Corporation Bank u/s.36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act 1961.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 47 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 770
Whether u/s.439, CrPC the High Court could have issued directions, mandating age determination test to be conducted in all cases involving the POCSO Act. This larger question involves twin considerations, one on the aspect of jurisdiction and the other on the aspect of law i.e., the postulate of the act regarding determination of age, and how the directions issued in the impugned judgement correspond to or are in contravention of the same.
Supreme Court of India11 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 468 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 550
Whether the FIR and the charge-sheet filed against the appellants- accused for offences u/ss.3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act as well as for the offences u/s.506 r/w s.34, IPC, ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 466 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 522
Issue arose for consideration whether the disciplinary action taken against respondent No.1, culminating in his removal from service, suffers from any legal infirmity warranting interference.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 464 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 479
The specific issues which arise for determination are: (i) Whether the activities provided u/s.11(g) and (h) of the Railways Act pass muster of “distribution” of electricity, and whether such activities are a necessary pre-requisite to qualify as a DDL under the Act; (ii) Whether the Indian Railways, being an entity of the Central Government, falls within the ambit of “Appropriate Government” u/s.14 of the Electricity Act, 2003; (iii) Whether the Indian Railways, even if held to be a DDL under the Act, is exempt from the obligation to pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge or additional surcharge for the
Supreme Court of India8 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 463 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 453
Issue arose whether the decree of specific performance passed by the trial court merged in the order of the appellate court even though the appellate court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution; whether respondent’s application u/s.28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was maintainable after the Court had granted permission to make deposit of the balance amount and, pursuant thereto, the amount was also deposited; and whether the rescission of the contract and consequential dismissal of the execution application vitiated by a pedantic approach of the courts below as they failed to consider th
Supreme Court of India7 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 461 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 441
Whether the depreciation under the applicable tariff regulations must necessarily be allowed over the entire technical useful life of an asset irrespective of the period during which the asset is actually utilised for supply of electricity; whether Regulation 6.32 of 2011 Regulations confers an absolute right upon the generating utility to recover entire capital cost over the useful life of the asset, even where the asset ceases to supply electricity to the consumer; whether the APTEL erred in law in disregarding the regulatory framework and approval conditions which limited the operational an
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 46 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 517
Issue arose as regards taxability of gains said to arise on amalgamation, where shares of the amalgamating company held by the assessees as stock-in-trade, stand substituted by shares of the amalgamated company; whether such substitution, in and of itself, constitutes a realisation giving rise to taxable business income u/s.28, Income Tax Act, 1961 and if so, the conditions under which such accrual or receipt can be said to arise in the commercial sense, or whether the incidence of taxation arises only upon the subsequent sale of the substituted shares; whether the High Court while remanding t
Supreme Court of India6 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 455 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 421
Whether the direction of closure of the appellant-units issued by the NGT is liable to be set aside; whether the judgment of Pahwa Plastics squarely applies to the facts of this case.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2026 INSC 508 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 424
Issue arose whether s.13(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980 can be interpreted to permit fresh recommendation or change in place of posting of a waitlisted candidate, who has already been recommended for appointment elsewhere; and whether, after enforcement of the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission Act, 2023, repealing the Old Act, the recommendation dated 13.12.2023 and consequential communications and placement order dated 12.01.2024 and 15.01.2025, issued in favour of the appellant can be sustained within the statutory scheme of the New
Supreme Court of India18 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 502 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 410
Whether the Decree in question is a simple Preliminary Decree, or whether the Trial Court, made it both a Preliminary and a Final Decree; whether the same could be put to Execution; whether the High Court erred in interdicting the Execution Proceedings holding that before putting the Decree to Execution, a Final Decree was necessary.
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 5 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 1
Whether the High Court has rightly allowed the application filed by the respondent u/s.11, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 490 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 263
Matter pertains to the premature release of the petitioner sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of the deceased, and has been in jail for approximately twenty-two years.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 488 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 241
Issue arose whether the students transferred to private medical colleges liable to pay fees at Government rates or at the rates applicable to private medical colleges; how the differential liability, if any, is to be apportioned between the students and the Educational Trust; whether the State of Odisha and/or the MCI/NMC should be directed to make good the deficiency; and whether the entire liability should be fixed on the Education Trust.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 486 · [2026] 6 S.C.R. 294
The present appeal by the appellant-convict is directed against judgment and order dated 04.02.2025 of the High Court. Thereby, the High Court confirmed the conviction and sentence against the appellant and held the appellant guilty of commission of offences u/ss.302 and 323 of the IPC and u/ss.3(2)(v) and 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 481 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 584
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court setting aside the summoning order passed by the Magistrate and remanding the matter, regarding complicity of first appellant-corporate entity running the co-accused hospital, and the third appellant-Chairman, both of whom are in a separate territorial jurisdiction than the Magistrate; and whether the allegations contained in the complaint prima facie disclose commission of a criminal offence.
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 48 · [2026] 2 S.C.R. 144
Whether F.A. No. 213 of 2000 abated on non-substitution of LRs of ‘M’ i.e., appellant 1(2), who was one of the LRs of deceased- judgment debtor ‘K’; whether the order of the High Court dtd.03.05.2013, holding that appellants No. 2 and 3 along with other heirs of ‘K’ sufficiently represented the interest of ‘K’ in the appeal, would, by the principle of res judicata, bar a declaration that the appeal had abated; whether by allowing impleadment of the heirs and legal representatives of ‘M’ as proforma respondents in F. A. No. 213 of 2000, vide order dtd.03.05.2013, the High Court, in effect set a
Supreme Court of India12 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 479 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 577
Whether the filing/refiling of the appeal by respondent No.1 was incurably tainted and ought to have been rejected at the threshold by NCLAT.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 476 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 597
Matter arose as regards inclusion of Rajasthani language as medium of instructions for education and public employment.
Supreme Court of India7 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 474 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 567
Issue arose whether the appellant-assessee is entitled to a deduction of Rs.21,74,234/- being the interest paid by it in respect of the loan availed from the Corporation Bank u/s.36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act 1961.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 47 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 770
Whether u/s.439, CrPC the High Court could have issued directions, mandating age determination test to be conducted in all cases involving the POCSO Act. This larger question involves twin considerations, one on the aspect of jurisdiction and the other on the aspect of law i.e., the postulate of the act regarding determination of age, and how the directions issued in the impugned judgement correspond to or are in contravention of the same.
Supreme Court of India11 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 468 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 550
Whether the FIR and the charge-sheet filed against the appellants- accused for offences u/ss.3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act as well as for the offences u/s.506 r/w s.34, IPC, ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 466 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 522
Issue arose for consideration whether the disciplinary action taken against respondent No.1, culminating in his removal from service, suffers from any legal infirmity warranting interference.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 464 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 479
The specific issues which arise for determination are: (i) Whether the activities provided u/s.11(g) and (h) of the Railways Act pass muster of “distribution” of electricity, and whether such activities are a necessary pre-requisite to qualify as a DDL under the Act; (ii) Whether the Indian Railways, being an entity of the Central Government, falls within the ambit of “Appropriate Government” u/s.14 of the Electricity Act, 2003; (iii) Whether the Indian Railways, even if held to be a DDL under the Act, is exempt from the obligation to pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge or additional surcharge for the
Supreme Court of India8 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 463 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 453
Issue arose whether the decree of specific performance passed by the trial court merged in the order of the appellate court even though the appellate court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution; whether respondent’s application u/s.28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was maintainable after the Court had granted permission to make deposit of the balance amount and, pursuant thereto, the amount was also deposited; and whether the rescission of the contract and consequential dismissal of the execution application vitiated by a pedantic approach of the courts below as they failed to consider th
Supreme Court of India7 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 461 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 441
Whether the depreciation under the applicable tariff regulations must necessarily be allowed over the entire technical useful life of an asset irrespective of the period during which the asset is actually utilised for supply of electricity; whether Regulation 6.32 of 2011 Regulations confers an absolute right upon the generating utility to recover entire capital cost over the useful life of the asset, even where the asset ceases to supply electricity to the consumer; whether the APTEL erred in law in disregarding the regulatory framework and approval conditions which limited the operational an
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 46 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 517
Issue arose as regards taxability of gains said to arise on amalgamation, where shares of the amalgamating company held by the assessees as stock-in-trade, stand substituted by shares of the amalgamated company; whether such substitution, in and of itself, constitutes a realisation giving rise to taxable business income u/s.28, Income Tax Act, 1961 and if so, the conditions under which such accrual or receipt can be said to arise in the commercial sense, or whether the incidence of taxation arises only upon the subsequent sale of the substituted shares; whether the High Court while remanding t
Supreme Court of India6 May 2026Full text
2026 INSC 455 · [2026] 5 S.C.R. 421
Whether the direction of closure of the appellant-units issued by the NGT is liable to be set aside; whether the judgment of Pahwa Plastics squarely applies to the facts of this case.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis