⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,461–7,480 · Page 374 of 500
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1264 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 798
[2017] 1 S.C.R. 798 A MIS. VOESTALPINE SCHIENEN GMBH V. DELHI METRO RA!L CORPORATION LTD. (Arbitration Petition (Civil) No. 50of2016) B FEBRUARY I 0, 2017 [A. K. SIKRI AND R. K. AGRAWAL, JJ.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - ss. 12(as amended), JI (6), (8) - Arbitration clause providing for appointment of c arb…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2017Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,461–7,480 · Page 374 of 500
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1264 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 798
[2017] 1 S.C.R. 798 A MIS. VOESTALPINE SCHIENEN GMBH V. DELHI METRO RA!L CORPORATION LTD. (Arbitration Petition (Civil) No. 50of2016) B FEBRUARY I 0, 2017 [A. K. SIKRI AND R. K. AGRAWAL, JJ.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - ss. 12(as amended), JI (6), (8) - Arbitration clause providing for appointment of c arb…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1263 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 923
2. It is true that there was some delay on the part of the appellant in filing the applications, but, the appellant had explained the delay. One cannot dispute that in appropriate cases, the parties are permitted to amend their pleadings at any stage not only duriug c the peudency of the trial but also at the first and…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1262 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 394
Allowing the appeal, the Court F Per Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.: HELD: 1.1 It appears that except motive, the High Court did not give any other plausible reasons for setting aside the well reasoned order of the trial court. After going through .the evidence placed before this Court, there is no reason to disbelieve the G…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1261 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 670
Allowing the appeals, the Court F HELD: 1.1 Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 puts ;•n obligation on the prosecution to furnish to the accused, free of cost, copies of the documents mentioned therein, without any delay. It includes, documents or the relevant extracts thereof which are forwarded by the…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1260 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 658
Mallikarjuna Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh 1990 AIR 1251:1990 (2) SCR 418; K. Sood v. Secretary, Civil Aviation 1993 AIR 2285: 1993 (3) SCR 772; State of Himachal Pradesh v. A Parent of a Student of Medical College, Shim/a 1985 AIR 910 : 1985 (3) H 658 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS v. SATPAL 659 SAINI SCR 676; …
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1259 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 422
422 v. MOHAMMED ANSARI UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 423 the Dismissing appeal, the Court , HELD: 1.1 The Statement of Objects and of the Reasons Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly postulate that the ArmedForces Tribunal is constituted for the ofand adjudication disputes regarding service matters and complaintsof the verd…
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1258 · [2017] 5 S.C.R. 314
Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The adjudication order refers to and is predicated on the rig being brought to the port for repairs in February, 1996 H 314 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI v. M/S ABAN 315 LOYD CHILES OFFSHORE LTD. & ORS. for which permission was sought from the Commissioner of A Customs under…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1257 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 508
H 508 V. RAJENDRAN AND ANR. v. ANNASAMY PANDIAN (D) 509 THR. LRS. KARTHYAYANI NATCHIAR The Court can allow the application filed under Order XXIII Rule A 1 (3) CPC for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to bring a fresh suit only if the condition in either of the clauses (a) or (b) that is, existence of a "formal defe…
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1256 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 418
Aman Preet Singh Rahi. Raghav Cbadl1, A. Venayngam Balan, B Advs. for the AppeiJant. Jayant K. Sud, Ajay P. Tushir, Umang Singh, Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advs. for t11e Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by c R. BANUMATIU, J. I. This appeal arises out of the order dated • 12.07.2016 passed by the High Cou…
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1255 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 550
Partly allowing the aP.peal, the Court HELD: As per Section 20(3) of the Army Act, 1950 an officer having power not less than a brigade or equivalent commander or any prescribed officer may dismiss or remove from F the service any person serving under his command. other than an officer or a junior commissioned officer.…
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1254 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 972
- Held: The challenge pertaining to tender conditions formulated by the Central Government is not tenable as no valid grounds for interference have been made out - The endeavour of the Government in the NIA is not based on any classification except that all service providers must have a minimum of 5 MHz of spectrum F i…
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1253 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 519
K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. for the Appellant. H. R. Rao, Ms. Niranjana Singh, Arijit Prasad, R. M. Bajaj, F Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.. K. SIKRI, J, 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the matter finally at this stage with the consent of t…
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1252 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 566
Pradip Ghosh, Sr.Adv., Rauf Rahim, Ms. Poulami Das Dey, Advs. Gfor the Appellant. Mrinal Kanti Manda!, PanJat Sinha, Ad vs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. K. SIKRl, J. I. We have h.:a;\:i learned counsel for the parties at length. H 568 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] I S.C.R. A 2. For t…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1250 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 83
- In view of serious all{/ ·wide ranging implications of the issue invoh,ed as al.m the fact that serio11s doubts have been e>.]Jressed in the reference order abouJ the correctnes.o; of the view in Banga lore Water Supply and Sewerage Supply & Sewerage Board etc. v. A. Rajappa and Ors. etc. (1978) 2 SCC 213, mu11er ref…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 125 · [2017] 5 S.C.R. 473
H 473 474 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 5 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The plaintiff came with the case in the suit that 'P' was the owner of the property, who transferred it in favour of 'S', on whose General Power of Attorney 'B' has transferred the property to the plaintiff by Sale Deed dated 04.…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1249 · [2017] 14 S.C.R. 500
- Medical evidence on record, shows that lower limbs of the G appellant have been paralysed resulting in a loss of bladder and bowel control - The medical evidence establishes that the disability of the appellant is one hundred percent - On facts, the compensation of Rs.8,66,0001- awarded by the Tribunal enhanced by an…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1248 · [2017] 12 S.C.R. 179
[2017] 12 S.C.R. 179 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. A v. PFIZER LIMITED AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 22972 of2017) DECEMBER 15, 2017 B [R.F. NARIMAN AND SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.] Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - s. 26A - Powers of Central . Government to prohibit manufacture, etc., of drug and cosmetic in public interest - Exerci…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1247 · [2017] 12 S.C.R. 499
H 499 500 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] l 2 S.C.R. A C.B. Gururaj, K.P. Singh, Prakash Ranjan Nayak, Advs for the Appellant. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court B ofKarnataka dated 13 April 2016. 3. On 18 Jun…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1246 · [2017] 14 S.C.R. 107
108 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 14 S.C.R. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD:l.1 The position of law is that where the land has not been used for any purpose contemplated under the Land Reforms Act, 1954 and has been built upon, it would cease to be agricultural land. Once agricultural land loses its basic charac…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1244 · [2017] 12 S.C.R. 988
[2017] 12 S.C.R. 988 A DISABLED RIGHTS GROUP & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 292 of2006) B DECEMBER 15, 2017 [A. K. SIKRI AND ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.] Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - ss.2(i), (k), (v), (w), (zd) and (ze), 16, 25(I)(h), 31, 32, 34, 40 and 89 - Public C interest liti…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2017 INSC 1263 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 923
2. It is true that there was some delay on the part of the appellant in filing the applications, but, the appellant had explained the delay. One cannot dispute that in appropriate cases, the parties are permitted to amend their pleadings at any stage not only duriug c the peudency of the trial but also at the first and…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1262 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 394
Allowing the appeal, the Court F Per Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.: HELD: 1.1 It appears that except motive, the High Court did not give any other plausible reasons for setting aside the well reasoned order of the trial court. After going through .the evidence placed before this Court, there is no reason to disbelieve the G…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1261 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 670
Allowing the appeals, the Court F HELD: 1.1 Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 puts ;•n obligation on the prosecution to furnish to the accused, free of cost, copies of the documents mentioned therein, without any delay. It includes, documents or the relevant extracts thereof which are forwarded by the…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1260 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 658
Mallikarjuna Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh 1990 AIR 1251:1990 (2) SCR 418; K. Sood v. Secretary, Civil Aviation 1993 AIR 2285: 1993 (3) SCR 772; State of Himachal Pradesh v. A Parent of a Student of Medical College, Shim/a 1985 AIR 910 : 1985 (3) H 658 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS v. SATPAL 659 SAINI SCR 676; …
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1259 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 422
422 v. MOHAMMED ANSARI UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 423 the Dismissing appeal, the Court , HELD: 1.1 The Statement of Objects and of the Reasons Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly postulate that the ArmedForces Tribunal is constituted for the ofand adjudication disputes regarding service matters and complaintsof the verd…
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1258 · [2017] 5 S.C.R. 314
Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The adjudication order refers to and is predicated on the rig being brought to the port for repairs in February, 1996 H 314 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI v. M/S ABAN 315 LOYD CHILES OFFSHORE LTD. & ORS. for which permission was sought from the Commissioner of A Customs under…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1257 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 508
H 508 V. RAJENDRAN AND ANR. v. ANNASAMY PANDIAN (D) 509 THR. LRS. KARTHYAYANI NATCHIAR The Court can allow the application filed under Order XXIII Rule A 1 (3) CPC for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to bring a fresh suit only if the condition in either of the clauses (a) or (b) that is, existence of a "formal defe…
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1256 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 418
Aman Preet Singh Rahi. Raghav Cbadl1, A. Venayngam Balan, B Advs. for the AppeiJant. Jayant K. Sud, Ajay P. Tushir, Umang Singh, Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advs. for t11e Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by c R. BANUMATIU, J. I. This appeal arises out of the order dated • 12.07.2016 passed by the High Cou…
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1255 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 550
Partly allowing the aP.peal, the Court HELD: As per Section 20(3) of the Army Act, 1950 an officer having power not less than a brigade or equivalent commander or any prescribed officer may dismiss or remove from F the service any person serving under his command. other than an officer or a junior commissioned officer.…
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1254 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 972
- Held: The challenge pertaining to tender conditions formulated by the Central Government is not tenable as no valid grounds for interference have been made out - The endeavour of the Government in the NIA is not based on any classification except that all service providers must have a minimum of 5 MHz of spectrum F i…
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1253 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 519
K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. for the Appellant. H. R. Rao, Ms. Niranjana Singh, Arijit Prasad, R. M. Bajaj, F Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.. K. SIKRI, J, 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the matter finally at this stage with the consent of t…
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1252 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 566
Pradip Ghosh, Sr.Adv., Rauf Rahim, Ms. Poulami Das Dey, Advs. Gfor the Appellant. Mrinal Kanti Manda!, PanJat Sinha, Ad vs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. K. SIKRl, J. I. We have h.:a;\:i learned counsel for the parties at length. H 568 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] I S.C.R. A 2. For t…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1250 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 83
- In view of serious all{/ ·wide ranging implications of the issue invoh,ed as al.m the fact that serio11s doubts have been e>.]Jressed in the reference order abouJ the correctnes.o; of the view in Banga lore Water Supply and Sewerage Supply & Sewerage Board etc. v. A. Rajappa and Ors. etc. (1978) 2 SCC 213, mu11er ref…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 125 · [2017] 5 S.C.R. 473
H 473 474 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 5 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The plaintiff came with the case in the suit that 'P' was the owner of the property, who transferred it in favour of 'S', on whose General Power of Attorney 'B' has transferred the property to the plaintiff by Sale Deed dated 04.…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1249 · [2017] 14 S.C.R. 500
- Medical evidence on record, shows that lower limbs of the G appellant have been paralysed resulting in a loss of bladder and bowel control - The medical evidence establishes that the disability of the appellant is one hundred percent - On facts, the compensation of Rs.8,66,0001- awarded by the Tribunal enhanced by an…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1248 · [2017] 12 S.C.R. 179
[2017] 12 S.C.R. 179 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. A v. PFIZER LIMITED AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 22972 of2017) DECEMBER 15, 2017 B [R.F. NARIMAN AND SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.] Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - s. 26A - Powers of Central . Government to prohibit manufacture, etc., of drug and cosmetic in public interest - Exerci…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1247 · [2017] 12 S.C.R. 499
H 499 500 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] l 2 S.C.R. A C.B. Gururaj, K.P. Singh, Prakash Ranjan Nayak, Advs for the Appellant. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court B ofKarnataka dated 13 April 2016. 3. On 18 Jun…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1246 · [2017] 14 S.C.R. 107
108 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 14 S.C.R. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD:l.1 The position of law is that where the land has not been used for any purpose contemplated under the Land Reforms Act, 1954 and has been built upon, it would cease to be agricultural land. Once agricultural land loses its basic charac…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2017Full text
2017 INSC 1244 · [2017] 12 S.C.R. 988
[2017] 12 S.C.R. 988 A DISABLED RIGHTS GROUP & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 292 of2006) B DECEMBER 15, 2017 [A. K. SIKRI AND ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.] Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - ss.2(i), (k), (v), (w), (zd) and (ze), 16, 25(I)(h), 31, 32, 34, 40 and 89 - Public C interest liti…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis