⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
721–740 · Page 37 of 500
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 377 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 144
The High Court converted the conviction of respondents u/s.302 of IPC into the second part of s.304 of the IPC. Whether the judgment of the High Court requires interference.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 376 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 156
Issue arose as regards the correctness of judgment and order of the Special Court acquitting the respondents for offences under Ranbir Penal Code, 1932 and Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
721–740 · Page 37 of 500
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 377 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 144
The High Court converted the conviction of respondents u/s.302 of IPC into the second part of s.304 of the IPC. Whether the judgment of the High Court requires interference.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 376 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 156
Issue arose as regards the correctness of judgment and order of the Special Court acquitting the respondents for offences under Ranbir Penal Code, 1932 and Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987.
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 375 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 841
Matter pertains to the validity of the income tax dues of the corporate debtor owed to the Central Government, when not a part of the approved Resolution Plan.
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 374 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 850
In view of detection of anomalies in the functioning of the beneficiary research institution-Centre for Research in Rural and Industrial Development (CRRID), whether the appellant-Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) was justified in withholding its grant to CRRID; whether the control exercised by ICSSR on CRRID is ‘deep and pervasive’.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 373 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 120
Whether the Division Bench was justified in interfering with the order of the Single Judge dismissing the writ petition by the eligible retired employee who had failed to exercise option under Bank of India (Employees’) Pension Scheme, 1995 within the stipulated period.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 372 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 129
Whether the term ‘degree’ as mentioned in the rules and the recruitment notification for the appointment as Food Safety Officer (FSO) issued by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission can be restricted to “Bachelor’s degree” or whether the same would cover in its ambit, the “Master’s degree” as well.
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 371 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 866
Whether on facts, the complainant-respondent would come under the definition of ‘consumer’ in terms of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; whether any liability rested on the appellant to disburse the entire amount of Rs.31,00,000/- i.e., the remaining consideration amount for sale of the flat payable to the complainant-respondent by the borrower; whether borrower should have been joined in proceedings before the NCDRC.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 366 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 811
Matter pertains to the adequacy of compensation granted to the appellants under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 364 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 821
The present Miscellaneous Applications have been filed seeking intervention in the matter and seeking clarification/ modification of the directions contained in Para 42 of the Judgment and Order dated 20.09.2024 in Criminal Appeal No. 3883-3884 of 2024. The two questions arise before the Court: (i) whether the Advocates have an indefeasible right to appear for a party or to get their appearances marked for a party, though not duly authorised to appear in the court proceedings and (ii) whether the impugned directions given by the court impinge or affect any of the legal, fundamental or statutor
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 363 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1813
Whether judicial discipline and propriety were maintained, in the light of r.26 of the Appellate Side Rules of the High Court at Calcutta, 1966 in relation to applications u/Art.226 and the powers of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Court as the master of the roster.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 361 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 50
Matter pertains to the enhancement of the amount of compensation granted to the appellant, aged 21 years, a veterinary student and State Level player in Volleyball who sufferred quadriplegia-paralysis of all four limbs after being hit by the car and was declared 100% disabled.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 360 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 95
Whether the High Court erred in reversing the conviction of the respondent-accused under Section 376, Penal Code, 1860 for the rape of a minor girl and acquitting him.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 36 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 313
Issue arose whether the appellant-Corporation was bound to convey the lease in favour of the respondent in terms of s.51 of the Bombay Improvement Trust Transfer Act, 1925; and whether writ petition filed before the High Court sufferred from delays and laches and was liable to be dismissed as the cause of action had arisen in 1955 whereas the writ petition was filed in 2016 after a delay of 61 (sixty-one) years.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 359 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 204
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court holding the appellant no.1 guilty of offence punishable u/s. 304 IPC and appellant no. 2 for offences punishable u/ss. 323 and 451 IPC and sentencing accordingly, setting aside the order of acquittal by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 358 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 802
Whether the petition for modification of the decree regarding the custody of the child filed by the respondent-mother and the execution petition filed by the appellant-father should be heard together or whether the execution petition should proceed irrespective of the pendency of the modification petition.
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 357 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 63
The victim died in an accident. The appellants filed claim petition for compensation. In the Miscellaneous First Appeal, the High Court fixed the monthly income of deceased as Rs.8000/- per month. Whether the High Court was justified in fixing the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 8000/- per month in the given facts and circumstances of the case.
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 355 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 184
Whether the High Court was right in holding that when the principal prayer for administration of the estate was rejected by the Trial Court, any other prayer indirectly seeking partition could not have been granted, until the proper parties were impleaded in the suit; whether the sale deed in favour of the 2nd defendant by ‘V’ was valid to the extent of his undivided share in the suit property. * Author [2025] 4 S.C.R. 185 Gangubai Raghunath Ayare v. Gangaram Sakharam Dhuri (D) Thr. LRs and Ors.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 354 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 789
Matter pertains to the issue as to a person joining as an Assistant Engineer, has option to migrate to either the degree or diploma quota; and the scope of the Kerala Public Health Engineering Service Special Rules, 1960 and the Kerala Public Health Engineering Subordinate Service Rules, 1966.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 352 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1555
Law governing the arbitration agreement in the present case.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 351 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 197
In the instant Writ petition, purportedly filed in Public Interest, the Petitioner sought a direction to the private hospitals not to compel the patients to buy the medicines, etc. from the pharmacies recommended by them. The issues were (i) whether the affairs of the private hospitals, nursing homes, medical institutes, etc. with reference to the fixation of prices of drugs, equipment, or other accessories sold from the pharmacies run by them and/or with whom they have some commercial agreement, can be regulated through administrative or legislative measures? (ii) If so, what can be the exten
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 375 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 841
Matter pertains to the validity of the income tax dues of the corporate debtor owed to the Central Government, when not a part of the approved Resolution Plan.
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 374 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 850
In view of detection of anomalies in the functioning of the beneficiary research institution-Centre for Research in Rural and Industrial Development (CRRID), whether the appellant-Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) was justified in withholding its grant to CRRID; whether the control exercised by ICSSR on CRRID is ‘deep and pervasive’.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 373 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 120
Whether the Division Bench was justified in interfering with the order of the Single Judge dismissing the writ petition by the eligible retired employee who had failed to exercise option under Bank of India (Employees’) Pension Scheme, 1995 within the stipulated period.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 372 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 129
Whether the term ‘degree’ as mentioned in the rules and the recruitment notification for the appointment as Food Safety Officer (FSO) issued by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission can be restricted to “Bachelor’s degree” or whether the same would cover in its ambit, the “Master’s degree” as well.
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 371 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 866
Whether on facts, the complainant-respondent would come under the definition of ‘consumer’ in terms of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; whether any liability rested on the appellant to disburse the entire amount of Rs.31,00,000/- i.e., the remaining consideration amount for sale of the flat payable to the complainant-respondent by the borrower; whether borrower should have been joined in proceedings before the NCDRC.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 366 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 811
Matter pertains to the adequacy of compensation granted to the appellants under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 364 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 821
The present Miscellaneous Applications have been filed seeking intervention in the matter and seeking clarification/ modification of the directions contained in Para 42 of the Judgment and Order dated 20.09.2024 in Criminal Appeal No. 3883-3884 of 2024. The two questions arise before the Court: (i) whether the Advocates have an indefeasible right to appear for a party or to get their appearances marked for a party, though not duly authorised to appear in the court proceedings and (ii) whether the impugned directions given by the court impinge or affect any of the legal, fundamental or statutor
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 363 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1813
Whether judicial discipline and propriety were maintained, in the light of r.26 of the Appellate Side Rules of the High Court at Calcutta, 1966 in relation to applications u/Art.226 and the powers of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Court as the master of the roster.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 361 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 50
Matter pertains to the enhancement of the amount of compensation granted to the appellant, aged 21 years, a veterinary student and State Level player in Volleyball who sufferred quadriplegia-paralysis of all four limbs after being hit by the car and was declared 100% disabled.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 360 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 95
Whether the High Court erred in reversing the conviction of the respondent-accused under Section 376, Penal Code, 1860 for the rape of a minor girl and acquitting him.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 36 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 313
Issue arose whether the appellant-Corporation was bound to convey the lease in favour of the respondent in terms of s.51 of the Bombay Improvement Trust Transfer Act, 1925; and whether writ petition filed before the High Court sufferred from delays and laches and was liable to be dismissed as the cause of action had arisen in 1955 whereas the writ petition was filed in 2016 after a delay of 61 (sixty-one) years.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 359 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 204
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court holding the appellant no.1 guilty of offence punishable u/s. 304 IPC and appellant no. 2 for offences punishable u/ss. 323 and 451 IPC and sentencing accordingly, setting aside the order of acquittal by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 358 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 802
Whether the petition for modification of the decree regarding the custody of the child filed by the respondent-mother and the execution petition filed by the appellant-father should be heard together or whether the execution petition should proceed irrespective of the pendency of the modification petition.
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 357 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 63
The victim died in an accident. The appellants filed claim petition for compensation. In the Miscellaneous First Appeal, the High Court fixed the monthly income of deceased as Rs.8000/- per month. Whether the High Court was justified in fixing the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 8000/- per month in the given facts and circumstances of the case.
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 355 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 184
Whether the High Court was right in holding that when the principal prayer for administration of the estate was rejected by the Trial Court, any other prayer indirectly seeking partition could not have been granted, until the proper parties were impleaded in the suit; whether the sale deed in favour of the 2nd defendant by ‘V’ was valid to the extent of his undivided share in the suit property. * Author [2025] 4 S.C.R. 185 Gangubai Raghunath Ayare v. Gangaram Sakharam Dhuri (D) Thr. LRs and Ors.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 354 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 789
Matter pertains to the issue as to a person joining as an Assistant Engineer, has option to migrate to either the degree or diploma quota; and the scope of the Kerala Public Health Engineering Service Special Rules, 1960 and the Kerala Public Health Engineering Subordinate Service Rules, 1966.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 352 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1555
Law governing the arbitration agreement in the present case.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 351 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 197
In the instant Writ petition, purportedly filed in Public Interest, the Petitioner sought a direction to the private hospitals not to compel the patients to buy the medicines, etc. from the pharmacies recommended by them. The issues were (i) whether the affairs of the private hospitals, nursing homes, medical institutes, etc. with reference to the fixation of prices of drugs, equipment, or other accessories sold from the pharmacies run by them and/or with whom they have some commercial agreement, can be regulated through administrative or legislative measures? (ii) If so, what can be the exten
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis