⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
701–720 · Page 36 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 401 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1200
Whether the case of the present Petitioner is specifically covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Others [2021] 13 SCR 737; After the said judgment was brought to the notice of the respondents/authorities, whether the respondents/authorities could have proceeded with the recovery proceedings.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
701–720 · Page 36 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 401 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1200
Whether the case of the present Petitioner is specifically covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Others [2021] 13 SCR 737; After the said judgment was brought to the notice of the respondents/authorities, whether the respondents/authorities could have proceeded with the recovery proceedings.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 400 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1165
Issue arose whether the reclassification of Leading Fireman/Tandel under the Recruitment Rules, 2014, as Class III, validly overrides the earlier classification under Appendix A of the MSR 1954, and consequently fixes the retirement age at 58 rather than 60.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 4 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 12
Appellant herein has sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising under sections 353 and 186 of IPC.
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 399 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1189
Whether the complaint filed by the respondent-Credit Co-operative Society under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of a cheque allegedly issued by the appellant in favour of the respondent, ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 397 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1174
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the respondent u/s.13(2) r/w. s.13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possessing assets disproportionate to known sources of income while exercising jurisdiction u/s.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 395 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1150
Whether the Plaint Schedule stood transferred in favour of one late PC through legal, valid and binding documents; Whether appellant is justified in contending that moulding of relief by the impugned judgment is illegal.
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 394 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1113
Whether on facts, the Tribunal and the High Court erred in finding contributory negligence on the part of the driver of the scooter; whether contributory negligence could have been concluded on the ground of the scooter driver having only a learner’s license.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 392 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1821
Prosecutrix, a minor village girl, was allegedly kidnapped on the pretext of securing her a job, and then gang raped by accused-appellants over a period of two months by holding her captive by threatening her life. Whether the trial court and the High Court erred in convicting appellants u/ss.366 and 376(2)(g) IPC.
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 391 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1122
The three parties herein are the borrower/flat owners, the builder and the Bank – the lender. There were defaults at the end of each parties. However, same has been settled. Only three small issues have been flagged by the appellants: i) The Bank be directed to remove the word ‘settlement’ used in the loan account statement as it may affect future loan facilities being availed by the appellant; ii) The apartments purchased by the appellants are ready and some minor work remains which the builder may complete forthwith and hand over possession to the appellants; (iii) Another issue raised is th
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 389 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1133
Issue arose for consideration that whether the transfer or reappointment of a government employee from one post to another impact his/her seniority in the new post, and if so, is such seniority contingent upon whether the transfer was made in public interest or at the employees own request.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 388 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 957
The question to be decided herein is twin fold, whether the document of the year 1985 is a gift or Settlement or Will and whether the requirements under law or conditions in the deed have been satisfied to vest a legal right.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 387 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 933
Whether the concurrent conviction of the appellant u/s.302 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860 is justified; whether he is entitled to remission of sentence.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 386 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 951
Whether the criminal proceedings against the appellant-accused ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 384 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1579
(i) What is the scope of section 174 CrPC and how is it different from investigation pursuant to filing of FIR under section 154 CrPC. (ii) Whether recourse to inquest proceedings under Section 174 of the CrPC by the Police obviates the requirement of registration of F.I.R. under section 154 of CrPC. (iii) What is the settled law with regard to registration of FIR as laid down by this Hon’ble Court. (iv) Whether the High Court was right in passing the impugned order rejecting the prayer for issue of writ of mandamus directing the Police to register FIR and investigate on it.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 383 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1011
Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellants were held to be the lawful owners of the ‘Patta Land’.
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 382 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 915
Whether the High Court was justified in condoning the delay in filing the Second Appeal.
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 381 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 904
Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court qua the appellants; whether in the facts of the case, mere presence of the appellants at the scene of crime, without anything further, was sufficient to hold them as members of the unlawful assembly.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 38 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 431
Whether reduction in share capital is covered under “sale, exchange or relinquishment of the asset” used in Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 379 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 890
Whether the High Court was justified in non-suiting the appellant and others on the ground that an appropriate civil action would mean the proceedings only before a Civil Court and not Writ Court.
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 378 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 897
Issue arose as to whether the conviction u/s.302 IPC could be converted into s.304 Part I or Part II IPC.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 400 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1165
Issue arose whether the reclassification of Leading Fireman/Tandel under the Recruitment Rules, 2014, as Class III, validly overrides the earlier classification under Appendix A of the MSR 1954, and consequently fixes the retirement age at 58 rather than 60.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 4 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 12
Appellant herein has sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising under sections 353 and 186 of IPC.
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 399 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1189
Whether the complaint filed by the respondent-Credit Co-operative Society under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of a cheque allegedly issued by the appellant in favour of the respondent, ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 397 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1174
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the respondent u/s.13(2) r/w. s.13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possessing assets disproportionate to known sources of income while exercising jurisdiction u/s.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 395 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1150
Whether the Plaint Schedule stood transferred in favour of one late PC through legal, valid and binding documents; Whether appellant is justified in contending that moulding of relief by the impugned judgment is illegal.
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 394 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1113
Whether on facts, the Tribunal and the High Court erred in finding contributory negligence on the part of the driver of the scooter; whether contributory negligence could have been concluded on the ground of the scooter driver having only a learner’s license.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 392 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1821
Prosecutrix, a minor village girl, was allegedly kidnapped on the pretext of securing her a job, and then gang raped by accused-appellants over a period of two months by holding her captive by threatening her life. Whether the trial court and the High Court erred in convicting appellants u/ss.366 and 376(2)(g) IPC.
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 391 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1122
The three parties herein are the borrower/flat owners, the builder and the Bank – the lender. There were defaults at the end of each parties. However, same has been settled. Only three small issues have been flagged by the appellants: i) The Bank be directed to remove the word ‘settlement’ used in the loan account statement as it may affect future loan facilities being availed by the appellant; ii) The apartments purchased by the appellants are ready and some minor work remains which the builder may complete forthwith and hand over possession to the appellants; (iii) Another issue raised is th
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 389 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1133
Issue arose for consideration that whether the transfer or reappointment of a government employee from one post to another impact his/her seniority in the new post, and if so, is such seniority contingent upon whether the transfer was made in public interest or at the employees own request.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 388 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 957
The question to be decided herein is twin fold, whether the document of the year 1985 is a gift or Settlement or Will and whether the requirements under law or conditions in the deed have been satisfied to vest a legal right.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 387 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 933
Whether the concurrent conviction of the appellant u/s.302 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860 is justified; whether he is entitled to remission of sentence.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 386 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 951
Whether the criminal proceedings against the appellant-accused ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 384 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1579
(i) What is the scope of section 174 CrPC and how is it different from investigation pursuant to filing of FIR under section 154 CrPC. (ii) Whether recourse to inquest proceedings under Section 174 of the CrPC by the Police obviates the requirement of registration of F.I.R. under section 154 of CrPC. (iii) What is the settled law with regard to registration of FIR as laid down by this Hon’ble Court. (iv) Whether the High Court was right in passing the impugned order rejecting the prayer for issue of writ of mandamus directing the Police to register FIR and investigate on it.
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 383 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1011
Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellants were held to be the lawful owners of the ‘Patta Land’.
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 382 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 915
Whether the High Court was justified in condoning the delay in filing the Second Appeal.
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 381 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 904
Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court qua the appellants; whether in the facts of the case, mere presence of the appellants at the scene of crime, without anything further, was sufficient to hold them as members of the unlawful assembly.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 38 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 431
Whether reduction in share capital is covered under “sale, exchange or relinquishment of the asset” used in Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 379 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 890
Whether the High Court was justified in non-suiting the appellant and others on the ground that an appropriate civil action would mean the proceedings only before a Civil Court and not Writ Court.
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 378 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 897
Issue arose as to whether the conviction u/s.302 IPC could be converted into s.304 Part I or Part II IPC.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis