⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,141–7,160 · Page 358 of 500
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 663 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 329
- The plaintiff-Trust acquired the right to prosecute the suit, after it E got registered - The suit is restored to be deciJed afresh on merits by the trial court. Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:l. It is an admitted fact that the appellant/plaintiff -Trust was not a registered public Trust under the Act on…
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 662 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 476
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,141–7,160 · Page 358 of 500
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 663 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 329
- The plaintiff-Trust acquired the right to prosecute the suit, after it E got registered - The suit is restored to be deciJed afresh on merits by the trial court. Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:l. It is an admitted fact that the appellant/plaintiff -Trust was not a registered public Trust under the Act on…
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 662 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 476
[2017] 8 S.C.R. 476 A SGT CHAMAN LAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 8834 of 2015) B JULY25,2017 IDIPAK MISRA, AMITAVA ROY AND A. M. KHANWILKAR, JJ.j Service Law: C Promotion - On selection post - Claim for - By the handicapped officer, whose medical category was A4G4 (P) -Alleging discrimination in the …
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 660 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 338
[2017] 8 S.C.R. 338 A SWARAJ ABHIYAN (V) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (C) No. 857 of2015) B JULY21,2017 [MADAN B. LOKUR AND N. V. RAMANA, JJ.) National Food Security Act, 2013: ss.14, 15, 16, 28 and 29 - Implementation of - By the State C Governments - Sought by.filing writ petition u/Art. 32 of Constitution…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 66 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 904
WITH C. A. Nos. 796, 797-798, 800-801 and 802of2017. B. Adinarayana Rao, S. Gururaj Rao, Sr. Advs., Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Prabhakar Parnam, Ch. Leela Sarveswar, A.V. S. Raju (for V. N. Raghup…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 659 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 472
State of MP. v. Sheet/a Sahai and Others (2009) 8 SCC 617 : [2009] 12 SCR 1048; Randhir Singh Rana v. State E (Delhi Administration) (1997) 1 SCC 361: [1996] 10 Suppl. SCR 880; Reeta Nag v. State of West Bengal and others (2009) 9 SCC 129 : [2009] 13 SCR 276 -distinguished. Case Law Reference F [2009] 12 SCR 1048 disti…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 658 · [2017] 7 S.C.R. 924
[2017] 7 S.C.R. 924 A MS. EERA THROUGH DR. MANJULA KRIPPENDORF v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1217-1219 of 2017) B JULY21, 2017 [DIPAK MISRA AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: Object of its legislation - Discussed. (Per Dipak Misra, J.) c s.2(d)…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 656 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 731
- Defendant filed application u/Or. IX. r.I 3 to set aside the ex parte decree, howeve1; the same was dismissed in default - Thereafter, defendant died - Legal heirs of the defendant i.e. appellants filed application praying for restoration of application filed u/Or. IX D r. I 3 - Application dismissed by trial Court -…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 653 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 488
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The addition of charge was based on a subsequent investigation on the direction issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police after disposal of the Section 438 petition G by the High Court and the arrest also was carried out on his instruction. It is significant to note that when…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 652 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 507
WITH C. A. No. 898 of 2010. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, D. Mahesh Babu, Advs. for the Appellants. D S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Mrityunjai Singh, M/s. Venkat Pi,ilwai Law Associates, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. I. The issue raised in these Appeals pertains to the question whether …
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 649 · [2017] 7 S.C.R. 850
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. It is clear that the High Court concluded that lantern was not burning since, had the lantern been burning, there would have certainly been blackening on the peg and on the wall near to it. The trial court noticed the evidence and gave reason for holding that blackening on the …
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 645 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 524
524 K. SUB BARAYUDU AND OTHERS v. THE SPECIAL 525 DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISITION) of Rs.1,5001- for each pomegranate tree - As regards lime trees, A fresh limes are available throughout the year and have good market and the lime trees are earning income almost throughout the year -Compensation of Rs. 100/- per each…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 642 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 517
14. 09.1992 - It is obvious that seven years back a fruit bearing tree would have fetched lesser income than it would fetch now - On facts, appellant awarded compensation of Rs.2,0001- per G pomegranate tree along with all the statutory benefits. Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 As per Letter No. F(3) 21…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 640 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 491
Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: Normally in a contempt jurisdiction the Court shall not enter upon adjudication of a dispute. Maybe the applicant in a contempt petition is entitled to some relief but relief has to be G granted after proper adjudication of the dispute because only after a proper adjudication, i…
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 637 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 453
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The amount referred to as compensation under G Section 128 of Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, is the amount @ 15% compound interest on the amount already deposited, as ordered by the Tribunal. Merely, because a liquidated amount is not stipulated or det…
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 635 · [2017] 7 S.C.R. 894
Para 28 r/w Exemption Notification dated 28'" Febntary, 1992 C - Exemption Notification issued to appellant (manufacturer of a bulk drug) for the period upto 31.12.1994 - Demand notice by revenue to the appellant finding that there was differential in the price charged for the goods manufactured during exemption period…
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 634 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 151
F Evidence Act, 1872: s. 65B (4) - interpretation - Admissibility of electronic records - Admissibility of Call Detail Record (CDR) - No objection taken when the CDRs were adduced in evidence before the trial court or appellate stage before the High Court - Permissibility of G an objection regarding inadmissibility at …
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 629 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 389
- referred to. Case Law Reference (2015) 13 sec 122 referred to Para 4 F CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 1185 of2017. From the Judgment and Order dated 18.04.2017 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Writ Petition No. 132 of2017. G Devadatt Kamat, Rajesh Inamda…
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 628 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 367
368 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017) 6 S.C.R. A unanimity between the Members of the Managing Committee of the School resolving to settle the issue with respondent No.I amicably on terms agreed upon then perhaps, compromise between respondent No.I on the one hand and the Management of School on the other would have been pe…
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 623 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 375
- Justification of - Held: High Court erred in entertaining the tenant's writ petition as also in exercising its supervisory jurisdiction D by interfering in the orders impugned therein - On facts or/and in law, no case made out by tenant on the merits - High Court should have dismissed the writ petition in limine sinc…
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 622 · [2017] 7 S.C.R. 825
H 825 826 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 7 S.C.R. A Per N. V. Ramana, J.: Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 It is well settled that circumstantial evidence should be strong, convincing and unassailable leading to the only inference that crime should have been committed by the accused B only and it should not give …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2017] 8 S.C.R. 476 A SGT CHAMAN LAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 8834 of 2015) B JULY25,2017 IDIPAK MISRA, AMITAVA ROY AND A. M. KHANWILKAR, JJ.j Service Law: C Promotion - On selection post - Claim for - By the handicapped officer, whose medical category was A4G4 (P) -Alleging discrimination in the …
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 660 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 338
[2017] 8 S.C.R. 338 A SWARAJ ABHIYAN (V) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (C) No. 857 of2015) B JULY21,2017 [MADAN B. LOKUR AND N. V. RAMANA, JJ.) National Food Security Act, 2013: ss.14, 15, 16, 28 and 29 - Implementation of - By the State C Governments - Sought by.filing writ petition u/Art. 32 of Constitution…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 66 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 904
WITH C. A. Nos. 796, 797-798, 800-801 and 802of2017. B. Adinarayana Rao, S. Gururaj Rao, Sr. Advs., Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Prabhakar Parnam, Ch. Leela Sarveswar, A.V. S. Raju (for V. N. Raghup…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 659 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 472
State of MP. v. Sheet/a Sahai and Others (2009) 8 SCC 617 : [2009] 12 SCR 1048; Randhir Singh Rana v. State E (Delhi Administration) (1997) 1 SCC 361: [1996] 10 Suppl. SCR 880; Reeta Nag v. State of West Bengal and others (2009) 9 SCC 129 : [2009] 13 SCR 276 -distinguished. Case Law Reference F [2009] 12 SCR 1048 disti…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 658 · [2017] 7 S.C.R. 924
[2017] 7 S.C.R. 924 A MS. EERA THROUGH DR. MANJULA KRIPPENDORF v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1217-1219 of 2017) B JULY21, 2017 [DIPAK MISRA AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: Object of its legislation - Discussed. (Per Dipak Misra, J.) c s.2(d)…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 656 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 731
- Defendant filed application u/Or. IX. r.I 3 to set aside the ex parte decree, howeve1; the same was dismissed in default - Thereafter, defendant died - Legal heirs of the defendant i.e. appellants filed application praying for restoration of application filed u/Or. IX D r. I 3 - Application dismissed by trial Court -…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 653 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 488
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The addition of charge was based on a subsequent investigation on the direction issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police after disposal of the Section 438 petition G by the High Court and the arrest also was carried out on his instruction. It is significant to note that when…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 652 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 507
WITH C. A. No. 898 of 2010. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, D. Mahesh Babu, Advs. for the Appellants. D S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Mrityunjai Singh, M/s. Venkat Pi,ilwai Law Associates, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. I. The issue raised in these Appeals pertains to the question whether …
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 649 · [2017] 7 S.C.R. 850
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. It is clear that the High Court concluded that lantern was not burning since, had the lantern been burning, there would have certainly been blackening on the peg and on the wall near to it. The trial court noticed the evidence and gave reason for holding that blackening on the …
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 645 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 524
524 K. SUB BARAYUDU AND OTHERS v. THE SPECIAL 525 DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISITION) of Rs.1,5001- for each pomegranate tree - As regards lime trees, A fresh limes are available throughout the year and have good market and the lime trees are earning income almost throughout the year -Compensation of Rs. 100/- per each…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 642 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 517
14. 09.1992 - It is obvious that seven years back a fruit bearing tree would have fetched lesser income than it would fetch now - On facts, appellant awarded compensation of Rs.2,0001- per G pomegranate tree along with all the statutory benefits. Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 As per Letter No. F(3) 21…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 640 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 491
Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: Normally in a contempt jurisdiction the Court shall not enter upon adjudication of a dispute. Maybe the applicant in a contempt petition is entitled to some relief but relief has to be G granted after proper adjudication of the dispute because only after a proper adjudication, i…
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 637 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 453
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The amount referred to as compensation under G Section 128 of Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, is the amount @ 15% compound interest on the amount already deposited, as ordered by the Tribunal. Merely, because a liquidated amount is not stipulated or det…
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 635 · [2017] 7 S.C.R. 894
Para 28 r/w Exemption Notification dated 28'" Febntary, 1992 C - Exemption Notification issued to appellant (manufacturer of a bulk drug) for the period upto 31.12.1994 - Demand notice by revenue to the appellant finding that there was differential in the price charged for the goods manufactured during exemption period…
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 634 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 151
F Evidence Act, 1872: s. 65B (4) - interpretation - Admissibility of electronic records - Admissibility of Call Detail Record (CDR) - No objection taken when the CDRs were adduced in evidence before the trial court or appellate stage before the High Court - Permissibility of G an objection regarding inadmissibility at …
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 629 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 389
- referred to. Case Law Reference (2015) 13 sec 122 referred to Para 4 F CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 1185 of2017. From the Judgment and Order dated 18.04.2017 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Writ Petition No. 132 of2017. G Devadatt Kamat, Rajesh Inamda…
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 628 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 367
368 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017) 6 S.C.R. A unanimity between the Members of the Managing Committee of the School resolving to settle the issue with respondent No.I amicably on terms agreed upon then perhaps, compromise between respondent No.I on the one hand and the Management of School on the other would have been pe…
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 623 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 375
- Justification of - Held: High Court erred in entertaining the tenant's writ petition as also in exercising its supervisory jurisdiction D by interfering in the orders impugned therein - On facts or/and in law, no case made out by tenant on the merits - High Court should have dismissed the writ petition in limine sinc…
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2017Full text
2017 INSC 622 · [2017] 7 S.C.R. 825
H 825 826 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 7 S.C.R. A Per N. V. Ramana, J.: Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 It is well settled that circumstantial evidence should be strong, convincing and unassailable leading to the only inference that crime should have been committed by the accused B only and it should not give …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis