⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
641–660 · Page 33 of 500
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 473 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 78
Issue arose whether civil suits could have been instituted in courts in Patna and Delhi by employees in view of the specific clauses in the appointment letter that courts in Mumbai would have exclusive jurisdiction to decide disputes by and between the contracting parties.
Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 472 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 446
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
641–660 · Page 33 of 500
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 473 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 78
Issue arose whether civil suits could have been instituted in courts in Patna and Delhi by employees in view of the specific clauses in the appointment letter that courts in Mumbai would have exclusive jurisdiction to decide disputes by and between the contracting parties.
Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 472 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 446
Whether the benefit of extension of retirement age for the physically disabled category could be confined to persons with visual impairment as provided in the OM dated 29.03.2013 or it should be available to persons suffering from all such disabilities as are specified in the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016; whether such extension could be withdrawn as was done by the OM dated 04.11.2019. If yes, then what would be its effect on the claim of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 471 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 608
Whether the High Court erred in quashing the FIR against the respondent no.1-public servant under Section 13(1)(b) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in a case of Disproportionate Assets, on the ground that the Superintendent of Police (SP) failed to conduct a preliminary enquiry before passing the orders directing registration of FIR.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 47 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 657
The two accused-appellants and their father-the third accused, were convicted by the trial court u/s.302 r/w s.34 IPC for assaulting a person with deadly weapons causing his death. High Court upheld the conviction of the appellants while setting aside the conviction of their father. The complainant (PW-6) who filed the FIR was initially projected as the eye witness but later turned hostile during the trial and it was only PW-10 (mother of the deceased) who claimed to be the eye witness. The conviction of appellants was challenged in the instant appeal as being illegal causing grave miscarriage
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 469 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 603
How the compensation payable under the Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the Dependents of Deceased Government Employees Rules, 2006 has to be dealt with in computing the compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 468 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 435
Whether the Tribunal was justified in directing the insurer to pay the award amount and recover it from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle carrying hazardous goods, in view of the absence of an endorsement in the driving licence of the driver as required under s.11 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 r/w r.9 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 467 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 458
In view of the unequivocal admission made by the defendant in his written statement, whether the High Court was right in decreeing the suit for recovery of possession applying Or.XII r.6 of the CPC thereby, affirming the decree of eviction passed by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 466 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 58
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court in revision application confirming the judgment of the appellate bench whereby decree of the trial court was reversed; and whether the ‘agreement of conducting’ between parties was in nature of licensor and licensee of the suit premises or merely for conducting the hotel business of the first defendant by the plaintiff.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 463 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 714
The present set of appeals have travelled to this 3-Judge Bench as a result of the split verdict delivered through Judgment dated 18.05.2023 in Civil Appeal No. 3957 of 2023 and other connected matters. All the candidates had successfully cleared their preliminary examination, followed by mains examination, as per the requirements of marks in their respective categories. However, none of these candidates had their certificates issued as per the date specified in the Subsequent Notice (dated 04.08.2022), their names were not included in the list of the candidates called for interview.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 462 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 47
Matter pertains to the correctness of order by the Division Bench of the High Court with regard to upholding the order of the sub-registrar, refusing registration of a sale deed.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 458 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 425
Whether the allegations against the appellant, as they stand, constitute an offence, u/ss.376(2)(f), 417 and 506 IPC; and whether the case of the appellant is fit for discharge u/s.227 CrPC, 1973.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 457 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 23
Appellant established physical relationship with the complainant on promise of marriage. Complainant obtained divorce from her husband on the assurance of the appellant that he will marry her. Later, on refusal of the appellant to marry her, complainant lodged FIR u/ss.376 and 506 IPC. The Sessions Court discharged the appellant. High Court set aside the order of discharge. The issue for consideration was whether there was sufficient material on record for the Sessions Court to have discharged the appellant for offences under ss.376 and 506 IPC.
Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 456 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 617
Issue arose whether the term imprisonment for a term “not less than 10 years” in clause (i) of the proviso (a) to s.167(2) Cr.P.C would include an offence where the punishment of 14 years of imprisonment is prescribed, but no minimum period of imprisonment is prescribed for such offence.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 454 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2789
Whether SEBI can pass multiple final orders on the same cause of action; applicability of principles of res judicata/constructive res judicata; whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in setting aside the 2018 disgorgement order passed by SEBI holding that it was barred by the principle of res judicata in view of its earlier 2014 order.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 453 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 33
The present dispute hinges on the phrase “voyage should commence & complete before monsoon sets in”, a special condition contained in the contract for insurance between the parties, and raises questions regarding its validity, interpretation and materiality. Whether, the special condition in the policy schedule for voyage insurance stands breached justifying the de facto repudiation of the appellant’s claim by the respondent.
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 451 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 651
The issue involved relates to the appointments to the post of assistant teachers in primary schools in the State of West Bengal.
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 450 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 551
Issue arose whether a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell is liable to be decreed if the buyer had accepted the refund of the majority of the earnest money deposit/advance consideration, during the pendency of the suit.
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 449 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 13
Whether recovery of the amount extended to stenographer Grade-I and Personal Assistant, while they were in service, justified after their retirement and without affording any opportunity of hearing.
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 448 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 695
Whether in light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Jaiveer Singh & Ors. v. The State of Uttarakhand & Ors. and the order of this Court in the case of Viswanath v. The State of Uttarakhand & Ors. the impugned judgment and order of the High Court is liable to be quashed and set aside.
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 447 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 681
Whether the limitation to file an appeal under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code starts from the date of pronouncement of the order or from the date when the order is communicated to the parties.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Whether the benefit of extension of retirement age for the physically disabled category could be confined to persons with visual impairment as provided in the OM dated 29.03.2013 or it should be available to persons suffering from all such disabilities as are specified in the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016; whether such extension could be withdrawn as was done by the OM dated 04.11.2019. If yes, then what would be its effect on the claim of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 471 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 608
Whether the High Court erred in quashing the FIR against the respondent no.1-public servant under Section 13(1)(b) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in a case of Disproportionate Assets, on the ground that the Superintendent of Police (SP) failed to conduct a preliminary enquiry before passing the orders directing registration of FIR.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 47 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 657
The two accused-appellants and their father-the third accused, were convicted by the trial court u/s.302 r/w s.34 IPC for assaulting a person with deadly weapons causing his death. High Court upheld the conviction of the appellants while setting aside the conviction of their father. The complainant (PW-6) who filed the FIR was initially projected as the eye witness but later turned hostile during the trial and it was only PW-10 (mother of the deceased) who claimed to be the eye witness. The conviction of appellants was challenged in the instant appeal as being illegal causing grave miscarriage
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 469 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 603
How the compensation payable under the Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the Dependents of Deceased Government Employees Rules, 2006 has to be dealt with in computing the compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 468 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 435
Whether the Tribunal was justified in directing the insurer to pay the award amount and recover it from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle carrying hazardous goods, in view of the absence of an endorsement in the driving licence of the driver as required under s.11 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 r/w r.9 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 467 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 458
In view of the unequivocal admission made by the defendant in his written statement, whether the High Court was right in decreeing the suit for recovery of possession applying Or.XII r.6 of the CPC thereby, affirming the decree of eviction passed by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 466 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 58
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court in revision application confirming the judgment of the appellate bench whereby decree of the trial court was reversed; and whether the ‘agreement of conducting’ between parties was in nature of licensor and licensee of the suit premises or merely for conducting the hotel business of the first defendant by the plaintiff.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 463 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 714
The present set of appeals have travelled to this 3-Judge Bench as a result of the split verdict delivered through Judgment dated 18.05.2023 in Civil Appeal No. 3957 of 2023 and other connected matters. All the candidates had successfully cleared their preliminary examination, followed by mains examination, as per the requirements of marks in their respective categories. However, none of these candidates had their certificates issued as per the date specified in the Subsequent Notice (dated 04.08.2022), their names were not included in the list of the candidates called for interview.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 462 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 47
Matter pertains to the correctness of order by the Division Bench of the High Court with regard to upholding the order of the sub-registrar, refusing registration of a sale deed.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 458 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 425
Whether the allegations against the appellant, as they stand, constitute an offence, u/ss.376(2)(f), 417 and 506 IPC; and whether the case of the appellant is fit for discharge u/s.227 CrPC, 1973.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 457 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 23
Appellant established physical relationship with the complainant on promise of marriage. Complainant obtained divorce from her husband on the assurance of the appellant that he will marry her. Later, on refusal of the appellant to marry her, complainant lodged FIR u/ss.376 and 506 IPC. The Sessions Court discharged the appellant. High Court set aside the order of discharge. The issue for consideration was whether there was sufficient material on record for the Sessions Court to have discharged the appellant for offences under ss.376 and 506 IPC.
Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 456 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 617
Issue arose whether the term imprisonment for a term “not less than 10 years” in clause (i) of the proviso (a) to s.167(2) Cr.P.C would include an offence where the punishment of 14 years of imprisonment is prescribed, but no minimum period of imprisonment is prescribed for such offence.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 454 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2789
Whether SEBI can pass multiple final orders on the same cause of action; applicability of principles of res judicata/constructive res judicata; whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in setting aside the 2018 disgorgement order passed by SEBI holding that it was barred by the principle of res judicata in view of its earlier 2014 order.
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 453 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 33
The present dispute hinges on the phrase “voyage should commence & complete before monsoon sets in”, a special condition contained in the contract for insurance between the parties, and raises questions regarding its validity, interpretation and materiality. Whether, the special condition in the policy schedule for voyage insurance stands breached justifying the de facto repudiation of the appellant’s claim by the respondent.
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 451 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 651
The issue involved relates to the appointments to the post of assistant teachers in primary schools in the State of West Bengal.
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 450 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 551
Issue arose whether a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell is liable to be decreed if the buyer had accepted the refund of the majority of the earnest money deposit/advance consideration, during the pendency of the suit.
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 449 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 13
Whether recovery of the amount extended to stenographer Grade-I and Personal Assistant, while they were in service, justified after their retirement and without affording any opportunity of hearing.
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 448 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 695
Whether in light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Jaiveer Singh & Ors. v. The State of Uttarakhand & Ors. and the order of this Court in the case of Viswanath v. The State of Uttarakhand & Ors. the impugned judgment and order of the High Court is liable to be quashed and set aside.
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 447 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 681
Whether the limitation to file an appeal under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code starts from the date of pronouncement of the order or from the date when the order is communicated to the parties.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis