⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
601–620 · Page 31 of 500
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 525 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1373
Whether upon approval of the resolution plan by the NCLT, the claim of the respondent being outside the purview of the resolution plan stood extinguished; whether the arbitral award dated 06.07.2018 was capable of being executed.
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 524 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1350
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the judgment passed by the High Court affirming the order of the competent authority issuing certificate of deemed conveyance in respect of a plot to first respondent.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
601–620 · Page 31 of 500
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 525 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1373
Whether upon approval of the resolution plan by the NCLT, the claim of the respondent being outside the purview of the resolution plan stood extinguished; whether the arbitral award dated 06.07.2018 was capable of being executed.
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 524 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1350
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the judgment passed by the High Court affirming the order of the competent authority issuing certificate of deemed conveyance in respect of a plot to first respondent.
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 523 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2811
In petition u/s.34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Single Judge had set aside the Arbitral Award. Division Bench in appeal thereagainst u/s.37, Arbitration Act by way of the impugned judgment, inter alia upheld the dismissal of L&T’s counter-claim and agreed with the findings of the Arbitral Tribunal that the Supplementary Agreement was a non-starter as it was vitiated by economic duress; that the Development Agreement was not novated by the Supplementary Agreement; that L&T committed fundamental breach of the Development Agreement. The operative part of the award fixing the monetary
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 521 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1398
The question involved is the interpretation of proviso to Section 26(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (“RFCTLARR Act, 2013”) in the context of the date that is relevant for determining the market value of the land being acquired.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 520 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1403
The High Court in the impugned judgment took the view that Order 41 Rule 31 is mandatory and the failure on the part of the First Appellate Court to frame the points for determination as per Order 41 Rule 31 vitiated the judgment and made it wholly void. Whether non-compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 CPC would by itself vitiate the judgment of the Appellate Court; Whether the judgment of the Appellate Court can be interfered with under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC if the Appellant has not shown any points for determination in the Appeal.
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 52 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 718
Whether the High Court was justified in finding that the original plaintiff was not entitled to discretionary relief of specific performance under Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act; whether the relinquishment of claim to further performance of the remaining part of the contract can be made at any stage of litigation.
Supreme Court of India16 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 518 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2593
(a) Whether the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee had the power to determine and direct that a particular amount of the fees charged to NRI students be kept in a corpus fund maintained by the State? (b) Whether the self-financing medical colleges are entitled to retain the fees collected for the corpus fund which were to be transferred to the State?
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 518 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2497
Whether it is a fit case to use the power under Article 142 to do complete justice.
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 514 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1409
Whether a fresh suit can be filed to challenge a compromise decree.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 512 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1334
Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the s.482, CrPC application filed by the appellants despite the matter being civil in nature.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 511 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 169
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court enhancing the compensation awarded to the claimants under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 51 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 498
Whether the act of creating fake/multiple user IDs by an individual, who may or may not be an authorized railway agent, with the intention to procure and supply online tickets through IRCTC portal would constitute an offence under Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 509 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 128
Misconduct committed by Advocates. The Advocates offered an absolute and unconditional apology. Whether the advocates are worthy of pardon.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 508 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 829
Matter pertains recall of judgment of this Court on the ground that the respondents in the appeals were not served.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 507 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 243
Whether service of a Section 21 notice and joinder in a Section 11 application are prerequisites to implead a person/entity as a party to the arbitral proceedings; What is the source of jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal over a person/entity who is sought to be impleaded as a party to the arbitral proceedings; As a corollary, what is the relevant inquiry that the arbitral tribunal must undertake when determining its own jurisdiction under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 505 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 161
Whether High Court correctly disposed of the prayer for quashing of the summoning order issued by the Trial Court in Complaint Case u/ss.498A, 323, 504, 506 of the Penal Code, 1860 and s.4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 without deciding the quashing petition on merits.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 504 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2736
Appellants sought quashing of FIR in respect of offences u/ss.498-A and s.114 of IPC u/s.482 of CrPC. By the impugned order dated 01.02.2024, the High Court dismissed the petition.
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 502 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1275
Whether the complaint filed by the respondent makes out a case for offences punishable under Section 500 read with Section 34, IPC against the appellants.
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 501 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1312
Whether the High Court has committed any serious error in law while granting anticipatory bail in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 500 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1299
Whether the conviction of the appellant u/s.85(i)(b), Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 and the sentence awarded is justified.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 523 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2811
In petition u/s.34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Single Judge had set aside the Arbitral Award. Division Bench in appeal thereagainst u/s.37, Arbitration Act by way of the impugned judgment, inter alia upheld the dismissal of L&T’s counter-claim and agreed with the findings of the Arbitral Tribunal that the Supplementary Agreement was a non-starter as it was vitiated by economic duress; that the Development Agreement was not novated by the Supplementary Agreement; that L&T committed fundamental breach of the Development Agreement. The operative part of the award fixing the monetary
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 521 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1398
The question involved is the interpretation of proviso to Section 26(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (“RFCTLARR Act, 2013”) in the context of the date that is relevant for determining the market value of the land being acquired.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 520 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1403
The High Court in the impugned judgment took the view that Order 41 Rule 31 is mandatory and the failure on the part of the First Appellate Court to frame the points for determination as per Order 41 Rule 31 vitiated the judgment and made it wholly void. Whether non-compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 CPC would by itself vitiate the judgment of the Appellate Court; Whether the judgment of the Appellate Court can be interfered with under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC if the Appellant has not shown any points for determination in the Appeal.
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 52 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 718
Whether the High Court was justified in finding that the original plaintiff was not entitled to discretionary relief of specific performance under Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act; whether the relinquishment of claim to further performance of the remaining part of the contract can be made at any stage of litigation.
Supreme Court of India16 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 518 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2593
(a) Whether the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee had the power to determine and direct that a particular amount of the fees charged to NRI students be kept in a corpus fund maintained by the State? (b) Whether the self-financing medical colleges are entitled to retain the fees collected for the corpus fund which were to be transferred to the State?
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 518 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2497
Whether it is a fit case to use the power under Article 142 to do complete justice.
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 514 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1409
Whether a fresh suit can be filed to challenge a compromise decree.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 512 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1334
Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the s.482, CrPC application filed by the appellants despite the matter being civil in nature.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 511 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 169
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court enhancing the compensation awarded to the claimants under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 51 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 498
Whether the act of creating fake/multiple user IDs by an individual, who may or may not be an authorized railway agent, with the intention to procure and supply online tickets through IRCTC portal would constitute an offence under Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 509 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 128
Misconduct committed by Advocates. The Advocates offered an absolute and unconditional apology. Whether the advocates are worthy of pardon.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 508 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 829
Matter pertains recall of judgment of this Court on the ground that the respondents in the appeals were not served.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 507 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 243
Whether service of a Section 21 notice and joinder in a Section 11 application are prerequisites to implead a person/entity as a party to the arbitral proceedings; What is the source of jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal over a person/entity who is sought to be impleaded as a party to the arbitral proceedings; As a corollary, what is the relevant inquiry that the arbitral tribunal must undertake when determining its own jurisdiction under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 505 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 161
Whether High Court correctly disposed of the prayer for quashing of the summoning order issued by the Trial Court in Complaint Case u/ss.498A, 323, 504, 506 of the Penal Code, 1860 and s.4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 without deciding the quashing petition on merits.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 504 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2736
Appellants sought quashing of FIR in respect of offences u/ss.498-A and s.114 of IPC u/s.482 of CrPC. By the impugned order dated 01.02.2024, the High Court dismissed the petition.
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 502 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1275
Whether the complaint filed by the respondent makes out a case for offences punishable under Section 500 read with Section 34, IPC against the appellants.
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 501 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1312
Whether the High Court has committed any serious error in law while granting anticipatory bail in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 500 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1299
Whether the conviction of the appellant u/s.85(i)(b), Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 and the sentence awarded is justified.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis