⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,821–5,840 · Page 292 of 500
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1369 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 207
Respondent, appointed in 2010, was working as Grade II Police B Constable at the IXth Batallion, Manimuthar, Palayamkottai. She tendered her resignation on 1 June 2017, which was accepted on 12 June 2017. On 13 July 2017, the respondent purported to address communication withdrawing the resignation. The High Court in t…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1368 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 84
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,821–5,840 · Page 292 of 500
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1369 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 207
Respondent, appointed in 2010, was working as Grade II Police B Constable at the IXth Batallion, Manimuthar, Palayamkottai. She tendered her resignation on 1 June 2017, which was accepted on 12 June 2017. On 13 July 2017, the respondent purported to address communication withdrawing the resignation. The High Court in t…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1368 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 84
Sushil Karanjkar, Nikhilesh Kumar and K. N. Rai, Advs. for the Appellant. H 86 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 15 S.C.R. A Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar and Anoop Kandari, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. B 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgm…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1367 · [2019] 16 S.C.R. 1131
– The appellant had uninterruptedly served till the regularisation of his service which was made in accordance with the Rules – Further, the Respondent had issued an office memorandum dated 11.03.1994 providing for relaxation of the condition which prescribed minimum 10 years service on the post of Junior G Engineer – …
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1366 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 125
– It was also contended that the decision of the State amounted to blacklisting and that it was issued without notice or pre-decisional hearing – High Court rejected the challenge – On appeal, held: In E the instant case, even if one assumes that accused in the pending criminal case was involved and had sought to indul…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1365 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 37
the affected land owners filed Special Leave Petition(s) and Supreme Court vide judgment dtd. 11.11.16 passed in Civil Appeal No.2927/ 2010 allowed their appeals restoring the compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- per acre in their case, as awarded by the Reference Court – Present appellant(s) who was/were also aggrieved by t…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1364 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 24
Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD : Whether the respondent-insurer had waived the condition relating to delay in intimation and lodging of the claim, by appointing a surveyor. 1. In view of the law laid down by the three Judge Bench in the Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd. v. New India Assurance Company CLtd, the argume…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1363 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 270
Evidence – Evidentiary value of extra-judicial confession – Discussed. Allowing the appeals, the Court E HELD : 1.1 There are material contradictions in the testimonies of PW-28 and PW-29. The evidence of PW-28 and PW-29 also becomes shaky as both of them knew that Arjun was missing since 4th February 2001 but did not …
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1362 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 93
94 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 15 S.C.R. A granted to a candidate in the very academic year, the court can mould the relief and direct the admission to be granted in the next academic year by directing to increase the number of seats as considered appropriate in the case– In such eventuality, if the management was fou…
Supreme Court of India12 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1361 · [2019] 18 S.C.R. 1144
shared parenting by the parties in the U.S. and the petitioner-wife was not entitled to the sole custody of the children – Aggrieved, the petitioner-wife filed appeal before the High Court in India, which was dismissed – Thereafter, respondent-husband filed writ of Habeas Corpus before the High Court in India to direct…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1360 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 79
selection for the relinquished vacancy has to be as per the existing Rules – Thus, the respondent-candidate has no right to claim selection as per the Rules – Appeal allowed. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No.9338 of 2019. F From the impugned final Judgment and Order dated 12.07.2018 of the High Court of Ju…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1359 · [2019] 18 S.C.R. 990
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 10870 F of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2018 of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow in O.A. No. 477 of 2017 and order dated 12th July, 2018 in M.A. No. 1306 & 1307/2018 in OA No. 477/2017. G Ms. V.Mohana, R. Balasubramanian, Sr. Advs., Prana…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1357 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 253
identical and there were no major cosntradictions between them – According to PW-1, he was present at the place of incidence and immediately after occurrence dictated the complaint to PW-4 and according to PW-4, he reached the spot at about 12:45 p.m.– Thereafter, PW-1 was sent to police station – The version of PW-1 a…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1356 · [2019] 16 S.C.R. 1095
1096 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 16 S.C.R. A applicant has to pay – The respondent/applicant cannot claim the benefit of the earlier guideline value existing prior to the date when approval was granted by the Government – Therefore, the respondent will have to pay FSI Premium charges based on the guideline value as ex…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1355 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 829
829 830 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 14 S.C.R. A Bench in Hardeep Singh – Trial court furnished reasons for relying on the provisions of s.114 of the Evidence Act having due regard to the fact that the incident had taken place within the confines of the matrimonial home where only the second respondent and the deceased…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1354 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 818
818 RAM MURTI YADAV v. STATE OF UTTAR 819 PRADESH AND ANOTHER judicial function – Judges must strive for the highest standards of A integrity in both their professional and personal lives. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The service records of the appellant have been examined by the Screening Committee, the F…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1353 · [2019] 17 S.C.R. 1089
Validity of s.13(2) – Held: On a conjoint reading of Art. 323B and Arts. 245 and 246 with Entry 18 of the State List in the Seventh Schedule, the Chhattisgarh State Legislature was competent to enact the Rent Control Act, to the extent that it provides for the adjudication of original disputes relating to tenancy and r…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1352 · [2019] 17 S.C.R. 661
being a question of fact cannot be decided by High Court in s.482 petition – High Court also noted that the intermediary could not claim exemption in case he fails to expeditiously remove or disable access to the objectionable material or unlawful activity, even after receiving actual knowledge thereof and that since i…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1350 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 849
Allowing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1. The High Court did not keep in view that even though the respondent’s leave application dated 30.04.2004 was pending consideration, the respondent on her own went and joined Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS) on 15.06.2004 and this has been suppressed by the res…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1349 · [2019] 17 S.C.R. 742
– The refusal to set aside an arbitral award must be under s. 34 i.e. after the grounds set out in s. 34 have been applied to the arbitral award in question and after the courts have turned down such grounds – In the present case there was no adjudication u/s. 34 – Therefore, the appeals filed in the present case do no…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1348 · [2019] 17 S.C.R. 1128
Dr. Anand Vardhan Sharma, Amit Tyagi, V.K. Vashudev, Kailash Prashad Pandey, Advs. for the Respondents. H 1130 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 17 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. ABDUL NAZEER, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. B 3. The instant appeal has been filed by the claimants challenging …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Sushil Karanjkar, Nikhilesh Kumar and K. N. Rai, Advs. for the Appellant. H 86 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 15 S.C.R. A Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar and Anoop Kandari, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. B 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgm…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1367 · [2019] 16 S.C.R. 1131
– The appellant had uninterruptedly served till the regularisation of his service which was made in accordance with the Rules – Further, the Respondent had issued an office memorandum dated 11.03.1994 providing for relaxation of the condition which prescribed minimum 10 years service on the post of Junior G Engineer – …
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1366 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 125
– It was also contended that the decision of the State amounted to blacklisting and that it was issued without notice or pre-decisional hearing – High Court rejected the challenge – On appeal, held: In E the instant case, even if one assumes that accused in the pending criminal case was involved and had sought to indul…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1365 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 37
the affected land owners filed Special Leave Petition(s) and Supreme Court vide judgment dtd. 11.11.16 passed in Civil Appeal No.2927/ 2010 allowed their appeals restoring the compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- per acre in their case, as awarded by the Reference Court – Present appellant(s) who was/were also aggrieved by t…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1364 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 24
Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD : Whether the respondent-insurer had waived the condition relating to delay in intimation and lodging of the claim, by appointing a surveyor. 1. In view of the law laid down by the three Judge Bench in the Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd. v. New India Assurance Company CLtd, the argume…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1363 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 270
Evidence – Evidentiary value of extra-judicial confession – Discussed. Allowing the appeals, the Court E HELD : 1.1 There are material contradictions in the testimonies of PW-28 and PW-29. The evidence of PW-28 and PW-29 also becomes shaky as both of them knew that Arjun was missing since 4th February 2001 but did not …
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1362 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 93
94 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 15 S.C.R. A granted to a candidate in the very academic year, the court can mould the relief and direct the admission to be granted in the next academic year by directing to increase the number of seats as considered appropriate in the case– In such eventuality, if the management was fou…
Supreme Court of India12 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1361 · [2019] 18 S.C.R. 1144
shared parenting by the parties in the U.S. and the petitioner-wife was not entitled to the sole custody of the children – Aggrieved, the petitioner-wife filed appeal before the High Court in India, which was dismissed – Thereafter, respondent-husband filed writ of Habeas Corpus before the High Court in India to direct…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1360 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 79
selection for the relinquished vacancy has to be as per the existing Rules – Thus, the respondent-candidate has no right to claim selection as per the Rules – Appeal allowed. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No.9338 of 2019. F From the impugned final Judgment and Order dated 12.07.2018 of the High Court of Ju…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1359 · [2019] 18 S.C.R. 990
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 10870 F of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2018 of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow in O.A. No. 477 of 2017 and order dated 12th July, 2018 in M.A. No. 1306 & 1307/2018 in OA No. 477/2017. G Ms. V.Mohana, R. Balasubramanian, Sr. Advs., Prana…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1357 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 253
identical and there were no major cosntradictions between them – According to PW-1, he was present at the place of incidence and immediately after occurrence dictated the complaint to PW-4 and according to PW-4, he reached the spot at about 12:45 p.m.– Thereafter, PW-1 was sent to police station – The version of PW-1 a…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1356 · [2019] 16 S.C.R. 1095
1096 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 16 S.C.R. A applicant has to pay – The respondent/applicant cannot claim the benefit of the earlier guideline value existing prior to the date when approval was granted by the Government – Therefore, the respondent will have to pay FSI Premium charges based on the guideline value as ex…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1355 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 829
829 830 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 14 S.C.R. A Bench in Hardeep Singh – Trial court furnished reasons for relying on the provisions of s.114 of the Evidence Act having due regard to the fact that the incident had taken place within the confines of the matrimonial home where only the second respondent and the deceased…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1354 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 818
818 RAM MURTI YADAV v. STATE OF UTTAR 819 PRADESH AND ANOTHER judicial function – Judges must strive for the highest standards of A integrity in both their professional and personal lives. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The service records of the appellant have been examined by the Screening Committee, the F…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1353 · [2019] 17 S.C.R. 1089
Validity of s.13(2) – Held: On a conjoint reading of Art. 323B and Arts. 245 and 246 with Entry 18 of the State List in the Seventh Schedule, the Chhattisgarh State Legislature was competent to enact the Rent Control Act, to the extent that it provides for the adjudication of original disputes relating to tenancy and r…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1352 · [2019] 17 S.C.R. 661
being a question of fact cannot be decided by High Court in s.482 petition – High Court also noted that the intermediary could not claim exemption in case he fails to expeditiously remove or disable access to the objectionable material or unlawful activity, even after receiving actual knowledge thereof and that since i…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1350 · [2019] 14 S.C.R. 849
Allowing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1. The High Court did not keep in view that even though the respondent’s leave application dated 30.04.2004 was pending consideration, the respondent on her own went and joined Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS) on 15.06.2004 and this has been suppressed by the res…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1349 · [2019] 17 S.C.R. 742
– The refusal to set aside an arbitral award must be under s. 34 i.e. after the grounds set out in s. 34 have been applied to the arbitral award in question and after the courts have turned down such grounds – In the present case there was no adjudication u/s. 34 – Therefore, the appeals filed in the present case do no…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1348 · [2019] 17 S.C.R. 1128
Dr. Anand Vardhan Sharma, Amit Tyagi, V.K. Vashudev, Kailash Prashad Pandey, Advs. for the Respondents. H 1130 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 17 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. ABDUL NAZEER, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. B 3. The instant appeal has been filed by the claimants challenging …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis