⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
561–580 · Page 29 of 500
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 570 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1921
Issue arose whether a litigant who was already a party to the suit, yet contests the fact or legality of a compromise embodied in a decree, is restricted to an application before the trial court under the proviso to Ord. XXIII r.3 CPC or may maintain a first appeal u/s.96 CPC notwithstanding s.96(3) CPC.
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
561–580 · Page 29 of 500
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 570 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1921
Issue arose whether a litigant who was already a party to the suit, yet contests the fact or legality of a compromise embodied in a decree, is restricted to an application before the trial court under the proviso to Ord. XXIII r.3 CPC or may maintain a first appeal u/s.96 CPC notwithstanding s.96(3) CPC.
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 567 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2707
Whether the Respondent-alleged contemnor is guilty of civil contempt for non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court vide Order dated 07.11.2022.
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 566 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2650
i) Whether after the dismissal of the petition for restoration of suit u/Or. IX R.4 of the CPC a fresh suit is maintainable; ii) Whether after dismissal of suit in default u/R.2 and R.3 of Or. IX of the CPC, a fresh suit is barred by the principle of res judicata.
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 565 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1734
Matter pertains to the maintainability of the time-barred application of the employee before the tribunal, filed after rejection of a belated representation in service dispute.
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 564 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1753
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the High Court confirming the order of the appellate authority which had reversed the order passed by the prescribed authority granting eviction of the respondent-tenant on the ground of bona fide need.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 563 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1723
Whether the appellant was rightly denied the promotion to the grade of Chief Secretary.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 562 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1715
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition of the appellants u/s.482 CrPC seeking quashing of the proceedings against them.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 561 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1708
Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the conviction and sentence of the accused-A1 u/ss.363, 366, 376 and 201 r/w s.34, IPC and accused-A2 u/s.201 r/w s.34 and acquitting them.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 560 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1695
The Additional Judicial Commissioner took cognizance against one V and appellants on 13.06.2019 in SC/ST Case No.08/2017. Whether the Additional Judicial Commissioner while taking cognizance has to record detailed reasons for taking cognizance; whether the FIR (u/ss.498A, 406 and 420 of the Penal Code, 1860 and s.3(1)(iv) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989) itself was instituted with mala fide intention and was liable to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 56 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 729
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellants u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by time; whether the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 apply to s.34 of the 1996 Act and to what extent; does s.4 of the 1963 Act apply to the 3-month limitation period or also to the 30-day condonable period in s.34(3); and will s.10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 apply to s.34(3) and in what manner.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 559 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2347
Whether an employee of the State who had availed the benefit of leave encashment maximum of 300 days once on attaining the age of superannuation under Rule 36 of Sikkim Government Services (Leave) Rules, 1982, can further be entitled for leave encashment again on relieving after the period of re-employment.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 558 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1688
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing appellant’s petition u/s.482 CrPC seeking quashing of chargesheet against him.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 557 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1543
Matter pertains to the correctness of High Court order rejecting the writ petition of the appellants against the First Appellate Court’s common order allowing I.A. u/Ord.11 r.14 CPC and allowing I.A. seeking permission to raise additional grounds in the first appeal.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 556 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1522
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court was justified in directing for investigation by the CBI.
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 555 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 275
Whether, in pursuance of a purported enquiry where there was none to present the case of the department, no witness was examined in support of the charges and no document was formally proved, any order of punishment could validly be made; whether the disciplinary authority was justified in placing reliance on a report of enquiry prepared by the Enquiry Officer who had looked into documents which were not provided to the respondent and had arrived at findings of guilt only on the basis of the charge- sheet, the reply thereto of the respondent and such documents; whether failure or omission or n
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 554 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1662
Whether due process was followed in dismissing the appellant from service and whether his dismissal from service is justified, on facts and in the circumstances; whether, in light of the facts, evidence, witnesses, and circumstances of the case, the charges in the criminal proceedings are substantially identical to those in the departmental proceedings, such that an acquittal in the criminal case would render the findings in the disciplinary proceedings vulnerable.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 553 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2320
Whether the High Court was right in taking the view that the suit of the plaintiff for declaration of his title based on a valid Gift Deed should fail as the plaintiff omitted to pray for the consequential relief of cancellation of the sale deed or a declaration that the same is not binding on him.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 552 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2364
Issue arose whether the suit was barred by limitation; whether the sale deeds were void documents; whether the Will stood admitted in the previous suits and was no longer required to be proved; whether the First Appellate Court was right in decreeing the suit without the plaintiffs seeking relief of declaration/cancellation.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 55 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 462
Will a husband, who secures a decree for restitution of conjugal rights, stand absolved of paying maintenance to his wife by virtue of Section 125(4), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if his wife refuses to abide by the said decree and return to the matrimonial home.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 549 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1550
Matter pertains to the correctness of order passed by the tribunal dismissing the review application and holding that disability of the appellant was less than 20%.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 567 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2707
Whether the Respondent-alleged contemnor is guilty of civil contempt for non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court vide Order dated 07.11.2022.
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 566 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2650
i) Whether after the dismissal of the petition for restoration of suit u/Or. IX R.4 of the CPC a fresh suit is maintainable; ii) Whether after dismissal of suit in default u/R.2 and R.3 of Or. IX of the CPC, a fresh suit is barred by the principle of res judicata.
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 565 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1734
Matter pertains to the maintainability of the time-barred application of the employee before the tribunal, filed after rejection of a belated representation in service dispute.
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 564 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1753
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the High Court confirming the order of the appellate authority which had reversed the order passed by the prescribed authority granting eviction of the respondent-tenant on the ground of bona fide need.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 563 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1723
Whether the appellant was rightly denied the promotion to the grade of Chief Secretary.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 562 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1715
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition of the appellants u/s.482 CrPC seeking quashing of the proceedings against them.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 561 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1708
Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the conviction and sentence of the accused-A1 u/ss.363, 366, 376 and 201 r/w s.34, IPC and accused-A2 u/s.201 r/w s.34 and acquitting them.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 560 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1695
The Additional Judicial Commissioner took cognizance against one V and appellants on 13.06.2019 in SC/ST Case No.08/2017. Whether the Additional Judicial Commissioner while taking cognizance has to record detailed reasons for taking cognizance; whether the FIR (u/ss.498A, 406 and 420 of the Penal Code, 1860 and s.3(1)(iv) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989) itself was instituted with mala fide intention and was liable to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 56 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 729
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellants u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by time; whether the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 apply to s.34 of the 1996 Act and to what extent; does s.4 of the 1963 Act apply to the 3-month limitation period or also to the 30-day condonable period in s.34(3); and will s.10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 apply to s.34(3) and in what manner.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 559 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2347
Whether an employee of the State who had availed the benefit of leave encashment maximum of 300 days once on attaining the age of superannuation under Rule 36 of Sikkim Government Services (Leave) Rules, 1982, can further be entitled for leave encashment again on relieving after the period of re-employment.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 558 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1688
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing appellant’s petition u/s.482 CrPC seeking quashing of chargesheet against him.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 557 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1543
Matter pertains to the correctness of High Court order rejecting the writ petition of the appellants against the First Appellate Court’s common order allowing I.A. u/Ord.11 r.14 CPC and allowing I.A. seeking permission to raise additional grounds in the first appeal.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 556 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1522
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court was justified in directing for investigation by the CBI.
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 555 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 275
Whether, in pursuance of a purported enquiry where there was none to present the case of the department, no witness was examined in support of the charges and no document was formally proved, any order of punishment could validly be made; whether the disciplinary authority was justified in placing reliance on a report of enquiry prepared by the Enquiry Officer who had looked into documents which were not provided to the respondent and had arrived at findings of guilt only on the basis of the charge- sheet, the reply thereto of the respondent and such documents; whether failure or omission or n
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 554 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1662
Whether due process was followed in dismissing the appellant from service and whether his dismissal from service is justified, on facts and in the circumstances; whether, in light of the facts, evidence, witnesses, and circumstances of the case, the charges in the criminal proceedings are substantially identical to those in the departmental proceedings, such that an acquittal in the criminal case would render the findings in the disciplinary proceedings vulnerable.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 553 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2320
Whether the High Court was right in taking the view that the suit of the plaintiff for declaration of his title based on a valid Gift Deed should fail as the plaintiff omitted to pray for the consequential relief of cancellation of the sale deed or a declaration that the same is not binding on him.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 552 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2364
Issue arose whether the suit was barred by limitation; whether the sale deeds were void documents; whether the Will stood admitted in the previous suits and was no longer required to be proved; whether the First Appellate Court was right in decreeing the suit without the plaintiffs seeking relief of declaration/cancellation.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 55 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 462
Will a husband, who secures a decree for restitution of conjugal rights, stand absolved of paying maintenance to his wife by virtue of Section 125(4), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if his wife refuses to abide by the said decree and return to the matrimonial home.
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 549 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1550
Matter pertains to the correctness of order passed by the tribunal dismissing the review application and holding that disability of the appellant was less than 20%.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis