⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,741–5,760 · Page 288 of 500
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 192 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 150
TNEB v. TNEB-THOZHILALAR AYKKIYA SANGAM 151 Allowance at a higher rate than what was granted by the State A Government to its employees is not warranted – Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – s. 18. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Payment of Dearness Allowance was governed by the Wage Settlement dated 08.07.1998 an…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,741–5,760 · Page 288 of 500
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 192 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 150
TNEB v. TNEB-THOZHILALAR AYKKIYA SANGAM 151 Allowance at a higher rate than what was granted by the State A Government to its employees is not warranted – Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – s. 18. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Payment of Dearness Allowance was governed by the Wage Settlement dated 08.07.1998 an…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 191 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 131
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 131 131 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. A v. C. GIRIJA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1577 of 2019) FEBRUARY 13, 2019 B [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Service law: Promotion – Belated representation – Notification inviting applications for filling up of 05 posts under 30% LDCE quota (04 unreserved and 01 reserve…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 190 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 610
intermediate post was set aside by High Court – Pursuant to the order of High Court, State deleted the post of ‘Senior Operator’ and refixed the scales of pay corresponding to the existing pre-revised scales of pay – Review petition by the respondent-Authority dismissed – Writ appeals allowed by Division Bench of High …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 19 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 63
64 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 1 S.C.R. A Sanchar Nigam Limited’s case. The respondent is awarded Rs.1 lakh in lieu of his right to claim re-instatement and back wages in full and final satisfaction of this dispute. [Paras 11-14][67-B-E] Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Bhurumal (2014) 7 SCC 177 – relied on. B District…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 189 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 749
[2019] 3 S.C.R. 749 749 VASANT CHEMICALS LIMITED A v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HYDERABAD METROPOLITIAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD AND OTHERS B (Civil Appeal Nos. 4616-4617 of 2009) FEBRUARY 13, 2019 [R. BANUMATHI AND INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.] Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1989: C s.55 – Charges t…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 188 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 310
– High Court held that the Public Prosecutor did not apply his mind and thus mandatory requirement of the proviso to s.43D(2)(b) was not fulfilled – On appeal, held: The first document, purporting to E be the application of the IO, contained the reasons for extended period of investigation but the second document detai…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 187 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 1050
1050 M/S SCG CONTRACTS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. K. S. CHAMANKAR 1051 INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. interpretation of a statutory prohibition – Thus, the written statement A of defendant no. 1 to be taken off the record – Res judicata. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 A perusal of the amendments made in the wake of the Com…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 186 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 725
of unearned increase by DDA – Also, since income tax department had already paid unearned increase, DDA was not entitled to raise any demand of unearned increase – On interpreting the auction notice and the sale deed it is clear that what was transferred to the respondent was leasehold right – Therefore, the respondent…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 185 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 590
rejected in the judgment of the Division Bench – Order of the Single Judge, quashing the rejection of the representation of the respondent will not amount to a mandamus to regularize the respondent or to treat him in the regular employment of the State – All that the High Court will be construed to have held is that on…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 184 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 121
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 121 121 THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. A v. RAVINDRA NATH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 12367 of 2017) FEBRUARY 12, 2019 B [UDAY UMESH LALIT AND HEMANT GUPTA, JJ.] State Bank of India Act, 1955: s.18 – Re-fixation of salary – Respondent joined the appellant bank in 1981 and on 24.6.2001, he was posted at Joh…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 183 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 968
HELD: 1. A perusal of the First Proviso to Section 32(1) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 read with F Section 29 would show that when an application is filed by the landlord for possession and that application is rejected then the tenant is deemed to have purchased the land. Section 32F, on the other …
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 182 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 953
[2019] 3 S.C.R. 953 953 PARKASH CHAND A v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 2393 of 2010) FEBRUARY 12, 2019 B [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 376 and 506 – Rape – PW.2-prosecutrix alleged that appellant caught hold of her on a common path of villages an…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 180 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 932
932 SUPREME [2019]COURT3 REPORTSS.C.R. 932 [2019] 3 S.C.R. A MALA SINGH & ORS. v. STATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No.1144 of 2009) B FEBRUARY 12, 2019 [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – s. 302/149 or s. 302/34 – Conviction under – Trial Court convicted 11 accused persons u/ss. 148, 302…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 18 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 963
Shambo Nandy, Ms. N. Annapoorani, Advs. for the Appellant. Anil Kumar Jha, Sunil Roy, Advs. for the Respondents. H BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v. THE STATE OF 965 JHARKHAND & ORS. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. On 07.01.2019, this Court placing reliance on the decision of this…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 18 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 301
F Shambo Nandy, Ms. N. Annapoorani Advs. for the appellant. Anil Kumar Jha, Sunil Roy, Advs. for the respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This appeal is directed G against the final judgment and order dated 02.04.2008 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in LPA N…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 179 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 717
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Adv. for the Respondent. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 21.11.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.449 of 1999 …
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 178 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 234
This is only in consonance with the general power of superintendence vested in the State Government under Section 8. The Act maintains a clear distinction between a local area as the unit for grant of licence, and the entire State for other purposes. The State government is the sole repository of these other powers wit…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 176 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 105
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 105 105 CHANDRU @ CHANDRASEKARAN A v. STATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CB CID AND ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1193 of 2011) B FEBRUARY 12, 2019 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: s.302 r/w. s. 120B – Murder – Prosecution case based on circumstantial evidence – Convic…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 174 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 821
modified in terms of the directions issued. [Para 17, 18] [827-F-H; 828-A-B] CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 1232 of 2019. From the Judgment and Order dated 08.06.2018 of the National C Consumer Disputes Redressal Commis…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 171 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 913
913 914 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 3 S.C.R. A Court went beyond the relief explicitly granted in the original order – It was not open to the Court to interpret the relief granted in such a manner so as to expand its scope to include the second relief prayed for but not granted – The Court’s power in a clarificatory p…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2019 INSC 191 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 131
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 131 131 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. A v. C. GIRIJA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1577 of 2019) FEBRUARY 13, 2019 B [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Service law: Promotion – Belated representation – Notification inviting applications for filling up of 05 posts under 30% LDCE quota (04 unreserved and 01 reserve…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 190 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 610
intermediate post was set aside by High Court – Pursuant to the order of High Court, State deleted the post of ‘Senior Operator’ and refixed the scales of pay corresponding to the existing pre-revised scales of pay – Review petition by the respondent-Authority dismissed – Writ appeals allowed by Division Bench of High …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 19 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 63
64 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 1 S.C.R. A Sanchar Nigam Limited’s case. The respondent is awarded Rs.1 lakh in lieu of his right to claim re-instatement and back wages in full and final satisfaction of this dispute. [Paras 11-14][67-B-E] Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Bhurumal (2014) 7 SCC 177 – relied on. B District…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 189 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 749
[2019] 3 S.C.R. 749 749 VASANT CHEMICALS LIMITED A v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HYDERABAD METROPOLITIAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD AND OTHERS B (Civil Appeal Nos. 4616-4617 of 2009) FEBRUARY 13, 2019 [R. BANUMATHI AND INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.] Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1989: C s.55 – Charges t…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 188 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 310
– High Court held that the Public Prosecutor did not apply his mind and thus mandatory requirement of the proviso to s.43D(2)(b) was not fulfilled – On appeal, held: The first document, purporting to E be the application of the IO, contained the reasons for extended period of investigation but the second document detai…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 187 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 1050
1050 M/S SCG CONTRACTS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. K. S. CHAMANKAR 1051 INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. interpretation of a statutory prohibition – Thus, the written statement A of defendant no. 1 to be taken off the record – Res judicata. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 A perusal of the amendments made in the wake of the Com…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 186 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 725
of unearned increase by DDA – Also, since income tax department had already paid unearned increase, DDA was not entitled to raise any demand of unearned increase – On interpreting the auction notice and the sale deed it is clear that what was transferred to the respondent was leasehold right – Therefore, the respondent…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 185 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 590
rejected in the judgment of the Division Bench – Order of the Single Judge, quashing the rejection of the representation of the respondent will not amount to a mandamus to regularize the respondent or to treat him in the regular employment of the State – All that the High Court will be construed to have held is that on…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 184 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 121
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 121 121 THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. A v. RAVINDRA NATH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 12367 of 2017) FEBRUARY 12, 2019 B [UDAY UMESH LALIT AND HEMANT GUPTA, JJ.] State Bank of India Act, 1955: s.18 – Re-fixation of salary – Respondent joined the appellant bank in 1981 and on 24.6.2001, he was posted at Joh…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 183 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 968
HELD: 1. A perusal of the First Proviso to Section 32(1) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 read with F Section 29 would show that when an application is filed by the landlord for possession and that application is rejected then the tenant is deemed to have purchased the land. Section 32F, on the other …
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 182 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 953
[2019] 3 S.C.R. 953 953 PARKASH CHAND A v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 2393 of 2010) FEBRUARY 12, 2019 B [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 376 and 506 – Rape – PW.2-prosecutrix alleged that appellant caught hold of her on a common path of villages an…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 180 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 932
932 SUPREME [2019]COURT3 REPORTSS.C.R. 932 [2019] 3 S.C.R. A MALA SINGH & ORS. v. STATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No.1144 of 2009) B FEBRUARY 12, 2019 [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – s. 302/149 or s. 302/34 – Conviction under – Trial Court convicted 11 accused persons u/ss. 148, 302…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 18 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 963
Shambo Nandy, Ms. N. Annapoorani, Advs. for the Appellant. Anil Kumar Jha, Sunil Roy, Advs. for the Respondents. H BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v. THE STATE OF 965 JHARKHAND & ORS. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. On 07.01.2019, this Court placing reliance on the decision of this…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 18 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 301
F Shambo Nandy, Ms. N. Annapoorani Advs. for the appellant. Anil Kumar Jha, Sunil Roy, Advs. for the respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This appeal is directed G against the final judgment and order dated 02.04.2008 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in LPA N…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 179 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 717
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Adv. for the Respondent. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 21.11.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.449 of 1999 …
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 178 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 234
This is only in consonance with the general power of superintendence vested in the State Government under Section 8. The Act maintains a clear distinction between a local area as the unit for grant of licence, and the entire State for other purposes. The State government is the sole repository of these other powers wit…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 176 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 105
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 105 105 CHANDRU @ CHANDRASEKARAN A v. STATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CB CID AND ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1193 of 2011) B FEBRUARY 12, 2019 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: s.302 r/w. s. 120B – Murder – Prosecution case based on circumstantial evidence – Convic…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 174 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 821
modified in terms of the directions issued. [Para 17, 18] [827-F-H; 828-A-B] CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 1232 of 2019. From the Judgment and Order dated 08.06.2018 of the National C Consumer Disputes Redressal Commis…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 171 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 913
913 914 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 3 S.C.R. A Court went beyond the relief explicitly granted in the original order – It was not open to the Court to interpret the relief granted in such a manner so as to expand its scope to include the second relief prayed for but not granted – The Court’s power in a clarificatory p…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis