⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,621–5,640 · Page 282 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 336 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 677
U.P. Ordinance No.1 of 1977 – s.73 of U.P. Land Laws (Amendment) Act, 1977 dealt with transitory provisions – s.73(1) provided that all proceedings for acquisition of bhumidhari rights under ss.134 and 135 of the 1950 Act as they stood immediately before 28.01.1977 and all proceedings arising therefrom, pending on such…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 335 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 926
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,621–5,640 · Page 282 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 336 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 677
U.P. Ordinance No.1 of 1977 – s.73 of U.P. Land Laws (Amendment) Act, 1977 dealt with transitory provisions – s.73(1) provided that all proceedings for acquisition of bhumidhari rights under ss.134 and 135 of the 1950 Act as they stood immediately before 28.01.1977 and all proceedings arising therefrom, pending on such…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 335 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 926
926 SUPREME [2019]COURT2 REPORTSS.C.R. 926 [2019] 2 S.C.R. A BABU RAM v. SANTOKH SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS B (Civil Appeal No. 2553 of 2019) MARCH 07, 2019 [UDAY UMESH LALIT AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Hindu Succession Act, 1956: C s. 22 – Preferential right to acquire property in certain cases – Applicabili…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 334 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 945
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 945 945 SHODA DEVI A v. DDU/RIPON HOSPITAL SHIMLA AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2557 of 2019) MARCH 07, 2019 B [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE AND DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Consumer Protection Act, 1986: Medical negligence – Compensation – Appellant’s case was C that she was admitted in respondent-Hospital on account o…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 333 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 975
E CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 6878 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 22.05.2018 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi in Consumer Case No. 1094 of 2018. F Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv., Ms. Bhabna Das, Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi, Advs. for the Appellants. Salil Pa…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 332 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 916
2. The need to remand the case to the SDJM is called for only when some factual inquiry is required to be held to decide C any factual issue involved in the case which cannot be undertaken at the revision stage or when it is noticed that there is no finding on any particular factual issue(s) recorded by the SDJM or whe…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 331 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 287
287 288 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A the employees were out of employment, was to be dealt with – It was always in contemplation that if an employee had superannuated on attaining the age of 58 years and was thereafter re-inducted in service with superannuation age being 60 years, he would not be entitled to…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 330 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 957
territorial jurisdiction by filing application for revocation of leave, High Court should have granted liberty to the respondents (defendants) to file the written statement in the suit and to raise therein a plea of territorial jurisdiction of the Court, instead of entertaining the said application – An issue of such n…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 33 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 161
of the appellant that he was slapped was also not made out from the evidence on record – Appeal before Supreme Court – Held: The Tribunal had re-appreciated the evidence and had concurred with the findings of DCM – The view taken by Tribunal was a plausible view and, therefore, did not warrant any interference in appea…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 329 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 921
– Held: While considering the case of discharge, sought immediately after the charge-sheet is filed, the Court cannot become an Appellate Court and start appreciating the evidence by finding out inconsistency in the statements of the witnesses as was done by the High Court in the impugned order – There is no prima faci…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 328 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 210
mortality rates – Mortality rates increase with age – Hence, when an insurer initially collects premium from individuals of a younger age, the amount it collects is higher than the amount it pays out towards claims – Difference between them is the ‘reserve’ – Thus if a policy holder wishes to discontinue a policy befor…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 327 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 660
the Sessions Judge and…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 32 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 317
regularization be considered in other places where Group ‘D’ posts are available – Propriety of – Held: Direction to consider the casual workers for regularization in other establishments was not justified – Original order passed by the Tribunal did not contain mandamus for regularization – Order mandated that seniorit…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 319 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 183
afresh on the basis of the pleadings on the record. Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The appellant claims ad hoc appointment on the post of Lecturer, Military Science in a Post Graduate College Affiliated to the Gorakhpur University. The submission of F appellant is that paragraphs of the counter-affidavit …
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 318 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 648
650 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 4 S.C.R. A relating to the subject matter of the suit so that the dispute may be determined in their presence and the multiplicity of proceedings could be avoided. [Paras 7-9] [656-F-H; 657-A, D, G, E] 1.3 As per Rule 1-A ibid., in the eventuality of plaintiff B withdrawing the suit or …
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 317 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 1088
1088 SUPREME[2019]COURT3 S.C.R.REPORTS1088 [2019] 3 S.C.R. A M.R. KRISHNA MURTHI v. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & OTHERS (Civil Appeal Nos. 2476-2477 of 2019) B MARCH 05, 2019 [A. K. SIKRI AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.] Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Motor accident – Compensation – Assessment of – C Determination of loss of…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 316 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 279
11.08.2000 in the High Court – High Court modified order of the Settlement Commission dated 11.08.2000 by reversing the waiver of interest in terms of Settlement Commission’s directions contained in its order dated 11.10.2002 – On appeal, held: The approach of the High Court was without jurisdiction – The High Court fa…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 315 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 995
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 – s.22 – Appellants sought F a factual review through the methodology of re-appreciation of factual matrix by Supreme Court u/s.22 of the NGT Act – Held: It is settled that merely because the remedy of appeal is provided against the decision of the Tribunal on a substantial question of…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 314 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 163
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 163 163 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME A TAX (CENTRAL) - I v. NRA IRON & STEEL PVT. LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 2463 of 2019) B MARCH 05, 2019 [UDAY UMESH LALIT AND INDU MALHOTRA, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 – s.68 – Cash credits – Money received through Share Capital/Premium from various companies – Assessi…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 312 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 945
Public Services Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Special Backward Category and Other Backward Classes Act, 2001 [Act VIII of 2004] – ss. 3-6, 11 - Directorate of Town Planning and Valuation (Recruitment) Rules, 2011 - r-3 - Consitution of India - Art…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 311 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 887
887 888 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 2 S.C.R. A upheld by dismissing the SLP on behalf of accused no. 1. Thus, there is no reason to take a different view to one taken by the High Court that accused were liable for conviction u/s. 302. [Para 13, 14][894-F-G; 895-D] 1.2 The appellant submitted that there could be no con…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
926 SUPREME [2019]COURT2 REPORTSS.C.R. 926 [2019] 2 S.C.R. A BABU RAM v. SANTOKH SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS B (Civil Appeal No. 2553 of 2019) MARCH 07, 2019 [UDAY UMESH LALIT AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Hindu Succession Act, 1956: C s. 22 – Preferential right to acquire property in certain cases – Applicabili…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 334 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 945
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 945 945 SHODA DEVI A v. DDU/RIPON HOSPITAL SHIMLA AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2557 of 2019) MARCH 07, 2019 B [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE AND DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Consumer Protection Act, 1986: Medical negligence – Compensation – Appellant’s case was C that she was admitted in respondent-Hospital on account o…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 333 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 975
E CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 6878 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 22.05.2018 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi in Consumer Case No. 1094 of 2018. F Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv., Ms. Bhabna Das, Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi, Advs. for the Appellants. Salil Pa…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 332 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 916
2. The need to remand the case to the SDJM is called for only when some factual inquiry is required to be held to decide C any factual issue involved in the case which cannot be undertaken at the revision stage or when it is noticed that there is no finding on any particular factual issue(s) recorded by the SDJM or whe…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 331 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 287
287 288 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A the employees were out of employment, was to be dealt with – It was always in contemplation that if an employee had superannuated on attaining the age of 58 years and was thereafter re-inducted in service with superannuation age being 60 years, he would not be entitled to…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 330 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 957
territorial jurisdiction by filing application for revocation of leave, High Court should have granted liberty to the respondents (defendants) to file the written statement in the suit and to raise therein a plea of territorial jurisdiction of the Court, instead of entertaining the said application – An issue of such n…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 33 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 161
of the appellant that he was slapped was also not made out from the evidence on record – Appeal before Supreme Court – Held: The Tribunal had re-appreciated the evidence and had concurred with the findings of DCM – The view taken by Tribunal was a plausible view and, therefore, did not warrant any interference in appea…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 329 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 921
– Held: While considering the case of discharge, sought immediately after the charge-sheet is filed, the Court cannot become an Appellate Court and start appreciating the evidence by finding out inconsistency in the statements of the witnesses as was done by the High Court in the impugned order – There is no prima faci…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 328 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 210
mortality rates – Mortality rates increase with age – Hence, when an insurer initially collects premium from individuals of a younger age, the amount it collects is higher than the amount it pays out towards claims – Difference between them is the ‘reserve’ – Thus if a policy holder wishes to discontinue a policy befor…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 327 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 660
the Sessions Judge and…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 32 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 317
regularization be considered in other places where Group ‘D’ posts are available – Propriety of – Held: Direction to consider the casual workers for regularization in other establishments was not justified – Original order passed by the Tribunal did not contain mandamus for regularization – Order mandated that seniorit…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 319 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 183
afresh on the basis of the pleadings on the record. Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The appellant claims ad hoc appointment on the post of Lecturer, Military Science in a Post Graduate College Affiliated to the Gorakhpur University. The submission of F appellant is that paragraphs of the counter-affidavit …
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 318 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 648
650 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 4 S.C.R. A relating to the subject matter of the suit so that the dispute may be determined in their presence and the multiplicity of proceedings could be avoided. [Paras 7-9] [656-F-H; 657-A, D, G, E] 1.3 As per Rule 1-A ibid., in the eventuality of plaintiff B withdrawing the suit or …
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 317 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 1088
1088 SUPREME[2019]COURT3 S.C.R.REPORTS1088 [2019] 3 S.C.R. A M.R. KRISHNA MURTHI v. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & OTHERS (Civil Appeal Nos. 2476-2477 of 2019) B MARCH 05, 2019 [A. K. SIKRI AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.] Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Motor accident – Compensation – Assessment of – C Determination of loss of…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 316 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 279
11.08.2000 in the High Court – High Court modified order of the Settlement Commission dated 11.08.2000 by reversing the waiver of interest in terms of Settlement Commission’s directions contained in its order dated 11.10.2002 – On appeal, held: The approach of the High Court was without jurisdiction – The High Court fa…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 315 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 995
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 – s.22 – Appellants sought F a factual review through the methodology of re-appreciation of factual matrix by Supreme Court u/s.22 of the NGT Act – Held: It is settled that merely because the remedy of appeal is provided against the decision of the Tribunal on a substantial question of…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 314 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 163
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 163 163 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME A TAX (CENTRAL) - I v. NRA IRON & STEEL PVT. LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 2463 of 2019) B MARCH 05, 2019 [UDAY UMESH LALIT AND INDU MALHOTRA, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 – s.68 – Cash credits – Money received through Share Capital/Premium from various companies – Assessi…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 312 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 945
Public Services Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Special Backward Category and Other Backward Classes Act, 2001 [Act VIII of 2004] – ss. 3-6, 11 - Directorate of Town Planning and Valuation (Recruitment) Rules, 2011 - r-3 - Consitution of India - Art…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 311 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 887
887 888 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 2 S.C.R. A upheld by dismissing the SLP on behalf of accused no. 1. Thus, there is no reason to take a different view to one taken by the High Court that accused were liable for conviction u/s. 302. [Para 13, 14][894-F-G; 895-D] 1.2 The appellant submitted that there could be no con…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis