⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,501–5,520 · Page 276 of 500
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 502 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 897
[2019] 6 S.C.R. 897 897 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA A v. RIMJHIM (Civil Appeal No. 3600 of 2019) APRIL 09, 2019 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Service Law – Appointment – Appellant invited applications for the post of Assistant Grade-II (Hindi) by publishing advertisement – Respondent applied – Short-listed – H…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 501 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 631
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,501–5,520 · Page 276 of 500
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 502 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 897
[2019] 6 S.C.R. 897 897 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA A v. RIMJHIM (Civil Appeal No. 3600 of 2019) APRIL 09, 2019 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Service Law – Appointment – Appellant invited applications for the post of Assistant Grade-II (Hindi) by publishing advertisement – Respondent applied – Short-listed – H…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 501 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 631
Application dismissed – Revision in the High Court – Dismissed – On appeal, held: In the 1966 suit, in terms of compromise entered into between the plaintiff, the parents and three brothers, the properties were mutually divided amongst said six persons – Since the parents were alive, the proper parties in an action see…
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 50 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 432
432 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 432 [2019] 2 S.C.R. A STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR. v. SHASHI KUMAR (Civil Appeal No.988 of 2019) B JANUARY 16, 2019 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND HEMANT GUPTA, JJ.] Service Law – Compassionate appointment – The State, if entitled to take into account family pension and oth…
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 5 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 25
categorically held in the earlier round of litigation that the mother of respondents No. 1 to 3 and the predecessor in title, had failed to establish her title to the suit property – The said finding was admittedly not challenged by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and had attained finality – In this view of the matter, the resp…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 498 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 590
qualifying marks/benchmark to obtain minimum 12 marks in the interview and the performance appraisal was not permissible and it defeated the principle of seniority-cum-merit and, therefore, directed to prepare a fresh promotion list by prescribing the minimum necessary cut off merit marks out of 100 so that the rule of…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 495 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 910
the trial court and held properties were not benami in nature – Appellant contended that the suit properties acquired in the names of defendant Nos.1 to 3 were benami in nature – On appeal, held: Supreme Court in catena of decisions has held that source of money can never be the sole consideration and it is merely one …
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 493 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 518
518 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS6 S.C.R. 518 [2019] 6 S.C.R. A JAGDISH PRASAD PATEL (DEAD) THR. LRS.& ANOTHER v. SHIVNATH & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 2176 of 2007) B APRIL 09, 2019 [R. BANUMATHI AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Suit: Suit for declaration of title and possession – Filed by C respondents-plaintiffs – Suit contest…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 490 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 950
No.3 having become aware of the factum of blacklisting of the appellant amended the petition to incorporate the said fact – Writ Petition allowed by the High Court – Sustainability of – Held: Not sustainable – Impugned order misread the blacklisting clause – Show cause notice itself did not amount to the process of bla…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 489 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 941
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD : 1. The judicial pronouncements of this Court have endeavoured to devise a standard formula, so far as possible, in respect of the calculation of the amount of compensation qua F various components. The amount of compensation determined is to be paid to the claimants who are de…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 486 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 577
[2019] 6 S.C.R. 577 577 RUPALI DEVI A v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 71 of 2012) APRIL 09, 2019 B [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, L. NAGESWARA RAO AND SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: s.498A – Jurisdiction – Whether in a case where cruelty had been committed in a matrimonial home by the C husband o…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 482 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 549
U. R. Lalit, Sushil Kumar Jain, Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advs. Puneet Jain, Harsh Jain, Abhinav Deshwal, Ms. Ankita Gupta, Shailendra Sharma H PEER SINGH v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 551 (for Ms. Pratibha Jain), Ehtesham Hashmi, Akbar Siddique, Ms. Pallavi A Pratap, Advs. for the Appellant. Vaibhav Srivastava, DAG, Chandan K…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 481 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 904
904 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS5 S.C.R. 904 [2019] 5 S.C.R. A SAMPAT BABSO KALE & ANR. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal Nos. 694–695 of 2011) B APRIL 09, 2019 [S.A. BOBDE AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302/498A r/w. s. 34 – Murder by husband and his sister – C By setting his wife on fire – 98% …
Supreme Court of India14 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 48 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 982
982 UNION OF INDIA v. KRISHNA KUMAR 983 post of Naib Subedar. In 2011, Union of India introduced an A intermediate rank of Warrant officer by the abolition/upgradation of one post of Havildar. In terms of the new Recruitment Rules i.e. Assam Rifles Warrant Officer (General Duty) Group ‘C’ combatised Posts Recruitment R…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 478 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 938
the order – On appeal, held: Present case has been tagged with M/s. D.J. Malpani vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik, [2019] 6 SCR 925 wherein it was held that the amount of Dharmada cannot be included in the transaction value for the purposes of assessments – In view of the said judgment, the present appeal is …
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 478 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 925
[2019] 6 S.C.R. 925 925 M/S D.J. MALPANI A v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASHIK (Civil Appeal No. 5282 of 2005) APRIL 09, 2019 B [S. A. BOBDE, DEEPAK GUPTA AND VINEET SARAN, JJ.] Central Excise Act, 1944: s.4 – Assessable value – Dharmada, a charitable donation – Inclusion of, in the assessable value – Held: C Whe…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 477 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 507
Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1 There were two FIRs filed pursuant to reporting that Respondent No.1 was guilty of objectionable behavior with adolescent girl students in the school. In both these FIRs the investigation was undertaken and charge-sheets stand filed. Thus, prima facie, the allegations made in …
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 476 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 478
Act – (ii)Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the notice issued u/s.148 of the Act was bad because it was based on mere change of opinion by overlooking the fact that there was no foundation to form any such opinion – (iii) When admittedly the notice in question satisfied the requirements of s.148 of the Act…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 473 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 283
Sufficient averments in the complaint to sustain the order for award of interim maintenance – Whether the requirements of ss.2(f), 2(q), 2(s) are fulfilled is a matter of evidence which would be adjudicated E upon the trial – At this stage, for the purpose of an interim order for maintenance, there was material which j…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 472 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 761
J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv., Narender Singh, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Chandra Nand Jha. Advs. for the Appellant. H 761 762 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A R. Balasubramanian, Sr. Adv., Prashant Singh, B. K. Satija, Ms. Alka Agrawal, Tanvir Nayar, A. K. Sharma, Advs. for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 471 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 765
submitted a test report, required for obtaining such connection, only in March 2005 – Respondent cannot be faulted for the delay which occurred between the date of the submission of the application and until the appellant complied with the requirement of submitting the test report on 24 March 2005 – No cogent explanati…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Application dismissed – Revision in the High Court – Dismissed – On appeal, held: In the 1966 suit, in terms of compromise entered into between the plaintiff, the parents and three brothers, the properties were mutually divided amongst said six persons – Since the parents were alive, the proper parties in an action see…
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 50 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 432
432 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 432 [2019] 2 S.C.R. A STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR. v. SHASHI KUMAR (Civil Appeal No.988 of 2019) B JANUARY 16, 2019 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND HEMANT GUPTA, JJ.] Service Law – Compassionate appointment – The State, if entitled to take into account family pension and oth…
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 5 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 25
categorically held in the earlier round of litigation that the mother of respondents No. 1 to 3 and the predecessor in title, had failed to establish her title to the suit property – The said finding was admittedly not challenged by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and had attained finality – In this view of the matter, the resp…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 498 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 590
qualifying marks/benchmark to obtain minimum 12 marks in the interview and the performance appraisal was not permissible and it defeated the principle of seniority-cum-merit and, therefore, directed to prepare a fresh promotion list by prescribing the minimum necessary cut off merit marks out of 100 so that the rule of…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 495 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 910
the trial court and held properties were not benami in nature – Appellant contended that the suit properties acquired in the names of defendant Nos.1 to 3 were benami in nature – On appeal, held: Supreme Court in catena of decisions has held that source of money can never be the sole consideration and it is merely one …
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 493 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 518
518 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS6 S.C.R. 518 [2019] 6 S.C.R. A JAGDISH PRASAD PATEL (DEAD) THR. LRS.& ANOTHER v. SHIVNATH & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 2176 of 2007) B APRIL 09, 2019 [R. BANUMATHI AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Suit: Suit for declaration of title and possession – Filed by C respondents-plaintiffs – Suit contest…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 490 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 950
No.3 having become aware of the factum of blacklisting of the appellant amended the petition to incorporate the said fact – Writ Petition allowed by the High Court – Sustainability of – Held: Not sustainable – Impugned order misread the blacklisting clause – Show cause notice itself did not amount to the process of bla…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 489 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 941
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD : 1. The judicial pronouncements of this Court have endeavoured to devise a standard formula, so far as possible, in respect of the calculation of the amount of compensation qua F various components. The amount of compensation determined is to be paid to the claimants who are de…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 486 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 577
[2019] 6 S.C.R. 577 577 RUPALI DEVI A v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 71 of 2012) APRIL 09, 2019 B [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, L. NAGESWARA RAO AND SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: s.498A – Jurisdiction – Whether in a case where cruelty had been committed in a matrimonial home by the C husband o…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 482 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 549
U. R. Lalit, Sushil Kumar Jain, Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advs. Puneet Jain, Harsh Jain, Abhinav Deshwal, Ms. Ankita Gupta, Shailendra Sharma H PEER SINGH v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 551 (for Ms. Pratibha Jain), Ehtesham Hashmi, Akbar Siddique, Ms. Pallavi A Pratap, Advs. for the Appellant. Vaibhav Srivastava, DAG, Chandan K…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 481 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 904
904 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS5 S.C.R. 904 [2019] 5 S.C.R. A SAMPAT BABSO KALE & ANR. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal Nos. 694–695 of 2011) B APRIL 09, 2019 [S.A. BOBDE AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302/498A r/w. s. 34 – Murder by husband and his sister – C By setting his wife on fire – 98% …
Supreme Court of India14 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 48 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 982
982 UNION OF INDIA v. KRISHNA KUMAR 983 post of Naib Subedar. In 2011, Union of India introduced an A intermediate rank of Warrant officer by the abolition/upgradation of one post of Havildar. In terms of the new Recruitment Rules i.e. Assam Rifles Warrant Officer (General Duty) Group ‘C’ combatised Posts Recruitment R…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 478 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 938
the order – On appeal, held: Present case has been tagged with M/s. D.J. Malpani vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik, [2019] 6 SCR 925 wherein it was held that the amount of Dharmada cannot be included in the transaction value for the purposes of assessments – In view of the said judgment, the present appeal is …
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 478 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 925
[2019] 6 S.C.R. 925 925 M/S D.J. MALPANI A v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASHIK (Civil Appeal No. 5282 of 2005) APRIL 09, 2019 B [S. A. BOBDE, DEEPAK GUPTA AND VINEET SARAN, JJ.] Central Excise Act, 1944: s.4 – Assessable value – Dharmada, a charitable donation – Inclusion of, in the assessable value – Held: C Whe…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 477 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 507
Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1 There were two FIRs filed pursuant to reporting that Respondent No.1 was guilty of objectionable behavior with adolescent girl students in the school. In both these FIRs the investigation was undertaken and charge-sheets stand filed. Thus, prima facie, the allegations made in …
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 476 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 478
Act – (ii)Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the notice issued u/s.148 of the Act was bad because it was based on mere change of opinion by overlooking the fact that there was no foundation to form any such opinion – (iii) When admittedly the notice in question satisfied the requirements of s.148 of the Act…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 473 · [2019] 6 S.C.R. 283
Sufficient averments in the complaint to sustain the order for award of interim maintenance – Whether the requirements of ss.2(f), 2(q), 2(s) are fulfilled is a matter of evidence which would be adjudicated E upon the trial – At this stage, for the purpose of an interim order for maintenance, there was material which j…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 472 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 761
J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv., Narender Singh, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Chandra Nand Jha. Advs. for the Appellant. H 761 762 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A R. Balasubramanian, Sr. Adv., Prashant Singh, B. K. Satija, Ms. Alka Agrawal, Tanvir Nayar, A. K. Sharma, Advs. for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2019Full text
2019 INSC 471 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 765
submitted a test report, required for obtaining such connection, only in March 2005 – Respondent cannot be faulted for the delay which occurred between the date of the submission of the application and until the appellant complied with the requirement of submitting the test report on 24 March 2005 – No cogent explanati…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis