⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
521–540 · Page 27 of 500
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 627 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 156
Whether the High Court rightly dismissed the second appeal filed by the petitioner herein (plaintiff) affirming the judgment passed by the First Appellate Court which had upheld the decree passed by the trial court dismissing the suit on the ground of limitation.
Supreme Court of India4 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 626 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 123
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
521–540 · Page 27 of 500
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 627 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 156
Whether the High Court rightly dismissed the second appeal filed by the petitioner herein (plaintiff) affirming the judgment passed by the First Appellate Court which had upheld the decree passed by the trial court dismissing the suit on the ground of limitation.
Supreme Court of India4 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 626 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 123
The questions arose for consideration whether the appellate tribunal and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission justified in rejecting the appellant’s claim of additional capitalization due to replacement of the damaged Inter-connecting Transformers-ICTs; whether the self-insurance policy of the appellant covered the cost of replacement of the damaged ICTs; and whether the Member Secretary of NRPC should have been directed by the appellate tribunal to issue revised availability certificate for the transmission assets.
Supreme Court of India4 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 625 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 141
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court partly allowing the appeal of the respondents, enhancing the compensation and fastening the liability on the insurance company.
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 624 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1503
Whether the High Court erred in setting aside the appointments of the appellants as Assistant Professors as being incompatible with the rules and regulations.
Supreme Court of India2 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 623 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 653
Whether the denial of admission to the appellant in the MBBS UG course under Scheduled Castes PwBD quota was grossly illegal, arbitrary and violative of the appellant’s fundamental rights as guaranteed u/Arts.14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India2 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 622 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1731
The instant appeals are arising out of the two impugned orders dated 27.02.2024 and 12.04.2024 by which the Division Bench of the High Court declared re-election of all the office bearers since it was held that the electoral college itself was flawed and appointed committee of administrators to conduct re-elections. Furthermore, it was held that the amendments to the bye-laws had not been carried out in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the Constitution of Church of South India (CSI) and it was held that the Special Meeting of the Synod held on 7th and 8th March 2022 was not duly con
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 619 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 100
Whether the charge of criminal contempt is proved against the appellants-contemnors beyond all reasonable doubt; whether the conviction of the appellants by the High Court for criminal contempt of Court and the sentence imposed ought to be upheld.
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 618 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 64
Issue arose whether the High Court was right in holding that a licensed stamp vendor falls within the ambit of a public servant for the purposes of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and whether the conviction of the appellant-licensed stamp vendor for offences punishable u/ss.7, 13(1)d, 13(2) of the 1988 Act was sustainable.
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 617 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 22
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the courts below dismissing the suit instituted by the appellant- purchaser for specific performance of contract; and whether the appellant entitled to the refund of the amount purportedly paid as advance money.
Supreme Court of India2 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 616 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1565
Whether an arbitral tribunal has the authority or power to implead or join a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement as a party to the arbitration proceedings.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 615 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 1
Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 366, 376(2)(g) and 342, Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3(2)(v), Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is justified.
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 612 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1778
The dispute involved in the present case is fixation of inter se seniority in respect of direct recruitment which includes some in-service candidates also recruited under the direct recruitment quota.
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 611 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2663
Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the order passed by the Trial Court impleading the appellant as one of the defendants in the suit instituted by the original plaintiff for specific performance of the agreement to sell.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 610 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2467
Whether the High Court has exercised its jurisdiction in public interest by directing the KMC to initiate demolition of the unauthorised construction.
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 609 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1891
Whether the engineering and technical service fees/agency commission/charges paid by the appellant and its subsidiaries to the local agent of the overseas supplier were includable in the assessable value of the imported goods (spare parts) under the Customs Act, 1962, as held by all the lower authorities.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 607 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2451
Appellants sought for quashing of the chargesheet submitted against them u/s.306 IPC.
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 606 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2461
Can the High Court in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 reject a plaint.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 605 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2080
In ‡M. Hakeem and Anr.’s case, this Court held that while exercising powers u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a Court hearing the petition had no power to “modify” the Award, whereas other benches of two judges and three judges of this Court have either modified or accepted modification of the arbitral awards. In view of the divergent and contrasting judicial opinions as regards the power of the court u/s.34 to modify an arbitral award, the matter has been placed before the Constitution Bench to decide the questions referred. The questions referred are: whether the powers o
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 599 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2851
1. Whether the present digital KYC / e-KYC / video-KYC framework is inaccessible to persons with disabilities? 2. Whether the regulatory authorities (RBI, SEBI, TRAI, PFRDA, IRDAI, DoT) have failed to ensure reasonable accommodations and accessibility in digital KYC processes? 3. Whether the mandatory requirement of capturing a “live photograph” and conducting a “liveness check” (through blinking, reading text on screen, etc.) is discriminatory and violative of Article 21 read in conjunction with Articles 14, 15 and 38 of the Constitution? 4. Whether the absence of clear standards checks and a
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 598 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2006
Whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the plaint filed by the appellant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on the ground that the suit was barred by limitation.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
The questions arose for consideration whether the appellate tribunal and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission justified in rejecting the appellant’s claim of additional capitalization due to replacement of the damaged Inter-connecting Transformers-ICTs; whether the self-insurance policy of the appellant covered the cost of replacement of the damaged ICTs; and whether the Member Secretary of NRPC should have been directed by the appellate tribunal to issue revised availability certificate for the transmission assets.
Supreme Court of India4 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 625 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 141
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court partly allowing the appeal of the respondents, enhancing the compensation and fastening the liability on the insurance company.
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 624 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1503
Whether the High Court erred in setting aside the appointments of the appellants as Assistant Professors as being incompatible with the rules and regulations.
Supreme Court of India2 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 623 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 653
Whether the denial of admission to the appellant in the MBBS UG course under Scheduled Castes PwBD quota was grossly illegal, arbitrary and violative of the appellant’s fundamental rights as guaranteed u/Arts.14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India2 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 622 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1731
The instant appeals are arising out of the two impugned orders dated 27.02.2024 and 12.04.2024 by which the Division Bench of the High Court declared re-election of all the office bearers since it was held that the electoral college itself was flawed and appointed committee of administrators to conduct re-elections. Furthermore, it was held that the amendments to the bye-laws had not been carried out in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the Constitution of Church of South India (CSI) and it was held that the Special Meeting of the Synod held on 7th and 8th March 2022 was not duly con
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 619 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 100
Whether the charge of criminal contempt is proved against the appellants-contemnors beyond all reasonable doubt; whether the conviction of the appellants by the High Court for criminal contempt of Court and the sentence imposed ought to be upheld.
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 618 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 64
Issue arose whether the High Court was right in holding that a licensed stamp vendor falls within the ambit of a public servant for the purposes of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and whether the conviction of the appellant-licensed stamp vendor for offences punishable u/ss.7, 13(1)d, 13(2) of the 1988 Act was sustainable.
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 617 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 22
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the courts below dismissing the suit instituted by the appellant- purchaser for specific performance of contract; and whether the appellant entitled to the refund of the amount purportedly paid as advance money.
Supreme Court of India2 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 616 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1565
Whether an arbitral tribunal has the authority or power to implead or join a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement as a party to the arbitration proceedings.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 615 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 1
Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 366, 376(2)(g) and 342, Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3(2)(v), Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is justified.
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 612 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1778
The dispute involved in the present case is fixation of inter se seniority in respect of direct recruitment which includes some in-service candidates also recruited under the direct recruitment quota.
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 611 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2663
Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the order passed by the Trial Court impleading the appellant as one of the defendants in the suit instituted by the original plaintiff for specific performance of the agreement to sell.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 610 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2467
Whether the High Court has exercised its jurisdiction in public interest by directing the KMC to initiate demolition of the unauthorised construction.
Supreme Court of India1 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 609 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1891
Whether the engineering and technical service fees/agency commission/charges paid by the appellant and its subsidiaries to the local agent of the overseas supplier were includable in the assessable value of the imported goods (spare parts) under the Customs Act, 1962, as held by all the lower authorities.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 607 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2451
Appellants sought for quashing of the chargesheet submitted against them u/s.306 IPC.
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 606 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2461
Can the High Court in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 reject a plaint.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 605 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2080
In ‡M. Hakeem and Anr.’s case, this Court held that while exercising powers u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a Court hearing the petition had no power to “modify” the Award, whereas other benches of two judges and three judges of this Court have either modified or accepted modification of the arbitral awards. In view of the divergent and contrasting judicial opinions as regards the power of the court u/s.34 to modify an arbitral award, the matter has been placed before the Constitution Bench to decide the questions referred. The questions referred are: whether the powers o
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 599 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2851
1. Whether the present digital KYC / e-KYC / video-KYC framework is inaccessible to persons with disabilities? 2. Whether the regulatory authorities (RBI, SEBI, TRAI, PFRDA, IRDAI, DoT) have failed to ensure reasonable accommodations and accessibility in digital KYC processes? 3. Whether the mandatory requirement of capturing a “live photograph” and conducting a “liveness check” (through blinking, reading text on screen, etc.) is discriminatory and violative of Article 21 read in conjunction with Articles 14, 15 and 38 of the Constitution? 4. Whether the absence of clear standards checks and a
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 598 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2006
Whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the plaint filed by the appellant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on the ground that the suit was barred by limitation.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis