⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
501–520 · Page 26 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 661 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 310
Issue arose whether the purchase tax, as imposed by s.5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 or s.7A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, is a tax in the nature of manufacture or consignment tax or an inter-state levy, and thus, ultra vires the Constitution and beyond the legislative powers of the state legislature; whether the purchase of goods by the appellants from dealers exempted from payment of tax by virtue of notifications or exemptions issued under the Kerala Act or Tamil Nadu Act is a purchase “which is liable to tax” within the meaning of s.5A of the Kerala Act or s.
Supreme Court of India5 May 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
501–520 · Page 26 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 661 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 310
Issue arose whether the purchase tax, as imposed by s.5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 or s.7A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, is a tax in the nature of manufacture or consignment tax or an inter-state levy, and thus, ultra vires the Constitution and beyond the legislative powers of the state legislature; whether the purchase of goods by the appellants from dealers exempted from payment of tax by virtue of notifications or exemptions issued under the Kerala Act or Tamil Nadu Act is a purchase “which is liable to tax” within the meaning of s.5A of the Kerala Act or s.
Supreme Court of India5 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 658 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 307
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the application of the appellants seeking quashing of the complaint, and that too without issuing notice to respondents.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 657 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 160
Whether the High Court erred in reversing the acquittal and convicting the accused persons based on the testimony of the IOs which was founded only on s.161, CrPC statements of the witnesses; whether present was a case of two probable views, in which case the one favourable to the accused ought to be taken.
Supreme Court of India9 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 656 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1911
Issue arose with respect to the legality and propriety of the directions issued by the Division Bench of the High Court to the appellant to take down/delete the pages and discussion with regard to the observations made by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 655 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 180
The appellant was convicted for the offence punishable u/s.7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and also for the offence punishable u/s.13(1)(d) r/w. s.13(2) of the Act by the trial Court. The High Court affirmed the conviction of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 654 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2536
The conviction of the appellant as well as the sentence imposed on him u/ss.7 and 13(1)(d) r/w. s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is questioned.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 653 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1306
Whether the High Court erred by not quashing the prosecution against the accused under ss.186 and 353 of Indian Penal Code.
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 646 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2515
1. Whether an unregistered sale agreement can confer valid title or ownership of immovable property. 2. Whether a High Court exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 can direct dispossession of a party without proof of actual and physical possession.
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 644 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1279
Whether in case of discharge of a serviceman from the Indian Army, on the ground of medical invalidation and consequent denial of disability pension, the burden of proof lies on the serviceman or the concerned department? Whether the existence of a causal link between the service conditions and the disability in order to claim disability pension or the nature of the service area? Whether a non-reasoned order of the Medical board be relied upon to grant or deny of disability pension?
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 643 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1854
Matter pertains to appeal challenging the conviction and sentence of the appellant u/s.109 IPC r/w ss.13(1)(e) and 13(2) of PC Act; appeal challenging the attachment Order as modified by the High Court; and the appeal challenging the Administrative Order passed * Author [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1855 P. Nallammal v. State By The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anticorruption Police, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu by the Chief Justice of the High Court by which criminal appeals were listed for fresh hearing.
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 640 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1263
Appellants issued work order to 1st respondent for construction of flats and paid advance. Bank guarantee equivalent to the advance money was furnished by 1st respondent to secure the amount. When the work got delayed and disputes arose between the parties, the appellants requested refund of debit balance, failing which the bank guarantee was to be encashed. The 1st respondent filed petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the Commercial Court, along with applications under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 and Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC, so as to restrain the appella
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 639 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 814
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the appeal falls on a day when the court is closed or commences from the day when the court reopens? (ii) What is the meaning of the term ‘prescribed period’ as defined under Section 2(j) read with Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and Rule 3 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016? (iii) Whether the NCLAT has the power to condone the delay beyond the said prescribed and condonable period unde
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 636 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2473
Whether the High Court erred in directing further investigation into the highly belated complaint filed by the complainant-Company after unexplained delay of six years by twisting and manipulating the facts to give a colour of criminal offence to a purely civil dispute.
Supreme Court of India28 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 635 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2722
Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the petition filed by the appellant for quashing of FIR and the consequential proceedings.
Supreme Court of India5 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 634 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 168
Whether the evidence led, in the instant case, justified the Trial Court’s exercise of power u/s.319 CrPC to summon respondent no. 2, and whether the High Court was right in setting that order aside at the threshold.
Supreme Court of India5 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 633 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 303
Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of the First Appellate Court acquitting the appellant-accused and setting aside his conviction u/s.138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as recorded by the trial Court.
Supreme Court of India5 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 632 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 210
Matter pertains to the correctness of the dismissal of the partition suit u/Ord.XII r.6 CPC by the Single Judge of the High Court based on the admission, and that too on its own motion without an application being filed by the other party.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 630 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 798
Whether a dispute raised by an insured after giving a full and final discharge voucher to the insurer can be referred to arbitration.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 629 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1809
Whether the Appellant belongs to the Hindu Parayan caste in the State of Kerala and is covered by the 1950 Order insofar as it relates to the State of Kerala; whether the Appellant had still retained the Hindu Parayan caste, as a member of the Hindu religion, when he contested from the Devikulam Assembly Constituency for Legislative Assembly of Kerala.
Supreme Court of India4 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 628 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 601
Whether the petition filed by the petitioner herein u/Or.18 Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rightly rejected by the High Court.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 658 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 307
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the application of the appellants seeking quashing of the complaint, and that too without issuing notice to respondents.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 657 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 160
Whether the High Court erred in reversing the acquittal and convicting the accused persons based on the testimony of the IOs which was founded only on s.161, CrPC statements of the witnesses; whether present was a case of two probable views, in which case the one favourable to the accused ought to be taken.
Supreme Court of India9 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 656 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1911
Issue arose with respect to the legality and propriety of the directions issued by the Division Bench of the High Court to the appellant to take down/delete the pages and discussion with regard to the observations made by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 655 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 180
The appellant was convicted for the offence punishable u/s.7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and also for the offence punishable u/s.13(1)(d) r/w. s.13(2) of the Act by the trial Court. The High Court affirmed the conviction of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 654 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2536
The conviction of the appellant as well as the sentence imposed on him u/ss.7 and 13(1)(d) r/w. s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is questioned.
Supreme Court of India8 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 653 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1306
Whether the High Court erred by not quashing the prosecution against the accused under ss.186 and 353 of Indian Penal Code.
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 646 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2515
1. Whether an unregistered sale agreement can confer valid title or ownership of immovable property. 2. Whether a High Court exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 can direct dispossession of a party without proof of actual and physical possession.
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 644 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1279
Whether in case of discharge of a serviceman from the Indian Army, on the ground of medical invalidation and consequent denial of disability pension, the burden of proof lies on the serviceman or the concerned department? Whether the existence of a causal link between the service conditions and the disability in order to claim disability pension or the nature of the service area? Whether a non-reasoned order of the Medical board be relied upon to grant or deny of disability pension?
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 643 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1854
Matter pertains to appeal challenging the conviction and sentence of the appellant u/s.109 IPC r/w ss.13(1)(e) and 13(2) of PC Act; appeal challenging the attachment Order as modified by the High Court; and the appeal challenging the Administrative Order passed * Author [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1855 P. Nallammal v. State By The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anticorruption Police, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu by the Chief Justice of the High Court by which criminal appeals were listed for fresh hearing.
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 640 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1263
Appellants issued work order to 1st respondent for construction of flats and paid advance. Bank guarantee equivalent to the advance money was furnished by 1st respondent to secure the amount. When the work got delayed and disputes arose between the parties, the appellants requested refund of debit balance, failing which the bank guarantee was to be encashed. The 1st respondent filed petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the Commercial Court, along with applications under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 and Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC, so as to restrain the appella
Supreme Court of India7 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 639 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 814
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the appeal falls on a day when the court is closed or commences from the day when the court reopens? (ii) What is the meaning of the term ‘prescribed period’ as defined under Section 2(j) read with Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and Rule 3 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016? (iii) Whether the NCLAT has the power to condone the delay beyond the said prescribed and condonable period unde
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 636 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2473
Whether the High Court erred in directing further investigation into the highly belated complaint filed by the complainant-Company after unexplained delay of six years by twisting and manipulating the facts to give a colour of criminal offence to a purely civil dispute.
Supreme Court of India28 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 635 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2722
Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the petition filed by the appellant for quashing of FIR and the consequential proceedings.
Supreme Court of India5 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 634 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 168
Whether the evidence led, in the instant case, justified the Trial Court’s exercise of power u/s.319 CrPC to summon respondent no. 2, and whether the High Court was right in setting that order aside at the threshold.
Supreme Court of India5 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 633 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 303
Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of the First Appellate Court acquitting the appellant-accused and setting aside his conviction u/s.138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as recorded by the trial Court.
Supreme Court of India5 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 632 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 210
Matter pertains to the correctness of the dismissal of the partition suit u/Ord.XII r.6 CPC by the Single Judge of the High Court based on the admission, and that too on its own motion without an application being filed by the other party.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 630 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 798
Whether a dispute raised by an insured after giving a full and final discharge voucher to the insurer can be referred to arbitration.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 629 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1809
Whether the Appellant belongs to the Hindu Parayan caste in the State of Kerala and is covered by the 1950 Order insofar as it relates to the State of Kerala; whether the Appellant had still retained the Hindu Parayan caste, as a member of the Hindu religion, when he contested from the Devikulam Assembly Constituency for Legislative Assembly of Kerala.
Supreme Court of India4 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 628 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 601
Whether the petition filed by the petitioner herein u/Or.18 Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rightly rejected by the High Court.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis