⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,021–5,040 · Page 252 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 172 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 609
Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The parties had by mutual consent agreed to the appointment of all the three arbitrators and they had submitted their respective claims before the arbitrators. The arbitrators Gare the close relatives of the parties and no misconduct is alleged against the arbitrators. They …
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 171 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 501
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,021–5,040 · Page 252 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 172 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 609
Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The parties had by mutual consent agreed to the appointment of all the three arbitrators and they had submitted their respective claims before the arbitrators. The arbitrators Gare the close relatives of the parties and no misconduct is alleged against the arbitrators. They …
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 171 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 501
[2020] 4 S.C.R. 501 501 THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA A v. MELVIN SOHLANGPIAW (Special Leave To Appeal (Crl.) No.1218 of 2018) FEBRUARY 11, 2020 B [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Constitution of India: Sixth Schedule, Paragraph 4 and 5 – Respondent, a member of the Khasi Scheduled Tribe, was tried for C mu…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 17 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 931
HELD: 1. The fact that the deceased was riding on a motor cycle along with the driver and another, may not, by itself, without H 931 932 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 1 S.C.R. A anything more, make him guilty of contributory negligence. At the most it would make him guilty of being a party to the violation of the law. S…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 169 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 736
06.08.2009 to the Government of India for grant of SSSP scheme from the Government of India – The Government of India found respondent no. 1 ineligible for grant of SSSP scheme under the relaxed criteria for Goa Liberation Movement, Phase-II – Writ petition by respondent no. 1 – The High Court allowed the writ F petiti…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 166 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 763
Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Re: First Issue : F Whether the construction raised by the Appellants was lawful under the 1961 Act, in light of the 1988 notification? In the instant case, exercising its powers under Section 19(3) of the Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Re…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 165 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 723
Ahlawat, M. Umashankar, Naresh Kumar, Advs. for the Appellants. S.S. Javali, Sr. Adv., P. R. Ramasesh, Abdul Azeem Kalebudde, Advs. for the R…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 164 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 887
– Thus, High Court has a discretion on the facts of each case either to do so or not to do so. Disposing of the appeals, the Court E HELD: The High Court is not mandatorily required to call for a statement from the Tribunal in every case, where a reference is made. This is so because of the language of Sub-Section 4 wh…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 163 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 707
believe that she is married to him and as a result of such mis-representation, woman should believe that she was lawfully married…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 162 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 697
, Rule 17 A CPC. If such an application had been filed, it would have either been dismissed on the ground of limitation or even if allowed, the prayer for specific performance, inse…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 160 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 687
– Claim against 2 cheques is barred by limitation – Criminal case u/ s.138 concerns only 2 cheques – Appellant no.3 filed Summary Suit for recovery of Rs.1,20,00,000/- based on four receipts – FIR registered against appellants alleging forgery and fabrication of E the four receipts – Appellant nos.1-3 sought its quashi…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 16 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 779
the contractor, he completed the work on 30.04.08 and final bill was paid – Road was damaged and the State called upon the contractor to repair the damaged portion and according to the contractor, this repair was completed – Case of the contractor is that in terms of the contract, the contractor was only liable to remo…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 158 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 699
– Present SLPs filed against orders dtd. 16.03.2018 and 26.11.2018 – Submissions made only on the question as to whether judgment in Preetam Singh’s case reported as [2014] 10 SCR 910 requires reference to larger Bench or not – Held: Main issue considered in G Preetam Singh’s case was as to whether the State Govt. has …
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 157 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 727
– Held: Per Arun Mishra and Vineet Saran, JJ. – Provisions made in s.18A are rendered of academic use as they were enacted to take care of mandate issued in Dr. Subhash Kashinath case which no more prevails – A preliminary inquiry is permissible only in the E circumstances as per law laid down by Constitution Bench in …
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 152 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 625
- Sub-lessee directed to pay certain amount towards lease rent, maintenance charges and electricity charges for resotration of Eelectricity – Petition disposed of. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 21341 of 2019. From the Judgment and Order dated 31.07.2019 of the High Court F at Calcutta…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 151 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 646
– Alteration of the guideline by prescribing an additional criteria E only in respect of one District i.e. Rewa was without authority – The additional criteria, having been introduced after commencement of selection process, was not justified. Dismissing the appeals, the Court F HELD: 1.1 Though the guidelines dated 2.…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 150 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 658
658 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 658 [2020] 2 S.C.R. A MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI B (Civil Appeal No. 11923 of 2018) FEBRUARY 07, 2020 [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND NAVIN SINHA, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 – Proviso to s.43B – Allowable C deduction u/s.43…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 15 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 766
FORCE AND OTHERS B (Civil Appeal No. 86 of 2020) JANUARY 08, 2020 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND HRISHIKESH ROY, JJ.] Service Law – Appellant, constable in the Border Security C Force (BSF) was sanctioned leave from 10.02.2007 to 01.03.2007– Rejoined on 04.04.2007 – Dismissed on the ground of such misconduct – On ap…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 149 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 680
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The entire case is based upon Rule 59 of the C Jharkhand Pension Rules, 2000 and the Circular dated 12th August, 1969 of the erstwhile State of Bihar. Rule 59 of the Rules empowers the State Government to declare any specified kind of service rendered by one in a non-gazett…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 148 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 583
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: Whether the glider involved in the accident was an D Aircraft. 1. It becomes important to note that though the glider in question was equipped with an engine, this was mainly for the purpose of adding self-launching capacity to the vehicle, as evident from the Transport Safety Boa…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 147 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 661
in *PCLU case, does not prima facie appear to be correct – Besides the decision is also per in curiam – Therefore, the decision needs reconsideration – Matter to be placed before larger Bench to reconsider *PCLU case – Matters to be placed before Larger Bench also to consider applicability of principles laid down in #U…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2020] 4 S.C.R. 501 501 THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA A v. MELVIN SOHLANGPIAW (Special Leave To Appeal (Crl.) No.1218 of 2018) FEBRUARY 11, 2020 B [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Constitution of India: Sixth Schedule, Paragraph 4 and 5 – Respondent, a member of the Khasi Scheduled Tribe, was tried for C mu…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 17 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 931
HELD: 1. The fact that the deceased was riding on a motor cycle along with the driver and another, may not, by itself, without H 931 932 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 1 S.C.R. A anything more, make him guilty of contributory negligence. At the most it would make him guilty of being a party to the violation of the law. S…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 169 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 736
06.08.2009 to the Government of India for grant of SSSP scheme from the Government of India – The Government of India found respondent no. 1 ineligible for grant of SSSP scheme under the relaxed criteria for Goa Liberation Movement, Phase-II – Writ petition by respondent no. 1 – The High Court allowed the writ F petiti…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 166 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 763
Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Re: First Issue : F Whether the construction raised by the Appellants was lawful under the 1961 Act, in light of the 1988 notification? In the instant case, exercising its powers under Section 19(3) of the Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Re…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 165 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 723
Ahlawat, M. Umashankar, Naresh Kumar, Advs. for the Appellants. S.S. Javali, Sr. Adv., P. R. Ramasesh, Abdul Azeem Kalebudde, Advs. for the R…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 164 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 887
– Thus, High Court has a discretion on the facts of each case either to do so or not to do so. Disposing of the appeals, the Court E HELD: The High Court is not mandatorily required to call for a statement from the Tribunal in every case, where a reference is made. This is so because of the language of Sub-Section 4 wh…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 163 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 707
believe that she is married to him and as a result of such mis-representation, woman should believe that she was lawfully married…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 162 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 697
, Rule 17 A CPC. If such an application had been filed, it would have either been dismissed on the ground of limitation or even if allowed, the prayer for specific performance, inse…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 160 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 687
– Claim against 2 cheques is barred by limitation – Criminal case u/ s.138 concerns only 2 cheques – Appellant no.3 filed Summary Suit for recovery of Rs.1,20,00,000/- based on four receipts – FIR registered against appellants alleging forgery and fabrication of E the four receipts – Appellant nos.1-3 sought its quashi…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 16 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 779
the contractor, he completed the work on 30.04.08 and final bill was paid – Road was damaged and the State called upon the contractor to repair the damaged portion and according to the contractor, this repair was completed – Case of the contractor is that in terms of the contract, the contractor was only liable to remo…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 158 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 699
– Present SLPs filed against orders dtd. 16.03.2018 and 26.11.2018 – Submissions made only on the question as to whether judgment in Preetam Singh’s case reported as [2014] 10 SCR 910 requires reference to larger Bench or not – Held: Main issue considered in G Preetam Singh’s case was as to whether the State Govt. has …
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 157 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 727
– Held: Per Arun Mishra and Vineet Saran, JJ. – Provisions made in s.18A are rendered of academic use as they were enacted to take care of mandate issued in Dr. Subhash Kashinath case which no more prevails – A preliminary inquiry is permissible only in the E circumstances as per law laid down by Constitution Bench in …
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 152 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 625
- Sub-lessee directed to pay certain amount towards lease rent, maintenance charges and electricity charges for resotration of Eelectricity – Petition disposed of. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 21341 of 2019. From the Judgment and Order dated 31.07.2019 of the High Court F at Calcutta…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 151 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 646
– Alteration of the guideline by prescribing an additional criteria E only in respect of one District i.e. Rewa was without authority – The additional criteria, having been introduced after commencement of selection process, was not justified. Dismissing the appeals, the Court F HELD: 1.1 Though the guidelines dated 2.…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 150 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 658
658 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 658 [2020] 2 S.C.R. A MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI B (Civil Appeal No. 11923 of 2018) FEBRUARY 07, 2020 [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND NAVIN SINHA, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 – Proviso to s.43B – Allowable C deduction u/s.43…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 15 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 766
FORCE AND OTHERS B (Civil Appeal No. 86 of 2020) JANUARY 08, 2020 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND HRISHIKESH ROY, JJ.] Service Law – Appellant, constable in the Border Security C Force (BSF) was sanctioned leave from 10.02.2007 to 01.03.2007– Rejoined on 04.04.2007 – Dismissed on the ground of such misconduct – On ap…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 149 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 680
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The entire case is based upon Rule 59 of the C Jharkhand Pension Rules, 2000 and the Circular dated 12th August, 1969 of the erstwhile State of Bihar. Rule 59 of the Rules empowers the State Government to declare any specified kind of service rendered by one in a non-gazett…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 148 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 583
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: Whether the glider involved in the accident was an D Aircraft. 1. It becomes important to note that though the glider in question was equipped with an engine, this was mainly for the purpose of adding self-launching capacity to the vehicle, as evident from the Transport Safety Boa…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 147 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 661
in *PCLU case, does not prima facie appear to be correct – Besides the decision is also per in curiam – Therefore, the decision needs reconsideration – Matter to be placed before larger Bench to reconsider *PCLU case – Matters to be placed before Larger Bench also to consider applicability of principles laid down in #U…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis