⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
481–500 · Page 25 of 500
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 684 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1983
Whether by way of the circular dated 30.01.2004 the benefits granted under the statutory notification dated 01.04.2003 could have been curtailed by expanding the exclusionary clause; whether crude degummed soyabean oil imported by the appellant is an agricultural product; what is an agricultural product.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 683 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 266
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
481–500 · Page 25 of 500
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 684 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1983
Whether by way of the circular dated 30.01.2004 the benefits granted under the statutory notification dated 01.04.2003 could have been curtailed by expanding the exclusionary clause; whether crude degummed soyabean oil imported by the appellant is an agricultural product; what is an agricultural product.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 683 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 266
Issue arose as regards the effect of the failure of the eyewitnesses to identify the accused in the court on the prosecution case.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 682 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1023
Whether it would be just and proper, in the instant case, to accept 78% disability as assessed by the Tribunal appointed Commissioner; whether any amount receivable on account of PF, pension or insurance be deducted from the salary of the victim for the purpose of determining the income or loss of earning for calculating compensation; whether the appellants are entitled for enhancement of the compensation amount.
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 681 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2484
Matter pertains to the sustainability of the order passed by the High Court rejecting the petition of the appellants seeking quashing of complaint against them.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 680 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1360
Whether the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity was correct in reversing the Order passed by Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission thereby exonerating respondent from bearing the entire construction cost for the Bay.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 679 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1
i) Whether alienation of land by the District Collector, Medak, Government of Andhra Pradesh vide order dated 08.02.2001 was a sale or alienation/allotment; ii) whether any condition was imposed pursuant to the alienation of land by the Government of Andhra Pradesh; iii) whether any condition/restriction imposed by the State Government would be violative of s.10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Supreme Court of India9 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 678 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1375
The Court was seized of a matter concerning the contemptuous conduct of a Tehsildar who forcibly evicted home dwellers and defied court orders. Court appreciated the factual scenario in light of principle of rule of law.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 677 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2549
Matter pertains to the violation of human rights on refusal to register FIR by the Inspector of Police as also using of objectionable language while talking to complainant’s mother; and correctness of order of the State Human Rights Commission directing the Excise Department to pay compensation to the complainant with liberty to recover the amount from the appellant-Inspector of Police.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 676 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 360
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the petition u/s.482 of the CrPC filed by respondent no.2 (through its Director); thereby directing the release of Rs. 15.90 lakhs being withheld by the Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) as payout for sale of certain shares in his favor on superdari subject to him furnishing a Guarantee of the same amount, before the Magistrate Court.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 675 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 365
The appellants challenge the common judgement and order of the High Court whereby High Court reduced the compensation payable to appellant no.1 and dismissed the claim in so far as it relates appellant no.2 in a case arising out of a claim petition filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 674 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 372
Whether the appellant was rightly convicted for abetment of offence u/s.13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 672 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 253
An appeal suit along with the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days was preferred. The High Court allowed the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days. Whether the delay is to be condoned or not, and if the delay is justifiable, then whether the case should be allowed to proceed on merits, or be dismissed on procedural grounds.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 671 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 382
Whether the High Court while exercising its revisionary jurisdiction erred in upholding the conviction of the appellant under Section 498A, Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 670 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 402
Issue arose with regards to admissibility of pension to the employees of the Co-operative Societies who were absorbed with the Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board (MPSEB); if the answer to the same is yes then what would be the length of service to be counted i.e. whether the service rendered in the Society would also be counted for determining the qualifying period for calculation of pension or only the service rendered after absorption in the MPSEB would be counted.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 669 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 193
The question arose as regards the determination of the amount due and payable by the respondent-buyer to the appellant-developer for the allotment of flat.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 668 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1316
I. Whether providing exclusionary volume based discounts, imposing contractual terms, refusing supply etc. will amount to abuse of dominant position? II. Whether the functional-discount / “no-Chinese” scheme (including the later TMLA arrangement) imposes unfair or discriminatory conditions under Section 4(2)(a) and Section 4(2)(b) of the Act? III. Whether the LTTSA with Schott Kaisha produced a margin- squeeze proscribed by Section 4(2)(e) of the Act? IV. Whether Schott India tied or bundled NGA and NGC tubes, thereby breaching Section 4(2)(d) of the Act? V. Whether an effects-based (harm) ana
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 667 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1933
(a) Whether the 100-point assessment laid down in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2017) 9 SCC 766 and modified in Indira Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2023) 8 SCC 1 for the designation of Senior Advocates require reconsideration in light of the experience gained and concerns expressed. (b) Whether the inclusion of members of the Bar in the Permanent Committee for designation is legally permissible under Section 16(2) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which confers the power of designation exclusively on the Supreme Court and High Courts. (c) Whether advocates practising in tria
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 665 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 395
Whether while exercising power u/s.11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court has to confine its consideration as to the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties; If so, whether it would be permissible, while exercising jurisdiction u/s.11, to hold that some of the claims raised are non-arbitrable or fall within excepted category.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 663 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 414
Whether the High Court was justified in restoring the interim injunction in favour of Respondent No.1 in a modified term during the pendency of the Suit.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 662 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 291
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellant is entitled for regular bail.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Issue arose as regards the effect of the failure of the eyewitnesses to identify the accused in the court on the prosecution case.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 682 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1023
Whether it would be just and proper, in the instant case, to accept 78% disability as assessed by the Tribunal appointed Commissioner; whether any amount receivable on account of PF, pension or insurance be deducted from the salary of the victim for the purpose of determining the income or loss of earning for calculating compensation; whether the appellants are entitled for enhancement of the compensation amount.
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 681 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2484
Matter pertains to the sustainability of the order passed by the High Court rejecting the petition of the appellants seeking quashing of complaint against them.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 680 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1360
Whether the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity was correct in reversing the Order passed by Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission thereby exonerating respondent from bearing the entire construction cost for the Bay.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 679 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1
i) Whether alienation of land by the District Collector, Medak, Government of Andhra Pradesh vide order dated 08.02.2001 was a sale or alienation/allotment; ii) whether any condition was imposed pursuant to the alienation of land by the Government of Andhra Pradesh; iii) whether any condition/restriction imposed by the State Government would be violative of s.10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Supreme Court of India9 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 678 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1375
The Court was seized of a matter concerning the contemptuous conduct of a Tehsildar who forcibly evicted home dwellers and defied court orders. Court appreciated the factual scenario in light of principle of rule of law.
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 677 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2549
Matter pertains to the violation of human rights on refusal to register FIR by the Inspector of Police as also using of objectionable language while talking to complainant’s mother; and correctness of order of the State Human Rights Commission directing the Excise Department to pay compensation to the complainant with liberty to recover the amount from the appellant-Inspector of Police.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 676 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 360
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the petition u/s.482 of the CrPC filed by respondent no.2 (through its Director); thereby directing the release of Rs. 15.90 lakhs being withheld by the Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) as payout for sale of certain shares in his favor on superdari subject to him furnishing a Guarantee of the same amount, before the Magistrate Court.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 675 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 365
The appellants challenge the common judgement and order of the High Court whereby High Court reduced the compensation payable to appellant no.1 and dismissed the claim in so far as it relates appellant no.2 in a case arising out of a claim petition filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 674 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 372
Whether the appellant was rightly convicted for abetment of offence u/s.13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 672 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 253
An appeal suit along with the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days was preferred. The High Court allowed the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days. Whether the delay is to be condoned or not, and if the delay is justifiable, then whether the case should be allowed to proceed on merits, or be dismissed on procedural grounds.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 671 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 382
Whether the High Court while exercising its revisionary jurisdiction erred in upholding the conviction of the appellant under Section 498A, Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 670 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 402
Issue arose with regards to admissibility of pension to the employees of the Co-operative Societies who were absorbed with the Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board (MPSEB); if the answer to the same is yes then what would be the length of service to be counted i.e. whether the service rendered in the Society would also be counted for determining the qualifying period for calculation of pension or only the service rendered after absorption in the MPSEB would be counted.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 669 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 193
The question arose as regards the determination of the amount due and payable by the respondent-buyer to the appellant-developer for the allotment of flat.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 668 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1316
I. Whether providing exclusionary volume based discounts, imposing contractual terms, refusing supply etc. will amount to abuse of dominant position? II. Whether the functional-discount / “no-Chinese” scheme (including the later TMLA arrangement) imposes unfair or discriminatory conditions under Section 4(2)(a) and Section 4(2)(b) of the Act? III. Whether the LTTSA with Schott Kaisha produced a margin- squeeze proscribed by Section 4(2)(e) of the Act? IV. Whether Schott India tied or bundled NGA and NGC tubes, thereby breaching Section 4(2)(d) of the Act? V. Whether an effects-based (harm) ana
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 667 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1933
(a) Whether the 100-point assessment laid down in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2017) 9 SCC 766 and modified in Indira Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2023) 8 SCC 1 for the designation of Senior Advocates require reconsideration in light of the experience gained and concerns expressed. (b) Whether the inclusion of members of the Bar in the Permanent Committee for designation is legally permissible under Section 16(2) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which confers the power of designation exclusively on the Supreme Court and High Courts. (c) Whether advocates practising in tria
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 665 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 395
Whether while exercising power u/s.11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court has to confine its consideration as to the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties; If so, whether it would be permissible, while exercising jurisdiction u/s.11, to hold that some of the claims raised are non-arbitrable or fall within excepted category.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 663 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 414
Whether the High Court was justified in restoring the interim injunction in favour of Respondent No.1 in a modified term during the pendency of the Suit.
Supreme Court of India12 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 662 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 291
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellant is entitled for regular bail.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis