⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,961–4,980 · Page 249 of 500
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 238 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 814
814 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 814 [2020] 4 S.C.R. A ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. v. RADHEY SHYAM PANDEY B (Civil Appeal No. 2463 of 2015) MARCH 02, 2020 [ARUN MISHRA, M. R. SHAH AND B. R. GAVAI, JJ.] Service Law – Voluntary Retirement Scheme – Whether the respondent employees are entit…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2020Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,961–4,980 · Page 249 of 500
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 238 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 814
814 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 814 [2020] 4 S.C.R. A ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. v. RADHEY SHYAM PANDEY B (Civil Appeal No. 2463 of 2015) MARCH 02, 2020 [ARUN MISHRA, M. R. SHAH AND B. R. GAVAI, JJ.] Service Law – Voluntary Retirement Scheme – Whether the respondent employees are entit…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 237 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 299
2. Now, so far as the submission on behalf of the petitioner that to go on strike/boycott courts is a fundamental right of F Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and it is a mode of peaceful representation to express the grievances by the lawyers’ community is concerned, such a ri…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 234 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 944
27.8.2003 passed by the DRT, the respondents-plaintiffs filed two suits to declare the order dated 27.8.2003 as non- est, ultra-vires, null and void and not binding on the suit property – In the said suits, the bank filed application u/Or. 7, r.11 to reject the respective plaints – The bank contended that as per s.20(1…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 232 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1071
total fund based limits/exposure (including liabilities likely to get devolved in the case of existing accounts) is equal to and above the threshold limit of Rs. 500 lacs; the term “Total Fund Based Limits” includes both term loan and Working Capital Limit – It further pointed out that appraisal fees for TEV study is d…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 230 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1048
appellant-MSEDCL that the respondents used supply of electricity to manufacture their products – The cost incurred on production has been passed on to the buyers/ consumers buying their products – In the peculiar facts of the case, as the Commission earlier opined in order dated 10.01.2002 that Captive Power Plant Poli…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 229 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1034
1034 SHRI MARUTI TUKARAM BAGAWE AND ORS. v. STATE OF 1035 MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. Supreme Court – Held: State Government withdrew the Resolution A dated 26.10.2004 by its Resolution dated 11.9.2009 realizing that the former Resolution created anomalous situation – Therefore Tribunal rightly upheld the Resolution dated 11.…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 228 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1015
exercise its power of judicial review unless there is allegation of mala fides or there are facts so glaring that the decision of compulsory retirement is unsupportable. Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer – Effect and criteria for its consideration – Discussed. G Dismissing the writ petitions, the Court HELD : 1…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 227 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 291
intended or anticipated to be so – The transactions in question were of deemed preference to related party during the look-back period of two years – The transactions also cannot be said to have been done in the ordinary course of business and hence are not excepted transfers in terms of sub-section (3) – Thus, the tra…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 225 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 207
of the first appellant-Bank was transferred to Branch Office at Sarsawa, Jabalpur – Submitted representation to Zonal Manager for being retained at Indore – Had earlier pointed out irregularities w.r.t accounts of liquor contractors – Also made sexual harassment allegations against the Zonal Manager – Single Judge quas…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 224 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 986
– Show cause notice was issued within jurisdiction – No double jeopardy occurred as one order was by disciplinary Committee E imposing penalty for misconduct while Notice was for conviction in criminal case. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The respondent has been convicted and F sentenced to two years of rigoro…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 223 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 975
H 975 976 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 3 S.C.R. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 When the plaintiffs assigned their rights to defendant Nos.5 to 8 on the request of defendant No.4 for a period of 9 years, plaintiffs having parted with their satellite rights could not have claimed any right for telecasting d…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 222 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1007
the Evacuee Property Act, there was no prior approval from the Custodian as contemplated under Section 32 of the Evacuee Property Act. The primary authority, though referred to various objections raised by the appellants herein, has allowed the application based on the alleged oral settlement by the appellants’ E prede…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 221 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 999
NARAYAN YADAV (D) THR. LRS. v. THE STATE 1001 OF BIHAR Amit Kumar, Somesh Chandra Jha, Praveen Chandra, Ms. Pyoli, A Advs. for the Appellants. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Saksham Maheshwari, D.K. Thakur, Devendra Jha, Abhishek Kumar, Shivraju HB, Rituparn Uniyal, H. L. Chumber, Dr. V. P.Appan, Gopal Singh, Jaideep Khanna, Sr…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 219 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 694
G Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 As per Section 32(2)(a) of the Himachal Land Revenue Act, 1954, record-of-rights, i.e. Jamabandi, shall include the name of persons who are landowners, tenants or assignees of land revenue and also the rent, land revenue, rates, cesses or H 694 SHRI PARTAP SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 218 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 885
– On appeal, held: No undue preference was given to the State run D and State aided institutions in the tariff notification – No error committed by the appellant in fixing higher tariff for the SFEIs categorising them as commercial entities – Judicial notice taken of the fact that the student profile of State run and S…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 216 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 970
thereon from time to time is deprecated – Rejection of bail application of co-accused would not come in the way of appellant who was granted interim protection by High Court which arrangement continued till date without any adverse report against him – To do complete justice in the matter, the main bail application pen…
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 215 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 663
directing appellant-husband to pay monthly maintenance and the parties to the dispute to file petition for divorce by mutual consent – Husband paid the maintenance for four months only – Respondent-wife filed execution petition for enforcement of the order for payment of maintenance – Family Court rejected the executio…
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 214 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 305
Words and Phrases – ‘occupied by’ and ‘possession’ – E discussed. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The provisions of the Joint Development Agreement would show that, at the very least, a license is granted in favour of the developer to enter upon the land to demolish F existing structures, construct and erect ne…
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 213 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 410
dismissed by High Court – Held: Deed of Settlement must be examined as a whole to determine the true intention of the settlor – Settlor had a clear intent to divest himself and his legal heirs of the property and endow it for the continuation of the charitable activities at the suit property – Deed of Settlement create…
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 212 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 891
[2020] 3 S.C.R. 891 891 SURESH CHAND AND ANR. A v. SURESH CHANDER (D) THR LRS. AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 482 of 2020) FEBRUARY 19, 2020 B [DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ. ] Rajasthan Pre-emption Act 1966: ss. 6, 5 – Right of pre-emption – When accrues – Held: Right of pre-emption is a C preferentia…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2020 INSC 237 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 299
2. Now, so far as the submission on behalf of the petitioner that to go on strike/boycott courts is a fundamental right of F Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and it is a mode of peaceful representation to express the grievances by the lawyers’ community is concerned, such a ri…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 234 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 944
27.8.2003 passed by the DRT, the respondents-plaintiffs filed two suits to declare the order dated 27.8.2003 as non- est, ultra-vires, null and void and not binding on the suit property – In the said suits, the bank filed application u/Or. 7, r.11 to reject the respective plaints – The bank contended that as per s.20(1…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 232 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1071
total fund based limits/exposure (including liabilities likely to get devolved in the case of existing accounts) is equal to and above the threshold limit of Rs. 500 lacs; the term “Total Fund Based Limits” includes both term loan and Working Capital Limit – It further pointed out that appraisal fees for TEV study is d…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 230 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1048
appellant-MSEDCL that the respondents used supply of electricity to manufacture their products – The cost incurred on production has been passed on to the buyers/ consumers buying their products – In the peculiar facts of the case, as the Commission earlier opined in order dated 10.01.2002 that Captive Power Plant Poli…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 229 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1034
1034 SHRI MARUTI TUKARAM BAGAWE AND ORS. v. STATE OF 1035 MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. Supreme Court – Held: State Government withdrew the Resolution A dated 26.10.2004 by its Resolution dated 11.9.2009 realizing that the former Resolution created anomalous situation – Therefore Tribunal rightly upheld the Resolution dated 11.…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 228 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1015
exercise its power of judicial review unless there is allegation of mala fides or there are facts so glaring that the decision of compulsory retirement is unsupportable. Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer – Effect and criteria for its consideration – Discussed. G Dismissing the writ petitions, the Court HELD : 1…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 227 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 291
intended or anticipated to be so – The transactions in question were of deemed preference to related party during the look-back period of two years – The transactions also cannot be said to have been done in the ordinary course of business and hence are not excepted transfers in terms of sub-section (3) – Thus, the tra…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 225 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 207
of the first appellant-Bank was transferred to Branch Office at Sarsawa, Jabalpur – Submitted representation to Zonal Manager for being retained at Indore – Had earlier pointed out irregularities w.r.t accounts of liquor contractors – Also made sexual harassment allegations against the Zonal Manager – Single Judge quas…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 224 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 986
– Show cause notice was issued within jurisdiction – No double jeopardy occurred as one order was by disciplinary Committee E imposing penalty for misconduct while Notice was for conviction in criminal case. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The respondent has been convicted and F sentenced to two years of rigoro…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 223 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 975
H 975 976 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 3 S.C.R. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 When the plaintiffs assigned their rights to defendant Nos.5 to 8 on the request of defendant No.4 for a period of 9 years, plaintiffs having parted with their satellite rights could not have claimed any right for telecasting d…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 222 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1007
the Evacuee Property Act, there was no prior approval from the Custodian as contemplated under Section 32 of the Evacuee Property Act. The primary authority, though referred to various objections raised by the appellants herein, has allowed the application based on the alleged oral settlement by the appellants’ E prede…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 221 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 999
NARAYAN YADAV (D) THR. LRS. v. THE STATE 1001 OF BIHAR Amit Kumar, Somesh Chandra Jha, Praveen Chandra, Ms. Pyoli, A Advs. for the Appellants. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Saksham Maheshwari, D.K. Thakur, Devendra Jha, Abhishek Kumar, Shivraju HB, Rituparn Uniyal, H. L. Chumber, Dr. V. P.Appan, Gopal Singh, Jaideep Khanna, Sr…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 219 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 694
G Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 As per Section 32(2)(a) of the Himachal Land Revenue Act, 1954, record-of-rights, i.e. Jamabandi, shall include the name of persons who are landowners, tenants or assignees of land revenue and also the rent, land revenue, rates, cesses or H 694 SHRI PARTAP SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 218 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 885
– On appeal, held: No undue preference was given to the State run D and State aided institutions in the tariff notification – No error committed by the appellant in fixing higher tariff for the SFEIs categorising them as commercial entities – Judicial notice taken of the fact that the student profile of State run and S…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 216 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 970
thereon from time to time is deprecated – Rejection of bail application of co-accused would not come in the way of appellant who was granted interim protection by High Court which arrangement continued till date without any adverse report against him – To do complete justice in the matter, the main bail application pen…
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 215 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 663
directing appellant-husband to pay monthly maintenance and the parties to the dispute to file petition for divorce by mutual consent – Husband paid the maintenance for four months only – Respondent-wife filed execution petition for enforcement of the order for payment of maintenance – Family Court rejected the executio…
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 214 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 305
Words and Phrases – ‘occupied by’ and ‘possession’ – E discussed. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The provisions of the Joint Development Agreement would show that, at the very least, a license is granted in favour of the developer to enter upon the land to demolish F existing structures, construct and erect ne…
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 213 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 410
dismissed by High Court – Held: Deed of Settlement must be examined as a whole to determine the true intention of the settlor – Settlor had a clear intent to divest himself and his legal heirs of the property and endow it for the continuation of the charitable activities at the suit property – Deed of Settlement create…
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2020Full text
2020 INSC 212 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 891
[2020] 3 S.C.R. 891 891 SURESH CHAND AND ANR. A v. SURESH CHANDER (D) THR LRS. AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 482 of 2020) FEBRUARY 19, 2020 B [DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ. ] Rajasthan Pre-emption Act 1966: ss. 6, 5 – Right of pre-emption – When accrues – Held: Right of pre-emption is a C preferentia…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis