⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,901–4,920 · Page 246 of 500
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 304 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 176
authorized by legislation – True test is not whether the amount contributed by beneficiary is adequate to defray the entire cost of expenditure envisaged under the scheme – So long as the service rendered is not free of charge, any deficiency of service is amenable to the fora for redressal constituted under Consumer A…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,901–4,920 · Page 246 of 500
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 304 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 176
authorized by legislation – True test is not whether the amount contributed by beneficiary is adequate to defray the entire cost of expenditure envisaged under the scheme – So long as the service rendered is not free of charge, any deficiency of service is amenable to the fora for redressal constituted under Consumer A…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 303 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 755
Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The protection of the environment is premised D not only on the active role of courts, but also on robust institutional frameworks within which every stakeholder complies with its duty to ensure sustainable development. A framework of environmental governance committed to the…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 302 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 930
930 SUPREME COURT[2020] 4REPORTSS.C.R. 930 [2020] 4 S.C.R. A SAJAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal Nos. 2170-2171 of 2020) B MARCH 17, 2020 [R. BANUMATHI AND A. S. BOPANNA, JJ.] Land Acquisition: Acquisition of land – Comprising of cultivable as well as C non-agricultural land used for running sugar mi…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 300 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 433
[2020] 10 S.C.R. 433 433 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. A v. LT. CDR. ANNIE NAGARAJA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2182-87 of 2020) MARCH 17, 2020 B [DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Navy Act, 1957 – s.9(2) – Women Short Service Commissioned (SSC) Officers – Grant of Permanent Commissions (PCs) – Right to C be co…
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 30 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 909
as Nediyathuruthu island is concerned, the appellant filed four special leave petitions arising out of disposal of the writ petitions and a review petition by the High Court – The appellants contended that the decision of the Supreme Court in Vaamika island was confined only to the facts relating to Vettila Thuruthu is…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 3 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 185
– Appeal to Supreme Court – Held: The essence of Art. 30(1) is to ensure equal treatment between majority and minority institutions – A regulation framed in the national interest must apply to all institutions regardless of they being minority or majority – E Regulation, if seeks to ensure the standards of excellence o…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 299 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 492
2. Section 44-A clearly provides that it is only after the filing of the certified copy and the certificate, that the provision of Section 47 CPC will become applicable. This clearly indicates Ethat this section only lays down the procedure to be followed by the District Court. [Para 20][503-F] 3. In view of this Court…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 298 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 904
904 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS7 S.C.R. 904 [2020] 7 S.C.R. A COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE v. MR. MUKESH GOYAL & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1819 of 2020) B MARCH 17, 2020 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Architects Act, 1972 – s. 37 – Prohibition against use of title – The High Court held that s.37 of the Arc…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 297 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 944
– Meanwhile, respondent no. 2 had filed application before the Executing Court that it did not authorise the sale of properties – Consequent to respondent no.2 application, respondent no.1 made a statement to withdraw SLP on 21.04.2008 and filed an objection G application u/Or. XXI, r. 90 of CPC on 20.06.2008 – Respond…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 295 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 201
at Air Force Station Gwalior – Nature of his duties had an inherent seriousness – A finding of guilt was arrived at by enquiry officer w.r.t both the charges – In his departmental appeal, respondent raised no issues of procedural irregularity with consequent prejudice – Common order of punishment of ‘discharge’ from se…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 294 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1
[2020] 3 S.C.R. 1 1 INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY A v. MANOHARLAL & ORS. ETC. (S.L.P. (C) Nos. 9036-9038 of 2016) MARCH 06, 2020 B [ARUN MISHRA, INDIRA BANERJEE, VINEET SARAN, M. R. SHAH AND S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.] Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013:…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 293 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 687
H 687 688 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 4 S.C.R. A Vishwajit Singh, Pankaj Singh, Ms. Ridhima Singh, Ms. Vijaya Singh, Vignesh Singh, Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Siddharth Krishna Dwivedi, Ms. Vibha Dwivedi, Ms. Nidhi Dwivedi, Andleeb Naqvi, Ms. Garima Prashad, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgmen…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 292 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 888
– Indeed, as correctly noted by the High Court, the scope of judicial review under Art.226 is limited – The standards to be met prior to interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction are very high, Gand there needs to be gross substantive injustice through the conclusion, glaring irregularities in procedure or the need…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 291 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 922
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.The Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (now christened as “Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923”) is a piece B of socially beneficial legislation. The provisions will therefore have to be interpreted in a manner to advance the purpose of the legislation, rather than to stultify it. In …
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 290 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 903
[2020] 4 S.C.R. 903 903 INDIAN SOCIAL ACTION FORUM (INSAF) A v. UNION OF INDIA (Civil Appeal No. 1510 of 2020) MARCH 06, 2020 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010: Purpose of enactment – Held: It is made to consolidate the law to regulate the acceptance and utilisation …
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 29 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 755
4. The respondent by remaining away from duty since 1991 to 1998 without producing contemporaneous medical record has not only been irresponsible and indisciplined but tried to get away F with it by producing the certificate of a specialist Doctor who may not have treated the respondent. Significantly, although the res…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 289 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 344
The National Commission upheld the finding of the State Commission – On appeal, held: It is settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Laxmi Engineering that an agreement for buy back by the seed Company of the crop grown by a farmer cannot be regarded as a resale transaction and he cannot be brought out of the scope …
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 286 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 110
110 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER v. 111 M/S. V.K. TRADERS AND OTHERS Allowing the appeals, the Court A HELD: 1. No reliance can be placed upon the lease deeds allegedly executed between the defaulting rice miller(s) and the17(1)(d) respondent(s), as they do not satisfy the statutory requirements of Section 17(…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 285 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 116
116 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 116 [2020] 4 S.C.R. A COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR v. M/S UNIVERSAL FERRO & ALLIED CHEMICALS LTD. & ANR. B (Civil Appeal Nos. 848-852 of 2009) MARCH 06, 2020 [S.A. BOBDE, CJI, B. R. GAVAI AND SURYA KANT, JJ.] Central Excise Act, 1944: s.3(1) and its proviso, s.5(1) and i…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 284 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 565
approach Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre for appointment of arbitrator, if they so desire – Arbitration and Conciliation Amendment Act, 2015. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – s.2(1)(f) – International Commercial Arbitration – Factors to be fulfilled for – C Held: Three factors ought to be fulfilled-(…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2020 INSC 303 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 755
Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The protection of the environment is premised D not only on the active role of courts, but also on robust institutional frameworks within which every stakeholder complies with its duty to ensure sustainable development. A framework of environmental governance committed to the…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 302 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 930
930 SUPREME COURT[2020] 4REPORTSS.C.R. 930 [2020] 4 S.C.R. A SAJAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal Nos. 2170-2171 of 2020) B MARCH 17, 2020 [R. BANUMATHI AND A. S. BOPANNA, JJ.] Land Acquisition: Acquisition of land – Comprising of cultivable as well as C non-agricultural land used for running sugar mi…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 300 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 433
[2020] 10 S.C.R. 433 433 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. A v. LT. CDR. ANNIE NAGARAJA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2182-87 of 2020) MARCH 17, 2020 B [DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Navy Act, 1957 – s.9(2) – Women Short Service Commissioned (SSC) Officers – Grant of Permanent Commissions (PCs) – Right to C be co…
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 30 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 909
as Nediyathuruthu island is concerned, the appellant filed four special leave petitions arising out of disposal of the writ petitions and a review petition by the High Court – The appellants contended that the decision of the Supreme Court in Vaamika island was confined only to the facts relating to Vettila Thuruthu is…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 3 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 185
– Appeal to Supreme Court – Held: The essence of Art. 30(1) is to ensure equal treatment between majority and minority institutions – A regulation framed in the national interest must apply to all institutions regardless of they being minority or majority – E Regulation, if seeks to ensure the standards of excellence o…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 299 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 492
2. Section 44-A clearly provides that it is only after the filing of the certified copy and the certificate, that the provision of Section 47 CPC will become applicable. This clearly indicates Ethat this section only lays down the procedure to be followed by the District Court. [Para 20][503-F] 3. In view of this Court…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 298 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 904
904 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS7 S.C.R. 904 [2020] 7 S.C.R. A COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE v. MR. MUKESH GOYAL & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1819 of 2020) B MARCH 17, 2020 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Architects Act, 1972 – s. 37 – Prohibition against use of title – The High Court held that s.37 of the Arc…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 297 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 944
– Meanwhile, respondent no. 2 had filed application before the Executing Court that it did not authorise the sale of properties – Consequent to respondent no.2 application, respondent no.1 made a statement to withdraw SLP on 21.04.2008 and filed an objection G application u/Or. XXI, r. 90 of CPC on 20.06.2008 – Respond…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 295 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 201
at Air Force Station Gwalior – Nature of his duties had an inherent seriousness – A finding of guilt was arrived at by enquiry officer w.r.t both the charges – In his departmental appeal, respondent raised no issues of procedural irregularity with consequent prejudice – Common order of punishment of ‘discharge’ from se…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 294 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1
[2020] 3 S.C.R. 1 1 INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY A v. MANOHARLAL & ORS. ETC. (S.L.P. (C) Nos. 9036-9038 of 2016) MARCH 06, 2020 B [ARUN MISHRA, INDIRA BANERJEE, VINEET SARAN, M. R. SHAH AND S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.] Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013:…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 293 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 687
H 687 688 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 4 S.C.R. A Vishwajit Singh, Pankaj Singh, Ms. Ridhima Singh, Ms. Vijaya Singh, Vignesh Singh, Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Siddharth Krishna Dwivedi, Ms. Vibha Dwivedi, Ms. Nidhi Dwivedi, Andleeb Naqvi, Ms. Garima Prashad, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgmen…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 292 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 888
– Indeed, as correctly noted by the High Court, the scope of judicial review under Art.226 is limited – The standards to be met prior to interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction are very high, Gand there needs to be gross substantive injustice through the conclusion, glaring irregularities in procedure or the need…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 291 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 922
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.The Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (now christened as “Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923”) is a piece B of socially beneficial legislation. The provisions will therefore have to be interpreted in a manner to advance the purpose of the legislation, rather than to stultify it. In …
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 290 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 903
[2020] 4 S.C.R. 903 903 INDIAN SOCIAL ACTION FORUM (INSAF) A v. UNION OF INDIA (Civil Appeal No. 1510 of 2020) MARCH 06, 2020 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010: Purpose of enactment – Held: It is made to consolidate the law to regulate the acceptance and utilisation …
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 29 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 755
4. The respondent by remaining away from duty since 1991 to 1998 without producing contemporaneous medical record has not only been irresponsible and indisciplined but tried to get away F with it by producing the certificate of a specialist Doctor who may not have treated the respondent. Significantly, although the res…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 289 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 344
The National Commission upheld the finding of the State Commission – On appeal, held: It is settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Laxmi Engineering that an agreement for buy back by the seed Company of the crop grown by a farmer cannot be regarded as a resale transaction and he cannot be brought out of the scope …
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 286 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 110
110 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER v. 111 M/S. V.K. TRADERS AND OTHERS Allowing the appeals, the Court A HELD: 1. No reliance can be placed upon the lease deeds allegedly executed between the defaulting rice miller(s) and the17(1)(d) respondent(s), as they do not satisfy the statutory requirements of Section 17(…
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 285 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 116
116 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 116 [2020] 4 S.C.R. A COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR v. M/S UNIVERSAL FERRO & ALLIED CHEMICALS LTD. & ANR. B (Civil Appeal Nos. 848-852 of 2009) MARCH 06, 2020 [S.A. BOBDE, CJI, B. R. GAVAI AND SURYA KANT, JJ.] Central Excise Act, 1944: s.3(1) and its proviso, s.5(1) and i…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 284 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 565
approach Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre for appointment of arbitrator, if they so desire – Arbitration and Conciliation Amendment Act, 2015. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – s.2(1)(f) – International Commercial Arbitration – Factors to be fulfilled for – C Held: Three factors ought to be fulfilled-(…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis