⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,801–4,820 · Page 241 of 500
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 415 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 719
[2020] 6 S.C.R. 719 719 RAMNATH & CO. A v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (Civil Appeal Nos. 2506-2509 of 2020) JUNE 05, 2020 B [A. M. KHANWILKAR AND DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 – s. 80-O – The appellants-assessees were engaged in providing services to certain foreign buyers of frozen seafood and/ or m…
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 414 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 801
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,801–4,820 · Page 241 of 500
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 415 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 719
[2020] 6 S.C.R. 719 719 RAMNATH & CO. A v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (Civil Appeal Nos. 2506-2509 of 2020) JUNE 05, 2020 B [A. M. KHANWILKAR AND DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 – s. 80-O – The appellants-assessees were engaged in providing services to certain foreign buyers of frozen seafood and/ or m…
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 414 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 801
[2020] 6 S.C.R. 801 801 STATE OF ORISSA A v. M/s. B. ENGINEERS & BUILDERS LTD. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2516 of 2020) JUNE 05, 2020 B [A. M. KHANWILKAR, INDIRA BANERJEE AND DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 – ss.2(g),(jj) & 5(2)(AA) – Amendment in 1947 Act for levying sales tax on works contracts – C C…
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 413 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 538
letter dated 19.9.2002 to the effect that the action taken by the Bank was in accordance with the rules and the appellant need not correspond with the Bank in that regard any further. This firm response from the respondent-Bank could trigger the right of the appellant to sue the respondent-Bank. Moreover, the fact that…
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 412 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 27
SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMU v. THE STATE REP. BY THE 29 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.164 – Importance of A the evidence of the statement recorded u/s.164 and whether it constitutes substantial evidence – A statement of a witness recorded under s.164 cannot be used as substantive evidence an…
Supreme Court of India2 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 411 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 73
[2020] 9 S.C.R. 73 73 M/S. CENTROTRADE MINERALS AND METALS INC. A v. HINDUSTAN COPPER LTD. (Civil Appeal No.2562 of 2006) JUNE 02, 2020 B [R. F. NARIMAN, S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, JJ.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: s.48 – Enforceability of the foreign award – Contract of sale of commodity betwe…
Supreme Court of India1 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 410 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 295
C P. S. Narasimha, Sr. Adv., Mohd. Bande Ali and Rakesh K. Sharma, Advs. for the Appellants. Ms. Filza Moonis, G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Mohd. Wasay Khan and Bharat J. Joshi, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. 1. The respondent is an auction-p…
Supreme Court of India29 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 409 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 269
[2020] 4 S.C.R. 269 269 SONU @ SUNIL A v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No.57 of 2013) MAY 29, 2020 B [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND K.M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss.394, 460, 302 r/w s.34 – Robbery and murder – Five accused including appellant – Case based on circumstantial evidence – Prosecution case was th…
Supreme Court of India28 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 408 · [2020] 11 S.C.R. 170
ill not have any legal and valid effect to abridge the right enshrined in the scheme of Rules. Indisputedly, the appellant cannot be allowed to contend that…
Supreme Court of India27 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 407 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 1
upon him who stood retired from service and what should be the nature of penalty would always depend on the relevant scheme of Rules and on the facts and circumstances of each case, but either of the substantive penalties specified under Rule 27 of the Rules, 1978 including dismissal from service are not open to be inf…
Supreme Court of India22 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 403 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 156
review petitions before the High Court on the ground that the judgment of the High Court dated 26.02.2019 suffered from error apparent on the face of the record – The said review petitions were dismissed by the High Court by order dated 10.10.2019 – On appeal, held: In the instant case, the High Court in its judgment d…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 401 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 642
Furthermore, DLS is now a dying cadre and the policy of the Corporation at the relevant time entailed regularisation of workmen only under DPS – No case made out for initiating contempt action against the Corporation and its Officers – Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – s.10(1)(d) – Contract Labour (Regulation and Aboliti…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 400 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 222
222 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS8 S.C.R. 222 [2020] 8 S.C.R. A ARNAB RANJAN GOSWAMI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 130 of 2020) B MAY 19, 2020 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Constitution of India: C Arts. 19(1)(a), 19(2) and 32 – Writ Petition – Seeking quashing of various FI…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 4 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 315
has to establish a strong prima facie case on the basis of undisputed facts – Conduct of plaintiff , balance of convenience and irreparable injury is also very essential to be considered – In the facts of the present case, whether there existed a concluded contract is a matter of trial – The plaintiff had failed to pro…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 399 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 782
Areas Development Act, 1966 – Acquiescence/Waiver. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Outline Development Plan (ODP)/Master Plan was prepared by the Planning Authority for the new planning area and had received approval of the State. In the backdrop of C the stated agreements, ODP/Master Plan and the amendme…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 398 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 426
Atul Kumar, S. K. Verma, Advs. for the Appellant. H 426 MUNISH KUMAR v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH 427 AND ANOTHER Abhinav Mukerji, Addl. AG, Mohan Lal Sharma, Adv. for the A Respondents. The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER 1. Leave granted. B 2. The present appeal relates to a claim for compassionate app…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 397 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 357
lead to grant of probate – The probate is granted only on proof of Will as also on removal of suspicious circumstances, if there be any, to the final satisfaction of the conscience of the Court. Dismissing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. There has not been any question on the testamentary capacity and soundness of min…
Supreme Court of India13 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 396 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 1163
– Hence instant appeal – Held: In terms of s.65, secondary evidence may be given with regard to existence, condition or the contents of a document when the original is shown or appears to be in possession or power against whom the document is sought to be produced, or of any person out of reach of, or not subject F to,…
Supreme Court of India13 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 395 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 552
552 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 552 [2020] 4 S.C.R. A RAMNATH AGRAWAL & ORS. v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1305 of 2010) B MAY 13, 2020 [N. V. RAMANA, SANJIV KHANNA AND KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.] Transfer of Property Act, 1872 – s.105 – Agreement when not a lease – In 1976, Food Corporation of …
Supreme Court of India11 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 394 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 173
other staff/gardeners, etc. be dedicated for maintainance; (vi) It is directed that a Consultant be appointed for further beautification of the area and for the requisite horticultural development and an additional project plan be prepared and placed on record, for this purpose. H 173 174 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 4…
Supreme Court of India11 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 392 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 254
be entitled to receive such additional/reduced cost actually incurred – Appellant invoked the arbitration clause – Arbitral Tribunal allowed the claim holding that Clause 23 must be liberally construed and any circular of the Government would amount to a change in law – On appeal, High Court set aside the award – Held:…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2020] 6 S.C.R. 801 801 STATE OF ORISSA A v. M/s. B. ENGINEERS & BUILDERS LTD. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2516 of 2020) JUNE 05, 2020 B [A. M. KHANWILKAR, INDIRA BANERJEE AND DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 – ss.2(g),(jj) & 5(2)(AA) – Amendment in 1947 Act for levying sales tax on works contracts – C C…
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 413 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 538
letter dated 19.9.2002 to the effect that the action taken by the Bank was in accordance with the rules and the appellant need not correspond with the Bank in that regard any further. This firm response from the respondent-Bank could trigger the right of the appellant to sue the respondent-Bank. Moreover, the fact that…
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 412 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 27
SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMU v. THE STATE REP. BY THE 29 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.164 – Importance of A the evidence of the statement recorded u/s.164 and whether it constitutes substantial evidence – A statement of a witness recorded under s.164 cannot be used as substantive evidence an…
Supreme Court of India2 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 411 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 73
[2020] 9 S.C.R. 73 73 M/S. CENTROTRADE MINERALS AND METALS INC. A v. HINDUSTAN COPPER LTD. (Civil Appeal No.2562 of 2006) JUNE 02, 2020 B [R. F. NARIMAN, S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, JJ.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: s.48 – Enforceability of the foreign award – Contract of sale of commodity betwe…
Supreme Court of India1 Jun 2020Full text
2020 INSC 410 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 295
C P. S. Narasimha, Sr. Adv., Mohd. Bande Ali and Rakesh K. Sharma, Advs. for the Appellants. Ms. Filza Moonis, G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Mohd. Wasay Khan and Bharat J. Joshi, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. 1. The respondent is an auction-p…
Supreme Court of India29 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 409 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 269
[2020] 4 S.C.R. 269 269 SONU @ SUNIL A v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No.57 of 2013) MAY 29, 2020 B [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND K.M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss.394, 460, 302 r/w s.34 – Robbery and murder – Five accused including appellant – Case based on circumstantial evidence – Prosecution case was th…
Supreme Court of India28 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 408 · [2020] 11 S.C.R. 170
ill not have any legal and valid effect to abridge the right enshrined in the scheme of Rules. Indisputedly, the appellant cannot be allowed to contend that…
Supreme Court of India27 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 407 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 1
upon him who stood retired from service and what should be the nature of penalty would always depend on the relevant scheme of Rules and on the facts and circumstances of each case, but either of the substantive penalties specified under Rule 27 of the Rules, 1978 including dismissal from service are not open to be inf…
Supreme Court of India22 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 403 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 156
review petitions before the High Court on the ground that the judgment of the High Court dated 26.02.2019 suffered from error apparent on the face of the record – The said review petitions were dismissed by the High Court by order dated 10.10.2019 – On appeal, held: In the instant case, the High Court in its judgment d…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 401 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 642
Furthermore, DLS is now a dying cadre and the policy of the Corporation at the relevant time entailed regularisation of workmen only under DPS – No case made out for initiating contempt action against the Corporation and its Officers – Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – s.10(1)(d) – Contract Labour (Regulation and Aboliti…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 400 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 222
222 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS8 S.C.R. 222 [2020] 8 S.C.R. A ARNAB RANJAN GOSWAMI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 130 of 2020) B MAY 19, 2020 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Constitution of India: C Arts. 19(1)(a), 19(2) and 32 – Writ Petition – Seeking quashing of various FI…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 4 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 315
has to establish a strong prima facie case on the basis of undisputed facts – Conduct of plaintiff , balance of convenience and irreparable injury is also very essential to be considered – In the facts of the present case, whether there existed a concluded contract is a matter of trial – The plaintiff had failed to pro…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 399 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 782
Areas Development Act, 1966 – Acquiescence/Waiver. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Outline Development Plan (ODP)/Master Plan was prepared by the Planning Authority for the new planning area and had received approval of the State. In the backdrop of C the stated agreements, ODP/Master Plan and the amendme…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 398 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 426
Atul Kumar, S. K. Verma, Advs. for the Appellant. H 426 MUNISH KUMAR v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH 427 AND ANOTHER Abhinav Mukerji, Addl. AG, Mohan Lal Sharma, Adv. for the A Respondents. The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER 1. Leave granted. B 2. The present appeal relates to a claim for compassionate app…
Supreme Court of India19 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 397 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 357
lead to grant of probate – The probate is granted only on proof of Will as also on removal of suspicious circumstances, if there be any, to the final satisfaction of the conscience of the Court. Dismissing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. There has not been any question on the testamentary capacity and soundness of min…
Supreme Court of India13 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 396 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 1163
– Hence instant appeal – Held: In terms of s.65, secondary evidence may be given with regard to existence, condition or the contents of a document when the original is shown or appears to be in possession or power against whom the document is sought to be produced, or of any person out of reach of, or not subject F to,…
Supreme Court of India13 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 395 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 552
552 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 552 [2020] 4 S.C.R. A RAMNATH AGRAWAL & ORS. v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1305 of 2010) B MAY 13, 2020 [N. V. RAMANA, SANJIV KHANNA AND KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.] Transfer of Property Act, 1872 – s.105 – Agreement when not a lease – In 1976, Food Corporation of …
Supreme Court of India11 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 394 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 173
other staff/gardeners, etc. be dedicated for maintainance; (vi) It is directed that a Consultant be appointed for further beautification of the area and for the requisite horticultural development and an additional project plan be prepared and placed on record, for this purpose. H 173 174 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 4…
Supreme Court of India11 May 2020Full text
2020 INSC 392 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 254
be entitled to receive such additional/reduced cost actually incurred – Appellant invoked the arbitration clause – Arbitral Tribunal allowed the claim holding that Clause 23 must be liberally construed and any circular of the Government would amount to a change in law – On appeal, High Court set aside the award – Held:…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis