⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,601–4,620 · Page 231 of 500
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 652 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 942
3. All these facts were brought before the High Court in application filed under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. The combined Dcomplaint having been filed on 06.07.2018, i.e., well within 180 days, the High Court did not commit any error in cancelling the default bail, granted to the appellants on 12.07.2018. [Paras 11 and 12][…
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2020Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,601–4,620 · Page 231 of 500
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 652 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 942
3. All these facts were brought before the High Court in application filed under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. The combined Dcomplaint having been filed on 06.07.2018, i.e., well within 180 days, the High Court did not commit any error in cancelling the default bail, granted to the appellants on 12.07.2018. [Paras 11 and 12][…
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 650 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 218
the appellant to deposit additional sums to meet the shortfall created in the security deposit, to retain the membership of the Exchange – Appellant denied such obligation to pay, as its trading facilities had stood suspended throughout that period – Thereafter expulsion of membership of the appellant by the Exchange –…
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 65 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 132
– Held: It is clear from a reading of the judgment in Rajendra Singh Rana and S.A. Sampath Kumar that a failure to exercise jurisdiction vested in a Speaker cannot be covered by the shield contained in G paragraph 6 of the Tenth Schedule, and that when a Speaker refrains from deciding a petition within a reasonable tim…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 649 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 411
Dismissing the appeal, the Court F HELD : 1.1 It is no doubt true that a large number of witnesses turned hostile and the Trial Court was also not happy with the manner, the prosecution conducted this case. But that is not an unusual event in the long drawn out trials and in the absence of any witness protection regime…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 648 · [2020] 11 S.C.R. 800
amount was paid, the order of winding up could not be recalled – The Official Liquidator also submitted that he had already taken over charge of the assets of the Company – Company Court passed an order keeping the winding up in abeyance, however, directed the Official Liquidator to continue to be in custody of the ass…
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 647 · [2020] 14 S.C.R. 327
327 328 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 14 S.C.R. A cited as a precedent in any other case – Accordingly, appeals are disposed of. North End Foods Marketing Pvt Ltd v Securities and Exchange Board of India (Appeal 80 of 2019 decided on 12.03.2019 by Securities Appellate Tribunal) – B referred to. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICT…
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 646 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 466
Schools – Qualification for the same included passing of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) and Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination (ATRE) – For ATRE-2018, minimum qualifying marks for General & OBC candidates was 45% and for SC/ST was 40% – Candidates were selected for appointment – National Council for Teachers E …
Supreme Court of India17 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 645 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 956
958 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 12 S.C.R. A prior to filing of the charge-sheet. It is also not in dispute that Post-Facto consent was given by the State Government vide notification dated 7th September 2018, under Section 6 of the DSPE Act to the authorities to investigate the public servants. [Para 14][968-B-C] B 3.…
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 643 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 1175
1175 1176 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 13 S.C.R. A notice makes it clear that the action of blacklisting was neither expressly proposed nor could it have been inferred from the language employed by the Corporation in its show cause notice – It was incumbent on the part of the Corporation to clarify in the show cause th…
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 642 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 1090
Tushar Mehta, SG, Adarsh Tripathi and Gaurav, Advs. for the G Appellant. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv., Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Ajay Bhargava, Siddharth Srivastava, Mohit Kishore, Ms. Warmika Trehan and Shivank Diddi, Advs. for the Respondent. H 1090 NTPC LTD. (SIMHADRI PROJECT) v. RAJIV CHAKRABORTY 1091 The following Order of the…
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 641 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 422
1.5 Emphasis was laid on the…
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 640 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 1030
1032 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 13 S.C.R. A 2. The Land Revenue Act does not expressly bar the jurisdiction of the Civil Court in respect of boundary disputes. The boundary disputes are between two revenue estates and does not include the demarcation of the land of the parties. Section 83 of the Land Revenue Act bars…
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 64 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 24
24 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS5 S.C.R. 24 [2020] 5 S.C.R. A CHANABASAPPA v. KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD. & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 475 of 2020) B JANUARY 21, 2020 [ARUN MISHRA AND INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894: s. 34 – Payment of interest under – Whether from the date C of award or from the date prio…
Supreme Court of India6 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 639 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 607
– Dismissed in limine on the ground of 10 years delay in filing the D petition – Appeal to Supreme Court – Held: In absence of any supply by the manufacturing company, the order of blacklisting invoking Tender clauses is a fundamental flaw and hence not sustainable – An order of blacklisting beyond 3 years or maximum 5…
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 636 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 593
[2020] 9 S.C.R. 593 593 HITESH VERMA A v. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 707 of 2020) NOVEMBER 05, 2020 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO, HEMANT GUPTA AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 – Petition under – For quashing charges u/ss. 452, C 504 and 506 IPC and u/ss. 3(1)(x) (Substitu…
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 635 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 351
[2020] 12 S.C.R. 351 351 GURUSIMRAN SINGH NARULA A v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 560 of 2020 NOVEMBER 05, 2020 B [ASHOK BHUSHAN, R. SUBHASH REDDY AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Disaster Management Act, 2005 – Novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) – Pandemic – A writ petition filed in the public C interes…
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 634 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 455
– However, the High Court in its order noticed that if the Company F is acquitted of the charges, the said benefit will also directly go to the appellant – Thus, the conviction and sentence passed against the appellant, being a nominated person of the Company was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the trial …
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 633 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 997
[2020] 7 S.C.R. 997 997 C. BRIGHT A v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 3441 of 2020) NOVEMBER 05, 2020 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO, HEMANT GUPTA AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002: s.14 – Whether C mandatory or directory pr…
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 632 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 279
280 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 12 S.C.R. A petition before the Jharkhand High court and the same was pending, held that the order of stoppage of pension is part of retirement benefit, and petitioner ought to have filed the writ petition before the Jharkhand High Court – Hence, the writ petition challenging letters wa…
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 631 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 1093
Family Laws: D Maintenance/ interim maintenance – Maintenance laws have been enacted as a measure of social justice which fall within constitutional sweep of Art. 15(3) reinforced by Art. 39 of the Constitution – Guidelines framed in exercise of power u/Art. 142 – On the issues of maintenance which would cover overlapp…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2020 INSC 650 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 218
the appellant to deposit additional sums to meet the shortfall created in the security deposit, to retain the membership of the Exchange – Appellant denied such obligation to pay, as its trading facilities had stood suspended throughout that period – Thereafter expulsion of membership of the appellant by the Exchange –…
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 65 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 132
– Held: It is clear from a reading of the judgment in Rajendra Singh Rana and S.A. Sampath Kumar that a failure to exercise jurisdiction vested in a Speaker cannot be covered by the shield contained in G paragraph 6 of the Tenth Schedule, and that when a Speaker refrains from deciding a petition within a reasonable tim…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 649 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 411
Dismissing the appeal, the Court F HELD : 1.1 It is no doubt true that a large number of witnesses turned hostile and the Trial Court was also not happy with the manner, the prosecution conducted this case. But that is not an unusual event in the long drawn out trials and in the absence of any witness protection regime…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 648 · [2020] 11 S.C.R. 800
amount was paid, the order of winding up could not be recalled – The Official Liquidator also submitted that he had already taken over charge of the assets of the Company – Company Court passed an order keeping the winding up in abeyance, however, directed the Official Liquidator to continue to be in custody of the ass…
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 647 · [2020] 14 S.C.R. 327
327 328 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 14 S.C.R. A cited as a precedent in any other case – Accordingly, appeals are disposed of. North End Foods Marketing Pvt Ltd v Securities and Exchange Board of India (Appeal 80 of 2019 decided on 12.03.2019 by Securities Appellate Tribunal) – B referred to. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICT…
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 646 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 466
Schools – Qualification for the same included passing of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) and Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination (ATRE) – For ATRE-2018, minimum qualifying marks for General & OBC candidates was 45% and for SC/ST was 40% – Candidates were selected for appointment – National Council for Teachers E …
Supreme Court of India17 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 645 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 956
958 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 12 S.C.R. A prior to filing of the charge-sheet. It is also not in dispute that Post-Facto consent was given by the State Government vide notification dated 7th September 2018, under Section 6 of the DSPE Act to the authorities to investigate the public servants. [Para 14][968-B-C] B 3.…
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 643 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 1175
1175 1176 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 13 S.C.R. A notice makes it clear that the action of blacklisting was neither expressly proposed nor could it have been inferred from the language employed by the Corporation in its show cause notice – It was incumbent on the part of the Corporation to clarify in the show cause th…
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 642 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 1090
Tushar Mehta, SG, Adarsh Tripathi and Gaurav, Advs. for the G Appellant. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv., Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Ajay Bhargava, Siddharth Srivastava, Mohit Kishore, Ms. Warmika Trehan and Shivank Diddi, Advs. for the Respondent. H 1090 NTPC LTD. (SIMHADRI PROJECT) v. RAJIV CHAKRABORTY 1091 The following Order of the…
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 641 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 422
1.5 Emphasis was laid on the…
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 640 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 1030
1032 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 13 S.C.R. A 2. The Land Revenue Act does not expressly bar the jurisdiction of the Civil Court in respect of boundary disputes. The boundary disputes are between two revenue estates and does not include the demarcation of the land of the parties. Section 83 of the Land Revenue Act bars…
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 64 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 24
24 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS5 S.C.R. 24 [2020] 5 S.C.R. A CHANABASAPPA v. KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD. & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 475 of 2020) B JANUARY 21, 2020 [ARUN MISHRA AND INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894: s. 34 – Payment of interest under – Whether from the date C of award or from the date prio…
Supreme Court of India6 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 639 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 607
– Dismissed in limine on the ground of 10 years delay in filing the D petition – Appeal to Supreme Court – Held: In absence of any supply by the manufacturing company, the order of blacklisting invoking Tender clauses is a fundamental flaw and hence not sustainable – An order of blacklisting beyond 3 years or maximum 5…
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 636 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 593
[2020] 9 S.C.R. 593 593 HITESH VERMA A v. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 707 of 2020) NOVEMBER 05, 2020 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO, HEMANT GUPTA AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 – Petition under – For quashing charges u/ss. 452, C 504 and 506 IPC and u/ss. 3(1)(x) (Substitu…
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 635 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 351
[2020] 12 S.C.R. 351 351 GURUSIMRAN SINGH NARULA A v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 560 of 2020 NOVEMBER 05, 2020 B [ASHOK BHUSHAN, R. SUBHASH REDDY AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Disaster Management Act, 2005 – Novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) – Pandemic – A writ petition filed in the public C interes…
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 634 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 455
– However, the High Court in its order noticed that if the Company F is acquitted of the charges, the said benefit will also directly go to the appellant – Thus, the conviction and sentence passed against the appellant, being a nominated person of the Company was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the trial …
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 633 · [2020] 7 S.C.R. 997
[2020] 7 S.C.R. 997 997 C. BRIGHT A v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 3441 of 2020) NOVEMBER 05, 2020 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO, HEMANT GUPTA AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002: s.14 – Whether C mandatory or directory pr…
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 632 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 279
280 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 12 S.C.R. A petition before the Jharkhand High court and the same was pending, held that the order of stoppage of pension is part of retirement benefit, and petitioner ought to have filed the writ petition before the Jharkhand High Court – Hence, the writ petition challenging letters wa…
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2020Full text
2020 INSC 631 · [2020] 13 S.C.R. 1093
Family Laws: D Maintenance/ interim maintenance – Maintenance laws have been enacted as a measure of social justice which fall within constitutional sweep of Art. 15(3) reinforced by Art. 39 of the Constitution – Guidelines framed in exercise of power u/Art. 142 – On the issues of maintenance which would cover overlapp…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis