⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,521–4,540 · Page 227 of 500
Supreme Court of India2020
(2020) 5 SCC 1
Anticipatory bail should not ordinarily be limited to a fixed period; it continues until the trial concludes, unless special circumstances warrant otherwise. | Principles of anticipatory bail duration governing BNSS Section 482 (corresponding to old CrPC Section 438).
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,521–4,540 · Page 227 of 500
Supreme Court of India2020
(2020) 5 SCC 1
Anticipatory bail should not ordinarily be limited to a fixed period; it continues until the trial concludes, unless special circumstances warrant otherwise. | Principles of anticipatory bail duration governing BNSS Section 482 (corresponding to old CrPC Section 438).
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 99 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 152
152 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS1 S.C.R. 152 [2020] 1 S.C.R. A KASHMIRA DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 724 of 2019) B JANUARY 28, 2020 [R. BANUMATHI AND A. S. BOPANNA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss.304-B, 498-A – Case of the prosecution is that victim (since deceased) was married to proforma respon…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 98 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 359
[2020] 3 S.C.R. 359 359 SHREE AMBICA MEDICAL STORES & ORS. A v. THE SURAT PEOPLE’S CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 562 of 2020) B JANUARY 28, 2020 [DR. DHANANJAYAY Y CHANDRACHUD AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Insurance Act, 1938 – s.64(VB) – Appellants hypothecated C goods with first respondent-bank under an…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 97 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 418
not affect the pending proceedings as regards surplus land and would be continued and disposed of as per 1953 Act – Therefore, provisions of ss. 8(3) and 9(3) of 1972 Act could not have been applied to the pending proceedings – Punjab Security of land Tenures Act, 1953 – ss. 5A, 5B and 5C. G Dismissing the appeal, the …
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 96 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 50
Vishnu Mehra and Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advs. for the E Appellant. Gagan Gupta, Sanjeev Agarwal…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 95 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 523
and Single Judge of High Court, without analysing the pleadings and the evidence – A declaration u/s. 140 of Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 is issued that the election of the returned candidate is set aside being invalid and election petitioner is declared as having been duly elected – Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 – s.…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 93 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 374
simplcitor – Appeal to Supreme Court: Held: From the tenor of the termination order it is evident that it is ex- facie stigmatic and punitive – Such an order could be issued only after subjecting the incumbent to a regular inquiry as per service Rules – Therefore, the termination order is illegal – Incumbent is directe…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 92 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 436
Madras City Tenants’ Protection Act, 1921 – Sub-clauses (i) F and (ii) (a) to Cl.4 of s.2 – Applicability of – Held: Sub-clauses (i) and (ii)(a) to clause (4) of s. 2 of the Act apply to all tenants who had entered into oral or unregistered written agreements or registered written agreements without any stipulation wit…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 91 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 459
services of the first respondent were liable to be protected – The Respondent relied upon a circulars dated 08.04.2019 and 20.06.2019 issued by the Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct taxes – Both Circulars have relied upon the Judgments of a two-Judge Bench of this Court in SG Barapatre v. Shri Ananta Gajan…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 90 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 145
[2020] 1 S.C.R. 145 145 SARDAR ALI KHAN A v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2020) B JANUARY 24, 2020 [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 418, 419, 420, 467 & 468 and 471 – C A plot was owned by the father o…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 88 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 348
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: Hashish oil is shown at Sl. No. 13 in the notification C dated 19th October, 2001 issued by the Central Government in exercise of power under Section 2(viia) and (xxiiia) of the NDPS Act. Hashish oil above 1 kg is commercial quantity. The jurisdiction of the Court to grant bail is …
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 87 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 464
464 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 464 [2020] 2 S.C.R. A THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA v. J.R. WILLIAM SINGH B (Civil Appeal No. 200 of 2020) JANUARY 24, 2020 [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Service Law – Higher Scale and designation – Time bound C promotion – claim for- The respondent was app…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 85 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 329
state in writing any reasons he may have to urge against his dismissal or removal from service – In the present case, such an opportunity was given to the appellant, therefore, proper procedure was followed before dismissing the appellant from service – Insofar as double jeopardy is concerned, it is required to be note…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 84 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 564
Registry be withdrawn by the appellant with interest accrued thereon – Remainder be paid within six weeks from today with interest @ 12% p.a. on entire amount of Rs.4,70,000/- from the date of order of District Forum till its realisation. Insurance – Contract of insurance – Rules of interpretation C– Discussed. Allowin…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 82 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 1182
1184 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 2 S.C.R. A B. Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv., D. Bharat Kumar, Tadimalla Bhaskar Gowtham, Aman Shukla, Abhijit Sengupta, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Rukmini Bobde, Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Ms. Tanisha Samanta, B. Krishna Prasad, Advs. for the Respondents. B The Judgment of the Court was delive…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 81 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 1188
1188 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 1188 [2020] 2 S.C.R. A STAR INDIA (P) LTD. v. SOCIETY OF CATALYSTS & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 6597 of 2008) B JANUARY 23, 2020 [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – s.2(1)(r)(3)(a) – Unfair trade practice – A television channel-Star Ind…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 79 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 484
3. The directions issued by this Court in #Salauddin Case were clear that the State and its authorities were to act in terms of the report of the Bhatnagar Committee in accordance with the E decisions in *M. Nagraj and **Suraj Bhan Meena. The basic foundation of the present contempt petitions projecting the issuance of…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 77 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 125
– Admittedly, the matrimonial house was at Chennai – Respondent made allegations of domestic violence against fourteen appellants– Against appellant nos.1, 2 & 14, the averments of alleged domestic violence were that they took away the jewellery of the respondent F gifted by her father during marriage and the alleged a…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 76 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 1157
F Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 No provision in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 or Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 has been brought to the notice of the Court Gunder which the bid of any Resolution Applicant has to mat…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 75 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 132
Appellant is the sole claimant to the estate of the deceased on the basis of Will – Witnesses deposed the execution of the Will in favour of the appellant – No one else came forward to seek execution of decree as the legal representative of the deceased decree holder – In the absence of any rival claim, the High Court …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 99 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 152
152 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS1 S.C.R. 152 [2020] 1 S.C.R. A KASHMIRA DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 724 of 2019) B JANUARY 28, 2020 [R. BANUMATHI AND A. S. BOPANNA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss.304-B, 498-A – Case of the prosecution is that victim (since deceased) was married to proforma respon…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 98 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 359
[2020] 3 S.C.R. 359 359 SHREE AMBICA MEDICAL STORES & ORS. A v. THE SURAT PEOPLE’S CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 562 of 2020) B JANUARY 28, 2020 [DR. DHANANJAYAY Y CHANDRACHUD AND AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.] Insurance Act, 1938 – s.64(VB) – Appellants hypothecated C goods with first respondent-bank under an…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 97 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 418
not affect the pending proceedings as regards surplus land and would be continued and disposed of as per 1953 Act – Therefore, provisions of ss. 8(3) and 9(3) of 1972 Act could not have been applied to the pending proceedings – Punjab Security of land Tenures Act, 1953 – ss. 5A, 5B and 5C. G Dismissing the appeal, the …
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 96 · [2020] 5 S.C.R. 50
Vishnu Mehra and Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advs. for the E Appellant. Gagan Gupta, Sanjeev Agarwal…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 95 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 523
and Single Judge of High Court, without analysing the pleadings and the evidence – A declaration u/s. 140 of Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 is issued that the election of the returned candidate is set aside being invalid and election petitioner is declared as having been duly elected – Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 – s.…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 93 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 374
simplcitor – Appeal to Supreme Court: Held: From the tenor of the termination order it is evident that it is ex- facie stigmatic and punitive – Such an order could be issued only after subjecting the incumbent to a regular inquiry as per service Rules – Therefore, the termination order is illegal – Incumbent is directe…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 92 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 436
Madras City Tenants’ Protection Act, 1921 – Sub-clauses (i) F and (ii) (a) to Cl.4 of s.2 – Applicability of – Held: Sub-clauses (i) and (ii)(a) to clause (4) of s. 2 of the Act apply to all tenants who had entered into oral or unregistered written agreements or registered written agreements without any stipulation wit…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 91 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 459
services of the first respondent were liable to be protected – The Respondent relied upon a circulars dated 08.04.2019 and 20.06.2019 issued by the Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct taxes – Both Circulars have relied upon the Judgments of a two-Judge Bench of this Court in SG Barapatre v. Shri Ananta Gajan…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 90 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 145
[2020] 1 S.C.R. 145 145 SARDAR ALI KHAN A v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2020) B JANUARY 24, 2020 [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 418, 419, 420, 467 & 468 and 471 – C A plot was owned by the father o…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 88 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 348
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: Hashish oil is shown at Sl. No. 13 in the notification C dated 19th October, 2001 issued by the Central Government in exercise of power under Section 2(viia) and (xxiiia) of the NDPS Act. Hashish oil above 1 kg is commercial quantity. The jurisdiction of the Court to grant bail is …
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 87 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 464
464 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 464 [2020] 2 S.C.R. A THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA v. J.R. WILLIAM SINGH B (Civil Appeal No. 200 of 2020) JANUARY 24, 2020 [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND M. R. SHAH, JJ.] Service Law – Higher Scale and designation – Time bound C promotion – claim for- The respondent was app…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 85 · [2020] 3 S.C.R. 329
state in writing any reasons he may have to urge against his dismissal or removal from service – In the present case, such an opportunity was given to the appellant, therefore, proper procedure was followed before dismissing the appellant from service – Insofar as double jeopardy is concerned, it is required to be note…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 84 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 564
Registry be withdrawn by the appellant with interest accrued thereon – Remainder be paid within six weeks from today with interest @ 12% p.a. on entire amount of Rs.4,70,000/- from the date of order of District Forum till its realisation. Insurance – Contract of insurance – Rules of interpretation C– Discussed. Allowin…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 82 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 1182
1184 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2020] 2 S.C.R. A B. Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv., D. Bharat Kumar, Tadimalla Bhaskar Gowtham, Aman Shukla, Abhijit Sengupta, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Rukmini Bobde, Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Ms. Tanisha Samanta, B. Krishna Prasad, Advs. for the Respondents. B The Judgment of the Court was delive…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 81 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 1188
1188 SUPREME COURT[2020]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 1188 [2020] 2 S.C.R. A STAR INDIA (P) LTD. v. SOCIETY OF CATALYSTS & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 6597 of 2008) B JANUARY 23, 2020 [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – s.2(1)(r)(3)(a) – Unfair trade practice – A television channel-Star Ind…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 79 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 484
3. The directions issued by this Court in #Salauddin Case were clear that the State and its authorities were to act in terms of the report of the Bhatnagar Committee in accordance with the E decisions in *M. Nagraj and **Suraj Bhan Meena. The basic foundation of the present contempt petitions projecting the issuance of…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 77 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 125
– Admittedly, the matrimonial house was at Chennai – Respondent made allegations of domestic violence against fourteen appellants– Against appellant nos.1, 2 & 14, the averments of alleged domestic violence were that they took away the jewellery of the respondent F gifted by her father during marriage and the alleged a…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 76 · [2020] 2 S.C.R. 1157
F Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 No provision in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 or Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 has been brought to the notice of the Court Gunder which the bid of any Resolution Applicant has to mat…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2020Full text
2020 INSC 75 · [2020] 1 S.C.R. 132
Appellant is the sole claimant to the estate of the deceased on the basis of Will – Witnesses deposed the execution of the Will in favour of the appellant – No one else came forward to seek execution of decree as the legal representative of the deceased decree holder – In the absence of any rival claim, the High Court …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis