⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,101–4,120 · Page 206 of 500
Supreme Court of India1 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 588 · [2021] 14 S.C.R. 1161
seek approval of the Tenancy rights, but was withdrawn on the basis of an order withdrawing the appeal against the grant of occupancy rights – Thus, the purchasers took steps to procure surrender of tenancy rights, realizing that such surrender cannot be oral or by executing a sale deed – It was a cover up operation in…
Supreme Court of India1 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 587 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1113
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,101–4,120 · Page 206 of 500
Supreme Court of India1 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 588 · [2021] 14 S.C.R. 1161
seek approval of the Tenancy rights, but was withdrawn on the basis of an order withdrawing the appeal against the grant of occupancy rights – Thus, the purchasers took steps to procure surrender of tenancy rights, realizing that such surrender cannot be oral or by executing a sale deed – It was a cover up operation in…
Supreme Court of India1 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 587 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1113
Evidence Act, 1872 – s.112 – Held: Indian law leans towards legitimacy and frowns upon bastardy – Presumption of legitimacy of a child can only be displaced by strong preponderance of G evidence, and not merely by balance of probabilities. Constitution of India – Right to privacy – DNA Tests – Test of proportionality –…
Supreme Court of India1 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 586 · [2021] 11 S.C.R. 836
Registration Act, 1908 – Proviso to s.49, exceptions under – G Discussed. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Section 49 deals with the effect of non-registration of documents which are compulsorily registrable under Section 17 of the Registration Act and Transfer of Property H 836 KORUKONDA CHALAPATHI RAO v. KORU…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 585 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 55
April, 2000 before the respondents’ seeking “resignation” from the army on the ground of non-availabilit…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 583 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 204
Dismissing the appeal, the Court C HELD: 1. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of immovable property. The transfer consists of the transfer of a right to enjoy immovable property. It creates an interest in the property. One of the essential elements of the lease is the period of time for which the demise holds…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 582 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 23
The following Order of the Court was passed : E O R D E R The respondent was employed with the appellant-bank in the Middle Management Grade Scale-II and his promotion to Middle Management Grade Scale-III came up for consideration in November, 1984 when he was interviewed by the Interview Committee which made its recom…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 581 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 676
676 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS10 S.C.R. 676 [2021] 10 S.C.R. A PLACIDO FRANCISCO PINTO (D) BY LRs. & ANR v. JOSE FRANCISCO PINTO & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 1491 of 2007) B SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 [HEMANT GUPTA AND V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, JJ.] Contract Act, 1872 – s.25 – Suit for possession and accounts filed by appellant no.1 aga…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 580 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 251
Amit Kumar Singh, Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema, Ms. Chubalemla Chang, C Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Gauri Puri, Adv. for the Respondent. The Order of the Court was passed by S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. D 1. Counsel for parties were heard, with their consent, for final disposal of the appeal. The appellant (hereby “insurer”) question…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2021Full text
2021 INSC 58 · [2021] 4 S.C.R. 397
– Further, respondent’s prayer to allot Plot No.1/41 is malafide as the same was allotted to his father – High Court did not give any cogent reason as to on what basis direction was issued to allot a plot to the respondent – Mere statement of the counsel for the Board G that 19 plots are vacant cannot be utilized for i…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 579 · [2021] 7 S.C.R. 838
838 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS7 S.C.R. 838 [2021] 7 S.C.R. A RAJENDRA NAROTTAMDAS SHETH & ANR. v. CHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 4222 of 2020) B SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 [L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAI, B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ. ] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – s. 7 – Maintainability of – Insolvency and Ban…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 575 · [2021] 7 S.C.R. 1063
1063 1064 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2021] 7 S.C.R. A is no remorse on the part of the contemnor – It is a contempt on the face of the Court, however one more chance given to hear him on the question of final sentence. Directing the listing of the petition, the Court HELD: 1.1 The raison d’etre of contempt jurisdiction is …
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 573 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 7
THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. v. 9 SHAHEENA MASARAT & ANR. Court committed no error in directing the appointment of A Respondent No.1. The direction issued by the High Court to continue Respondent No.2 is set aside. Respondent No.2 has been continuing to work from 2004. Therefore, the Appellant is directed to a…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 572 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 1
Kumar Dushyant Singh, T. Meikandan, Ms. Pooja Singh, Ms. Subasri Jaganathan, K. K. Mohan, Advs. for the Appellant. Amit Anand Tiwari, AAG, D. Kumanan, Sheikh Fakhruddin Kalia, H Advs. for the Respondent. MUNUSAMY v. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 3 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling ag…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 570 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 15
respondent no.1, dismissed – General Clauses Act, 1897 – s.27. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: The summons issued by registered post was received back with postal endorsement of refusal, as would be clear from the order dated 19.02.1997. Sub-Rule (5) of Order V F Rule 9 of the Code states inter alia that if the d…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2021Full text
2021 INSC 57 · [2021] 2 S.C.R. 59
The following Judgment of the Court was delivered : JUDGMENT C Leave granted. 1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order dated 16.10.2020 passed by the learned Single Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby the petition filed by the appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 569 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 239
D. S. Bali, K. K. Mohan, Firoz Saifi, Ms. Shalu Sharma, Advs. for the Appellants. Tarunvir Singh Khehar, Shankar Divate, Advs. for the Respondents. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. 1. Special leave granted. Counsel for parties were heard, with their consent, for final disposal of the ap…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 568 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 249
[2021] 6 S.C.R. 249 249 RAMGOPAL & ANR. A v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 1489 of 2012) SEPTEMBER 29, 2021 B [N. V. RAMANA, CJI AND SURYA KANT, J.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss.482 and 320 – Quashing of criminal prosecution – On basis of compromise/ settlement between the parties – Jurisdic…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 566 · [2021] 7 S.C.R. 1080
proceedings, the appellants, the private respondents as well as the appellants in companion appeals received promotions from time to time and have retired from service, thus, the pensionary benefits being disbursed to them not to be disturbed and no recoveries made – Constitution of India – Art.142 – Punjab Civil Secre…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 565 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 268
B 2.1 The Surveyor decided to adopt volumetric analysis method rather than rely upon the stock records of the insured. The Surveyors could not be found at fault with, for rejecting the stock records of the insured. When the insured produced two sets of records and the quantum of material destroyed by fire Carrived on t…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 562 · [2021] 12 S.C.R. 488
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD : 1. Section 24A(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, D1986 prescribes a period of limitation of two years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen for the admission of a complaint, by the District Forum, State Commission or the National Commission. In the case on han…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Evidence Act, 1872 – s.112 – Held: Indian law leans towards legitimacy and frowns upon bastardy – Presumption of legitimacy of a child can only be displaced by strong preponderance of G evidence, and not merely by balance of probabilities. Constitution of India – Right to privacy – DNA Tests – Test of proportionality –…
Supreme Court of India1 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 586 · [2021] 11 S.C.R. 836
Registration Act, 1908 – Proviso to s.49, exceptions under – G Discussed. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Section 49 deals with the effect of non-registration of documents which are compulsorily registrable under Section 17 of the Registration Act and Transfer of Property H 836 KORUKONDA CHALAPATHI RAO v. KORU…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 585 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 55
April, 2000 before the respondents’ seeking “resignation” from the army on the ground of non-availabilit…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 583 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 204
Dismissing the appeal, the Court C HELD: 1. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of immovable property. The transfer consists of the transfer of a right to enjoy immovable property. It creates an interest in the property. One of the essential elements of the lease is the period of time for which the demise holds…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 582 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 23
The following Order of the Court was passed : E O R D E R The respondent was employed with the appellant-bank in the Middle Management Grade Scale-II and his promotion to Middle Management Grade Scale-III came up for consideration in November, 1984 when he was interviewed by the Interview Committee which made its recom…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 581 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 676
676 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS10 S.C.R. 676 [2021] 10 S.C.R. A PLACIDO FRANCISCO PINTO (D) BY LRs. & ANR v. JOSE FRANCISCO PINTO & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 1491 of 2007) B SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 [HEMANT GUPTA AND V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, JJ.] Contract Act, 1872 – s.25 – Suit for possession and accounts filed by appellant no.1 aga…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 580 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 251
Amit Kumar Singh, Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema, Ms. Chubalemla Chang, C Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Gauri Puri, Adv. for the Respondent. The Order of the Court was passed by S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. D 1. Counsel for parties were heard, with their consent, for final disposal of the appeal. The appellant (hereby “insurer”) question…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2021Full text
2021 INSC 58 · [2021] 4 S.C.R. 397
– Further, respondent’s prayer to allot Plot No.1/41 is malafide as the same was allotted to his father – High Court did not give any cogent reason as to on what basis direction was issued to allot a plot to the respondent – Mere statement of the counsel for the Board G that 19 plots are vacant cannot be utilized for i…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 579 · [2021] 7 S.C.R. 838
838 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS7 S.C.R. 838 [2021] 7 S.C.R. A RAJENDRA NAROTTAMDAS SHETH & ANR. v. CHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 4222 of 2020) B SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 [L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAI, B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ. ] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – s. 7 – Maintainability of – Insolvency and Ban…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 575 · [2021] 7 S.C.R. 1063
1063 1064 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2021] 7 S.C.R. A is no remorse on the part of the contemnor – It is a contempt on the face of the Court, however one more chance given to hear him on the question of final sentence. Directing the listing of the petition, the Court HELD: 1.1 The raison d’etre of contempt jurisdiction is …
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 573 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 7
THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. v. 9 SHAHEENA MASARAT & ANR. Court committed no error in directing the appointment of A Respondent No.1. The direction issued by the High Court to continue Respondent No.2 is set aside. Respondent No.2 has been continuing to work from 2004. Therefore, the Appellant is directed to a…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 572 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 1
Kumar Dushyant Singh, T. Meikandan, Ms. Pooja Singh, Ms. Subasri Jaganathan, K. K. Mohan, Advs. for the Appellant. Amit Anand Tiwari, AAG, D. Kumanan, Sheikh Fakhruddin Kalia, H Advs. for the Respondent. MUNUSAMY v. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 3 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling ag…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 570 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 15
respondent no.1, dismissed – General Clauses Act, 1897 – s.27. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: The summons issued by registered post was received back with postal endorsement of refusal, as would be clear from the order dated 19.02.1997. Sub-Rule (5) of Order V F Rule 9 of the Code states inter alia that if the d…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2021Full text
2021 INSC 57 · [2021] 2 S.C.R. 59
The following Judgment of the Court was delivered : JUDGMENT C Leave granted. 1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order dated 16.10.2020 passed by the learned Single Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby the petition filed by the appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 569 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 239
D. S. Bali, K. K. Mohan, Firoz Saifi, Ms. Shalu Sharma, Advs. for the Appellants. Tarunvir Singh Khehar, Shankar Divate, Advs. for the Respondents. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. 1. Special leave granted. Counsel for parties were heard, with their consent, for final disposal of the ap…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 568 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 249
[2021] 6 S.C.R. 249 249 RAMGOPAL & ANR. A v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 1489 of 2012) SEPTEMBER 29, 2021 B [N. V. RAMANA, CJI AND SURYA KANT, J.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss.482 and 320 – Quashing of criminal prosecution – On basis of compromise/ settlement between the parties – Jurisdic…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 566 · [2021] 7 S.C.R. 1080
proceedings, the appellants, the private respondents as well as the appellants in companion appeals received promotions from time to time and have retired from service, thus, the pensionary benefits being disbursed to them not to be disturbed and no recoveries made – Constitution of India – Art.142 – Punjab Civil Secre…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 565 · [2021] 9 S.C.R. 268
B 2.1 The Surveyor decided to adopt volumetric analysis method rather than rely upon the stock records of the insured. The Surveyors could not be found at fault with, for rejecting the stock records of the insured. When the insured produced two sets of records and the quantum of material destroyed by fire Carrived on t…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2021Full text
2021 INSC 562 · [2021] 12 S.C.R. 488
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD : 1. Section 24A(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, D1986 prescribes a period of limitation of two years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen for the admission of a complaint, by the District Forum, State Commission or the National Commission. In the case on han…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis