⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
381–400 · Page 20 of 500
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 806 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 364
Whether the High Court was justified in observing that since no offence of extortion u/s.383 IPC is made out, consequently, no offence u/s.387 IPC would be made out.
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 805 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 346
Whether the Courts below had rightly held that the Railway authorities could not have raised the demand notice after the delivery of goods.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
381–400 · Page 20 of 500
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 806 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 364
Whether the High Court was justified in observing that since no offence of extortion u/s.383 IPC is made out, consequently, no offence u/s.387 IPC would be made out.
Supreme Court of India5 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 805 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 346
Whether the Courts below had rightly held that the Railway authorities could not have raised the demand notice after the delivery of goods.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 804 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2612
Issue arose as regards the maintainability of an appeal under proviso to s.372 CrPC against order of acquittal in a case instituted upon a private complaint u/s.138 Negotiable Instruments Act, by treating the complainant in such proceeding as a victim within the meaning ascribed to the term u/s.2(wa) CrPC.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 803 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 331
Issue arose whether the cognizance on the complaint u/ss.498A rw s.34 IPC was taken beyond the limitation period as mandated u/s.468 CrPC; and whether the prima facie case u/ss.498A rw s.34 IPC was made out against the appellant-husband or his family.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 801 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 427
(i) Whether letter dated 25.09.2019 sent by the Deputy Secretary of State Government can be construed to be an order - Connectedly, whether the appellants would be entitled to the relief of deemed closure, as on 27.10.2019 by virtue of the deeming fiction present in s. 25-O(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; (ii) What would be the meaning of the phrase ‘appropriate Government’ and whether in the facts of this case, it was the appropriate Government acting in the matter of the closure - if not what is the effect in law, thereof.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 800 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 407
In a case based on circumstantial evidence where there were missing links in the chain of circumstances, whether the finding of the High Court regarding the conviction of the appellant for offences u/ss.302, 201 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860 and s.5 r/w s.25(1)(a), Arms Act, 1959 was sustainable in light of the evidence on record.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 80 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 92
Whether the High Court can pass any ad interim order for a limited period, before framing substantial question(s) of law, while dealing with a second appeal filed under Order XLI r/w Section 100 CPC.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 8 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1
Issue arose as regards invocation of extraordinary power u/Art. 226 of the Constitution to quash criminal proceedings.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 799 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 926
Matter pertains to the quantum of sentence imposed on the appellant and his release on bail on deposit of enhanced amount of fine.
Supreme Court of India16 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 796 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 735
Whether the High Court erred in granting bail to the respondents- accused(s) setting aside the order of the Trial Court by which it declined to grant bail.
Supreme Court of India2 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 795 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 307
Whether the conveyance of the suit land by the original plaintiff dated 02.11.1971 in favour of defendant no.1 could have been done and, the same having been done, could be sustained in law; whether the subsequent release of the charge created on the suit land by the Society upon receiving the entire dues having been paid by the plaintiff, would give retrospectivity to the said release so as to validate and ratify the Sale Deeds dated 02.11.1971 and 15.07.1972; against whom or between whom, if at all, any alienation under Section 48(e), Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is applicabl
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 794 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 696
Whether the allegations levelled in the impugned-FIR disclose a dispute of civil in nature; whether the proceedings of the impugned- FIR and the chargesheet filed as a culmination of the investigation is a gross abuse of process of the Court.
Supreme Court of India30 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 793 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 906
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the courts below convicting and sentencing the appellant u/ss.302, 304 IPC, and u/ss.3, 5 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Supreme Court of India30 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 792 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 787
Whether a recreational park developed on an alleged historical water body ought to be demolished and the water body restored or alternatively, whether the development warrants preservation given its current utility and the inexorable passage of time.
Supreme Court of India30 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 791 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 673
The central issue concerns the legality of the cancellation of allotment by Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC). Whether UPSIDC is responsible for frustrating the performance of the allotment contract; whether the cancellation of allotment of the subject land was procedurally defective and legally untenable.
Supreme Court of India28 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 790 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 242
Issue arose as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court whereby the petition filed by the appellant seeking quashing of the FIR for the offences punishable u/s.376(2)(n) IPC and s.3(2)(v) of the SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989, was rejected.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 79 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 63
Whether the High Court was correct in quashing the order/ memo dated 17.05.2023 issued by the Inspector General of Prisons, Ranchi, Jharkhand, making intra-State transfer of the respondent herein from Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Central Jail, Hazaribagh, to Central Jail, Dumka, within the State of Jharkhand.
Supreme Court of India29 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 789 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 782
Whether the quantum of permanent alimony of Rs.20,000/- per month, subject to a 5% increase every three years, fixed by the High Court ought to be enhanced.
Supreme Court of India29 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 788 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1014
The respondents herein were granted bail by the High Court for the offences punishable u/ss.143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 427, 326, 376 r/w ss.511 and 34 of IPC, 1860.
Supreme Court of India28 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 787 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 667
Whether the criminal proceedings against the appellants for offences u/s.120B r/w ss.420, 468, 471, Penal Code, 1860 and u/s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ought to be quashed.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 804 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2612
Issue arose as regards the maintainability of an appeal under proviso to s.372 CrPC against order of acquittal in a case instituted upon a private complaint u/s.138 Negotiable Instruments Act, by treating the complainant in such proceeding as a victim within the meaning ascribed to the term u/s.2(wa) CrPC.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 803 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 331
Issue arose whether the cognizance on the complaint u/ss.498A rw s.34 IPC was taken beyond the limitation period as mandated u/s.468 CrPC; and whether the prima facie case u/ss.498A rw s.34 IPC was made out against the appellant-husband or his family.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 801 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 427
(i) Whether letter dated 25.09.2019 sent by the Deputy Secretary of State Government can be construed to be an order - Connectedly, whether the appellants would be entitled to the relief of deemed closure, as on 27.10.2019 by virtue of the deeming fiction present in s. 25-O(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; (ii) What would be the meaning of the phrase ‘appropriate Government’ and whether in the facts of this case, it was the appropriate Government acting in the matter of the closure - if not what is the effect in law, thereof.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 800 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 407
In a case based on circumstantial evidence where there were missing links in the chain of circumstances, whether the finding of the High Court regarding the conviction of the appellant for offences u/ss.302, 201 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860 and s.5 r/w s.25(1)(a), Arms Act, 1959 was sustainable in light of the evidence on record.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 80 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 92
Whether the High Court can pass any ad interim order for a limited period, before framing substantial question(s) of law, while dealing with a second appeal filed under Order XLI r/w Section 100 CPC.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 8 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1
Issue arose as regards invocation of extraordinary power u/Art. 226 of the Constitution to quash criminal proceedings.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 799 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 926
Matter pertains to the quantum of sentence imposed on the appellant and his release on bail on deposit of enhanced amount of fine.
Supreme Court of India16 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 796 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 735
Whether the High Court erred in granting bail to the respondents- accused(s) setting aside the order of the Trial Court by which it declined to grant bail.
Supreme Court of India2 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 795 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 307
Whether the conveyance of the suit land by the original plaintiff dated 02.11.1971 in favour of defendant no.1 could have been done and, the same having been done, could be sustained in law; whether the subsequent release of the charge created on the suit land by the Society upon receiving the entire dues having been paid by the plaintiff, would give retrospectivity to the said release so as to validate and ratify the Sale Deeds dated 02.11.1971 and 15.07.1972; against whom or between whom, if at all, any alienation under Section 48(e), Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is applicabl
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 794 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 696
Whether the allegations levelled in the impugned-FIR disclose a dispute of civil in nature; whether the proceedings of the impugned- FIR and the chargesheet filed as a culmination of the investigation is a gross abuse of process of the Court.
Supreme Court of India30 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 793 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 906
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the courts below convicting and sentencing the appellant u/ss.302, 304 IPC, and u/ss.3, 5 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Supreme Court of India30 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 792 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 787
Whether a recreational park developed on an alleged historical water body ought to be demolished and the water body restored or alternatively, whether the development warrants preservation given its current utility and the inexorable passage of time.
Supreme Court of India30 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 791 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 673
The central issue concerns the legality of the cancellation of allotment by Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC). Whether UPSIDC is responsible for frustrating the performance of the allotment contract; whether the cancellation of allotment of the subject land was procedurally defective and legally untenable.
Supreme Court of India28 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 790 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 242
Issue arose as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court whereby the petition filed by the appellant seeking quashing of the FIR for the offences punishable u/s.376(2)(n) IPC and s.3(2)(v) of the SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989, was rejected.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 79 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 63
Whether the High Court was correct in quashing the order/ memo dated 17.05.2023 issued by the Inspector General of Prisons, Ranchi, Jharkhand, making intra-State transfer of the respondent herein from Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Central Jail, Hazaribagh, to Central Jail, Dumka, within the State of Jharkhand.
Supreme Court of India29 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 789 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 782
Whether the quantum of permanent alimony of Rs.20,000/- per month, subject to a 5% increase every three years, fixed by the High Court ought to be enhanced.
Supreme Court of India29 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 788 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1014
The respondents herein were granted bail by the High Court for the offences punishable u/ss.143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 427, 326, 376 r/w ss.511 and 34 of IPC, 1860.
Supreme Court of India28 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 787 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 667
Whether the criminal proceedings against the appellants for offences u/s.120B r/w ss.420, 468, 471, Penal Code, 1860 and u/s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ought to be quashed.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis