⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
21–40 · Page 2 of 500
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 666 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 538
Whether the filing of charge-sheet without additional copies as required by s.193(8) of the BNSS would entitle the appellant for the benefit of default bail.
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 665 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 518
Challenge by the appellant to the correctness of the refusal of the High Court to quash the criminal case and the issuance of process by the Magistrate, in connection with the complaint filed against her alleging that in her electoral filing for the position of Councillor in the Municipal elections, she did not disclose the true extent of the property owned by herself and her spouse contrary to the rules; propriety of the cognizance order.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
21–40 · Page 2 of 500
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 666 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 538
Whether the filing of charge-sheet without additional copies as required by s.193(8) of the BNSS would entitle the appellant for the benefit of default bail.
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 665 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 518
Challenge by the appellant to the correctness of the refusal of the High Court to quash the criminal case and the issuance of process by the Magistrate, in connection with the complaint filed against her alleging that in her electoral filing for the position of Councillor in the Municipal elections, she did not disclose the true extent of the property owned by herself and her spouse contrary to the rules; propriety of the cognizance order.
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 662 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 504
Whether the compromise as accepted by the Civil Court on 22.02.1994 was in accordance with Or.XXIII r.3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or not.
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 661 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 494
Issue arose that for assessing the annual income of a deceased person or claimant under the Motor Vehicles Act, the ITRs for the previous year appropriate or average of the past two/three years to be taken into consideration.
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 660 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 481
Whether a Magistrate must record evidence when the offence is strictly triable by the Court of Sessions as in this case, where the allegations were inter alia u/s.302 of IPC.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 66 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 904
Whether the fee paid by the appellant to the personalities/speakers, through their booking agents, is liable to Service Tax under the reverse charge mechanism, more particularly under the taxable category of “Event Management Service” u/ss.65(40) and 65(41) r/w. s.65(105)(zu) respectively of Chapter V of the Finance Act.
Supreme Court of India24 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 656 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 379
Issue arose as regards the just and fair compensation to be awarded to the claimant-skilled carpenter in the facts of the case, the parameters and the permissible heads of compensation.
Supreme Court of India23 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 653 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 195
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the concurrent finding of negligence and the quantum of compensation awarded by the courts below; and the enhancement of compensation on the ground that the future earning potential of the deceased was not adequately assessed and that compensation under the conventional heads was not fully granted.
Supreme Court of India10 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 650 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 297
Issue arose as regards the power and jurisdiction of the High Court to issue the directions that trial court while trying a case under the Prevention of Corruption Act to examine the sanctioning authority exercising powers u/s.311 CrPC before framing charge, even if there is no challenge to the same by the accused.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 65 · [2026] 2 S.C.R. 200
Does the first proviso to s.3(2) of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 require the constitution of a Joint Committee where notices, having been given in both Houses on the same day, is later followed by refusal to admit the motion by the Presiding Officer of one House and admission of the motion by the Presiding Officer of the other House; whether, in view of the office of the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha falling vacant, the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha was competent to refuse admission of the notice of motion; what is the effect, if any, of the Deputy Chairman’s refusal to admit the motion o
Supreme Court of India19 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 648 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 187
Whether the High Court erred in reversing the decree for mandatory injunction for removal of encroachment in favour of the plaintiff passed by the Trial Court and upheld by the first Appellate Court and, undertaking an exercise to compensate the legal heirs of the plaintiff in monetary terms without any prayer being made in that regard.
Supreme Court of India19 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 647 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 175
Whether the right to walk is a Fundamental Right; whether the High Court erred in reducing the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
Supreme Court of India15 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 644 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 113
Issue arose whether the Special Police Establishment-SPE as constituted u/s.2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Special Police Establishment Act, 1947 for investigating offences specified by the State Government u/s.3 of the Act of 1947 entitled to exemption from the application of the Act of 2005 by virtue of s.24(4) thereof, on the ground that it is an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation; and whether the Notification dated 25.08.2011 provides for a matter beyond the parent legislation or whether it is intra vires s.24(4) of the Act of 2005.
Supreme Court of India11 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 639 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 255
Issue arose whether the dismissal order was passed by the competent authority; whether a fresh show-cause notice for punishment was required after the de novo proceedings before the labour court; whether the plea relating to subsistence allowance requires reconsideration; whether the direction treating the suspension period as punishment is valid; and whether the punishment of dismissal is disproportionate.
Supreme Court of India11 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 637 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 101
Issue arose whether the appellant can be held liable under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the injuries sustained by respondent no.1 that were caused due to the falling of a roadside tree on the vehicle by which the respondent no.1 was travelling, but had stopped under the tree waiting for the rain to subside and then proceed further.
Supreme Court of India11 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 636 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 240
Whether the earlier proceedings provided opportunity enough for the plaintiff by being substantially similar, to raise the point of his ownership of the suit properties by virtue of the 1960 sale deed when the main ground urged otherwise was cancellation of sale deed; whether the High Court in terms of the impugned judgment erred in dismissing the suit as being barred by constructive res judicata.
Supreme Court of India11 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 635 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 75
Matter pertains to implementation of Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994.
Supreme Court of India9 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 630 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 220
Whether the High Court was right in refusing to entertain, try and adjudicate the writ petition of the appellant on the ground of forum non conveniens.
Supreme Court of India1 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 629 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 208
Issue arose that where an appeal u/s.62 IBC is filed within time, i.e., 45 (forty-five) days or beyond the said period but before expiry of 60 (sixty) days as contemplated in the sub-sections thereof and are marked defective, for whatever reason, whether this Court can condone the delay in refiling of the appeal when the defects pointed out are not cured within 28 (twenty-eight) days.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 626 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 67
Matter pertains to inordinate delay of nearly two decades in the investigation of the criminal complaint.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 662 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 504
Whether the compromise as accepted by the Civil Court on 22.02.1994 was in accordance with Or.XXIII r.3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or not.
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 661 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 494
Issue arose that for assessing the annual income of a deceased person or claimant under the Motor Vehicles Act, the ITRs for the previous year appropriate or average of the past two/three years to be taken into consideration.
Supreme Court of India1 Jul 2026Full text
2026 INSC 660 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 481
Whether a Magistrate must record evidence when the offence is strictly triable by the Court of Sessions as in this case, where the allegations were inter alia u/s.302 of IPC.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 66 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 904
Whether the fee paid by the appellant to the personalities/speakers, through their booking agents, is liable to Service Tax under the reverse charge mechanism, more particularly under the taxable category of “Event Management Service” u/ss.65(40) and 65(41) r/w. s.65(105)(zu) respectively of Chapter V of the Finance Act.
Supreme Court of India24 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 656 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 379
Issue arose as regards the just and fair compensation to be awarded to the claimant-skilled carpenter in the facts of the case, the parameters and the permissible heads of compensation.
Supreme Court of India23 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 653 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 195
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the concurrent finding of negligence and the quantum of compensation awarded by the courts below; and the enhancement of compensation on the ground that the future earning potential of the deceased was not adequately assessed and that compensation under the conventional heads was not fully granted.
Supreme Court of India10 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 650 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 297
Issue arose as regards the power and jurisdiction of the High Court to issue the directions that trial court while trying a case under the Prevention of Corruption Act to examine the sanctioning authority exercising powers u/s.311 CrPC before framing charge, even if there is no challenge to the same by the accused.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 65 · [2026] 2 S.C.R. 200
Does the first proviso to s.3(2) of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 require the constitution of a Joint Committee where notices, having been given in both Houses on the same day, is later followed by refusal to admit the motion by the Presiding Officer of one House and admission of the motion by the Presiding Officer of the other House; whether, in view of the office of the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha falling vacant, the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha was competent to refuse admission of the notice of motion; what is the effect, if any, of the Deputy Chairman’s refusal to admit the motion o
Supreme Court of India19 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 648 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 187
Whether the High Court erred in reversing the decree for mandatory injunction for removal of encroachment in favour of the plaintiff passed by the Trial Court and upheld by the first Appellate Court and, undertaking an exercise to compensate the legal heirs of the plaintiff in monetary terms without any prayer being made in that regard.
Supreme Court of India19 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 647 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 175
Whether the right to walk is a Fundamental Right; whether the High Court erred in reducing the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
Supreme Court of India15 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 644 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 113
Issue arose whether the Special Police Establishment-SPE as constituted u/s.2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Special Police Establishment Act, 1947 for investigating offences specified by the State Government u/s.3 of the Act of 1947 entitled to exemption from the application of the Act of 2005 by virtue of s.24(4) thereof, on the ground that it is an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation; and whether the Notification dated 25.08.2011 provides for a matter beyond the parent legislation or whether it is intra vires s.24(4) of the Act of 2005.
Supreme Court of India11 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 639 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 255
Issue arose whether the dismissal order was passed by the competent authority; whether a fresh show-cause notice for punishment was required after the de novo proceedings before the labour court; whether the plea relating to subsistence allowance requires reconsideration; whether the direction treating the suspension period as punishment is valid; and whether the punishment of dismissal is disproportionate.
Supreme Court of India11 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 637 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 101
Issue arose whether the appellant can be held liable under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the injuries sustained by respondent no.1 that were caused due to the falling of a roadside tree on the vehicle by which the respondent no.1 was travelling, but had stopped under the tree waiting for the rain to subside and then proceed further.
Supreme Court of India11 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 636 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 240
Whether the earlier proceedings provided opportunity enough for the plaintiff by being substantially similar, to raise the point of his ownership of the suit properties by virtue of the 1960 sale deed when the main ground urged otherwise was cancellation of sale deed; whether the High Court in terms of the impugned judgment erred in dismissing the suit as being barred by constructive res judicata.
Supreme Court of India11 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 635 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 75
Matter pertains to implementation of Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994.
Supreme Court of India9 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 630 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 220
Whether the High Court was right in refusing to entertain, try and adjudicate the writ petition of the appellant on the ground of forum non conveniens.
Supreme Court of India1 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 629 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 208
Issue arose that where an appeal u/s.62 IBC is filed within time, i.e., 45 (forty-five) days or beyond the said period but before expiry of 60 (sixty) days as contemplated in the sub-sections thereof and are marked defective, for whatever reason, whether this Court can condone the delay in refiling of the appeal when the defects pointed out are not cured within 28 (twenty-eight) days.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2026Full text
2026 INSC 626 · [2026] 7 S.C.R. 67
Matter pertains to inordinate delay of nearly two decades in the investigation of the criminal complaint.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis