⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,781–3,800 · Page 190 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1026 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 330
C K. S. Vidyanadam and Others v. Vairavan (1997) 3 SCC 1 : [1997] 1 SCR 993 – referred to. Case Law Reference [1997] 1 SCR 993 referred to Para 12 D CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1013 of 2014. From the Judgment and Order dated 17.10.2008 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Letter Patent…
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2022Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,781–3,800 · Page 190 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1026 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 330
C K. S. Vidyanadam and Others v. Vairavan (1997) 3 SCC 1 : [1997] 1 SCR 993 – referred to. Case Law Reference [1997] 1 SCR 993 referred to Para 12 D CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1013 of 2014. From the Judgment and Order dated 17.10.2008 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Letter Patent…
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1025 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 425
approached Supreme Court – Appellant pointed out that even after more than three months, the reasoned order is still not available to the parties – Held: An appeal, which could be preferred on the question of law or fact, would also remain an empty formality for the simple reason that neither determination of question …
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1024 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 537
537 538 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 10 S.C.R. A in a criminal case would not automatically entitle a candidate for appointment to the post – It would be still open to the employer to consider the antecedents and examine whether the candidate concerned is suitable and fit for appointment to the post – Generalisations a…
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1023 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 463
aid, in the form of grant – Thus, the State cannot shrug its part of the responsibility to pay the appellants the share of leave encashment benefits, and hide behind either r.5 (viii) or the undertaking executed by them – Appellants entitled to privilege leave entitlement benefits, to be paid by the State and managemen…
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1022 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 437
– Aggreived, secured creditor filed writ petition – High Court set aside the order passed by the designated authority holding that the order was beyond the scope and ambit of the powers to be exercised u/s 14, and directed the designated authority to dispose of the application in accordance with the provisions of s.14 …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1020 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 271
to the nature of the accusations and the nature of injuries, the prosecution case prima facie cannot be dubbed as fanciful or improbable – Impugned order set aside – Respondent no.2 to surrender – If he applies for bail afresh after surrendering and at an appropriate stage, such an application may be considered on its …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1019 · [2022] 5 S.C.R. 889
G CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 6676 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 19.02.2019 of the High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi Bench in MFA No.200507 of 2018. H 889 890 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 5 S.C.R. A With Civil Appeal No. 6677 of 2022. Sharanagouda Patil, Ms. Supreeta Sharanagouda for…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1018 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 874
in the cases of Surjit Singh & Kapoor Singh – Aforesaid decisions of the High Court were the subject matter of appeals before Supreme Court wherein the compensation was further enhanced – Landowners in the present appeals are also similarly situated – Accordingly, the amount of compensation payable to the landowners D …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1017 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 182
be taken against the petitioner in FIRs/complaints already lodged or that may be lodged in future pertaining to the debate for a period of eight weeks from the date of judgment so as to enable the petitioner to approach the concerned Court for appropriate relief – The investigation of any subsequent FIRs/complaints whi…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1016 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 864
aforesaid – Further, considering the fact that earlier also the dismissal order was set aside on the ground that it was in breach of principles of natural justice and the matter was remitted back and thereafter again when the fresh order of dismissal has been passed, it is again found to be in violation thereof and aga…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1015 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 1
Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 – ss.12, 14 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Or. 1 r.10(2), Or.43 r.1 – Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – s.13 – Interpretation of Statutes – Harmonious Construction – Held: s.14 of the Admiralty E Act provides the fora for an appeal from any judgment, d…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1013 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 367
Appellants are accused in FIR registered for offences under various provisions of the 2015 Act – Reports were submitted by the Public Prosecutor seeking extension of time up to 180 days to complete the investigation – Prayer for extending the time up to 180 days was allowed by the Special Court – Appellants filed separ…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1011 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 226
allowing the counter-claim is restored – Suit – Practice and Procedure. Practice and Procedure – Clever drafting – Suit filed for permanent injunction on the basis of unregistered agreement to sell – Held: Plaintiff cleverly prayed for relief of permanent injunction H 226 BALRAM SINGH v. KELO DEVI 227 only and did not …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1010 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 481
Good” in the ACRs for the years 2005-2006 and 2006- 2007, and was graded only “Good” in the ACR for the year 2007-2008 by the very same reporting and reviewing officer, despite the fact that specifically the respondent was given the opportunity against the ACR for the year 2007-2008 – However, no valid reasons are give…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 101 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 707
the High Court, also the SLP was disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits – All the issues were kept open for being considered by High Court in the Review Petition, and the appellant was permitted to approach this court, if aggrieved by the order passed therein as well as in the Writ Petition – Present appe…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1008 · [2022] 5 S.C.R. 893
fraud vitiates everything and such forged/fake DEPB licenses/ Scripps are void ab initio, it cannot be said that the Department acted illegally in invoking the extended period of limitation – Department justified in invoking the same – Further, whether the buyer(s) had knowledge about the fraud or the forged/fake DEPB …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1006 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 854
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1.1 The record indicates that both the Labour Court and the Single Judge elaborately considered the depositions of the parties as well as the evidence on the record. In fact, the appellant workman had applied under the RTI Act, eliciting relevant documents to substantiate his clai…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1005 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 527
Procedure, 1908 – Or.7, r.3. Cause of action – What is – Discussed. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 From the averments in the plaint, it is patently Fclear that there were two plots of land, Plot No. 4/4 being the suit property which was inherited by the Respondent from his grandmother ‘RB’ and Plot No. 4/5, …
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1004 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 536
538 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 15 S.C.R. A of India, this Court held that the approval of a resolution plan in relation to a Corporate Debtor does not discharge the guarantor of the Corporate Debtor. On a parity of reasoning, the approval of a resolution in respect of one borrower cannot certainly discharge a co-borr…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1003 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 133
D 3. A reading of the statement of objects and reasons with the statutory Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules enables the NCLT to pass orders for the ends of justice including order permitting an applicant for CIRP to withdraw its application and to enable a corporate body to carry on business with ease, free of any E impediment…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2022 INSC 1025 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 425
approached Supreme Court – Appellant pointed out that even after more than three months, the reasoned order is still not available to the parties – Held: An appeal, which could be preferred on the question of law or fact, would also remain an empty formality for the simple reason that neither determination of question …
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1024 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 537
537 538 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 10 S.C.R. A in a criminal case would not automatically entitle a candidate for appointment to the post – It would be still open to the employer to consider the antecedents and examine whether the candidate concerned is suitable and fit for appointment to the post – Generalisations a…
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1023 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 463
aid, in the form of grant – Thus, the State cannot shrug its part of the responsibility to pay the appellants the share of leave encashment benefits, and hide behind either r.5 (viii) or the undertaking executed by them – Appellants entitled to privilege leave entitlement benefits, to be paid by the State and managemen…
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1022 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 437
– Aggreived, secured creditor filed writ petition – High Court set aside the order passed by the designated authority holding that the order was beyond the scope and ambit of the powers to be exercised u/s 14, and directed the designated authority to dispose of the application in accordance with the provisions of s.14 …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1020 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 271
to the nature of the accusations and the nature of injuries, the prosecution case prima facie cannot be dubbed as fanciful or improbable – Impugned order set aside – Respondent no.2 to surrender – If he applies for bail afresh after surrendering and at an appropriate stage, such an application may be considered on its …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1019 · [2022] 5 S.C.R. 889
G CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 6676 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 19.02.2019 of the High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi Bench in MFA No.200507 of 2018. H 889 890 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 5 S.C.R. A With Civil Appeal No. 6677 of 2022. Sharanagouda Patil, Ms. Supreeta Sharanagouda for…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1018 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 874
in the cases of Surjit Singh & Kapoor Singh – Aforesaid decisions of the High Court were the subject matter of appeals before Supreme Court wherein the compensation was further enhanced – Landowners in the present appeals are also similarly situated – Accordingly, the amount of compensation payable to the landowners D …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1017 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 182
be taken against the petitioner in FIRs/complaints already lodged or that may be lodged in future pertaining to the debate for a period of eight weeks from the date of judgment so as to enable the petitioner to approach the concerned Court for appropriate relief – The investigation of any subsequent FIRs/complaints whi…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1016 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 864
aforesaid – Further, considering the fact that earlier also the dismissal order was set aside on the ground that it was in breach of principles of natural justice and the matter was remitted back and thereafter again when the fresh order of dismissal has been passed, it is again found to be in violation thereof and aga…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1015 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 1
Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 – ss.12, 14 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Or. 1 r.10(2), Or.43 r.1 – Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – s.13 – Interpretation of Statutes – Harmonious Construction – Held: s.14 of the Admiralty E Act provides the fora for an appeal from any judgment, d…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1013 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 367
Appellants are accused in FIR registered for offences under various provisions of the 2015 Act – Reports were submitted by the Public Prosecutor seeking extension of time up to 180 days to complete the investigation – Prayer for extending the time up to 180 days was allowed by the Special Court – Appellants filed separ…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1011 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 226
allowing the counter-claim is restored – Suit – Practice and Procedure. Practice and Procedure – Clever drafting – Suit filed for permanent injunction on the basis of unregistered agreement to sell – Held: Plaintiff cleverly prayed for relief of permanent injunction H 226 BALRAM SINGH v. KELO DEVI 227 only and did not …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1010 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 481
Good” in the ACRs for the years 2005-2006 and 2006- 2007, and was graded only “Good” in the ACR for the year 2007-2008 by the very same reporting and reviewing officer, despite the fact that specifically the respondent was given the opportunity against the ACR for the year 2007-2008 – However, no valid reasons are give…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 101 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 707
the High Court, also the SLP was disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits – All the issues were kept open for being considered by High Court in the Review Petition, and the appellant was permitted to approach this court, if aggrieved by the order passed therein as well as in the Writ Petition – Present appe…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1008 · [2022] 5 S.C.R. 893
fraud vitiates everything and such forged/fake DEPB licenses/ Scripps are void ab initio, it cannot be said that the Department acted illegally in invoking the extended period of limitation – Department justified in invoking the same – Further, whether the buyer(s) had knowledge about the fraud or the forged/fake DEPB …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1006 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 854
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1.1 The record indicates that both the Labour Court and the Single Judge elaborately considered the depositions of the parties as well as the evidence on the record. In fact, the appellant workman had applied under the RTI Act, eliciting relevant documents to substantiate his clai…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1005 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 527
Procedure, 1908 – Or.7, r.3. Cause of action – What is – Discussed. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 From the averments in the plaint, it is patently Fclear that there were two plots of land, Plot No. 4/4 being the suit property which was inherited by the Respondent from his grandmother ‘RB’ and Plot No. 4/5, …
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1004 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 536
538 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 15 S.C.R. A of India, this Court held that the approval of a resolution plan in relation to a Corporate Debtor does not discharge the guarantor of the Corporate Debtor. On a parity of reasoning, the approval of a resolution in respect of one borrower cannot certainly discharge a co-borr…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1003 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 133
D 3. A reading of the statement of objects and reasons with the statutory Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules enables the NCLT to pass orders for the ends of justice including order permitting an applicant for CIRP to withdraw its application and to enable a corporate body to carry on business with ease, free of any E impediment…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis