⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
361–380 · Page 19 of 500
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 83 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 804
Whether the impugned order of the High Court, in which the Disciplinary Authority’s order imposing penalty and the order of the Single Judge dismissing the writ petition of the appellant have merged, warrants any interference on any of the grounds available for judicial review; whether the objection by the respondent that limited notice having been issued at the time of admission of the intra-court appeal and the appellant’s grievance being addressed, this Court ought not to enlarge the scope of the appeal has any substance.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
361–380 · Page 19 of 500
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 83 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 804
Whether the impugned order of the High Court, in which the Disciplinary Authority’s order imposing penalty and the order of the Single Judge dismissing the writ petition of the appellant have merged, warrants any interference on any of the grounds available for judicial review; whether the objection by the respondent that limited notice having been issued at the time of admission of the intra-court appeal and the appellant’s grievance being addressed, this Court ought not to enlarge the scope of the appeal has any substance.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 829 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 611
Issue arose whether the conversation between spouses secretly recorded by one of them could be permitted to be made admissible in evidence; whether in light of the Evidence Act and the Family Courts Act, 1984, a conversation between spouses can be permitted to be given in evidence in a proceeding for divorce; whether such a recorded evidence should be disallowed solely on the ground that it is violative of the privacy of one of the spouses; and as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court, declining permission to the husband to corroborate his evidence in the form of recording o
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 828 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 573
Whether the appellant-company falls under the definition of ‘victim’ in terms of s.2(wa) r/w the proviso to s.372, CrPC or whether s.378, CrPC would prevail in the facts and circumstances; whether an appeal under the proviso to s.372, CrPC would be restricted only to mean an appeal to the First Appellate Court or include even an appeal to the Second Appellate Court/High Court.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 826 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 593
Issue arose as regards the objections raised by the respondents about the bonafides of the appellants as also the allegations that the appellants suppressed the initiation of parallel proceedings before the High Court.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 825 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 488
Whether objection of res judicata can be taken to bar the suit u/Or.VII, R.11, CPC.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 824 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 481
Issue arose as to whether the legal heirs of a deceased teacher in an aided school would be entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 or under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension Rules), 1982.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 822 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 474
Whether any interference is required in the multiplier adopted by the Tribunal and affirmed by the High Court; Whether the 9% interest rate granted by the Tribunal is perfectly in order.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 819 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 568
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court erred in dismissing the petitions filed by the appellants u/s.482, CrPC seeking quashing of criminal proceedings initiated against them, and holding that the proceedings involving serious offence u/s.376, IPC could not be quashed merely on the basis of a settlement or monetary compensation.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 818 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 463
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against respondent nos.1 and 2 in two complaint cases whereby they were charged for offences punishable u/ss.120B, 415, 420 r/w. s.34 of Penal Code, 1860. Whether a prima facie case exists against the respondents.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 817 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2122
Whether in the facts of the case, prima-facie offence u/s.364-A, IPC against appellant is made out or not.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 816 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1932
The instant criminal appeal assails the findings recorded by the High Court, thereby convicting the appellants herein u/s.302/34 of IPC and s.27 of the Arms Act, 1959. Whether the findings recorded by the High Court in the facts and circumstances of the case is sustainable.
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 815 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1519
Whether the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, marginally enhanced by the High Court along with other statutory benefits is fair and reasonable.
Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 814 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2742
Whether the High Court erred in declining to interfere in the order terminating the service of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India2 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 813 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2799
Issue arose whether directions issued by the High Court regarding grant of rehabilitation assistance/appointment under the Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990 warrants interference in view of the Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 2020.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 812 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 764
The crux of the dispute is the ‘per square foot rate’ at which the mesne profit is to be calculated in connection with Hindustan Organic Chemicals Ltd.’s (HOCL) occupation, as ‘tenant’. The High Court held that application of uniform rate of Rs. 160/- per sq.ft. per month with the rate of interest payable at 8% p.a. would be appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 811 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 741
Whether the prosecution of the appellants under the UP Gangsters Act satisfies the statutory thresholds prescribed under the Act, when it is based entirely on a single FIR, in which the appellants were already arrested and released on bail, and where no new act or omission had occurred between the date of registration of the First FIR i.e., 11.10.2022, and the preparation of the gang chart on 29.04.2023.
Supreme Court of India9 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 810 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 394
Whether in the attending facts and circumstances, the High Court could have accepted a submission of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, to conduct narco-analysis test of all the accused persons (including the appellant) and other witnesses, during the investigation; whether a report of a voluntary narco-analysis test can form the sole basis of conviction in the absence of other evidence on record; whether an accused can voluntarily seek a narco-analysis test, as a matter of an indefeasible right.
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 81 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 781
The two questions of law fall for consideration in the instant appeal; First, the effect of merger of the trial court’s decree with that of the decree passed by High Court in second appeals; Secondly, whether the defendants/judgment debtors could have prayed for rescission of contract on the ground that the plaintiffs/decree holders had failed to deposit the balance sale consideration within the stipulated time period of 20 days as prescribed in the original decree.
Supreme Court of India6 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 809 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 354
Whether the preventive detention of the detenu is in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 808 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 380
Matter pertains to correctness of the order passed by the National Commission imposing liability on the Development Authority to pay for interest paid by the respondents-buyers for loans secured for the flat, on account of delay in delivery of possession of flats.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 829 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 611
Issue arose whether the conversation between spouses secretly recorded by one of them could be permitted to be made admissible in evidence; whether in light of the Evidence Act and the Family Courts Act, 1984, a conversation between spouses can be permitted to be given in evidence in a proceeding for divorce; whether such a recorded evidence should be disallowed solely on the ground that it is violative of the privacy of one of the spouses; and as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court, declining permission to the husband to corroborate his evidence in the form of recording o
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 828 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 573
Whether the appellant-company falls under the definition of ‘victim’ in terms of s.2(wa) r/w the proviso to s.372, CrPC or whether s.378, CrPC would prevail in the facts and circumstances; whether an appeal under the proviso to s.372, CrPC would be restricted only to mean an appeal to the First Appellate Court or include even an appeal to the Second Appellate Court/High Court.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 826 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 593
Issue arose as regards the objections raised by the respondents about the bonafides of the appellants as also the allegations that the appellants suppressed the initiation of parallel proceedings before the High Court.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 825 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 488
Whether objection of res judicata can be taken to bar the suit u/Or.VII, R.11, CPC.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 824 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 481
Issue arose as to whether the legal heirs of a deceased teacher in an aided school would be entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 or under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension Rules), 1982.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 822 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 474
Whether any interference is required in the multiplier adopted by the Tribunal and affirmed by the High Court; Whether the 9% interest rate granted by the Tribunal is perfectly in order.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 819 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 568
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court erred in dismissing the petitions filed by the appellants u/s.482, CrPC seeking quashing of criminal proceedings initiated against them, and holding that the proceedings involving serious offence u/s.376, IPC could not be quashed merely on the basis of a settlement or monetary compensation.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 818 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 463
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against respondent nos.1 and 2 in two complaint cases whereby they were charged for offences punishable u/ss.120B, 415, 420 r/w. s.34 of Penal Code, 1860. Whether a prima facie case exists against the respondents.
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 817 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2122
Whether in the facts of the case, prima-facie offence u/s.364-A, IPC against appellant is made out or not.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 816 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1932
The instant criminal appeal assails the findings recorded by the High Court, thereby convicting the appellants herein u/s.302/34 of IPC and s.27 of the Arms Act, 1959. Whether the findings recorded by the High Court in the facts and circumstances of the case is sustainable.
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 815 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1519
Whether the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, marginally enhanced by the High Court along with other statutory benefits is fair and reasonable.
Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 814 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2742
Whether the High Court erred in declining to interfere in the order terminating the service of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India2 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 813 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2799
Issue arose whether directions issued by the High Court regarding grant of rehabilitation assistance/appointment under the Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990 warrants interference in view of the Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 2020.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 812 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 764
The crux of the dispute is the ‘per square foot rate’ at which the mesne profit is to be calculated in connection with Hindustan Organic Chemicals Ltd.’s (HOCL) occupation, as ‘tenant’. The High Court held that application of uniform rate of Rs. 160/- per sq.ft. per month with the rate of interest payable at 8% p.a. would be appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 811 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 741
Whether the prosecution of the appellants under the UP Gangsters Act satisfies the statutory thresholds prescribed under the Act, when it is based entirely on a single FIR, in which the appellants were already arrested and released on bail, and where no new act or omission had occurred between the date of registration of the First FIR i.e., 11.10.2022, and the preparation of the gang chart on 29.04.2023.
Supreme Court of India9 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 810 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 394
Whether in the attending facts and circumstances, the High Court could have accepted a submission of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, to conduct narco-analysis test of all the accused persons (including the appellant) and other witnesses, during the investigation; whether a report of a voluntary narco-analysis test can form the sole basis of conviction in the absence of other evidence on record; whether an accused can voluntarily seek a narco-analysis test, as a matter of an indefeasible right.
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 81 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 781
The two questions of law fall for consideration in the instant appeal; First, the effect of merger of the trial court’s decree with that of the decree passed by High Court in second appeals; Secondly, whether the defendants/judgment debtors could have prayed for rescission of contract on the ground that the plaintiffs/decree holders had failed to deposit the balance sale consideration within the stipulated time period of 20 days as prescribed in the original decree.
Supreme Court of India6 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 809 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 354
Whether the preventive detention of the detenu is in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India4 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 808 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 380
Matter pertains to correctness of the order passed by the National Commission imposing liability on the Development Authority to pay for interest paid by the respondents-buyers for loans secured for the flat, on account of delay in delivery of possession of flats.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis