Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,681–3,700 · Page 185 of 500
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1141 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 1135
[2022] 10 S.C.R. 1135 1135 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS A v. MUNSHI RAM (Civil Appeal No. 2811 of 2022) OCTOBER 31, 2022 B [M. R. SHAH AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Constitution of India: Arts.14 and 16 – Regularisation – Parity – In the instant case, the departmental catering and vending services were started by Northern Ra…
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2022Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,681–3,700 · Page 185 of 500
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1141 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 1135
[2022] 10 S.C.R. 1135 1135 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS A v. MUNSHI RAM (Civil Appeal No. 2811 of 2022) OCTOBER 31, 2022 B [M. R. SHAH AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Constitution of India: Arts.14 and 16 – Regularisation – Parity – In the instant case, the departmental catering and vending services were started by Northern Ra…
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1140 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 1094
1094 SUPREME COURT[2022] REPORTS19 S.C.R. 1094 [2022] 19 S.C.R. A GUJARAT STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. v. MAHAKALI FOODS PVT. LTD. (UNIT 2) & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 8008 of 2022) B OCTOBER 31, 2022 [UDAY UMESH LALIT, CJI AND BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – s.37 – Micro, Small and …
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 114 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 720
8.1 – CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. Allowing the appeal, this Court HELD: 1. At the outset it is required to be noted that the G issue involved in the present appeal is as such squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of M.V. Mohanan Nair. By detailed judgment and order this Court has interpreted the…
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1139 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 1033
of the deceased satisfies the conditions in s.32(1) and is itself a relevant fact –It is a dying declaration – Prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt – Judgment of High Court set aside – Sessions Court’s judgment convicting therespondent and the order sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for life for th…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1137 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 252
254 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 18 S.C.R. A specifically observed in paragraph 5 that all the universities shall incorporate the UGC Regulations in their Statutes and Regulations within one month from the date of the said order and Government will initiate steps to amend the Acts of the Universities, if required to im…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1136 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 975
[2022] 13 S.C.R. 975 975 DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA A v. SAILENDRA SHARMA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 7611 of 2022) OCTOBER 21, 2022 B [M. R. SHAH AND M. M. SUNDRESH, JJ] Chhattisgarh Dental Medicine Postgraduate Admission Rules, 2017 – Dentists Act, 1948 – Dental Council of India – Postgraduate Dental Course – Admission…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1135 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 988
take an appropriate decision, High Court while disposing of writ petition directed the Municipal Corporation to take an appropriate decision under s.391 of the Act, 1957 – High Court also directed that the Municipal Corporation to take possession of the land offered at Kishangarh and make all necessary arrangements to …
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1133 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1012
Raghenth Basant, Ms. Zehra Khan, Ajay Krishna, Harshad V. Hameed, Dileep Poolakkot, Mrs. Ashly Harshad, Advs. for the E Respondents. The following Order of the Court was passed: O R D E R 1. Leave granted. F 2. The appellant is the mother of the victim who is a 12 years old girl child. 3. The appellant is aggrieved by …
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1131 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 781
782 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 19 S.C.R. A balance between the two has to be struck – For the sustainable development of the State and on account of the availability of the timber, sanction of granting licenses can be permitted to continue, however, as a responsible State, it needs to ensure that environmental concer…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1130 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1042
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7629 of 2022. From the Judgment and Orders dated 07.03.2019 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in FAO No. 854 of 2014. F Vikas Kumar, Manish Paliwal, Ms. Megha Yadav, Ms. Himanshi Kaushik, M/s Corporate Legal Partners, Advs. for the Appellants. Vishnu Me…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 113 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 93
– Delhi High Court Act, 1966 – s. 5(2). H 93 94 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 8 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 So far as the expression “superior Court of any reciprocating territory” as defined under Section 44A of the Code is concerned, the judgment and decree has been passed by the notified superio…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1129 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 1027
1027 1028 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 13 S.C.R. A CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Review Petition (Crl.) No. 282 of 2022 in Criminal Appeal No. 612 of 2019. [From the Judgment and Order dated 15.07.2014 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No.2920 of 2013 and Criminal Reference No. 9…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1128 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 591
H 591 592 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 15 S.C.R. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Clause 7.2 of the brochure issued by the State Government provides that 50% of seats in post graduate diploma courses would be reserved for in-service candidates. Clause 7.2 also provides that “for in-service quota reservation…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1127 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 482
482 MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS v. SHAIKH 483 YUSUF BHAI CHAWLA & ORS. exercise of power of eminent domain by the State, the title of the A Almighty though by implication cannot cease. Wakf Act, 1995 – Wakf – Constituent elements of – Held: The first indispensable requirement is that there must be dedication – Ded…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1126 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 670
F Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Considering the evidence on record and the sale instances which were relied upon on behalf of the landowners and while considering the fact that the landowners shall be entitled to just and reasonable compensation for the lands acquired and G taking into consideration the deci…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1124 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 625
Court are restored for fresh adjudication by the AFT – Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007. Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of relevant material to the adjudicating authority in a sealed cover – Held: It makes the process of adjudication vague and opaque – Disclosure in a sealed C cover perpetuates two problems – Firstl…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1123 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 996
2. Since the arbitration agreements contained in all the Fthree agreements namely, Onshore Service Agreement, Lease Agreement and Drilling Service Agreement were not disputed by the respondent, and since the respondent itself had proposed to consolidate the disputes under the said agreements and to refer them to a sole…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1122 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 664
664 HARI RAM (DECEASED) THR. HIS LRS. v. LAND ACQUISITION 665 COLLECTOR CUM DIST. REVENUE OFFICER GURGAON Partly allowing the appeals, the Court A HELD: 1. The reasoning given by the High Court discarding the sale exemplars/sale instances produced as Exs. P1, P3 and P4, this court is of the opinion that the High Court …
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1121 · [2022] 11 S.C.R. 369
[2022] 11 S.C.R. 369 369 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH A v. NIRMAL KAUR @ NIMMO AND OTHERS (Criminal Appeal No. 956 of 2012) OCTOBER 20, 2022 B [B. R. GAVAI AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.2(xvii)(a) and (b) and s.15 – Conviction in relation to ‘poppy straw’ – ‘Poppy straw…
Supreme Court of India19 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1120 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 701
P. Vishwanath Setty, Sr. Adv., G. N. Reddy, Hemal Kiritkumar Sheth, Advs. for the Appellant. C Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Abhijit Basu, Ms. Tatini Basu, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DINESH MAHESHWARI, J. D Leave granted. 2. We have heard Mr. P. Vishwanath Setty, learned senior counsel…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2022 INSC 1140 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 1094
1094 SUPREME COURT[2022] REPORTS19 S.C.R. 1094 [2022] 19 S.C.R. A GUJARAT STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. v. MAHAKALI FOODS PVT. LTD. (UNIT 2) & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 8008 of 2022) B OCTOBER 31, 2022 [UDAY UMESH LALIT, CJI AND BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – s.37 – Micro, Small and …
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 114 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 720
8.1 – CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. Allowing the appeal, this Court HELD: 1. At the outset it is required to be noted that the G issue involved in the present appeal is as such squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of M.V. Mohanan Nair. By detailed judgment and order this Court has interpreted the…
Supreme Court of India31 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1139 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 1033
of the deceased satisfies the conditions in s.32(1) and is itself a relevant fact –It is a dying declaration – Prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt – Judgment of High Court set aside – Sessions Court’s judgment convicting therespondent and the order sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for life for th…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1137 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 252
254 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 18 S.C.R. A specifically observed in paragraph 5 that all the universities shall incorporate the UGC Regulations in their Statutes and Regulations within one month from the date of the said order and Government will initiate steps to amend the Acts of the Universities, if required to im…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1136 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 975
[2022] 13 S.C.R. 975 975 DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA A v. SAILENDRA SHARMA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 7611 of 2022) OCTOBER 21, 2022 B [M. R. SHAH AND M. M. SUNDRESH, JJ] Chhattisgarh Dental Medicine Postgraduate Admission Rules, 2017 – Dentists Act, 1948 – Dental Council of India – Postgraduate Dental Course – Admission…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1135 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 988
take an appropriate decision, High Court while disposing of writ petition directed the Municipal Corporation to take an appropriate decision under s.391 of the Act, 1957 – High Court also directed that the Municipal Corporation to take possession of the land offered at Kishangarh and make all necessary arrangements to …
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1133 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1012
Raghenth Basant, Ms. Zehra Khan, Ajay Krishna, Harshad V. Hameed, Dileep Poolakkot, Mrs. Ashly Harshad, Advs. for the E Respondents. The following Order of the Court was passed: O R D E R 1. Leave granted. F 2. The appellant is the mother of the victim who is a 12 years old girl child. 3. The appellant is aggrieved by …
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1131 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 781
782 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 19 S.C.R. A balance between the two has to be struck – For the sustainable development of the State and on account of the availability of the timber, sanction of granting licenses can be permitted to continue, however, as a responsible State, it needs to ensure that environmental concer…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1130 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1042
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7629 of 2022. From the Judgment and Orders dated 07.03.2019 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in FAO No. 854 of 2014. F Vikas Kumar, Manish Paliwal, Ms. Megha Yadav, Ms. Himanshi Kaushik, M/s Corporate Legal Partners, Advs. for the Appellants. Vishnu Me…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 113 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 93
– Delhi High Court Act, 1966 – s. 5(2). H 93 94 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 8 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 So far as the expression “superior Court of any reciprocating territory” as defined under Section 44A of the Code is concerned, the judgment and decree has been passed by the notified superio…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1129 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 1027
1027 1028 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 13 S.C.R. A CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Review Petition (Crl.) No. 282 of 2022 in Criminal Appeal No. 612 of 2019. [From the Judgment and Order dated 15.07.2014 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No.2920 of 2013 and Criminal Reference No. 9…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1128 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 591
H 591 592 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 15 S.C.R. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Clause 7.2 of the brochure issued by the State Government provides that 50% of seats in post graduate diploma courses would be reserved for in-service candidates. Clause 7.2 also provides that “for in-service quota reservation…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1127 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 482
482 MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS v. SHAIKH 483 YUSUF BHAI CHAWLA & ORS. exercise of power of eminent domain by the State, the title of the A Almighty though by implication cannot cease. Wakf Act, 1995 – Wakf – Constituent elements of – Held: The first indispensable requirement is that there must be dedication – Ded…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1126 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 670
F Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Considering the evidence on record and the sale instances which were relied upon on behalf of the landowners and while considering the fact that the landowners shall be entitled to just and reasonable compensation for the lands acquired and G taking into consideration the deci…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1124 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 625
Court are restored for fresh adjudication by the AFT – Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007. Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of relevant material to the adjudicating authority in a sealed cover – Held: It makes the process of adjudication vague and opaque – Disclosure in a sealed C cover perpetuates two problems – Firstl…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1123 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 996
2. Since the arbitration agreements contained in all the Fthree agreements namely, Onshore Service Agreement, Lease Agreement and Drilling Service Agreement were not disputed by the respondent, and since the respondent itself had proposed to consolidate the disputes under the said agreements and to refer them to a sole…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1122 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 664
664 HARI RAM (DECEASED) THR. HIS LRS. v. LAND ACQUISITION 665 COLLECTOR CUM DIST. REVENUE OFFICER GURGAON Partly allowing the appeals, the Court A HELD: 1. The reasoning given by the High Court discarding the sale exemplars/sale instances produced as Exs. P1, P3 and P4, this court is of the opinion that the High Court …
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1121 · [2022] 11 S.C.R. 369
[2022] 11 S.C.R. 369 369 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH A v. NIRMAL KAUR @ NIMMO AND OTHERS (Criminal Appeal No. 956 of 2012) OCTOBER 20, 2022 B [B. R. GAVAI AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.2(xvii)(a) and (b) and s.15 – Conviction in relation to ‘poppy straw’ – ‘Poppy straw…
Supreme Court of India19 Oct 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1120 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 701
P. Vishwanath Setty, Sr. Adv., G. N. Reddy, Hemal Kiritkumar Sheth, Advs. for the Appellant. C Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Abhijit Basu, Ms. Tatini Basu, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DINESH MAHESHWARI, J. D Leave granted. 2. We have heard Mr. P. Vishwanath Setty, learned senior counsel…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis