⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,641–3,660 · Page 183 of 500
Supreme Court of India9 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1187 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 273
H RAVI NAMBOOTHIRI v. K.A. BAIJU & ORS. 275 1.2 In other words sub-section (1) of Section 102 places, (i) A non- qualification/disqualification of the returned candidate; (ii) commission of any corrupt practice by the returned candidate or his election agent or any other person with the consent of the returned candidat…
Supreme Court of India9 Nov 2022Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,641–3,660 · Page 183 of 500
Supreme Court of India9 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1187 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 273
H RAVI NAMBOOTHIRI v. K.A. BAIJU & ORS. 275 1.2 In other words sub-section (1) of Section 102 places, (i) A non- qualification/disqualification of the returned candidate; (ii) commission of any corrupt practice by the returned candidate or his election agent or any other person with the consent of the returned candidat…
Supreme Court of India9 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1186 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 1031
letter and spirit – Once, the State Commission or the National Commission, as the case may be, comes to the conclusion that the term of a contract is unfair, particularly by adopting an unfair trade practice, the aggrieved party has to be extended the resultant relief – Once it is proved that there is a deficiency in s…
Supreme Court of India9 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1185 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 95
H 95 96 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 10 S.C.R. A Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: The purpose for which acquisition is made is also a relevant factor for determining the market value and the purpose for which the land is acquired must also be taken into consideration. Thus, when the acquisition is solely fo…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1184 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 1144
Allowing the appeals, the Court C HELD: 1.1 The first Writ Petition No. (PIL) 4290 of 2021 the allegations which had been made of money laundering and money being invested in shell companies are again mere allegations. The petitioner has actually sought an investigation by the Court. It prays for a writ of mandamus in …
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1183 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 777
Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv., Chinmay Deshpande, Parikshit Angadi, Anirudh Sanganeria, Balaji Srinivasan, Ms. Aakriti Priya, Shiva Krishnamurti, Ms. Gauri Pasricha, Devanshu Behl, Krishna Dev E Jagarlamudi, Ms. Inderdeep Kaur Raina, Ms. Pallavi Dewakar, M/s. M. Rambabu and Co., Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, Polanki Gowtham,…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1182 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 700
702 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 9 S.C.R. A the well settled legal position, the power of judicial review in the matter of disciplinary proceedings is extremely limited. It is circumscribed by the limits of correcting errors of law or procedural errors leading to manifest injustice or violation of principles of natural…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1181 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 679
[2022] 14 S.C.R. 679 679 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS. A v. PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION & ORS. (Civil Appeal No 8239 of 2022) (SLP (C) No. 17009 of 2019) B NOVEMBER 07, 2022 [UDAY UMESH LALIT, CJI AND AJAY RASTOGI, J.] Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 – s.154(1A)(a)-(e), (1B) – Factors and Categ…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1180 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 239
– In terms of this understanding, he was able to aggregate about 160 acres of land though actual development in terms of construction was never undertaken – He held 40% of the ‘yellow’ area in the concerned colony of Indore with all rights of selling – The applicant Ewas informed that his presence was required before t…
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1180 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 136
Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar and Another (2011) 1 SCC G 343 : [2010] 13 SCR 179 – relied on. Case Law Reference [2010] 13 SCR 179 relied on Para 8 H 136 T. J. PARAMESHWARAPPA v. BRANCH MANAGER, NEW 137 INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 8598- A 8599 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order …
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1180 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 207
207 208 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 9 S.C.R. A orders dated 10.06.2020, 19.08.2020 and 25.08.2020 – Therefore, the said orders are recalled. Disposing of the IAs, the Court HELD: 1.1. In these proceedings this Court is principally concerned with the plight of flat holders of Amrapali Group of B Companies. In order to …
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 118 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 121
With B Criminal Appeal Nos. 1202-1203 of 2014. Shree Prakash Sinha, Rakesh Mishra, Ms. Mohua Sinha, Nawalendra Kumar, Sidharth Singh, Shekher Kumar, Advs. for the Appellant. Tapesh Kumar Singh, AAG, Aditya Pratap Singh, Aditya Narayan C Das, Advs. for the Respondent. Seshadri Sekhar Ray (Amicus Curiae) The Judgment of …
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1179 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 616
1.2 Regulation 119 deals with the Proceedings of the Regional Council. As per Regulation 119(2) every Regional C Council shall at its first meeting held after its constitution and in subsequent years at a meeting to be held in December of every year elect from amongst its members a Chairman, a Vice-Chairman, a Secretar…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1178 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 391
Nagarathna, J.) (Concurring) : As per s. 101, the burden of proving a fact always lies upon the party who substantially asserts the D affirmative and until such burden is discharged, the other party is not required to be called upon to prove his case – Burden to prove documents lie on plaintiff alone as onus is always …
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1177 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 265
265 266 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 15 S.C.R. A S.Ravindra Bhat J. (for Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and himself)) : The Draft Rules framed, therefore, were a product of a thorough consultative exercise undertaken to remedy asymmetries caused by the lack of uniformity in Rules across States, which could hamper appreciation o…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1176 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 1129
Evidence Act, 1872 – 27, 45 & 65B – Circumstantial Evidence B – The circumstances taken cumulatively should form a chain so complete that there is no escape from the conclusion that within all human probability, the crime was committed by the accused only and none else – The evidence with regard to the arrest of the ap…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1175 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1
Trivedi and J.B. Pardiwala, JJ.) : Valid – Held (per Dinesh Maheshwari, J.): Reservation is an instrument of affirmative action by the State so as to ensure all-inclusive march towards the goals of H 1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 14 S.C.R. A an egalitarian society while counteracting inequalities; it is an instrumen…
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1174 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 602
Allowing the appeal, the Court Held: 1.1 The respondent No.1–original writ petitioner filed the writ petition and claimed the right, title, or interest in the lands in question on the basis of the Agreement to Sell dated H 602 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. DAMINI WADHWA & 603 ORS. 22.05.2016. Agreement to Sell by itse…
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1173 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 628
the mercy petition – As regards solitary confinement, segregation of a convict from the day when he was awarded death sentence till his mercy petition was disposed of, would be in violation of law laid down in Sunil Batra’s case – On facts, incarceration of the accused in solitary confinement and segregation from 2006 …
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1172 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 77
diploma course conducted by appellant-University – Digital evaluation of answer scripts – Writ petitions filed by respective students praying for re-evaluation – Single Judge ordered re-evaluation of the answer scripts – Order confirmed by Division Bench – On appeal, held : In absence of any regulation for re-evaluatio…
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 117 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 988
the respondent with the applications of introducing the borrowers, etc. – No evidence of involvement of the respondent – Charge of misappropriation of entire loan and subsidy amount was based on confessional statement, the said documentwas not exhibited and undeniably it was not signed – Document can bound authors but …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2022 INSC 1186 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 1031
letter and spirit – Once, the State Commission or the National Commission, as the case may be, comes to the conclusion that the term of a contract is unfair, particularly by adopting an unfair trade practice, the aggrieved party has to be extended the resultant relief – Once it is proved that there is a deficiency in s…
Supreme Court of India9 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1185 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 95
H 95 96 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 10 S.C.R. A Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: The purpose for which acquisition is made is also a relevant factor for determining the market value and the purpose for which the land is acquired must also be taken into consideration. Thus, when the acquisition is solely fo…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1184 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 1144
Allowing the appeals, the Court C HELD: 1.1 The first Writ Petition No. (PIL) 4290 of 2021 the allegations which had been made of money laundering and money being invested in shell companies are again mere allegations. The petitioner has actually sought an investigation by the Court. It prays for a writ of mandamus in …
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1183 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 777
Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv., Chinmay Deshpande, Parikshit Angadi, Anirudh Sanganeria, Balaji Srinivasan, Ms. Aakriti Priya, Shiva Krishnamurti, Ms. Gauri Pasricha, Devanshu Behl, Krishna Dev E Jagarlamudi, Ms. Inderdeep Kaur Raina, Ms. Pallavi Dewakar, M/s. M. Rambabu and Co., Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, Polanki Gowtham,…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1182 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 700
702 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 9 S.C.R. A the well settled legal position, the power of judicial review in the matter of disciplinary proceedings is extremely limited. It is circumscribed by the limits of correcting errors of law or procedural errors leading to manifest injustice or violation of principles of natural…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1181 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 679
[2022] 14 S.C.R. 679 679 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS. A v. PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION & ORS. (Civil Appeal No 8239 of 2022) (SLP (C) No. 17009 of 2019) B NOVEMBER 07, 2022 [UDAY UMESH LALIT, CJI AND AJAY RASTOGI, J.] Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 – s.154(1A)(a)-(e), (1B) – Factors and Categ…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1180 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 239
– In terms of this understanding, he was able to aggregate about 160 acres of land though actual development in terms of construction was never undertaken – He held 40% of the ‘yellow’ area in the concerned colony of Indore with all rights of selling – The applicant Ewas informed that his presence was required before t…
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1180 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 136
Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar and Another (2011) 1 SCC G 343 : [2010] 13 SCR 179 – relied on. Case Law Reference [2010] 13 SCR 179 relied on Para 8 H 136 T. J. PARAMESHWARAPPA v. BRANCH MANAGER, NEW 137 INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 8598- A 8599 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order …
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1180 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 207
207 208 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 9 S.C.R. A orders dated 10.06.2020, 19.08.2020 and 25.08.2020 – Therefore, the said orders are recalled. Disposing of the IAs, the Court HELD: 1.1. In these proceedings this Court is principally concerned with the plight of flat holders of Amrapali Group of B Companies. In order to …
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 118 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 121
With B Criminal Appeal Nos. 1202-1203 of 2014. Shree Prakash Sinha, Rakesh Mishra, Ms. Mohua Sinha, Nawalendra Kumar, Sidharth Singh, Shekher Kumar, Advs. for the Appellant. Tapesh Kumar Singh, AAG, Aditya Pratap Singh, Aditya Narayan C Das, Advs. for the Respondent. Seshadri Sekhar Ray (Amicus Curiae) The Judgment of …
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1179 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 616
1.2 Regulation 119 deals with the Proceedings of the Regional Council. As per Regulation 119(2) every Regional C Council shall at its first meeting held after its constitution and in subsequent years at a meeting to be held in December of every year elect from amongst its members a Chairman, a Vice-Chairman, a Secretar…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1178 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 391
Nagarathna, J.) (Concurring) : As per s. 101, the burden of proving a fact always lies upon the party who substantially asserts the D affirmative and until such burden is discharged, the other party is not required to be called upon to prove his case – Burden to prove documents lie on plaintiff alone as onus is always …
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1177 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 265
265 266 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 15 S.C.R. A S.Ravindra Bhat J. (for Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and himself)) : The Draft Rules framed, therefore, were a product of a thorough consultative exercise undertaken to remedy asymmetries caused by the lack of uniformity in Rules across States, which could hamper appreciation o…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1176 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 1129
Evidence Act, 1872 – 27, 45 & 65B – Circumstantial Evidence B – The circumstances taken cumulatively should form a chain so complete that there is no escape from the conclusion that within all human probability, the crime was committed by the accused only and none else – The evidence with regard to the arrest of the ap…
Supreme Court of India7 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1175 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1
Trivedi and J.B. Pardiwala, JJ.) : Valid – Held (per Dinesh Maheshwari, J.): Reservation is an instrument of affirmative action by the State so as to ensure all-inclusive march towards the goals of H 1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 14 S.C.R. A an egalitarian society while counteracting inequalities; it is an instrumen…
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1174 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 602
Allowing the appeal, the Court Held: 1.1 The respondent No.1–original writ petitioner filed the writ petition and claimed the right, title, or interest in the lands in question on the basis of the Agreement to Sell dated H 602 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. DAMINI WADHWA & 603 ORS. 22.05.2016. Agreement to Sell by itse…
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1173 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 628
the mercy petition – As regards solitary confinement, segregation of a convict from the day when he was awarded death sentence till his mercy petition was disposed of, would be in violation of law laid down in Sunil Batra’s case – On facts, incarceration of the accused in solitary confinement and segregation from 2006 …
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1172 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 77
diploma course conducted by appellant-University – Digital evaluation of answer scripts – Writ petitions filed by respective students praying for re-evaluation – Single Judge ordered re-evaluation of the answer scripts – Order confirmed by Division Bench – On appeal, held : In absence of any regulation for re-evaluatio…
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 117 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 988
the respondent with the applications of introducing the borrowers, etc. – No evidence of involvement of the respondent – Charge of misappropriation of entire loan and subsidy amount was based on confessional statement, the said documentwas not exhibited and undeniably it was not signed – Document can bound authors but …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis