⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,581–3,600 · Page 180 of 500
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1251 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 609
E Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. F Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2.1 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 2.2 …
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,581–3,600 · Page 180 of 500
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1251 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 609
E Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. F Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2.1 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 2.2 …
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1250 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 630
F Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: The original landowners failed in challenging the acquisition proceedings upto this Court. Under the circumstances, when due to pendency of the land acquisition proceedings, the possession could not be taken over, thereafter, it will not be open G for the landowners to contend tha…
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 125 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 399
E Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 It is true that as such all the three courts below (except the Industrial Court) held the termination of the respondent-workman in breach of Sections 25-F and 25-G of the Industrial Disputes Act and, therefore, the Labour Court ordered F reinstatement with back wages. H…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1249 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 620
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] G 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 2.2 H 62…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1248 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 827
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Delhi Development Authority v. Godfrey Philips (I) Ltd. & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 3073 of 2022 – relied on. G Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 –…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1247 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 625
Ashwani Kumar, Ishaan Sharma, Anshay Dhatwalia, Advs. for C the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment D and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition(C) No. 2674 of 2017 by which the High Court …
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1246 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 615
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] F 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 4 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 4 G CIVI…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1245 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 832
F Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: The High Court has not appreciated the reasons why the authority could not take the possession. The acquisition proceedings were under challenge before the High Court as well as thereafter before this Court. The acquisition proceedings have G attained finality pursuant to the judg…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1243 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 635
neither considered the allegations against the respective accused nor the role played by them nor the position held by them at the time of registering the FIR in the year 1994 nor the role played by them during the investigation of crime – High Court also did not take note of the recommendations made by the Committee h…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1242 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 642
SOLOMON SELVARAJ & ORS. v. INDIRANI BHAGAWAN 643 SINGH & ORS. the allegations in the application would not show cause of action A or that the allegations made by the applicant in the applications show that the suit would be barred by law for the time being in force (Order 33 Rule 5(d) & (f) CPC). Identical question was…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1241 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 841
Partly allowing the appeals, the Court F HELD: 1. The offence for which he was tried ultimately resulted into acquittal had arisen out of the matrimonial dispute which ultimately ended in settlement out of the court. Under the circumstances and in the peculiar facts of the case, the appellant could not have been denied…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1240 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 858
H 858 STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS v. LINDE INDIA 859 LIMITED AND ANOTHER Allowing the appeals, the Court A HELD: 1.1 It is required to be noted that an inspection and enquiry was carried out by a six members expert committee who submitted a detailed report wherein it was found that the ‘oxygen gas’ is not a direct ‘r…
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 124 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 810
Contracts – Foreign Funded Contracts – Constitution of India – Judicial Review – Scope of – Held: Scope of judicial review in F foreign funded contract should be far much less than the ordinary Government funded contracts funded from Consolidated Fund of India – The scope of judicial review in such foreign funded contr…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1238 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 745
Allowing the writ petition, the Court G HELD: 1. From the facts, it emerges that one of the key witnesses though initially he volunteered to give his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the CBI submitted an application to record his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., thereafter he did not turn up to get his state…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1236 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 87
present case, when the first complaint was filed u/ss.499, 500, IPC, the Judicial Magistrate was well within his jurisdictional competence to find out whether a prima facie case for summoning the accused was made out or not, however, on having found that the allegations made by appellant were in the teeth of fourth exc…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1235 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 435
DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI 1. On 15 April 2019, this Court, while considering Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No 31178 of 2018, declined to grant interim relief in IA No 33819 of 2019. The reliefs which were sought in G the application for interim relief were in the following terms: “a) … stopping a…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1234 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 709
[2022] 9 S.C.R. 709 709 SANSERA ENGINEERING LIMITED A v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LARGE TAX PAYER UNIT, BENGALURU Civil Appeal No. 8717 of 2022 B NOVEMBER 29, 2022 [M.R. SHAH AND M.M. SUNDRESH, JJ.] Central Excise Act, 1944: s.11B – Rebate of duty of excise – Limitation – Appellant, manufacturer of excisable goods exported…
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1232 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 638
638 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS14 S.C.R. 638 [2022] 14 S.C.R. A STATE OF U.P. & ORS. v. VIRENDRA KUMAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos.6622-6623 of 2022) B NOVEMBER 25, 2022 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA AND VIKRAM NATH, JJ.] Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 – s.3, 7, 8, 15, 92, 94(2)(nn) and 95(1)(f)…
Supreme Court of India24 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1231 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 686
(2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. F Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 3 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 3.1 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 8198 G of…
Supreme Court of India24 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1230 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 678
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD:1. From the judgment and order passed by the High G Court in the case of Jagjeet Singh & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., it appears that the High Court has heavily relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solan…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2022 INSC 1250 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 630
F Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: The original landowners failed in challenging the acquisition proceedings upto this Court. Under the circumstances, when due to pendency of the land acquisition proceedings, the possession could not be taken over, thereafter, it will not be open G for the landowners to contend tha…
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 125 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 399
E Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 It is true that as such all the three courts below (except the Industrial Court) held the termination of the respondent-workman in breach of Sections 25-F and 25-G of the Industrial Disputes Act and, therefore, the Labour Court ordered F reinstatement with back wages. H…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1249 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 620
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] G 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 2.2 H 62…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1248 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 827
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Delhi Development Authority v. Godfrey Philips (I) Ltd. & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 3073 of 2022 – relied on. G Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 –…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1247 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 625
Ashwani Kumar, Ishaan Sharma, Anshay Dhatwalia, Advs. for C the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment D and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition(C) No. 2674 of 2017 by which the High Court …
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1246 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 615
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] F 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 4 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 4 G CIVI…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1245 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 832
F Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: The High Court has not appreciated the reasons why the authority could not take the possession. The acquisition proceedings were under challenge before the High Court as well as thereafter before this Court. The acquisition proceedings have G attained finality pursuant to the judg…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1243 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 635
neither considered the allegations against the respective accused nor the role played by them nor the position held by them at the time of registering the FIR in the year 1994 nor the role played by them during the investigation of crime – High Court also did not take note of the recommendations made by the Committee h…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1242 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 642
SOLOMON SELVARAJ & ORS. v. INDIRANI BHAGAWAN 643 SINGH & ORS. the allegations in the application would not show cause of action A or that the allegations made by the applicant in the applications show that the suit would be barred by law for the time being in force (Order 33 Rule 5(d) & (f) CPC). Identical question was…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1241 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 841
Partly allowing the appeals, the Court F HELD: 1. The offence for which he was tried ultimately resulted into acquittal had arisen out of the matrimonial dispute which ultimately ended in settlement out of the court. Under the circumstances and in the peculiar facts of the case, the appellant could not have been denied…
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1240 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 858
H 858 STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS v. LINDE INDIA 859 LIMITED AND ANOTHER Allowing the appeals, the Court A HELD: 1.1 It is required to be noted that an inspection and enquiry was carried out by a six members expert committee who submitted a detailed report wherein it was found that the ‘oxygen gas’ is not a direct ‘r…
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 124 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 810
Contracts – Foreign Funded Contracts – Constitution of India – Judicial Review – Scope of – Held: Scope of judicial review in F foreign funded contract should be far much less than the ordinary Government funded contracts funded from Consolidated Fund of India – The scope of judicial review in such foreign funded contr…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1238 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 745
Allowing the writ petition, the Court G HELD: 1. From the facts, it emerges that one of the key witnesses though initially he volunteered to give his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the CBI submitted an application to record his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., thereafter he did not turn up to get his state…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1236 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 87
present case, when the first complaint was filed u/ss.499, 500, IPC, the Judicial Magistrate was well within his jurisdictional competence to find out whether a prima facie case for summoning the accused was made out or not, however, on having found that the allegations made by appellant were in the teeth of fourth exc…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1235 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 435
DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI 1. On 15 April 2019, this Court, while considering Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No 31178 of 2018, declined to grant interim relief in IA No 33819 of 2019. The reliefs which were sought in G the application for interim relief were in the following terms: “a) … stopping a…
Supreme Court of India29 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1234 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 709
[2022] 9 S.C.R. 709 709 SANSERA ENGINEERING LIMITED A v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LARGE TAX PAYER UNIT, BENGALURU Civil Appeal No. 8717 of 2022 B NOVEMBER 29, 2022 [M.R. SHAH AND M.M. SUNDRESH, JJ.] Central Excise Act, 1944: s.11B – Rebate of duty of excise – Limitation – Appellant, manufacturer of excisable goods exported…
Supreme Court of India25 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1232 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 638
638 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS14 S.C.R. 638 [2022] 14 S.C.R. A STATE OF U.P. & ORS. v. VIRENDRA KUMAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos.6622-6623 of 2022) B NOVEMBER 25, 2022 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA AND VIKRAM NATH, JJ.] Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 – s.3, 7, 8, 15, 92, 94(2)(nn) and 95(1)(f)…
Supreme Court of India24 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1231 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 686
(2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. F Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 3 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 3.1 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 8198 G of…
Supreme Court of India24 Nov 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1230 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 678
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD:1. From the judgment and order passed by the High G Court in the case of Jagjeet Singh & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., it appears that the High Court has heavily relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solan…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis